Citations

Abstract Background Plasma biomarkers offer improved accessibility compared to established diagnostic modalities for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, current plasma biomarker candidates have not been tested comprehensively in diverse populations, and represent only a fraction of pathways dysregulated in AD. This study seeks to address these knowledge gaps through untargeted plasma biomarker discovery in African Americans (AA), an underrepresented group in AD research despite having a higher risk of developing dementia compared to non‐Hispanic Whites (NHW). Method Untargeted proteomics were generated using the SomaScan 7k platform on plasma samples from AA study participants clinically diagnosed as AD dementia ( n = 181) or cognitively unimpaired (CU; n = 142). Machine learning was implemented to identify a set of plasma proteins to distinguish between AD dementia and CU. Predictive models were constructed by elastic net regression optimized with nested cross‐validation on 6,853 proteins and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The generalizability of plasma protein predictors was evaluated in an external Alzheimer's Disease Research Center cohort of 369 NHW and AA study participants diagnosed as AD dementia or CU. Result Thirty‐six proteins were selected as predictors. Proteins selected by machine learning were enriched for processes previously associated with AD including synaptic dysfunction, inflammation, vascular dysfunction, and amyloid processing. The 36 plasma proteins alone achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 to classify AD dementia in the discovery cohort, representing a 22% improvement over a model including age and sex. The 36 proteins were validated in an external cohort also achieving AUC=0.94, a 35% improvement over age and sex. Conclusion Biomarker discovery combining untargeted proteomics and machine learning identified a set of plasma proteins that could serve as a novel and highly accurate diagnostic plasma biomarker panel for AD. Work is underway to assess the association of the predictive panel with p ‐tau217, medical comorbidities, and social/structural determinants of health.

Abstract Background More than 85% of Alzheimer's disease (AD) donor brains exhibit some degree of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), which is characterized predominantly by Aβ40 deposits in the brain vasculature and can cause blood brain barrier (BBB) leakage. CAA is associated with risk of infarcts, cerebral hemorrhages, and cognitive decline. Brain cell type‐specific mechanisms that influence CAA pathology, as well as related measures such as Aβ40 biochemical measures and tight junction proteins, an indicator of BBB integrity, are still elusive. Method We performed single‐nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) of temporal cortex tissue from 79 AD donors, with varying levels of CAA co‐pathology. Measurements of soluble, insoluble and membrane‐associated fractions of brain Aβ40 and tight junction protein (claudin‐5, occludin) levels were available for these donors. We correlated these measures with cell proportions. We also conducted differential gene expression and analyses for intercellular communications and regulatory networks. Result We identified 25 clusters and annotated them with major brain cell types. There were 3 oligodendrocyte, 7 excitatory and 7 inhibitory neuronal, 2 microglial, 2 astrocytic, and 1 each for endothelial, pericytic, fibroblast, and oligodendrocyte precursor cell clusters. We found that higher CAA and Aβ40 levels correlate with reduced neuronal and increased microglial, astrocytic and vascular cell proportions. Increased tight junction proteins correlate with increased inhibitory neuronal and reduced microglial, astrocytic and vascular cell proportions. Among all clusters, one microglial, both astrocytic and the pericytic clusters have greater number of genes significantly associated with CAA, Aβ40 and tight junction protein levels. Most significant genes have negative associations with CAA and membrane‐bound Aβ40 and positive with tight junction protein measures. Using these genes as input for intercellular communications analysis, we prioritized ligand‐target interactions from microglia or astrocytes to pericytes. Some of the prioritized targets are transcription factors in pericytes. Using regulon analysis, we identified genes downstream of these transcription factors that are also significantly associated with lower CAA and membrane‐bound Aβ40 and higher tight junction protein levels. Conclusion We revealed glia‐to‐pericytes intercellular interactions and pericytic gene regulatory networks that are potentially perturbed by CAA and BBB breakdown. Future directions include analyzing external snRNAseq datasets and performing functional validations.

