Citations

12100 Background: The safety profiles of novel agents are mainly based on clinician-reported adverse events (AEs) from clinical trials. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may better represent the treatment burden experienced by patients (pts) compared with clinician-reported AEs. Using data from POLARIX, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 3 international study (NCT03274492), we previously presented PRO and clinician-reported data showing similar rates of neuropathy (Trněný et al. 2022). Here, we evaluate the reporting of other common symptoms using PRO and clinician-reported data in POLARIX. Methods: POLARIX methods were previously described (Tilly et al. 2022); this analysis included all pts with PRO data. PRO and clinician-reported data described the incidence and severity of fatigue, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Clinician-reported severity grading was based on the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.0. PROs were collected using the European Organisation Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Core 30 questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), which was administered to pts at clinic visits on Day 1 of Cycles 1 (baseline), 2, 3, and 5, and end of treatment (EOT). PRO severity scores included ‘A little’, ‘Quite a bit’, and ‘Very much’. Results: Overall, 825 pts were evaluable. From baseline to EOT, PROs showed a higher incidence of symptoms compared with clinicians for fatigue (98% vs 27%), constipation (68% vs 29%), diarrhea (56% vs 26%), nausea (58% vs 40%), and vomiting (24% vs 15%). PRO severity scores of ‘Quite a bit’ or ‘Very much’ were reported in 33% of pts for fatigue, 29% for constipation, 17% for diarrhea, 19% for nausea, and 7% for vomiting. Clinicians reported Grade ≥2 symptoms in 11% of pts for fatigue, 11% for constipation, 11% for diarrhea, 14% for nausea, and 6% for vomiting. Conclusions: In POLARIX, pts reported a higher incidence and severity of symptoms compared with clinicians. Although distinct scales were used, the differences in symptom rates reported by pts and clinicians were clinically meaningful. These data may have implications for symptom management, including physician evaluation and communication of symptom expectations for pts. Reporting of symptoms by PROs should be incorporated into clinical trials as an adjunct to standard AE reporting to better characterize the patient experience. Clinical trial information: NCT03274492 . [Table: see text]

12057 Background: AlthoughCLL primarily affects older adults (median age 71 years), limited data exists about the outcomes of adults who are ≥80 years old because they are under-enrolled on clinical trials. Methods: The Mayo Clinic CLL Database was used to conduct a retrospective cohort study of adults ≥80 years at the time of frontline CLL treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to plot OS, and cumulative incidence was used to plot TTNT, accounting for competing risk of death. The Mayo Clinic IRB approved the study. Results: Our study included 216 patients with CLL who were age ≥80 years at the time of frontline CLL therapy between 1/1995 and 11/2022 (Table). The median time from CLL diagnosis to initiation of frontline therapy was 3.1 years. The median OS after start of frontline therapy was 3.9 years. The median OS was 3.3 years (95% CI 2.6–4.2) for patients who received alkylating agents (e.g., chlorambucil, n=96), 3.8 years (95% CI 2.8–not reached [NR]) for purine analogues (e.g., fludarabine, n=11), 3.9 years (95% CI 3.2–4.9) for anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody monotherapy (e.g., obinutuzumab, n=64), and not reached (95% CI 3.3-NR) for novel agents (n=43) (P=0.02). The types of novel agents included ibrutinib (n=19), acalabrutinib (n=16), venetoclax (n=7), and orelabrutinib (n=1). There was no difference in OS between 36 patients who received