Citations

Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction cause substantial patient harm and are increasingly managed with endovascular venous interventions, including percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and stent placement. However, studies of these treatment elements have not been designed and reported with sufficient rigor to support confident conclusions about their clinical utility. In this project, the Trustworthy consensus-based statement approach was utilized to develop, via a structured process, consensus-based statements to guide future investigators of venous interventions. Thirty statements were drafted to encompass major topics relevant to venous study description and design, safety outcome assessment, efficacy outcome assessment, and topics specific to evaluating percutaneous venous thrombectomy and stent placement. Using modified Delphi techniques for consensus achievement, a panel of physician experts in vascular disease voted on the statements and succeeded in reaching the predefined threshold of >80% consensus (agreement or strong agreement) on all 30 statements. It is hoped that the guidance from these statements will improve standardization, objectivity, and patient-centered relevance in the reporting of clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction in clinical studies and thereby enhance venous patient care.

A full-term female was admitted at 3 days of life with a worsening rash since birth, concerning for infection. She developed clinical seizures and was transferred to our facility. She was admitted to the pediatric hospital medicine service and diagnostic workup was expanded with several specialists consulted. Presumptive diagnosis was made clinically, with definitive diagnosis established thereafter.

AbstractPlasma ceramide levels (henceforth, “ceramides”) are biomarkers of some diseases that are comorbidities of Down syndrome (DS). We sought to determine if comorbidities in DS were associated with ceramides, studying a convenience cohort of 35 study participants, all ≥12 months old. To identify comorbidities, we reviewed the problem lists in electronic health records that were concurrent with sample collection. We placed clinically related comorbidities into one of five categories of comorbidities, henceforth, categories: obesity/overweight; autoimmune disease; congenital heart disease; bacterial infection; and central nervous system (CNS) condition. We measured the eight ceramides most frequently associated with disease using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. We calculated a ceramide composite outcome score (CCOS) for each participant by normalizing each ceramide level to the mean for that level in the study population and then summing the normalized levels, to be proxy variable for all eight ceramides in aggregate. We used multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age and sex to test associations of categories with ceramides and with CCOSs. Post hoc,we realized that co‐occurring comorbidities might interfere with establishing associations between predictor categories and ceramides and that stratified analyses might eliminate their influence on associations. We posited that CCOSs could be used to screen for associations of categories with multiple ceramides, since most diseases have been associated with more than one ceramide. We chose to omit in the stratified analyses the two categories that were the most different from one another in their associations with their CCOSs, having the most divergent regression coefficients (the highest positive and lowest negative coefficients). We first omitted one of these two divergent categories in a stratified analysis and tested in the remaining participants (those without a comorbidity in the interfering category) for associations of the other four categories with their CCOSs and then did the same for the other divergent category. In each of these two screening stratified analyses, we found one category was significantly associated with its CCOS. In the two identified categories, we then tested for associations with each of the eight ceramides, using the appropriate stratified analysis. Next, we sought to determine if the associations of the two categories with ceramides we found by omitting participants in the interfering categories held in our small sample for participants in the omitted categories as well. For each of the two categories, we therefore omitted participantswithoutthe interfering category and determined associations between the predictor category and individual ceramides in the remaining participants (thosewitha comorbidity in the interfering category). In the a priori analyses, autoimmune disease was inversely associated with C16 and CNS condition was inversely associated with C23. Obesity/overweight and CNS condition were the two categories with the most divergent regression coefficients (0.037 vs. −0.048). In post hoc stratified analyses, after omitting participants with obesity/overweight, thereby leaving participantswithoutobesity/overweight, bacterial infection was associated with its CCOS and then with C14, C20, and C22. However, in the companion stratified analyses, omitting participants without obesity/overweight, thereby leaving participantswithobesity/overweight, bacterial infection was not associated with any of the eight ceramides. Similarly, in post hoc stratified analyses after omitting participants with a CNS condition, thereby leaving participantswithouta CNS condition, obesity/overweight was associated with its CCOS and then with C14, C23, and C24. In the companion analyses, omitting participants without a CNS condition, thereby leaving participantswitha CNS condition, obesity/overweight was inversely associated with C24.1. In conclusion, CNS and autoimmune disease were inversely associated with one ceramide each in a priori analyses. In post hoc analyses, we serendipitously omitted categories that interfered with associations of other categories with ceramides in stratified analyses. We found that bacterial infection was associated with three ceramides in participants without obesity/overweight and that obesity/overweight was associated with three ceramides in participants without a CNS condition. We therefore identified obesity/overweight and CNS conditions as potential confounders or effect modifiers for these associations. This is the first report of ceramides in DS and in human bacterial infection. Further study of ceramides in comorbidities of DS is justified.