Abstract Background Variability in meningeal signal has been observed with various tau‐PET tracers. Differences have been observed in sex and age. Furthermore, the potential role of glymphatic clearance in this variability remains unclear. Here we compare meningeal signal of [ 18 F]MK6240 and [ 18 F]FTP tau‐PET tracers in cognitively unimpaired (CU) amyloid‐β‐ (Aβ‐) individuals, in relation to age, sex and glymphatic clearance. Methods 92 CU Aβ‐ (7 CU young [18‐35yo] and 85 CU old) underwent [ 18 F]MK6240 and [ 18 F]FTP tau‐PET scans, structural MRI, and resting‐state functional MRI (rsfMRI). In native space, we defined nine distinct levels representing meningeal regions, organized from those closest to the cortex (1) to those furthest away (9). Glymphatic clearance, measured as gBOLD/CSF coupling, was calculated for each participant; a lower value means a more efficient glymphatic clearance. Associations between meningeal tracer signal and factors such as sex, age, and glymphatic clearance were analyzed using t‐tests and linear regression models. Results All 9 meningeal regions were tested and rendered similar results; we will be showing those for meninges level 2. [ 18 F]MK6240 and [ 18 F]FTP meningeal signal significantly correlated with each other in both sexes (Figure 1). We observed higher [ 18 F]MK6240 meningeal signal in females compared to males while no difference was found for [ 18 F]FTP signal (Figure 2). In females, [ 18 F]MK6240 meningeal signal did not show a significant association with age, whereas in males, a significant relationship was observed. Both males and females exhibited lower [ 18 F]FTP meningeal signal with increasing age (Figure 3A). Additionally, glymphatic clearance was significantly associated with age for females with [ 18 F]MK6240. No significant associations were found in males with [ 18 F]MK6240 or in either sex for [ 18 F]FTP (Figure 3B). Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that meningeal signal of [ 18 F]MK6240 is significantly associated with glymphatic clearance in females, while in males, it is associated with age. In contrast, [ 18 F]FTP signal is primarily influenced by age in both sexes. These results highlight the distinct relationship between [ 18 F]MK6240 signal and glymphatic function in females, while age appears to play a significant role in both males and females for other tracer signal patterns.

Abstract Background Some cases of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) feature the mislocalization of the normally nuclear TAR DNA binding protein (TDP‐43) to the cytoplasm where it is incorporated into inclusions in affected brain regions. TDP‐43 plays a crucial role in the suppression of cryptic exons in the mature RNA of many targets in both AD and FTD. One such target, Stathmin‐2 (STMN2), is misspliced in the absence of TDP‐43 leading to a reduction of STMN2 RNA and protein while the levels of the cryptic splice variant is increased. Cryptic exons are not conserved across species, meaning previous Tdp‐43 models did not capture Stmn2 processing defects and Stmn2 loss of function (LOF). We hypothesize that STMN2 LOF contributes to cognitive phenotypes observed in AD and FTD. Method We have generated a novel mouse that more accurately models human disease mechanisms by expressing short‐hairpin (shRNA) via adeno associated virus in the central nervous system of a recently described humanized Stmn2 mouse model in which Stmn2 splicing is dependent on Tdp‐43. In this mouse we will simultaneously model Tdp‐43 loss of function and aberrant Stmn2 splicing. Result Our preliminary experiments demonstrate that humanized Stmn2 mice expressing shRNA against Tardbp have a reduction of Tardbp RNA and TDP‐43 protein compared to mice expressing a non‐targeting shRNA. Tdp‐43 knock‐down is accompanied by cryptic splicing of endogenous mouse targets, Sortilin 1 and Translin . As anticipated, we also detected cryptic Stmn2 splicing, suggesting that correct Stmn2 splicing is dependent on Tdp‐43 in this model. We will further characterize motor and cognitive functions in addition to neurodegeneration and gliosis in these animals. Conclusion We anticipate this novel model, and our subsequent studies will identify relevant disease mechanisms and provide an invaluable tool with which to investigate therapies for AD and FTD.

