Citations

Background: In the N-MOmentum trial, the risk of an adjudicated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) attack was significantly reduced with inebilizumab compared with placebo. Objective: To demonstrate the robustness of this finding, using pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Methods: N-MOmentum is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked trial of inebilizumab, an anti-CD19 monoclonal B-cell-depleting antibody, in patients with NMOSD. Pre-planned and post hoc analyses were performed to evaluate the primary endpoint across a range of attack definitions and demographic groups, as well as key secondary endpoints. Results: In the N-MOmentum trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02200770), 174 participants received inebilizumab and 56 received placebo. Attack risk for inebilizumab versus placebo was consistently and significantly reduced, regardless of attack definition, type of attack, baseline disability, ethnicity, treatment history, or disease course (all with hazard ratios < 0.4 favoring inebilizumab, p < 0.05). Analyses of secondary endpoints showed similar trends. Conclusion: N-MOmentum demonstrated that inebilizumab provides a robust reduction in the risk of NMOSD attacks regardless of attack evaluation method, attack type, patient demographics, or previous therapy. The N-MOmentum study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT2200770.

Abstract OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether cell-based and tissue-based immunofluorescent assays (IFAs) run in parallel could be used to detect glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) autoantibodies in the CSF of dogs with meningoencephalitis of unknown origin (MUO) and other CNS disorders ANIMALS 15 CSF samples obtained from dogs with presumed MUO (n = 5), CNS disease other than MUO (5), and idiopathic epilepsy (5). PROCEDURES All CSF samples underwent parallel analysis with a cell-based IFA that targeted the α isoform of human GFAP and a tissue-based IFA that involved mouse brain cryosections. Descriptive data were generated. RESULTS Only 1 CSF sample yielded mildly positive results on the cell-based IFA; that sample was from 1 of the dogs with presumed MUO. The remaining 14 CSF samples tested negative on the cell-based IFA. All 15 CSF samples yielded negative results on the tissue-based IFA. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested that concurrent use of a cell-based IFA designed to target the human GFAP-α isoform and a tissue-based IFA that involved mouse tissue cryosections was inadequate for detection of GFAP autoantibodies in canine CSF samples. Given that GFAP autoantibodies were likely present in the CSF samples analyzed, these findings suggested that epitopes differ substantially between canine and human GFAP and that canine GFAP autoanti-body does not bind to mouse GFAP. Without a positive control, absence of GFAP autoantibody in this cohort cannot be ruled out. Further research is necessary to develop a noninvasive and sensitive method for diagnosis of MUO in dogs.

Background and Purpose: The diagnosis of spontaneous spinal cord infarction (SCI) is limited by the lack of diagnostic biomarkers and MRI features that often overlap with those of other myelopathies, especially acute myelitis. We investigated whether the ratio between serum neurofilament light chain levels and MRI T2-lesion area (neurofilament light chain/area ratio—NAR) differentiates SCI from acute myelitis of similar severity. Methods: We retrospectively identified Mayo Clinic patients (January 1, 2000–December 31, 2019) with (1) SCI, (2) AQP4 (aquaporin 4)-IgG or MOG (myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein)-IgG-associated myelitis at disease clinical presentation, or (3) idiopathic transverse myelitis from a previously identified population-based cohort of patients seronegative for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG. Serum neurofilament light chain levels (pg/mL) were assessed at the Verona University (SIMOA, Quanterix) in a blinded fashion on available stored samples obtained ≤3 months from myelopathy presentation. For each patient, the largest spinal cord lesion area (mm 2 ) was manually outlined by 2 independent raters on sagittal T2-weighted MRI images, and the mean value was used to determine NAR (pg/[mL·mm 2 ]). Results: Forty-eight patients were included SCI, 20 (definite, 11; probable, 6; possible, 3); acute myelitis, 28 (AQP4-IgG-associated, 17; MOG-IgG-associated, 5; idiopathic transverse myelitis, 6). The median expanded disability status scale score (range) at myelopathy nadir were 7.75 (2–8.5) and 5.5 (2–8), respectively. Serum neurofilament light chain levels (median [range] pg/mL) in patients with SCI (188 [14.3–2793.4]) were significantly higher compared with patients with AQP4-IgG-associated myelitis (37 [0.8–6942.9]), MOG-IgG-associated myelitis (45.8 [4–283.8]), and idiopathic transverse myelitis (15.6 [0.9–217.8]); P =0.01. NAR showed the highest accuracy for identification of SCI versus acute myelitis with values ≥0.35 pg/(mL·mm 2 ) yielding 86% specificity and 95% sensitivity (area under the curve=0.93). The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 6.67 and 0.06, respectively. NAR remained independently associated with SCI after adjusting for age, gender, immunotherapy before sampling, and days from myelopathy symptoms onset to sampling ( P =0.0007). Conclusions: NAR is a novel and promising clinical biomarker for differentiation of SCI from acute myelitis.

