Citations

Abstract Introduction Since the FDA approval of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH), few studies have been able to identify variables which predict curve improvements, with baseline extent of curvature most highly correlated. In addition to extent of baseline curvature, our team has previously identified curve direction and plaque calcification as additional predictive variables. We therefore sought to create an integrated predictive model which incorporated several factors to better estimate anticipated outcomes. Objective To report outcomes of a novel scoring system designed to better predict outcomes of men undergoing CCH injections for Peyronie’s disease (PD). Methods A prospective database has been maintained of men undergoing CCH injections for PD. Data were reviewed to identify variables predictive of curve improvements in men with isolated curvature as well as among those with key characteristics, including indentations, hourglass deformities, penile tapering, and calcification. A predictive model was subsequently developed to improve correlations between disease factors and subsequent CCH outcomes. The final model (CLINiC Score) assigned points as follows: +1 point for every 10 degrees of curvature (C for Curvature), +5 points for penile narrowing >25% (IN for INdent), +3 points for narrowing 0-25%, -4 points for pure lateral curvatures (L for Lateral), and -2 points for plaque calcification (C for Calcification). Patients were assigned scores based on the CLINiC model, and results were correlated with final curve outcomes. Results A total of 476 PD men were included in the current analysis. Baseline variables for the cohort included a mean age of 55.6 yrs (SD 10.9), PD duration 31.9 months (SD 61.4), composite curvature 64.6 degrees (SD 23.9), 47% with indentations, 42% with hourglass deformity, and 17% with calcification. The mean CLINiC score for the cohort was 6.9 (SD 3.4). For the overall cohort, the use of the CLINiC score increased the correlation coefficient from 0.35 to 0.46 (r-squared 0.13 vs 0.21), with a predictive linear formula of 2.1 - 3.2 * CLINiC score. The difference was more pronounced among a subset cohort of men who had pure lateral curvatures, plaque calcification, or narrowing deformity. In comparing the CLINiC predictive model to baseline curve alone, the correlation coefficient increased to 0.54 (r-squared 0.29, p<0.0001) compared to 0.38 (r-squared 0.15, p<0.001). The linear equation to predict curve improvement outcomes using the CLINiC score was 2.2 - 3.5 * total CLINiC score. Conclusions Use of a novel scoring system (CLINiC) improves upon baseline curvature alone to predict post-CCH curve improvements, with the difference more pronounced among men with pure lateral curvatures, plaque calcification, and/or narrowing deformities. External validation is warranted. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Peyronie’s disease (PD) is a connective tissue disorder associated with the formation of fibrotic plaques in the tunica albuginea, leading to penile curvature. PD is underdiagnosed, and this may be related to the reluctance of some men to seek consultation with a health care provider (HCP). Objective The aim was to develop an English-language digital application (app) to increase PD awareness, give men concerned about penile curvature a self-screening tool, and provide a link for locating HCPs with expertise in PD. Methods The Peyronie’s Disease Self-Assessment App is Android- and iOS-compatible. It was developed as a self-assessment tool for screening purposes only. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any medical condition, disease, or health problem and should not be considered a replacement for a consultation with a physician. The app provides instructional videos on general features and how to perform a penile scanning procedure. Results The PD Self-Assessment App includes a questionnaire related to penile curvature, penetration difficulty, degree of bother for partner, and impact on sexual activity. An innovative feature of the app is a live scanning technology, which uses the phone’s camera to detect the contours of the penis from multiple angles and applies an algorithm that determines the degree of curvature. The resulting image is a 3D penile simulation in the app, which allows the user to mark the location of any “lumps.” The app will also produce a 2D outline to determine the maximum curvature. External links are provided to a PD education website and to locate an HCP. The patient can share both the questionnaire responses and penile curvature simulation with his HCP via the user’s native email. This tool has password protection features and encrypts sensitive data. The scan images are representations of the penis, not photographs. Images are stored in the app library and are not stored in the user’s photo gallery. To enhance security, all data are erased when the app is uninstalled. The app is adaptable and scalable as needed for future updates. Conclusions The PD Self-Assessment App will help improve patient knowledge of the condition, document penile deformity, and facilitate consultation with an HCP. For men with PD, the app will help ease their journey with PD. The app will assist HCPs with evaluation and diagnosis. Sequential documentation of penile curvature during medical treatment, during mechanical traction protocols, or following surgery will provide an evidence basis for tracking long-term outcomes in PD. