Citations

Abstract The overall goal of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is to optimize and validate biomarkers for clinical trials while sharing all data and biofluid samples with the global scientific community. ADNI has been instrumental in standardizing and validating amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. ADNI data were used for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Fujirebio and Roche Elecsys cerebrospinal fluid diagnostic tests. Additionally, ADNI provided data for the trials of the FDA‐approved treatments aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab. More than 6000 scientific papers have been published using ADNI data, reflecting ADNI's promotion of open science and data sharing. Despite its enormous success, ADNI has some limitations, particularly in generalizing its data and findings to the entire US/Canadian population. This introduction provides a historical overview of ADNI and highlights its significant accomplishments and future vision to pioneer “the clinical trial of the future” focusing on demographic inclusivity. Highlights The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) introduced a novel model for public‐private partnerships and data sharing. It successfully validated amyloid and Tau PET imaging, as well as CSF and plasma biomarkers, for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease. ADNI generated and disseminated vital data for designing AD clinical trials.

AbstractThe emergence of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved amyloid‐targeting therapies for Alzheimer's disease challenges clinicians and healthcare providers with a transformative landscape. Effectively communicating the risks, benefits, burdens, costs, and available support associated with these novel disease‐modifying treatments to patients, families, and other healthcare providers is essential but complex. In response, the Alzheimer's Association's Clinical Meaningfulness Workgroup has proposed language surrounding treatment eligibility, benefits, amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotyping, and treatment costs, serving as a resource to healthcare professionals in navigating discussions with patients and their families. As the landscape evolves with the approval of new Alzheimer's therapies, this resource stands poised for updates, ensuring its continued relevance in facilitating informed and meaningful patient‐provider dialogues.Highlights Effective communication of risks, benefits, burdens, and costs of FDA‐approved amyloid‐targeting antibodies is essential to patients, families, and healthcare providers. The Alzheimer's Association's Clinical Meaningfulness Workgroup provides language for physicians and healthcare providers around treatment eligibility, benefits, ARIA, APOE genotyping, and treatment costs. This supplementary resource may be updated as new AD therapies become approved.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONWe evaluated preliminary feasibility of a digital, culturally‐informed approach to recruit and screen participants for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI4).METHODSParticipants were recruited using digital advertising and completed digital surveys (e.g., demographics, medical exclusion criteria, 12‐item Everyday Cognition Scale [ECog‐12]), Novoic Storyteller speech‐based cognitive test). Completion rates and assessment performance were compared between underrepresented populations (URPs: individuals from ethnoculturally minoritized or low education backgrounds) and non‐URPs.RESULTSOf 3099 participants who provided contact information, 654 enrolled in the cohort, and 595 completed at least one assessment. Two hundred forty‐seven participants were from URPs. Of those enrolled, 465 met ADNI4 inclusion criteria and 237 evidenced possible cognitive impairment from ECog‐12 or Storyteller performance. URPs had lower ECog and Storyteller completion rates. Scores varied by ethnocultural group and educational level.DISCUSSIONPreliminary results demonstrate digital recruitment and screening assessment of an older diverse cohort, including those with possible cognitive impairment, are feasible. Improving engagement and achieving educational diversity are key challenges.Highlights A total of 654 participants enrolled in a digital cohort to facilitate ADNI4 recruitment. Culturally‐informed digital ads aided enrollment of underrepresented populations. From those enrolled, 42% were from underrepresented ethnocultural and educational groups. Digital screening tools indicate > 50% of participants likely cognitively impaired. Completion rates and assessment performance vary by ethnocultural group and education.

Abstract The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Clinical Core is responsible for coordination of all clinical activities at the ADNI sites, including project management, regulatory oversight, and site management and monitoring, as well as the collection of all clinical data and management of all study data. The Clinical Core is also charged with determining the clinical classifications and criteria for enrollment in evolving AD trials and enabling the ongoing characterization of the cross‐sectional features and longitudinal trajectories of the ADNI cohorts with application of these findings to optimal clinical trial designs. More than 2400 individuals have been enrolled in the cohorts since the inception of ADNI, facilitating refinement of our understanding of the AD trajectory and allowing academic and industry investigators to model therapeutic trials across the disease spectrum from the presymptomatic stage through dementia. Highlights Since 2004, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Clinical Core has overseen the enrollment of > 2400 participants with mild cognitive impairment, mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, and normal cognition. The longitudinal dataset has elucidated the full cognitive and clinical trajectory of AD from its presymptomatic stage through the onset of dementia. The ADNI data have supported the design of most major trials in the field.

