Citations

Black race and Hispanic ethnicity are associated with higher mortality in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), though mechanisms remain unclear. We evaluated 796 children with SCID who received nonsibling HCT between 1982 and 2020 using data from the Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium. Overall survival for Black (aHR 2.47, 95%CI 1.64, 3.71) and Asian/Pacific Islander patients (aHR 1.82, 95%CI 1.00, 3.30) was significantly lower compared with non-Hispanic White patients, while Hispanic patients had lower event-free survival (aHR 1.83, 95%CI 1.27, 2.63) compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Even after adjusting for age and infection, Black patients with SCID had more than twofold hazard of death compared with non-Hispanic White patients. NBS was associated with earlier diagnosis, reduced infection at HCT, and elimination of survival disparities between Black and non-Hispanic White patients. These findings suggest that universal, system-level interventions such as NBS can mitigate disparities in outcomes for children with SCID.

Patients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL) are generally excluded from pivotal T-cell redirecting bispecific antibody (BsAb) trials. We evaluated real-world outcomes in a multicenter retrospective study of 122 patients with primary or secondary PCL across 15 academic centers, categorized as 'active' (≥5% circulating plasma cells within 30 days of BsAb initiation) or 'historical'. In a heavily pretreated population, patients received teclistamab (37%), elranatamab (11%), talquetamab as a line of therapy (Tal LOT, 42%), or talquetamab as bridging therapy to CAR-T (Tal Bridge, 11%). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was grade 1-2 in 56% and grade 3-4 in 4%, whereas neurotoxicity was grade 1-2 in 16% and grade 3-4 in 5%. Among 110 evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 55%, including 61% with Tal LOT, 58% with Tal Bridge, 46% with elranatamab, and 33% with teclistamab. With a median follow-up of 8.3 months, talquetamab demonstrated superior survival. Tal LOT showed a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.5 months and a median overall survival (mOS) of 11.5 months, and both were unreached in the Tal Bridge cohort. In contrast, teclistamab and elranatamab showed a mPFS of 1.2 and 1.6 months and mOS of 8.1 and 3.6 months, respectively (P=0.007, P=0.023). In active PCL, Tal LOT achieved mPFS/mOS of 6.9/12.2 months versus 0.7/1.4 months with teclistamab and 1.0/3.1 months with elranatamab, respectively (P<0.001, P=0.002). Multivariable analysis associated active PCL with worse survival and Tal LOT with improved outcomes. BsAbs were safe in PCL, with talquetamab showing superior outcomes compared with BCMA-directed BsAbs.

Importance The NRG Oncology research organization and NSABP B-35 randomized clinical trial prospectively collected margin width data on postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)–positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who underwent lumpectomy, whole-breast irradiation (WBI), and randomly assigned adjuvant anastrozole or tamoxifen therapy. This permitted analysis of outcomes per margin width. Objective To analyze the effect of margin width on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Design, Setting, and Participants NSABP B-35 was a phase 3, double-blind, randomized clinical trial in which patients were randomized to either 5 years of tamoxifen or anastrozole. Postmenopausal women with HR-positive DCIS and tumor-free margins were eligible. Enrollment was from January 6, 2003, to June 15, 2006, in academic and community hospital members of the NSABP. Study data were analyzed from July 2024 to April 2025. Interventions There were no specific interventions based on lumpectomy margin width. Main Outcomes and Measures Lumpectomy margin width data were prospectively collected within 3 months of randomization. A pathology form classified margins as positive (ink on tumor), close (<1 mm), or negative (≥1 mm). For the negative margin subgroup, closest margin width was stated separately. Thus, an ancillary analysis using 1-mm and 2-mm margin width partitions was performed. Results A total of 3104 postmenopausal women (mean [SD] age, 61 [7.8] years) were enrolled in NSABP B-35. In an ancillary analysis, 2707 patients were included in the 1-mm margin width partition group, and 2546 patients were included in the 2-mm margin width partition group. IBTR was the most common first event, occurring in 90 of 2707 patients (3.3%): 24 of 502 patients (4.8%) with a margin width less than 1 mm and 66 of 2205 patients (3.0%) with a margin width greater than or equal to 1 mm. Ten-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of IBTR events was 5.6% vs 4.0% for margins less than 1 mm vs margins greater than or equal to 1 mm ( P = .04). Using 2 mm as the discriminant threshold for margin width, 39 of 879 patients (4.4%) with margins less than 2 mm and 49 of 1667 patients (2.9%) with margins greater than or equal to 2 mm experienced an IBTR first. Ten-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of IBTR events with margins less than or equal to 2 mm was 5.3% vs 3.8% for those with margins greater than 2 mm ( P = .05). In models adjusting for other patient and tumor factors, margin width was not a significant predictor of IBTR risk (2-mm threshold hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.86-2.06). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this ancillary analysis of the NSABP B-35 trial show that absolute differences in IBTR rates using margin width groupings of less than 1 mm or greater than or equal to 1 mm and margin width groupings of less than 2 mm or greater than or equal to 2 mm in postmenopausal women with HR-positive DCIS receiving lumpectomy, WBI, and adjuvant endocrine therapy were small. Omission of reexcision lumpectomies based on margin widths of less than 1 mm or less than 2 mm can be reconsidered in appropriate patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00053898