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. Clarification Industry initiated, executed and funded study Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Abstract Introduction Limited data currently exist on the role and efficacy of additional series of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injections among Peyronie’s disease (PD) men who have previously failed a first series of injections. We have previously reported outcomes of men undergoing a more aggressive protocol for CCH injections. We therefore sought to evaluate results of men who had previously failed CCH injections to determine if they would respond to a repeat course using a more aggressive protocol. Objective To evaluate outcomes of a novel, aggressive protocol for CCH injections among men who had previously failed 6-8 CCH injections using a traditional approach. Methods A randomized, controlled trial (NCT05108558) is ongoing. All participants had previously failed to achieve ≥20% curvature improvement with 6-8 prior CCH injections. Men are randomized 3:1 to receive either CCH + traction (RestoreX) + sildenafil (treatment) up front or initial observation followed by treatment (controls). Outcomes are subsequently compared between treatment and control groups. Key measures include objective curve improvements, and standardized / non-standardized questionnaires, with assessments obtained at baseline, 6-weeks after completion of CCH (treatment arm), after the no treatment period (controls), and at 1 year. Results A total of 11/40 men have been randomized to date, with one having completed four series of CCH injections, three completing one series, and three completing two series. The average age of the cohort is 64.4 years, with a mean PD duration of 28.1 months. Mean baseline curvature was 82.9 degrees (composite curve). The average estimated improvement with prior CCH injections (before enrollment in the current study) was 10%. Preliminary outcomes of men who had completed one series and had a follow-up curve assessment available (n=3) demonstrated an absolute improvement of 28.3 degrees (42%). Of the one patient who completed four full series, the absolute curve improvement was 55 degrees (65%). The overall range of improvement among the four men was 20 to 55 degrees or 31 to 65%, with no patients failing to experience improvements thus far. Conclusions Preliminary data suggests that a repeat course of CCH using a previously described more aggressive administration protocol is effective at improving penile curvature in the majority of men. It is unclear if the improvements are due to the difference in administration protocol, or due to the repeat course of CCH alone. Given the very preliminary nature of the current results, additional data, including external validation, are warranted. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Endo Pharmaceutical Clarification Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study

Abstract Introduction Since the FDA approval of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) for the treatment of Peyronie’s Disease (PD), there has been significant debate as to its role and comparable efficacy in relation to surgical therapies. Specifically, investigators have compared relative utilization, costs, and outcomes with varying conclusions. Objective To compare various objective and subjective outcome measures between men undergoing CCH or surgery for PD. Methods A randomized, controlled trial (NCT04786106) is ongoing. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either CCH + traction (RestoreX) + sildenafil or penile surgery (plication and/or incision and grafting) + traction + sildenafil for PD. Objective, standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] and Peyronie’s Disease Questionnaire [PDQ]), and non-standardized assessments are obtained at baseline, and post-treatment at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Key outcomes include differences in standardized questionnaires, penile curvature, penile length, subsequent interventions, and non-standardized questionnaire responses. Curvature is measured in two planes and summed to provide a composite curvature. Penile length is measured from pubic symphysis to corona. All therapies were stopped prior to the 3-month time point (i.e. traction and sildenafil). Results A total of 40 men have been randomized, with 3-month data available on 27 men (CCH=14, surgery=13) and 12-month data on 15 men (CCH=5, surgery=10). Mean age at enrollment was 54.9 years, PD duration 36.6 months (mo), composite curvature 72.3 degrees (deg), and penile length 12.7 cm. All baseline variables were statistically similar between cohorts. Regarding the primary outcome, post-treatment, CCH men reported higher overall satisfaction (3-months: 100% vs 88% surgery, p=0.16; 12-months 80% vs 70%, p=0.52). For secondary outcomes at 3 months, the median differences between CCH and surgery respectively were: IIEF-EFD (+3.5 vs +7, p=0.64), PDQ-physical (-10 vs -7, p=0.47, note: lower is better for PDQ scales), PDQ-pain (-2 vs -0.5, p=0.21), PDQ-bother (-4.5 vs -8.5, p=0.60), length change (+1.0 vs -0.5 cm, p<0.01), curvature absolute change (-26 vs -65 degrees, p=0.01), and curvature percentage improvement (46% vs 84%, p<0.01). More CCH men felt that treatment improved sexual function (86% vs 79%, p=0.45), erectile function (64% vs 56%, p=0.04), penile length (36% vs 6%, p<0.0001), and had less impact on sensation (14% less sensation vs 56%, p<0.01), while surgery men were more likely to report satisfaction with curvature (75% vs 64%, p=0.52). 100% of men in both groups would recommend treatment to a friend at 3 months, whereas 100% of CCH vs 70% of surgery men would recommend their therapy at 12 months. When asked which treatment they would pick if they could start again, at 3 months 100% of CCH men reported CCH and/or traction, while 79% of surgery men indicated surgery. Conclusions Preliminary data suggests that, when compared to surgery, CCH results in higher overall satisfaction (not statistically significant), decreased curve improvement, improved penile length, and fewer impacts on erectile function and sensation. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Endo Pharmaceutical Clarification Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study