ImportanceBlack or African American (hereinafter, Black) and Hispanic or Latino/a/x (hereinafter, Latinx) adults are disproportionally affected by Alzheimer disease, but most research studies do not enroll adequate numbers of both of these populations. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative-3 (ADNI3) launched a diversity taskforce to pilot a multipronged effort to increase the study inclusion of Black and Latinx older adults.ObjectiveTo describe and evaluate the culturally informed and community-engaged inclusion efforts to increase the screening and enrollment of Black and Latinx older adults in ADNI3.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study used baseline data from a longitudinal, multisite, observational study conducted from January 15, 2021, to July 12, 2022, with no follow-up. The study was conducted at 13 ADNI3 sites in the US. Participants included individuals aged 55 to 90 years without cognitive impairment and those with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer disease.ExposuresEfforts included (1) launch of an external advisory board, (2) changes to the study protocol, (3) updates to the digital prescreener, (4) selection and deployment of 13 community-engaged research study sites, (5) development and deployment of local and centralized outreach efforts, and (6) development of a community-science partnership board.Main Outcomes and MeasuresScreening and enrollment numbers from centralized and local outreach efforts, digital advertisement metrics, and digital prescreener completion.ResultsA total of 91 participants enrolled in the trial via centralized and local outreach efforts, of which 22 (24.2%) identified as Latinx and 55 (60.4%) identified as Black (median [IQR] age, 65.6 [IQR, 61.5-72.5] years; 62 women [68.1%]). This represented a 267.6% increase in the monthly rate of enrollment (before: 1.11 per month; during: 4.08 per month) of underrepresented populations. For the centralized effort, social media advertisements were run between June 1, 2021, and July 31, 2022, which resulted in 2079 completed digital prescreeners, of which 1289 met criteria for subsequent site-level screening. Local efforts were run between June 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. A total of 151 participants underwent site-level screening (100 from local efforts, 41 from centralized efforts, 10 from other sources).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of pilot inclusion efforts, a culturally informed, community-engaged approach increased the inclusion of Black and Latinx participants in an Alzheimer disease cohort study.

AbstractBackgroundWe examined neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and psychotropic medication use at the midway point of data collection of the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS). We compared amyloid‐positive early‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) participants and amyloid‐negative early‐onset non‐Alzheimer’s disease [EOnonAD]) participants across NPS domains and psychotropic medication categories.Method282 participants enrolled in LEADS were compared across diagnostic groups – amyloid‐positive EOAD (n = 212) and amyloid‐negative EOnonAD (n = 70). All participants were between ages 40 and 64 at baseline. NPS were measured with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory – Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) and Geriatric Depression Scale – Short Form (GDS‐SF). Medications were categorized into psychotropic category (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines). Groups were compared on NPI‐Q using binary logistic regression adjusting for sex and disease severity, on GDS‐SF using linear regression adjusting for sex and disease severity, and on psychotropic medication use using Chi square or Fisher’s exact test.ResultDemographic data are presented in Table 1. Average total NPI‐Q score was higher in EOnonAD than EOAD (p = .002, ŋp 2 = .03). Regardless of diagnostic group, informants endorsed Affective behaviors most frequently (76.2%). EOAD informants endorsed fewer Distress‐Tension behaviors (p = .02, OR = .498) and Impulse Control behaviors (p = .01, OR = .438). EOAD informants also endorsed apathy (p < .001, OR = .316), irritability (p = .02, OR = .498), and disinhibition (p = .04, OR = .476) at lower frequency than EOnonAD. GDS‐SF showed that the EOnonAD participants self‐reported more symptoms of depression than the EOAD group (p = .002, ŋp 2 = .03). (Table 2A). A minority of participants, regardless of diagnostic group, reported psychotropic medication use (35%). There was higher use in EOnonAD (38%) than EOAD (24%) (p = .03, Cohen W = .14) (Table 2B).ConclusionNPS burden and psychotropic medication use were higher in EOnonAD than EOAD participants, despite EOnonAD being less severely impaired. LEADS continues to collect data. Future studies will examine etiologies that may be larger drivers of NPS than AD neuropathology, mediators (e.g., race, ethnicity) in the association between NPS and diagnostic group classication, compare NPS in EOAD vs. LOAD, and examine longitudinal changes in neuropsychiatric profiles.

