Citations

A goal of the 3rd phase of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE3) Network was to examine the return of results (RoR) of actionable variants in more than 100 genes to consenting participants and their healthcare providers. Each of the 10 eMERGE sites developed plans for three essential elements of the RoR process: Disclosure to the participant, notification of the health care provider, and integration of results into the electronic health record (EHR). Procedures and protocols around these three elements were adapted as appropriate to individual site requirements and limitations. Detailed information about the RoR procedures at each site was obtained through structured telephone interviews and follow-up surveys with the clinical investigator leading or participating in the RoR process at each eMERGE3 institution. Because RoR processes at each of the 10 sites allowed for taking into account differences in population, disease focus and institutional requirements, significant heterogeneity of process was identified, including variability in the order in which patients and clinicians were notified and results were placed in the EHR. This heterogeneity in the process flow for eMERGE3 RoR reflects the “real world” of genomic medicine in which RoR procedures must be shaped by the needs of the patients and institutional environments.

Abstract Despite recent improvements in immunosuppressive therapy, hepatic allograft rejection remains a major cause of morbidity and late graft loss in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Although some biochemical tests suggest hepatic allograft damage, the gold standard for defining rejection remains based on morphologic findings. Acute cellular rejection usually occurs within the first 3 weeks posttransplantation and the incidence varies between 40% and 70%. Ductopenic rejection occurs in 5-10% of patients undergoing initial liver transplantation and usually occurs between 6 weeks and 6 months after the procedure. Induction and maintenance of immunosuppression with triple-drug therapy (cyclosporine, prednisone, and azathioprine) and other combinations that include anti-lymphocyte preparations have led to an overall decrease in the incidence of both cellular and ductopenic rejection. In addition, the availability of FK506 as a rescue therapy has saved grafts in some patients experiencing chronic (ductopenic) rejection. Overall, the correlation between the degree of biochemical liver dysfunction and the presence and severity of histologic rejection remains poor. Histologic severity of rejection, however, suggests which patients will require more immunosuppressive therapy and which patients may need antilymphocyte therapy to control the rejection episode. Some rejection episodes remain resistant to all known therapy and eventually lead to graft loss. New immunosuppressive agents and regimens are needed to improve graft and patient survival, decrease the incidence of cellular and ductopenic rejection, minimize drug-related side effects and complications, and reduce the high cost of immunosuppressive therapy.

We prospectively studied the utility of the amplification of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in the sera of liver transplant recipients in order to predict symptomatic CMV infection, thus enabling preemptive therapy with antiviral agents. Serum samples obtained at biweekly intervals from 20 sequential liver transplant recipients for at least 8 weeks following transplantation were tested by the PCR amplification procedure. Results were correlated with blood and urine cultures, histopathological findings from infected organs, and clinical manifestations. Six patients (30%) developed symptomatic CMV infection; in five (83%) of these patients, CMV DNA was detected prior to symptomatic CMV infection, and in one (17%) of these patients, CMV DNA was detected at the time of symptomatic CMV infection. CMV DNA was detected a mean of 13 days (range, 0 to 23 days) prior to the onset of symptomatic CMV infection. In addition, CMV DNA was detected in the sera of four of five patients with asymptomatic viremia and two patients with asymptomatic viruria. Lastly, the PCR was negative for sera from seven patients with no evidence of CMV infection. We found that PCR was able to detect the presence of CMV DNA in the sera of liver transplant recipients at a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 100% for CMV infection, while the sensitivity and specificity for symptomatic infection were 100 and 57%, respectively.

The development of multiple highly effective and safe direct-acting antivirals to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) has resulted in greater ease and confidence in managing HCV infection in transplant recipients that in turn has impacted the solid organ transplant community as well. In the United States, the opioid epidemic has increased the number of overdose deaths with a concomitant increase in younger HCV viremic donors after brain death being identified. At the same time, a decrease in HCV viremic transplant candidates has led to a growing interest in exploring the use of HCV viremic liver and kidney donor allografts in HCV-negative recipients. To date, experience with the use of HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts in HCV-negative recipients is limited to a few small prospective research trials, case series, and case reports. There are also limited data on recipient and donor selection for HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts. In response to this rapidly changing landscape in the United States, experts in the field of viral hepatitis and liver and kidney transplantation convened a meeting to review current data on liver and kidney recipient selection and developed consensus opinions related specifically to recipient and donor selection of HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts.

