Citations

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the association between standard pure tone and speech audiometry with neuroimaging characteristics reflective of aging and dementia in older adults.Study DesignProspective population‐based study.SettingSingle tertiary care referral center.MethodsParticipants from the Mayo Clinic Study of aging 60 years old or older with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment, baseline neuroimaging, and a behavioral audiogram associated with neuroimaging were eligible for study. Imaging modalities included structural MRI (sMRI) and fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery MRI (FLAIR‐MRI; N = 605), diffusion tensor imaging MRI (DTI‐MRI; N = 444), and fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET; N = 413). Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to evaluate associations with neuroimaging outcomes.ResultsMean (SD) pure tone average (PTA) was 33 (15) dB HL and mean (SD) word recognition score (WRS) was 91% (14). There were no significant associations between audiometric performance and cortical thinning assessed by sMRI. Each 10‐dB increase in PTA was associated with increased likelihood of abnormal white‐matter hyperintensity (WMH) from FLAIR‐MRI (odds ratio 1.26, P = .02). From DTI‐MRI, participants with <100% WRSs had significantly lower fractional anisotropy in the genu of the corpus callosum (parameter estimate [PE] −0.012, P = .008) compared to those with perfect WRSs. From FDG‐PET, each 10% decrease in WRSs was associated with decreased uptake in the anterior cingulate cortex (PE −0.013, P = .001).ConclusionPoorer audiometric performance was not significantly associated with cortical thinning but was associated with white matter damage relevant to cerebrovascular disease (increased abnormal WMH, decreased corpus callosum diffusion). These neuroimaging results suggest a pathophysiologic link between hearing loss and cerebrovascular disease.

Abstract Alzheimer's disease (AD) staging criteria lack standardized, empirical description. Well‐defined AD staging criteria are an important consideration in protocol design, influencing a more standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria and defining what constitutes meaningful differentiation among the stages. However, many trials are being designed on the basis of biomarker features and the two need to be coordinated. The Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable (AARR) Spring 2021 meeting discussed the implementation of preclinical AD staging criteria, and provided recommendations for how they may best be incorporated into clinical trials research. Discussion also included what currently available tools for global clinical trials may best define populations in preclinical AD trials, and if are we able to differentiate preclinical from clinical stages of the disease. Well‐defined AD staging criteria are key to improving early detection, diagnostics, clinical trial enrollment, and identifying statistically significant clinical changes, and researchers discussed how emerging blood biomarkers may help with more efficient screening in preclinical stages.

Abstract INTRODUCTION The timing of plasma biomarker changes is not well understood. The goal of this study was to evaluate the temporal co‐evolution of plasma and positron emission tomography (PET) Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers. METHODS We included 1408 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center participants. An accelerated failure time (AFT) model was fit with amyloid beta (Aβ) PET, tau PET, plasma p‐tau217, p‐tau181, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as endpoints. RESULTS Individual timing of plasma p‐tau progression was strongly associated with Aβ PET and GFAP progression. In the population, GFAP became abnormal first, then Aβ PET, plasma p‐tau, and tau PET temporal meta‐regions of interest when applying cut points based on young, cognitively unimpaired participants. DISCUSSION Plasma p‐tau is a stronger indicator of a temporally linked response to elevated brain Aβ than of tau pathology. While Aβ deposition and a rise in GFAP are upstream events associated with tau phosphorylation, the temporal link between p‐tau and Aβ PET was the strongest. Highlights Plasma p‐tau progression was more strongly associated with Aβ than tau PET. Progression on plasma p‐tau was associated with Aβ PET and GFAP progression. P‐tau181 and p‐tau217 become abnormal after Aβ PET and before tau PET. GFAP became abnormal first, before plasma p‐tau and Aβ PET.