a BTKi compared to the 7 patients who received venetoclax-based therapy. At a median follow-up time of 6.7 years from the first visit, 143 patients died from the following: progressive CLL (n=63), infections (n=12), other cancer (n=11), non-CLL reasons (n=21). Cause of death was unavailable for 36 patients. On multivariable analyses, older age (i.e., any 5-year increase in age) was associated with a 50% increased risk of death (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9, p=0.001), and treatment with non-novel agents was associated with 3.2 times increased risk of death (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.2-8.9, p=0.02). Of the 216 patients, 76 patients required second-line therapy; the median TTNT was 4.2 years (95% CI 2.9-NE). The most used second-line agents were monoclonal antibodies alone (20/76, 26%) and single-agent alkylators (18/76, 24%). Conclusions: When compared to all other CLL treatments, novel agents such as BTKi and venetoclax-based treatments are associated with significantly improved OS in patients with CLL ≥80 years old when used in the frontline setting. [Table: see text]

12051 Background: The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (Ipi-Nivo) is a standard of care regimen in many malignancies. However, immune-related adverse events (irAE) are common and are of great concern, especially when treating the elderly population. This subgroup of patients may be at greater risk for serious irAEs and be less able to tolerate the potential treatment side effects. We sought to retrospectively evaluate our experience treating elderly patients ≥ 80 years with Ipi-Nivo to characterize adverse events. Methods: A retrospective chart review of the electronic medical records of all patients treated with Ipi-Nivo at the Mayo Clinic Health System was performed. Patients with any solid tumor who received their first dose of Ipi-Nivo at the age of ≥ 80 were included. Records were analyzed for baseline characteristics, cancer type, toxicity, and response to therapy. Differences between continuous and categorical variables were assessed using the students’ t-test and the chi-squared test, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models assessed the relative contribution of factors to survival after treatment. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SAS V.9.4. Results: Forty-six patients met inclusion criteria, 13 females and 33 males. Median age of first dose was 83 (Range: 80 - 94). Sixty-seven percent had an ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1 and 33% had an ECOG PS 2-3. Thirteen (28.3%) patients received 4 cycles of Ipi-Nivo. Cancers included: 18 (40%) melanomas, 10 (21%) mesothelioma, 9 (19.5%) lung cancers, and 9 (19.5%) other types. Thirty-one patients (67%) developed at least one irAE. Of the irAEs, 8 (17.4%) were grade 1, 20 (43.5%) were grade 2, 14 (30.4%) were grade 3, and 3 (6.5%) were grade 4. Systemic steroids were used in 29 (63%) patients. Twenty-six (56.5%) patients were hospitalized for any cause, and 12 (26.1%) were hospitalized due to an irAE. Of the 26 patients hospitalized during treatment, 19 (73%) died within 1 year of discharge; 11 (42%) died within < 1 month of discharge and 3 (12%) died within 1-3 months of discharge. Median OS from the date of first Ipi-Nivo dose was 14.6 months in the ECOG PS 0-1 and 6.5 months in the ECOG PS 2-3. ECOG PS of 0-1 was associated with a significantly decreased risk of mortality (HR [hazard ratio] 0.33, 95 % CI [confidence interval]: 0.15-0.70; p=0.0025) compared to ECOG PS of 2-3. Conclusions: This is the first analysis to evaluate the outcomes of Ipi-Nivo in patients ≥ 80 years. Approximately 60% of the patients required systemic steroids and a quarter were hospitalized with grade 3-4 irAEs. As expected, patients with ECOG PS 2-3 did significantly worse than ECOG PS 0-1. Ipi-Nivo should be used with caution in patients ≥ 80 years.