Abstract Abstract 2859 Background: PTLD is the most common malignancy, other than melanomatous skin cancer complicating solid organ transplantation and has been one of the most commonly observed fatal consequences. The histologies are diverse and include B-cell, T-cell and Hodgkin lymphomas. Rituximab has affected the outcome in CD20+ patients with PTLD. This single institution study sought to identity the outcomes in patients of all histologies and presentations managed in the post-rituximab era. Methods: Patients with solid organ transplantation who were diagnosed with PTLD at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) between December 1970 and October 2009 were identified through the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Data Base. The rituximab era was defined as patients diagnosed after December 26, 2000, the date of diagnosis for the first patient treated with rituximab in our series. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of clinical factors and overall survival (OS). Results: 143 patients diagnosed with PTLD between December 1970 and October 2009 were identified. The median age at the time of diagnosis of PTLD was 50 years (range 15–84) with 41 patients (29%) over the age of 60. 93 were male (65%). At a median follow-up of 84 months (range 1–295), 95 patients (65%) have died. The types of organ transplant included renal (39%), liver (31%), cardiac (11%), lung (6%), renal/pancreas (6%), pancreas (4%), and multiorgan (4%). 83% of patients presented with extranodal disease. 28% had involvement of the engrafted organ. 76% of the patients developed PTLD that was EBV+ by in situ hybridization. 62% were stage 3–4. The IPI was intermediate-high in 39% of patients. Initial approaches to management included reduction in immunosuppression (45%), chemotherapy (12%), reduction in immunosuppression with rituximab (12%), rituximab (8%), and radiation therapy (6%). The overall response to therapeutic approaches was 46% in the pre-rituximab era and 56% in the post-rituximab era (chi-squared p=0.25). Patients treated with rituximab had an improved overall survival (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.99–2.79). Patients treated in the rituximab era had improved 1 year survival (76%) compared to patients in the pre-rituximab era (59%) (chi-squared p=0.03). However, the survival advantage in the rituximab era was not maintained in longer follow-up. The median overall survival in the pre-rituximab era was 31 months compared to 56 months in the post-rituximab era (logrank p=0.63). Conclusion: The overall response rates and overall survival are improved with rituximab treatment in CD20+ PTLD, however, the natural history of all PTLD has not improved significantly in the post-rituximab era. New approaches are needed for the prevention and management of all the histologies of PTLD. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histology in Eastern Europe and Asia, and adenocarcinoma is most common in North America and Western Europe. Surgery is a major component of treatment of locally advanced resectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer, and randomized trials have shown that the addition of preoperative chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy to surgery significantly improves survival. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, ramucirumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with esophageal and EGJ cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers focuses on recommendations for the management of locally advanced and metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and EGJ.

T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) is common after liver transplantation (LT), and it is often thought to have a minimum impact on outcomes. Because alloimmune response changes over time, we investigated the role of the timing of TCMR on patient and allograft survival and examined the risk factors for early and late TCMR. We reviewed protocol liver biopsies for 787 consecutive LT recipients with an 8.6‐year follow‐up. The incidence of early TCMR (≤6 weeks after LT) was 33.5% with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients having the lowest incidence. Younger recipient age (P < 0.01), number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches (P < 0.01), and use of deceased donor allografts (P = 0.01) were associated with increased risk of early TCMR, which had no impact on allograft (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79‐1.32; P = 0.89) or overall survival (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78‐1.34; P = 0.86). Late TCMR (>6 weeks after LT) was less common (17.7%) and was associated with different risk factors. The majority of late TCMR (56.2%) episodes had no antecedent early TCMR, although moderate‐to‐severe early TCMR (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.55‐5.23; P < 0.01) and steroid resistance (HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.87‐6.99; P < 0.01) were associated with late TCMR. Late TCMR increased risk of mortality (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.35‐2.65; P = 0.001) and graft loss (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.23‐2.37; P = 0.001). Thus, these data suggest that the timing and histologic grade of TCMR determine its impact on patient and allograft survival. Early mild TCMR episodes after LT do not adversely impact patient or allograft survival provided that they are adequately treated. The occurrence of late TCMR carries deleterious effects with increased longterm risk of graft loss and decreased survival. Patients with moderate‐to‐severe early TCMR are at an increased risk for late TCMR and warrant closer clinical follow‐up.

Significant hemostatic abnormalities can occur during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This study addressed three goals: 1)evaluation of the hemostatic mechanism at each stage of the OLT; 2) the relationship of the coagulation process with the thrombelastograph (TEG); and 3) comparison of results in patients requiring retransplantation or who died, with the overall pattern. To evaluate hemostasis during 50 consecutive OLTs, a detailed coagulation and TEG study was done. The surgical procedure was divided into the following stages: Stage I--induction of anesthesia to occlusion of blood flow to the patient’ s diseased liver; Stage II—occlusion of blood flow to the patient’ s diseased liver to reperfusion of the patient’ s new liver; and Stage III—reperfusion of the new liver until skin closure. 28 ml of arterial blood were sampled at the beginning and end of each stage and up to five days posttransplantation for the following: platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, prothrombin, factors V, VII, IX, and X, plasminogen, antiplasmin, antithrombin III (functional and immunologic), fibrinolytic split products, and TEG. The patient’ s core temperature and amount of blood products transfused were obtained intraoperatively during each of the six data times. The ischemia time of the donor liver was recorded. Significant hemostatic abnormalities developed during each of the 50 OLTs, especially during reperfusion of the donor liver. In some instances, this was corrected within one hour, but platelet counts continued to fall, and a number of coagulation factors rebounded only partially. The TEG values correlated with laboratory data and blood loss, but the correlations were not strong. The patient’ s requirement for red cells varied with the operative drop in temperature; however, the donor liver ischemia time and length of Stage II made no significant difference. It is concluded that 1) significant deterioration of coagulation factors occurs during OLT, 2) the TEG is an effective screening test that affords prompt information, 3) aggressive measures should be taken to maintain the patient’ s body temperature at 37°C, 4) patient outcome was not predicted by intraoperative hemostatic evaluation.