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects all brain cells and has complex genomic and immunological alterations. Previous research discovered missense AD risk or protective variants in microglial genes ABI3 and PLCG2, respectively. Expression levels of these genes are altered in AD and can influence microglial function. This study aims to uncover protective, and risk microglial molecular signatures associated with these variants to determine their role in microglial subtypes and states in AD by single cell expression and functional studies. Method We generated microglia‐enriched snRNAseq data from donors harboring either AD protective PLCG2 or AD risk ABI3 missense mutations, or neither mutation. After standard snRNAseq QC, we performed differential expressed gene (DEG) analysis of all microglial cells between variant carriers and non‐carriers using MAST. We defined protective signature as genes that are both down in ABI3 and up in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. In contrast, risk signature genes are up in ABI3 and down in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. We investigated the conservation of protective and risk signatures across multiple datasets, including scRNAseq data from iPSC‐derived microglia cells carrying PLCG2 protective variant, snRNAseq data from AD‐resilient donors, and data from AD and other diagnostic groups across multiple brain regions sourced from external datasets. Result We obtained snRNAseq profiles of 35,000 microglia from AD variant carriers. Our DEG analysis among all microglia cells provided 227 microglial protective and 293 risk signature genes defined by these variants. Using integrated analysis of multiple internal and external datasets, we further narrowed down these signatures. We determined that these high‐confidence protective signature genes are downregulated in early AD, upregulated in late AD brains and positively‐correlated with protective variant load in in vitro models. In contrast, risk signature genes are upregulated in early AD, downregulated in late AD and resilient donors. Risk signature expression is decreased with protective PLCG2 variant load, and altered with Aβ treatment in in vitro models. Conclusion Our study uncovers microglia specific protective and risk signatures associated with AD using sn/scRNAseq datasets from multiple sources and models. These findings nominate novel immune targets and pathways with implications for microglial function in health and disease, and ultimately therapeutic potential.

Abstract Background Tau‐PET imaging enables in vivo detection of tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), with early detection being critical for tracking disease progression. Here, we compare [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 in individuals with low tau burden. Method 450 individuals from the HEAD study (22 cognitively unimpaired (CU) young (CUY), 242 CU old and 186 cognitively impaired (CI)) underwent [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 tau‐PET and amyloid‐PET scans. Scans were processed using identical pipelines with inferior cerebellar gray matter as the reference region. Individuals were categorized as low tau if both [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 meta‐temporal SUVR were lower than 1.5. For comparison, [ 18 F]MK6240 and [ 18 F]FTP were transformed into one another using linear and non‐linear models; additionally, images were also z‐scored relative to the CUYs. Result Despite cognitive status and amyloid burden, several individuals showed elevated [ 18 F]FTP retention in temporal regions relative to [ 18 F]MK6240. As an example, Figure 1 shows [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 in 16 participants (4 per cognitive and amyloid status). Across most subjects with SUVRs<1.5, [ 18 F]FTP presented higher retention in meta‐temporal region as compared to [ 18 F]MK6240, though [ 18 F]MK6240 increased sharply above this threshold (Figure 2). In Figure 3, group‐average images and their transformed counterparts are shown for each group by amyloid and cognitive status, the subset of low‐tau participants in Aβ+ groups are also shown. In low tau groups, [ 18 F]FTP meta‐temporal retention is high in comparison to [ 18 F]MK6240. Additionally, z‐scored [ 18 F]FTP images show broader spread into temporal regions than [ 18 F]MK6240, reinforcing differences in retention. Conclusion [ 18 F]FTP shows meta‐temporal retention not seen with [ 18 F]MK6240 in low tau individuals. This discrepancy persists across transformed and z‐scored images, suggesting that there is a difference in early tracer retention between [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240. It is unclear if the early [ 18 F]FTP retention is related to early maturity levels of tau or off‐target signal. These findings have important implications for basic understanding of early tau retention, early diagnosis, and biomarker harmonization efforts.