12047 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a leading cause of death, particularly in older adults. Regorafenib (REGO) is an FDA-approved oral multi-kinase inhibitor for refractory mCRC based on the CORRECT trial results, but older adults were underrepresented with a median age of 61 (54–67). This study aimed to evaluate REGO safety in older adults with mCRC and assess the feasibility of using geriatric assessment (GA) to predict toxicity risk. Methods: 27 subjects (PTs) enrolled (median age 73, range 65-85) and started at 120mg of REGO for 21 days of a 28-day cycle with provider discretion to escalate to full dose of 160mg after cycle 1. GA was conducted at enrollment, 4 weeks later, and then every 3 months to monitor for any deterioration. GA assessed 8 geriatric domains (comorbidity, functional status, physical performance, cognition, psychological state, nutrition, medication review, and social support) using validated tools. Primary objective was to assess grade 3-5 toxicity rate, with secondary objectives evaluating REGO efficacy and exploring baseline GA and toxicity risk associations. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from date of consent. Continuous GA measures were compared using non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and binary GA measures were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Of 27 PTs enrolled, 15 were male, 12 were female, and 19 identified as white. At baseline, 77.7% of PTs had at least 3 (1-9) GA impairments. Physical performance (80.8%), comorbidity (75%), and cognition (69.2%) were the most prevalent impaired GA domains. 40% required dose reduction by end of cycle 2, and none escalated to full dose. 55% of PTs completed cycle 3. Main reasons for drug discontinuation were disease progression (80%) and toxicity (12%). 74.1% of PTs experienced at least one treatment-related grade 3-4 toxicity. Fatigue (33%), hypertension (30%), and hand-foot syndrome (15%) were the leading grade 3-4 toxicities. Median OS was 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.6-12.2m), and median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.5-3.4m). There was no significant difference in baseline GA measures between those who experienced toxicities and those who did not. No statistically significant toxicity risk was associated with any baseline GA impairment. The prevalence of impaired mini-nutritional assessment increased over 4 weeks (58% to 91%, p < 0.01), and median Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores decreased (7 to 6, p = 0.03). Conclusions: The study found that older adults with mCRC had comparable survival with REGO but experienced high toxicity. This may be ameliorated by recently published step-wise REDOS dosing method and should be considered in older adults with mCRC. The study confirms the feasibility of implementing GA within clinical trials. More data is needed on the role of GA in predicting toxicity with targeted therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT02466009 .

e23508 Background: Activating mutations in KIT are found in most pts with GIST. First-line imatinib provides initial clinical benefit in advanced disease, but prognosis is poor for pts whose tumors progress, despite 3 other approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Resistance is typically driven by secondary KIT mutations in the ATP-binding pocket (exons 13/14) or activation loop (exons 17/18). No approved drug has potent activity against both classes of resistance mutations, and many pts have polyclonal resistance after multiple lines of therapy. THE-630 is an investigational pan-variant KIT inhibitor. Based on preclinical models, an average plasma concentration (Cav) of 100 nM is predicted to have potent activity against all major classes of KIT-activating and resistance mutations. Here, we report initial data from a first-in-human study in pts with advanced GIST (NCT05160168). Methods: This ph 1/2 study is assessing the safety (including dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] and recommended ph 2 dose [RP2D]), pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of THE-630. Pts enrolled in the ph 1 portion were ≥18 y, had unresectable or metastatic GIST previously treated with imatinib and ≥1 additional TKI, and had ECOG performance status ≤2. Pts received THE-630 (QD; 28-day cycles) in a 3+3 dose-escalation design. PK was assessed on days 1 and 15 in cycle 1, antitumor activity was assessed by modified RECIST 1.1, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was assessed using Guardant360. Results: As of 13 Jan 2023, 19 pts had been treated in the ph 1 portion at THE-630 daily doses of 3 mg (n = 3), 4 mg (n = 7), 6 mg (n = 3), 9 mg (n = 3), and 12 mg (n = 3). Median age was 57 y (range 39–72); 13 pts had ≥4 prior TKIs. Median treatment duration was 55 days (range 1–252). PK analysis shows approximately dose-proportional increase in systemic exposure across doses tested. Mean steady-state Cav at 12 mg was 47 nM. There was 1 DLT at 4 mg (grade 5 myocardial infarction in a pt with 8 prior TKIs and hyperlipidemia where relationship to THE-630 could not be incontrovertibly ruled out). No other DLTs or related serious adverse events have occurred; 13 pts had treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), 91% of which were grade 1–2. The most common TRAEs were fatigue (n = 4), dry mouth (n = 3), anemia, ALT increase, AST increase, diarrhea, dyspepsia, dyspnea, and hypertension (n = 2 each). Reductions in select KIT-mutant allele fractions in ctDNA were observed, consistent with THE-630 levels achieved thus far. Stable disease (SD) was the best response in 1/7 pts at 4 mg, 1/3 pts at 6 mg, and 3/3 pts at 9 mg. Post data cut, SD was seen in 3/3 pts at 12 mg. Dose escalation continues to determine the RP2D. Conclusions: THE-630 had an acceptable initial safety profile, and escalation continues, as target exposure for pan-variant KIT activity is not yet reached. Reduction in KIT-mutant allele fractions in ctDNA and initial evidence of disease control were observed. Clinical trial information: NCT05160168 .