Abstract Hashimoto encephalopathy, also known as steroid-responsive encephalopathy associated with autoimmune thyroiditis, has been defined by sub-acute onset encephalopathy, with elevated thyroid antibodies, and immunotherapy responsiveness, in the absence of specific neural autoantibodies. We aimed to retrospectively review 144 cases referred with suspected Hashimoto encephalopathy over a 13-year period, and to determine the clinical utility of thyroid antibodies in the course of evaluation of those patients. One hundred and forty-four patients (all thyroid antibody positive) were included; 72% were women. Median age of symptom onset was 44.5 years (range, 10–87). After evaluation of Mayo Clinic, 39 patients (27%) were diagnosed with an autoimmune CNS disorder [autoimmune encephalopathy (36), dementia (2) or epilepsy (1)]. Three of those 39 patients had neural-IgGs detected (high glutamic acid decarboxylase-65, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor-receptor and neural-restricted unclassified antibody), and 36 were seronegative. Diagnoses among the remaining 105 patients (73%) were functional neurological disorder (n = 20), neurodegenerative disorder (n = 18), subjective cognitive complaints (n = 14), chronic pain syndrome (n = 12), primary psychiatric (n = 11), sleep disorder (n = 10), genetic/developmental (n = 8), non-autoimmune seizure disorders (n = 2) and other (n = 10). More patients with autoimmune CNS disorders presented with sub-acute symptom onset (P &lt; 0.001), seizures (P = 0.008), stroke-like episodes (P = 0.007), aphasia (P = 0.04) and ataxia (P = 0.02), and had a prior autoimmune history (P = 0.04). Abnormal brain MRI (P = 0.003), abnormal EEG (P = 0.007) and CSF inflammatory findings (P = 0.002) were also more frequent in the autoimmune CNS patients. Patients with an alternative diagnosis had more depressive symptoms (P = 0.008), anxiety (P = 0.003) and chronic pain (P = 0.002). Thyoperoxidase antibody titre was not different between the groups (median, 312.7 versus 259.4 IU/ml; P = 0.44; normal range, &lt;9 IU/ml). None of the non-autoimmune group and all but three of the CNS autoimmune group (two with insidious dementia presentation, one with seizures only) fulfilled the autoimmune encephalopathy criteria proposed by Graus et al. (A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15: 391–404.) (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 100%). Among patients who received an immunotherapy trial at our institution and had objective post-treatment evaluations, the 16 responders with autoimmune CNS disorders more frequently had inflammatory CSF, compared to 12 non-responders, all eventually given an alternative diagnosis (P = 0.02). In total, 73% of the patients referred with suspected Hashimoto encephalopathy had an alternative non-immune-mediated diagnosis, and more than half had no evidence of a primary neurological disorder. Thyroid antibody prevalence is high in the general population, and does not support a diagnosis of autoimmune encephalopathy in the absence of objective neurological and CNS-specific immunological abnormalities. Thyroid antibody testing is of little value in the contemporary evaluation and diagnosis of autoimmune encephalopathies.