ABSTRACT Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta‐cel) has demonstrated excellent efficacy and long‐term disease control in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, a proportion of patients experience early treatment failures. We investigated clinical factors associated with early progression or death (within 12 months) in patients with RRMM receiving standard‐of‐care cilta‐cel across the three Mayo clinic centers. Patients with a follow‐up of at least 12 months or progression or death within 12 months from infusion were included. Of the patients with early treatment failure ( n = 52), 69% had progressive disease and 31% had a non‐relapse mortality (NRM) event. In patients without early treatment failure ( n = 164), 13% of events were NRM. Among pretreatment factors, prior BCMA‐directed therapy, presence of extramedullary disease and a CAR‐HEMATOTOX score of ≥ 2 were independent predictors of early progression or death. The utilization of cilta‐cel in earlier lines of treatment (1–3 vs. 4 or more) demonstrated comparable PFS (12‐month PFS 73% vs. 77%, p = 0.94). Measurable residual disease positivity in the bone marrow at 3 months (11/197 patients) identified a small but high‐risk group with an increased risk of early treatment failure (OR 5.68; p = 0.012). Patients with less than a complete response on a FDG PET/CT at 3 months also had an increased risk of early treatment failure (OR 11.8; p < 0.0001). Our findings may help identify patients at high‐risk for early adverse outcomes despite receiving highly effective therapy, and support consideration of novel therapeutic strategies within a clinical trial setting.

Abstract Background Rare pediatric and young adult brain tumors pose major diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to limited evidence and scattered expertise. The International Rare Brain Tumor Board was established to enable multidisciplinary case review, shared learning, and collaborative decision support. Methods Launched in February 2025, the Rare Brain Tumor Board is a monthly collaborative initiative led by Children’s National Hospital and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Close partnership with the European Pediatric Rare CNS Tumor Board enhances transatlantic exchange and alignment of diagnostic and treatment recommendations. De-identified cases are presented with clinical history, neuroimaging, histopathology, and molecular profiling, including DNA methylation classification, available for the majority of cases. Sessions are structured to support integrated diagnosis and evidence-informed management recommendations through multidisciplinary discussion (neuropathology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and pediatric as well as adult neuro-oncology). Findings Since its inception, 12 sessions have been held averaging 138 participants per session, reviewing a total of 32 cases (mean 3 cases/session; range 1–4) from 7 different countries and 3 different continents. Entities reviewed include DICER1-intracranial sarcoma (n = 5), astroblastoma (n = 4), FOXR2-activated neuroblastoma (n = 4), CNS tumors with BCOR internal tandem duplication (n = 3) and, BCOR-fused tumors (n = 3), CIC-rearranged-sarcoma (n = 3), intracranial mesenchymal tumor FET::CREB fusion positive (n = 3), MN1::PATZ1 fusion tumors (n = 2), undifferentiated sarcoma (n = 2), PLAG1-fusion tumor (n = 1), medullomyoblastoma (n = 1), and EZHIP-altered diffuse midline glioma (DMG) (n = 1). Multidisciplinary review has supported diagnostic clarification, strengthened familiarity with ultra-rare entities, and informed real-world treatment discussions in settings where prospective data are limited. Discussions have also increased awareness of rare brain tumor registries and opportunities for systematic case capture. Conclusion An international multidisciplinary rare brain tumor board is a feasible, scalable model to advance integrated diagnosis and collaborative management of ultra-rare pediatric and young adult brain tumors, while building a shared knowledge base across institutions.