TPS11587 Background: Recurrent or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) remains a difficult disease to treat. Available agents such as doxorubicin, eribulin, trabectedin, ifosfamide, dacarbazine, or gemcitabine-based regimens are associated with low response rates and only modest improvements in progression free or overall survival. The oncogene CDK4 is ubiquitously amplified in this disease and represents a rational therapeutic target. In single-arm phase 2 studies, treatment with selective CDK4 inhibitors resulted in clinical benefit (12-week progression-free survival (PFS) of 57% with palbociclib and 74% with abemaciclib). We hypothesize that treatment with abemaciclib will improve PFS compared to placebo in patients with recurrent or metastatic DDLS. Methods: This is a phase 3 randomized double-blind study of abemaciclib versus placebo. Eligible patients have recurrent or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (purely well-differentiated liposarcoma excluded), progression of disease by RECIST 1.1 in the 6 months prior to study entry, any number of prior systemic therapies, and adequate organ function and performance status. Patients are stratified by number of prior lines of therapy (0 vs 1 or more) and randomized 1:1 between abemaciclib 200 mg PO twice a day and matching placebo. Patients are followed with scans every 6 weeks (every 12w after 36w) and those with progression of disease on placebo may cross over to open label abemaciclib. The primary endpoint is PFS. Target enrollment is 108 evaluable patients which provides 80% power with two-sided 10% significance level to detect a hazard ratio of 0.6. Secondary endpoints include response rate, PFS and response rate after crossover, and overall survival. Archival tissue will be collected to explore potential biomarkers. As of Feb 1, 2023, 43 patients have been accrued at 9 participating centers. Clinical trial information: NCT04967521 .

TPS11584 Background: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is an aggressive sarcoma subtype with frequent metastatic relapse. Advanced uLMS is treated with gemcitabine/docetaxel or anthracycline-based regimens. After failure of initial chemotherapy, remaining options provide limited benefit (trabectedin: objective response rate (ORR) 11%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) 4.0 months (mo); pazopanib: ORR 11%, mPFS 3.0 mo; dacarbazine: ORR 9%, mPFS 1.5 mo). 18-23% of uLMS harbor deleterious alterations in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair genes. HR-deficient cancers are unable to effectively repair double-stranded DNA breaks and may be sensitive to poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor-based strategies. In preclinical studies, the combination of temozolomide (T), an alkylating agent, and olaparib (O), a PARP inhibitor, markedly suppressed proliferation of uLMS models. Among 22 uLMS patients with median 3 prior lines, O+T demonstrated mPFS 6.9 mo and ORR 27% (Ingham M. et al. ASCO 2021: #11506). In correlative analysis, alterations in HR genes including PALB2 and RAD51B or absence of RAD51 foci formation by a functional assay were observed in patients with prolonged PFS (Bose S. et al. ASCO 2022: #11509). Based on these results, we designed a randomized phase 2/3 study to further evaluate O+T in advanced, pretreated uLMS. Methods: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A092104 is a randomized, open-label phase 2/3 clinical trial of O+T versus investigator’s choice in advanced uLMS. Eligible patients have ECOG performance status ≤2, progression on ≥ 2 prior treatment lines and measurable disease. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive T 75 mg/m2 orally daily + O 200 mg orally twice daily on days 1-7 in 21-day cycles (Arm 1) or investigator’s choice of trabectedin 1.5 mg/m2 over 24 hours every 21 days or pazopanib 400-600 mg orally daily (Arm 2). For phase 2, the primary endpoint is PFS. The design evaluates for an improvement in PFS from 4 mo to 8 mo, requires 70 patients, and yields 90% power and 1-sided alpha 0.10. If phase 2 is positive, phase 3 will enroll. For phase 3, the primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). The design evaluates for an improvement in OS from 13 mo to 23 mo, requires 165 patients (including 70 from phase 2) and yields 90% power with 1-sided alpha 0.025. Secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response, safety and patient-reported outcomes. Archival tissue will be collected and evaluated with a RAD51 foci formation assay. Genomic sequencing results will be obtained where available. The study opened to accrual in 1/2023. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT05633381 .