The measurement of physiologic pressure helps diagnose and prevent associated health complications. From typical conventional methods to more complicated modalities, such as the estimation of intracranial pressures, numerous invasive and noninvasive tools that provide us with insight into daily physiology and aid in understanding pathology are within our grasp. Currently, our standards for estimating vital pressures, including continuous BP measurements, pulmonary capillary wedge pressures, and hepatic portal gradients, involve the use of invasive modalities. As an emerging field in medical technology, artificial intelligence (AI) has been incorporated into analyzing and predicting patterns of physiologic pressures. AI has been used to construct models that have clinical applicability both in hospital settings and at-home settings for ease of use for patients. Studies applying AI to each of these compartmental pressures were searched and shortlisted for thorough assessment and review. There are several AI-based innovations in noninvasive blood pressure estimation based on imaging, auscultation, oscillometry and wearable technology employing biosignals. The purpose of this review is to provide an in-depth assessment of the involved physiologies, prevailing methodologies and emerging technologies incorporating AI in clinical practice for each type of compartmental pressure measurement. We also bring to the forefront AI-based noninvasive estimation techniques for physiologic pressure based on microwave systems that have promising potential for clinical practice.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Aktuell wurde mit dem Tetrafecta-Score das erste Instrument zur Beurteilung der Behandlungsqualität in der chirurgischen Primärtherapie des Peniskarzinoms (PECa) publiziert. Eine externe wissenschaftliche Auseinandersetzung mit den ihn definierenden Einzelkriterien steht bislang noch aus und bildet das Studienziel. Material und Methode Es wurde eine internationale Arbeitsgruppe bestehend aus 12 Urologen und einem Onkologen mit klinischer und akademisch-wissenschaftlicher Expertise auf dem Gebiet des Peniskarzinoms gegründet. In einem modifizierten vierstufigen Delphi-Prozess wurden unter Einbeziehung der Tetrafecta-Kriterien insgesamt 13 Kriterien für PECa-Patienten in den klinischen AJCC-Stadien 1–4 (T1–3N0–3, aber M0) definiert, von denen in einer geheimen Abstimmung jeder der Experten 5 auswählen musste, um dadurch einen individuellen Pentafecta-Score zu generieren. Anschließend wurde das Rating der Experten aggregiert ausgewertet und dadurch ein finaler Pentafecta-Score gebildet. Ergebnisse Keines der ursprünglichen Tetrafecta-Kriterien wurde in den finalen Pentafecta-Score übernommen, der sich aus den folgenden Kriterien zusammensetzt: 1.) Organerhalt, sofern immer möglich (≤T2), jedoch stets unter Wahrung eines negativen chirurgischen Schnittrandes, 2.) beidseitige inguinale Lymphadenektomie (ILAE) ab pT1G2N0, 3.) perioperative Chemotherapie sollte erfolgen, sofern durch die Leitlinien indiziert, 4.) ILAE sollte, sofern indiziert, in einem zeitlichen Abstand von maximal 3 Monaten zur Primärtumorresektion erfolgen und 5.) die behandelnde Klinik sollte im Minimum 15 chirurgische Primärtherapien bei PECa-Patienten durchführen. Nur 7 der 13 Experten (54%) zeigten eine starke Korrelation ihres individuellen mit dem finalen Pentafecta-Score (rsp >0.60). Schlussfolgerung Auf der Basis eines moderierten Abstimmungsprozesses unter internationalen PECa-Experten wurde ein Pentafecta-Score als Qualitätssicherungs-Instrument für die chirurgische Primärtherapie gebildet, der nun anhand von patientenrelevanten und patientenberichteten Endpunkten zu validieren ist.

Background Previous studies have established that higher baseline quality of life (QOL) scores are associated with improved survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We examined the relationship between overall survival (OS) and baseline QOL. Patients and Methods A total of 1 247 patients with mCRC participating in N9741 (comparing bolus 5-FU/LV, irinotecan [IFL] vs infusional 5-FU/leucovorin [LV]/oxaliplatin [FOLFOX] vs. irinotecan/oxaliplatin [IROX]) provided data at baseline on overall QOL using a single-item linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) 0–100 point scale. The association of OS according to clinically deficient (defined as CD-QOL, score 0–50) vs not clinically deficient (nCD-QOL, score 51–100) baseline QOL scores was tested. A multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to adjust for the effects of multiple baseline factors. An exploratory analysis was performed evaluating OS according to baseline QOL status among patients who did or did not receive second-line therapy. Results Baseline QOL was a strong predictor of OS for the whole cohort (CD-QOL vs nCD-QOL: 11.2 months vs 18.4 months, P < .0001), and in each arm IFL 12.4 vs 15.1 months, FOLFOX 11.1 months vs 20.6 months, and IROX 8.9 months vs 18.1 months. Baseline QOL was associated with baseline performance status (PS) ( P < .0001). After adjusting for PS and treatment arm, baseline QOL was still associated with OS ( P = .017). Conclusions Baseline QOL is an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with mCRC. The demonstration that patient-assessed QOL and PS are independent prognostic indicators suggests that these assessments provide important complementary prognostic information.

Abstract Background We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with irinotecan in a phase II trial setting for refractory, advanced unresectable biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Methods A total of 28 patients (27 were evaluable) with advanced BTCs who progressed on at least one prior systemic therapy were enrolled and were treated with trifluridine/tipiracil 25 mg/m2 (days 1-5 of 14-day cycle) and irinotecan 180 mg/m2 (day 1 of the 14-day cycle). The primary endpoint for the study was 16-week progression-free survival (PFS16) rate. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were pre-specified secondary endpoints. Results Of 27 patients, PFS16 rate was 37% (10/27; 95% CI: 19%-58%), thereby meeting the criteria for success for the primary endpoint. The median PFS and OS of the entire cohort were 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.5-7.4) and 9.1 months (95% CI: 8.0-14.3), respectively. In the patients evaluable for tumor response (n = 20), the ORR and DCR were 10% and 50%, respectively. Twenty patients (74.1%) had at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event (AE), and 4 patients (14.8%) had grade 4 AEs. A total of 37% (n = 10/27) and 51.9% (n = 14/27) experienced dose reductions in trifluridine/tipiracil and irinotecan, respectively. Delay in therapy was noted in 56% of the patients while 1 patient discontinued the therapy, primarily due to hematologic AEs. Conclusion The combination of trifluridine/tipiracil plus irinotecan is a potential treatment option for patients with advanced, refractory BTCs with good functional status and no targetable mutations. A larger randomized trial is needed to confirm these results. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04072445)