Abstract Background Approximately 12,000 adolescents and young adults (ages 15-39, AYAs) are diagnosed with a primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor each year. DNA methylation profiling has transformed CNS tumor classification by refining diagnostic accuracy and identifying biologically distinct subtypes, but its application has not been systematically evaluated in the AYA population. In this study, we examined the spectrum of CNS tumor types across age groups, with a focus on the AYA population. Methods We assembled a large dataset of CNS tumor samples with age annotations and methylation profiles matching with high confidence to a CNS tumor type using the NCI/Bethesda classifier. Prevalence of tumor type, methylation class and DNA copy number aberrations were compared across age strata (pediatric, AYA and adult). Results The cohort of 21,099 CNS tumors included 5139 tumors from AYAs (24%), which showed a mixed pattern, with tumors typical of childhood (e.g. medulloblastoma) as well as those common in older adults (e.g. glioblastoma). Several tumor types were specifically enriched in the AYA, including IDH-mutant astrocytoma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, posterior fossa group B ependymoma, and diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant, among others. Distinct methylation subclasses of multiple tumor types were observed in the AYA, and patterns of genomic aberrations showed age-specific distributions. Conclusion Large-scale methylation profiling revealed unique classification patterns of CNS tumors in AYAs, with specific tumor types, subclasses, and genomic alterations enriched in this population. These data may serve as a valuable reference resource for better understanding the spectrum of CNS tumors affecting AYA patients.

Abstract Background Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a rare large-vessel vasculitis that can involve pulmonary arteries, potentially leading to pulmonary hypertension (PH). Noninvasive evaluation by echocardiography is often used, but its reliability in confirming and characterizing PH in TA is unclear. We investigated the role of invasive hemodynamic testing in TA patients with suspected PH. Methods We retrospectively identified 10 patients with TA meeting 2022 ACR criteria and suspected PH based on symptoms and/or echocardiography; all underwent echocardiography followed by right heart catheterization (RHC).PH was defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) &gt;20 mmHg. PH was classified as pre-capillary (pulmonary artery wedge pressure [PAWP] ≤15 mmHg), post-capillary (PAWP &gt;15 mmHg), or combined (PAWP &gt;15 mmHg with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance). Echocardiographic parameters were collected where available, along with invasive hemodynamics, cardiac biomarkers (BNP/NT-proBNP), inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP), NYHA functional class, and outcomes. Results Median age was 44 years (range 18-58), and 90% were female. Based on invasive hemodynamics, pre-capillary PH was present in 5 patients, combined pre-/post-capillary PH in 3, and isolated post-capillary PH in 2. Median mPAP was 38 mmHg (IQR 30-55), median pulmonary vascular resistance 3.5 Wood units (IQR 2.3-8.7), and median PAWP 15 mmHg (IQR 8-24). Echocardiography frequently underestimated disease severity. Several patients with absent or low tricuspid regurgitation velocity (≤1.0 m/s), where measurable, demonstrated severe pre-capillary PH on RHC, including pulmonary vascular resistance &gt;6 Wood units. Among patients with available data, NT-proBNP levels ranged from 59 to 51,968 pg/mL, and inflammatory markers varied widely (CRP &lt;0.3 to 107.9 mg/L). Among patients with available NYHA data, most were class II-III. Conclusions In this TA cohort, RHC was essential to confirm and phenotype PH, which was present in the majority of those with suspected PH. Echocardiography alone often underestimated or misclassified PH in TA - in one case missing severe pre-capillary PH due to an absent TR signal, and in another failing to discern elevated left-heart filling pressure. Invasive assessment prevented missed diagnoses and misclassification, ensuring appropriate management of TA-associated PH This abstract is funded by: None

Importance Currently, there are no standardized outcome domains or measures in clinical trials for facial aging. Heterogeneity in outcome domains and measurement instruments across clinical trials creates difficulty in directly comparing interventions, determining superior therapies, and developing high-quality meta-analyses. Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) of essential domains to be reported in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions for facial aging. Evidence Review PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL were searched from September 2005 to September 2015. An updated search of the same databases was performed from September 2015 to February 2026. Studies were included if (1) they were randomized clinical trial or controlled clinical trial in design, (2) they assessed the efficacy or safety of an intervention for facial aging, (3) they were published in English, and (4) they involved human participants. Complementary sources, including patient interviews, were used to capture further relevant outcomes. Two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by consensus meetings, were used to identify outcome domains considered most important by both patient and physician stakeholders. Findings The final COS consists of 6 outcome domains: (1) overall convenience of treatment; (2) time to return to normal work and social activity; (3) overall assessment of focused area of treatment (at the point in time when treatment is expected to provide peak benefit); (4) duration of treatment effect; (5) severity of persistent local or systemic adverse events, including pigmentary change, skin texture change, delayed healing, scarring, and serious adverse events; and (6) patient satisfaction with treatment. Conclusions and Relevance The 6 outcome domains identified through a Delphi consensus are recommended for reporting in future facial aging trials to ensure that outcomes that matter most to patients and clinicians are measured and that results are comparable across interventions.