11563 Background: Afami-cel is an autologous, T-cell receptor (TCR) T-cell therapy to treat human leukocyte antigen (HLA) A*02–eligible patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors positive for the cancer testis antigen melanoma-associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4). The efficacy and safety of afami-cel in pretreated pts with advanced/metastatic synovial sarcoma or myxoid/round cell liposarcoma are being evaluated in the Phase 2, two-cohort, open-label, SPEARHEAD-1 (NCT04044768) trial. Here we report interim overall survival (OS) data in the pts with advanced synovial sarcoma in Cohort 1. Methods: Pts who were HLA-A*02 positive with advanced synovial sarcoma (with evidence of clinical/radiological progression) positive for MAGE-A4 received afami-cel after lymphodepleting chemotherapy containing fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint was overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 by independent review. Secondary endpoints included OS and progression-free survival (PFS), estimated utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of August 29, 2022, 44 pts with synovial sarcoma received afami-cel (2.68–9.99×109 transduced T-cells) in Cohort 1. The median age was 41 years (range: 19–73 years), 50% of pts were female, 89% of pts were white, 96% of pts were typed as HLA-A*02:01P, and median tumor MAGE-A4 expression H-score was 257 (132–300). Pts were heavily pre-treated with a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range: 1–12). The median follow-up time at the data cut-off was 20.8 months. Median PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.8, 5.8) and 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.8, 6.9) by independent and investigator review, respectively. Median OS by independent review was 15.4 months (95% CI: 10.9, not estimable) with 52% of pts censored at the data cut-off. The 12-month OS probability was 60% and 24-month OS probability was 40%. Twenty-one pts received additional therapy during long term follow up (systemic therapy, n = 20; radiation, n = 6; other, n = 4). In the 17 pts who had a RECIST response by independent review, the median OS was not reached, the 12-month OS probability was 90%, and 24-month OS probability was 60%. Conclusions: Pts with advanced synovial sarcoma treated with afami-cel in SPEARHEAD-1 had encouraging survival, especially those pts with a RECIST response. Clinical trial information: NCT04044768 .

11531 Background: Conventional chondrosarcoma (cCS) is the 2nd most common primary bone tumor and is resistant to chemotherapy and radiation. IDH1/2 mutations (m) occur in 50% of cCS. Both IDHm and wild-type (wt) cCS harbor epigenetic dysregulation. In preclinical models of IDHm and wt cCS, combination treatment with HDAC and DNMT inhibitors (i) suppressed growth in vitro and in vivo by reversing the hypermethylated state and inducing tumor suppressors, interferon response genes and apoptosis (Sheikh T, Schwartz G. Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20). Methods: NCI 10330 is a single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study evaluating the HDACi belinostat (B) with the DNMTi SGI-110 (S) or ASTX727 (A). A replaced S due to drug availability (pts were replaced). Pts had advanced cCS, ECOG PS ≤ 2 and could be treatment naïve. Progression was required for grade 1 cCS. Pts received B 1000mg/m2 IV + S 45mg/m2 SC both days 1-5 or B (same dosing) + A (cedazuridine 100mg/decitabine 35mg) PO both days 1-5, in 28-day cycles. 1° endpoint was objective response. A Simon 2-stage design was used. If ≥ 2/13 responses occurred in stage 1, the study would proceed to full accrual. Design had 85% power with α = 0.05 to test ORR 8% vs 28%. 2° endpoints included safety, PFS and OS. A safety lead-in was performed. Paired biopsies were collected. Results: Stage 1 is complete. 19 pts were treated: 6 on B+S and 13 on B+A. Median age was 50 and 67 years, respectively. All pts had prior surgery. 