Abstract Introduction A new three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis was introduced in 2019. The Rigicon Infla10® has been implanted in 26 centers by 103 physicians. Clinical investigation for FDA approval in United States will begin in late 2022. Objective We report initial survival from explantation and revision rates for infection, mechanical failure and medical problems. Data was obtained from analysis of Patient Information Forms (PIFs) submitted to the manufacturer. Patient information data was omitted prior to analysis. Methods 319 patients implanted from 1/06/2019 to 12/31/2021 were followed to analyze device durability from revision/removal and rates of reoperation for infection, mechanical failure or medical reason. Results Mean follow-up was 21.2 months with a range of 5-36 months. Mean age was 58.5. 4.38% required removal/revision. Mechanical failure was 2.5%. There were no infections reported and only two (0.6%) medical problems (component out of place). One Peyronie's patient required revision for inadequate straightening (0.03% Three patients (0.9%) requested device removal for dissatisfaction. A total of 95.6% of Rigicon Infla10® was free from explant or revision 13 months from the original implant date. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed cumulative survival of the device at 12, 24 and 36 months was 95.6%, 94.7% and 95.7% until surgical invention. Conclusions While this is a retrospective study derived from volunteered Patient Information Forms, we believe the vast majority of the early Rigicon Infla10® performed prior to 1/2022 were included in the analysis. Early results show initial durability from re-operation equivalent to contemporary, devices. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Rigicon, Boston Scientific, Coloplast.

Abstract Introduction The American Urological Association (AUA) recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis in penile implant surgery are based on low quality evidence and expert opinion. Recent evidence suggests the recommended regimens may be suboptimal. Objective To determine if the AUA recommended antibiotic regimen (vancomycin + gentamicin) for primary penile implant surgery is associated with a higher infection risk than non-standard regimens. Methods We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary IPP surgery. Patients undergoing revision surgery or with a history of IPP placement were excluded. Additionally, patients who underwent concomitant procedures for Peyronie’s disease or stress urinary incontinence were excluded. Patients were divided into those receiving standard AUA antibiotic prophylaxis (vancomycin + gentamicin) and those receiving any other (non-standard) antibiotic prophylaxis. The time to postoperative device explanation due to infection via a Cox regression model, the microorganisms involved, and the management of patients with device infection were evaluated. A subgroup analysis to identify the appropriate dosage of gentamicin was also performed. Results 4,161 patients underwent primary IPP placement (2,411 received vancomycin + gentamicin and 1,750 received other regimens). The infection rate was similar between groups, 1.0 vs 1.2% for standard vs non-standard prophylaxis. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the use of vancomycin + gentamicin (HR: 2.74, 95%CI: 1.38-5.41, p=0.004) and diabetes (HR: 1.87, 95%CI: 1.03-3.39, p=0.04) were significantly associated with higher risk of device explantation due to infection. Concomitant infusion of antifungals (HR: 0.08, 95%CI: 0.03-0.19, p<0.001) was associated with lower risk of infection. Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were the most frequently cultured microorganisms. Device infection was most commonly managed with salvage using a malleable prosthesis (40.4%). In patients of both groups receiving gentamicin as part of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, the use of weight-based gentamicin compared to 80 mg gentamicin was associated with similar risk of device explantation due to infection (HR: 2.88, 95% CI: 0.83 to 10, p = 0.1). Conclusions Vancomycin + gentamicin for antibiotic prophylaxis in primary penile implant surgery is independently associated with a higher infection risk than non-standard antibiotic regimens while antifungal use is associated with lower infection risk. There does not appear to be a difference in weight-based vs low dose (80mg) gentamicin on infection risk. Our results further demonstrate the importance of antifungal use in prophylaxis regimens. Additionally, a critical review of the recommended prophylactic regimens is needed. Tailoring individual regimens to local antibiograms may provide the best infection prevention. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast, Boston Scientific, Antares Pharma, Clarus Therapeutics, Cynosure, Promescent, Sprout, Viome.