Abstract Objectives To describe CSF‐defined neuronal intermediate filament (NIF) autoimmunity. Methods NIF‐IgG CSF‐positive patients (41, 0.03% of 118599 tested, 1996–2019) were included (serum was neither sensitive nor specific). Criteria‐based patient NIF‐IgG staining of brain and myenteric NIFs was detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA); NIF‐specificity was confirmed by cell‐based assays (CBAs, alpha internexin, neurofilament light [NF‐L]), heavy‐[NF‐H] chain). Results Sixty‐one percent of 41 patients were men, median age, 61 years (range, 21–88). Syndromes were encephalopathy predominant (23), cerebellar ataxia predominant (11), or myeloradiculoneuropathies (7). MRI abnormalities (T2 hyperintensities of brain, spinal cord white matter tracts. and peripheral nerve axons) and neurophysiologic testing (EEG, EMG, evoked potentials) co‐localized with clinical neurological phenotypes (multifocal in 29%). Thirty patients (73%) had ≥ 1 immunological perturbation: cancer (paraneoplastic), 22; systemic infection (parainfectious [including ehrlichosis, 3] or HIV), 7; checkpoint‐inhibitor cancer immunotherapy, 4; other, 5. Cancers were as follows: neuroendocrine‐lineage carcinomas, 12 (small cell, 6; Merkel cell, 5; pancreatic, 1 [11/12 had NF‐L‐IgG detected, versus 8/29 others, P = 0.0005]) and other, 11. Onset was predominantly subacute (92%) and accompanied by inflammatory CSF (75%), and immunotherapy response (77%). In contrast, CSF controls (15684 total) demonstrated NIF‐IgG negativity (100% of test validation controls), and low frequencies of autoimmune diagnoses (20% of consecutively referred clinical specimens) and neuroendocrine‐lineage carcinoma diagnosis (3.1% vs. 30% of NIF cases), P < 0.0001. Median NF‐L protein concentration was higher in 8 NF‐L‐IgG‐positive patients (median, 6718 ng/L) than 16 controls. Interpretation Neurological autoimmunity, defined by CSF‐detected NIF‐IgGs, represents a continuum of treatable axonopathies, sometimes paraneoplastic or parainfectious.

Abstract Background SMART (stroke‐like migraine attacks after radiation therapy) is a rare, delayed complication of brain radiation. In this study, we wanted to review the spectrum of symptoms, neuroradiological findings, autoimmune status, and outcomes in SMART syndrome patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with SMART syndrome at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between January 1995 and December 2018. Results We identified 25 unique patients with SMART syndrome and a total of 31 episodes and 15 (60%) patients were male. The median age at onset was 46 (interquartile range [IQR] 43–55) years and the median latency of onset after the initial radiation was 21.6 (IQR 14.4–28.2) years. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed gyral edema and enhancement in all cases with the temporal (25, 80.6%) and parietal (23, 74.2%) lobes being the most commonly affected. The median follow‐up of the patients in our cohort was 10 (IQR 6–32) weeks. On univariate analysis, factors associated with an increased risk of recurrent SMART episodes were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 8.1, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.1–52.6, p = 0.019) and absence of electrographic seizure discharges during initial symptoms (OR 7.4, 95% CI 1.1–45.9, p = 0.032). We could not identify an autoimmune etiology. Longer duration of symptoms (>10 weeks) correlated with an older age ( p = 0.049), temporal lobe involvement ( p < 0.001), and diffusion restriction ( p = 0.043). Conclusions SMART is a syndrome with characteristic imaging findings and clinical features. Incomplete recovery by 10 weeks occurred in one‐third of individuals and was associated with older age, temporal lobe involvement, and restricted diffusion on MRI.

Abstract Background Autoimmunity is an increasingly recognized cause of encephalitis with a similar prevalence to that of infectious etiologies. Over the past decade there has been a rapidly expanding list of antibody biomarker discoveries that have aided in the identification and characterization of autoimmune encephalitis. As the number of antibody biomarkers transitioning from the research setting into clinical laboratories has accelerated, so has the demand and complexity of panel-based testing. Clinical laboratories are increasingly involved in discussions related to test utilization and providing guidance on which testing methodologies provide the best clinical performance. Content To ensure optimal clinical sensitivity and specificity, comprehensive panel-based reflexive testing based on the predominant neurological phenotypic presentation (e.g., encephalopathy) is ideal in the workup of cases of suspected autoimmune neurological disease. Predictive scores based on the clinical workup can aid in deciding when to order a test. Testing of both CSF and serum is recommended with few exceptions. Appropriate test ordering and interpretation requires an understanding of both testing methodologies and performance of antibody testing in different specimen types. Summary This review discusses important considerations in the design and selection of neural antibody testing methodologies and panels. Increased collaboration between pathologists, laboratorians, and neurologists will lead to improved utilization of complex autoimmune neurology antibody testing panels.