17% (B+S) and 38% (B+A) had prior radiation. 33% (B+S) and 55% (B+A) were IDHm. 67% (B+S) and 75% (B+A) were histologic grade ≥ 2. There were no objective responses. Best response (at 8 weeks) was stable disease (SD) in 4/6 pts (67%) on B+S and 6/10 pts (60%) on B+A. mPFS was 4.2 mos (95% CI 1.97-NR) for B+S and 3.8 mos (95% CI 2.17-NR) for B+A. mOS has not been reached. For B+A, mPFS for IDHm vs wt pts was 4.7 and 3.1 mos, respectively (p=0.21). One pt with IDHm grade 2 cCS who progressed on FT-2102 (IDH1i) remains on B+A > 1 year. There were no DLTs during either safety lead-in. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 17% (B+S) and 69% (B+A). For B+A, the most common grade 3/4 TRAE was neutropenia (54%) and the most common all-grade TRAEs were nausea (69%), leukopenia (61%), neutropenia (54%), anemia (46%) and fatigue (46%). Paired tumor biopsies are being evaluated with whole exome sequencing, RNAseq, methylation array and multiplex IHC with results forthcoming. Conclusions: Combination HDACi + DNMTi was well-tolerated in advanced cCS. There were no objective responses; however, a subset of pts experienced prolonged SD with a trend towards improved mPFS in IDHm pts. Correlative work is ongoing with a focus on differential effects on IDHm tumors and whether modulation of the immune microenvironment might support combinations with immunotherapy. Support: UM1CA186689. Clinical trial information: NCT04340843 .

11507 Background: Single agent or combination chemotherapy, typically Dox- or gemcitabine-based, are standard 1st- and 2nd-line therapies in patients (pts) with metastatic LMS; however, objective response rates (ORR), progression-free, and overall survival (PFS/OS) remain inadequate. Lurbi (PharmaMar S.A. / Jazz Pharmaceuticals) binds to DNA inhibiting transcription and inducing double strand breaks leading to apoptosis and delaying S/G2 progression. In a prior pilot study, we showed Lurbi+Dox is well-tolerated, with signs of activity, particularly in LMS. We designed this phase 1b to optimize dosing to lead into a randomized (1:1) phase 2 trial of Dox+/-Lurbi in anthracycline-naïve LMS. Herein we provide updated efficacy and tolerability data for this Phase 1b cohort. Methods: Pts > 18 yrs with locally advanced/metastatic, unresectable non-GIST STS (Phase 1b only) w/o prior anthracycline or Lurbi/trabectedin, ECOG PS < 3, RECIST 1.1 measurable, and normal organ function were eligible. The phase 1b followed a 3+3 design. Dosing included fixed Lurbi (3.2 mg/m2 d1) with two Dox dose levels (DL; DL1: 25 mg/m2 d1; DL2 25 mg/m2 d1+8). All pts received GCSF prophylaxis. Tumor assessments were every 2 cycles. DL1 was chosen as RP2D and the phase 2 trial began accrual in Aug 2022 aiming to enroll 50 LMS pts randomized 1:1 (stratified by uterine LMS [uLMS]] v. other LMS) with PFS as primary endpoint. Pts progressing on Dox are allowed to cross to Lurbi monotherapy. Results: 10 patients were enrolled in Phase 1b. Histologies included 5 LMS (4 uLMS) and 1 each of myxofibrosarcoma (myxFS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), and solitary fibrous tumor (SFT). With a median follow-up of 344 days, 5/10 pts remain on treatment with median PFS of 357 days (95%CI 175-ND). 6 pts demonstrated partial response (PR; 5 confirmed), 3 with stable disease (SD), and 1 with progressive disease (PD, Table). Median time to PR was 81 days (range 46-207). Duration of response was over 132 days in all responders with 3 still on treatment. Treatment-related AEs were typical for Dox/Lurbi, including nausea, fatigue, and reversible LFT elevations/cytopenias. Updated safety and response data will be provided at the time of the meeting. Conclusions: Lurbi+Dox is well-tolerated with efficacy in STS including 6/10 pts achieving PR, 9/10 pts staying on treatment for >120d, and 6/10 pts >200d. The randomized phase 2 study is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT05099666 . [Table: see text]