Abstract Expression of macrophage receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO) by tumor-associated macrophages is associated with poor prognosis of multiple types of cancer. In this article, we report that cancer cells (e.g., breast cancer and glioblastoma cell lines) can upregulate surface MARCO expression on human macrophages not only via IL-6–induced STAT3 activation but also via sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR)-mediated IL-6 and IL-10 expression followed by STAT3 activation. We further found that MARCO ligation induces activation of the MEK/ERK/p90RSK/CREB signaling cascade, leading to IL-10 expression followed by STAT3-dependent PD-L1 upregulation. Such MARCO-induced macrophage polarization is accompanied by increased expression of PPARG, IRF4, IDO1, CCL17, and CCL22. Ligation of surface MARCO can thus result in decreased T cell responses mainly by reduction of their proliferation. Taken together, cancer cell–induced MARCO expression and its intrinsic regulatory function within macrophages are, to our knowledge, new aspects of cancer immune evasion mechanisms that need to be further studied in the future.

Abstract Introduction The transgender population has long been marginalized by society. Societal stigmata, fear to seek care, and dearth of provider knowledge regarding transgender health issues has caused disparities to widen. Objective The purpose of this case study is to call to attention the often-overlooked aspect of pediatric transgender care: the importance of fertility preservation prior to instituting gender-affirming therapy. Methods Twenty-one genetically XY females, followed by their multidisciplinary transgender care teams, were interested in starting hormone therapy due to impending onset and/or progression of puberty. Fortunately for these patients, their physicians were aware of fertility struggles after undergoing hormone therapy. Results Sperm cryopreservation via open gonadal biopsy, testicular tissue cryopreservation (TTC), and semen sample (when age/maturity-appropriate) were discussed. Though requiring surgery, biopsy/TTC relieves patients of the psychological impact of semen sample production. With IRB approval, 20 patients (median age 12 years, range 10-16 years) underwent TTC (Figure 1). One patient (age 16 years) opted for semen sample. All patients had success with spermatogonial stem cells cryopreserved for future patient use. Conclusions Gender affirming procedures and hormone therapy affect the long-term reproductive potential of transgender individuals. While cost concerns and insurance coverage regarding oncofertility is a prominent area of discussion, the transgender community is often excluded. With more individuals beginning medical and surgical therapy at a younger age, fertility preservation discussions are essential but often overlooked, depriving these individuals the joy of becoming a biological parent. As health care providers, addressing psychological, emotional, physical, and spiritual needs of patients is crucial, and fertility is a key aspect of this care. TTC can be safely done in pediatric populations, though research is necessary to expand beyond current experimental stage of tissue-development. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Many transmen chose to pursue penile prosthesis (PP) implantation as a stage of genital gender affirming surgery. The prosthesis facilitates penetrative intercourse, as the neophallus lacks rigid erectile tissue. While PP placement is a well-established and relatively low-risk surgical treatment option for erectile dysfunction is the cis-male population, published series of post-phalloplasty prosthesis placement have demonstrated a higher rate of complications and subsequent explant. Objective To demonstrate that an integrated surgical team that participates in all stages of phalloplasty creation can improve penile prosthesis outcomes in transmen. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all transmen who underwent PP implantation at our institution from January 2015 through October 2021, yielding a cohort of 44 men. Men who underwent phalloplasty for another reason (trauma, infection, priapism) were excluded. Both malleable (MPP) and inflatable (IPP) prostheses were included in the cohort. Home phalloplasty refers to phalloplasty performed at our institution, and outside phalloplasty at another institution. The surgical technique emphasizes exclusion of urinary flora from the operative field and avoiding excess anchor material to minimize niduses for infection. We analyzed preoperative, operative, and post-operative characteristics, stratified by whether the phalloplasty was performed at our institution. We also performed logistic regression for predictors of explant in the cohort. Results Cohort characteristics and outcomes are represented in Table 1. 44 PPs were implanted 28 at our institution, 16 at an outside institution. Average age was 32 and 33 in the cohorts, respectively. IPPs were more commonly implanted than MPP. Notably, operative time was significantly lower if the phalloplasty had been constructed at our institution (p=0.014). 16 men total required explant, 7/28 (25%) in the home phalloplasty group and 9/16 (56.3%) in the outside phalloplasty group. Predictors of explantation are shown in Table 2. Significant predictors included age (p=0.013), smoking (p=0.030), operative time (p=0.007), whether the phalloplasty was performed at our institution (p=0.043), and the number of pre-PP revision surgeries (p=0.047). On multivariate logistic regression including all variables significant on univariate analysis, only age (p=0.032) and operative time (p=0.010) remained significant predictors. Conclusions We present a large post-phalloplasty penile prosthesis cohort, demonstrating exceedingly low infection rate and improved explant rate in a cohort of men who all underwent both phalloplasty and prosthesis placement with the same surgical team. Our analysis suggests that phalloplasty characteristics, patient characteristics, and operative time can influence penile prosthesis outcomes. Disclosure No