AbstractBackgroundApproximately 10‐25% of amnestic early‐onset dementia are negative for amyloid (Early‐onset non‐Alzheimer’s Disease, EOnonAD). EOnonAD is a heterogenous group with various etiologies. In order to better understand the traits of EOnonAD, we clustered amnestic EOnonAD individuals according to cognitive patterns.MethodCognitive data of 62 EOnonAD individuals from the Longitudinal Early‐onset AD study (LEADS) were Z‐normalized to 91 intact individuals after adjusting for age, sex, and education. This led to domain‐averaged composite Z‐scores for memory, language, speed/attention, visuospatial, and executive function. Cluster analysis using the Ward method on the residuals for the five composites was performed. We used Scree plot using the pseudo T‐squared to determine the optimal number of clusters. We compared demographics, imaging biomarkers (amyloid and tau PET SUVR, hippocampal volume), plasma (pTau231, Aß40, Aß42, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and neurofilament light chain (NfL)), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (Aß42/40, NfL, Neurogranin, Visinin‐like protein, YKL‐40, and Synaptosome Associated Protein 25) across the clusters after adjusting for age, sex, and education. We compared gray matter density of each EOnonAD cluster to controls (n = 84) using voxel‐wise multiple linear regressions in SPM12, adjusting for age, sex, education, and intracranial volume.ResultScree plot using the pseudo‐T‐squared suggested three clusters. Cluster 1 (38/62, 61.3%) was characterized by having the mildest cognitive impairment in all domains. Cluster 2 (19/62, 30.6%) was characterized by more severe memory and language impairment. Cluster 3 (5/62, 8.1%) was characterized by more severe impairment in speed/attention, visuospatial, and executive function (Table 1). Cluster 3 showed significantly higher NfL for both plasma (Cluster 1 vs 3, p<0.001; Cluster 2 vs 3, p < 0.004) and CSF (Cluster 1 vs 3, p = 0.001). Other biomarkers did not show significant difference (Table 1). Only Cluster 3 showed significant atrophy in the bilateral fronto‐parietal areas at p<0.01, uncorrected (Figure 1).ConclusionWe identified heterogeneity in cognitive patterns among amnestic EOnonAD individuals. Cluster 1 had mildest cognitive impairment; Cluster 2 had predominant impairment in memory and language; and Cluster 3 had predominant impairment in speed/attention, visuospatial, and executive function, with significant fronto‐parietal atrophy and high NfL indicating active neurodegeneration.

AbstractBackgroundEthnoculturally diverse individuals from underrepresented populations (URPs), including but not limited to Black/African American and Hispanic/Latinx adults, are disproportionally affected by Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to non‐Hispanic/Latinx white (NLW) adults. However, URPs have historically been under‐included in AD studies. The objective of this study is to describe efforts, and the results of those efforts, to increase enrollment and engagement of ethnoculturally diverse individuals from URPs in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 3 (ADNI3).MethodsEfforts undertaken by ADNI to increase enrollment and engagement of URPs included (1) launching of a Diversity Taskforce (DVTF) lead by two health disparities experts in July 2020, charged with overseeing ADNI’s mission in this space. Specific DVTF activities included: (2) the establishment, funding, and instrumental support (e.g., training, consultation, resources) of diversity at 13 ADNI3 sites; (3) changing ADNI protocol to facilitate research participation of URPs (e.g., optional lumbar puncture and sharing of amyloid PET results); (4) hiring a marketing agency to launch culturally‐informed digital/social media campaigns for the 13 DVTF Sites, with local websites; (5) development of a database to capture performance metrics of inclusion efforts at the 13 DVTF Sites; and (6) formation of a six‐member External Advisory Board, comprised of leaders in health disparities research, to guide DVTF efforts.ResultURP enrollment at these 13 DVTF sites improved from 1.1 URPs per month previously to >4 URPs per month, a 264% increase. Across all 59 ADNI sites, overall enrollment of ethnoculturally diverse individuals from URPs went from 89 (16.8%) to 126 (21.1%), representing a 25% increase in enrollment between May 2020 and September 2021. Moreover, since February 1st, 2021, ADNI enrolled 43 new participants of which 33 (77%) were from URPs.ConclusionIt is possible to improve the enrollment and retention of URPs in AD research using a multi‐pronged community engaged approach that also provides human capital, infrastructure, and financial resources. The success of the DVTF has led to the formation of a new Engagement Core in ADNI4, tasked with implementing a scaled‐up culturally‐informed, community‐engaged research approach to URP inclusion and retention across all 59 ADNI sites.

AbstractBackgroundMixed model repeated measures (MMRM) is the most common analysis approach in clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease. The model treats time as a categorical variable, which can be problematic when assessments occur off‐schedule, as including off‐schedule visits can induce bias, and excluding them ignores valuable information and violates the intention to treat principle. This problem has been exacerbated by clinical trial visits which have been delayed due to the COVID19 pandemic. Since MMRM entails a mean parameter for each group and visit, the model can be inefficient for longer trials of Preclinical Alzheimer’s. As an alternative to MMRM, we propose a constrained longitudinal data analysis with natural cubic splines that treats time as continuous and uses test version effects to model the mean over time.MethodWe use model selection techniques to compare the predictive value of spline models to slope models, MMRM, and models that assume a proportional treatment effect using data from several completed trials. These trials include the ADCS trial of donepezil in MCI, trials of intranasal insulin and a fyn kinase inhibitor in mild Alzheimer’s dementia, and the A4 trial of solanezumab in Preclinical Alzheimer’s. Simulation studies assess the power and Type I error of these models for trials in Preclinical Alzheimer’s, MCI, and mild dementia.ResultThe spline model with ADAS‐Cog version effect attained the best predictive value for the trials in mild dementia. The proportional model was preferred for the trial in MCI, but the proportional effect assumption was violated, and the treatment effect estimate was in the wrong direction. Considering that the spline with two degrees of freedom and version effect provide fits that are similar to MMRM in Figure 1, we concluded that two degrees of freedom appear to be sufficient to capture enough of the general trend to assess the treatment effect. AIC results from the A4 Study will be considered and included after the study is completed in Spring 2023.ConclusionThe spline model is shown to have better predictive value and precision in real datasets and has better power and Type I error control in a variety of simulation scenarios.

AbstractBackgroundThe Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a longitudinal observational study of individuals across the dementia spectrum that validates biomarkers for clinical trials. The newest phase of the study, ADNI4, aims to substantially increase the inclusion of underrepresented populations to improve generalizability of ADNI results. Novel biomarkers, including a speech‐based cognitive assessment and blood‐based plasma biomarkers, are integrated into the study design as key participant screening measures.MethodTo help achieve recruitment goals, ADNI4 uses a new, multi‐phase approach to remotely enroll and screen participants. A large study cohort (aiming for 20,000+ participants) provide initial screening data via an online study platform including demographics, medical history related to study exclusionary criteria, and results from a speech‐based cognitive memory assessment (Novoic Ltd. Storyteller test) and a measure of subjective cognitive/functional decline (Everyday Cognition (ECog) 12‐item). Based on screening results, a subset of online study participants is referred to a Quest Diagnostics location to provide a blood sample for plasma biomarker analysis (aiming for 4,000+ participants). Finally, select participants are referred to ADNI clinical sites for in‐depth characterization (goal of up to 1,500 in‐clinic participants).ResultWe report ADNI’s initial approach for selecting participants from the online screening cohort to undergo plasma biomarker phenotyping, and subsequent selection to a clinical site. Participants from diverse demographic backgrounds (especially for race, ethnicity, and/or education) and those with a higher estimated likelihood of cognitive impairment are given priority in the referral selection process. Likelihood of cognitive impairment is assessed using results from subjective memory complaint questions, responses to the ECog 12‐item questionnaire, and the Novoic Storyteller results. Individuals with results showing high concordance across these measures are prioritized, as well as those who have subsequent plasma results indicating biomarker positivity.ConclusionWeighing the various study requirements and inclusivity goals increases the complexity of participant selection decision making, and is a time‐intensive process. As the ADNI study progresses we aim to automate the participant selection/referral process by developing algorithms that account and encode for changing study prioritizations and dynamics across numerous dimensions. Learnings from ADNI4’s new remote processes will help inform future clinical trial design.