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects all brain cells and has complex genomic and immunological alterations. Previous research discovered missense AD risk or protective variants in microglial genes ABI3 and PLCG2 , respectively. Expression levels of these genes are altered in AD and can influence microglial function. This study aims to uncover protective, and risk microglial molecular signatures associated with these variants to determine their role in microglial subtypes and states in AD by single cell expression and functional studies. Method We generated microglia‐enriched snRNAseq data from donors harboring either AD protective PLCG2 or AD risk ABI3 missense mutations, or neither mutation. After standard snRNAseq QC, we performed differential expressed gene (DEG) analysis of all microglial cells between variant carriers and non‐carriers using MAST. We defined protective signature as genes that are both down in ABI3 and up in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. In contrast, risk signature genes are up in ABI3 and down in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. We investigated the conservation of protective and risk signatures across multiple datasets, including scRNAseq data from iPSC‐derived microglia cells carrying PLCG2 protective variant, snRNAseq data from AD‐resilient donors, and data from AD and other diagnostic groups across multiple brain regions sourced from external datasets. Result We obtained snRNAseq profiles of 35,000 microglia from AD variant carriers. Our DEG analysis among all microglia cells provided 227 microglial protective and 293 risk signature genes defined by these variants. Using integrated analysis of multiple internal and external datasets, we further narrowed down these signatures. We determined that these high‐confidence protective signature genes are downregulated in early AD, upregulated in late AD brains and positively‐correlated with protective variant load in in vitro models. In contrast, risk signature genes are upregulated in early AD, downregulated in late AD and resilient donors. Risk signature expression is decreased with protective PLCG2 variant load, and altered with Aβ treatment in in vitro models. Conclusion Our study uncovers microglia specific protective and risk signatures associated with AD using sn/scRNAseq datasets from multiple sources and models. These findings nominate novel immune targets and pathways with implications for microglial function in health and disease, and ultimately therapeutic potential.

Abstract Background Variability in meningeal signal has been observed with various tau‐PET tracers. Differences have been observed in sex and age. Furthermore, the potential role of glymphatic clearance in this variability remains unclear. Here we compare meningeal signal of [ 18 F]MK6240 and [ 18 F]FTP tau‐PET tracers in cognitively unimpaired (CU) amyloid‐β‐ (Aβ‐) individuals, in relation to age, sex and glymphatic clearance. Methods 92 CU Aβ‐ (7 CU young [18‐35yo] and 85 CU old) underwent [ 18 F]MK6240 and [ 18 F]FTP tau‐PET scans, structural MRI, and resting‐state functional MRI (rsfMRI). In native space, we defined nine distinct levels representing meningeal regions, organized from those closest to the cortex (1) to those furthest away (9). Glymphatic clearance, measured as gBOLD/CSF coupling, was calculated for each participant; a lower value means a more efficient glymphatic clearance. Associations between meningeal tracer signal and factors such as sex, age, and glymphatic clearance were analyzed using t‐tests and linear regression models. Results All 9 meningeal regions were tested and rendered similar results; we will be showing those for meninges level 2. [ 18 F]MK6240 and [ 18 F]FTP meningeal signal significantly correlated with each other in both sexes (Figure 1). We observed higher [ 18 F]MK6240 meningeal signal in females compared to males while no difference was found for [ 18 F]FTP signal (Figure 2). In females, [ 18 F]MK6240 meningeal signal did not show a significant association with age, whereas in males, a significant relationship was observed. Both males and females exhibited lower [ 18 F]FTP meningeal signal with increasing age (Figure 3A). Additionally, glymphatic clearance was significantly associated with age for females with [ 18 F]MK6240. No significant associations were found in males with [ 18 F]MK6240 or in either sex for [ 18 F]FTP (Figure 3B). Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that meningeal signal of [ 18 F]MK6240 is significantly associated with glymphatic clearance in females, while in males, it is associated with age. In contrast, [ 18 F]FTP signal is primarily influenced by age in both sexes. These results highlight the distinct relationship between [ 18 F]MK6240 signal and glymphatic function in females, while age appears to play a significant role in both males and females for other tracer signal patterns.

Abstract Background Tau‐PET tracers are essential for visualizing pathology in Alzheimer’s (AD). High detectability to tau is crucial for early detection and monitoring of tau deposition. This study compares the noise to dynamic range ratio (NRR) of [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]MK6240, [ 18 F]PI2620, and [ 18 F]RO948, cross‐sectionally and longitudinally. Methods 460 individuals from the HEAD study (23 cognitively unimpaired (CU) young, 249 CU old and 188 cognitively impaired) underwent [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 tau‐PET scans; 94 additionally received [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948. A subset of 28 individuals (15 CU and 13 CI) underwent [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 follow‐up scans (1.5 ± 0.1 years later). Annual change was measured as [(followup‐baseline)/time between scans]. Noise was calculated as the standard deviation (SD) of CU Aβ‐ participants aged ≤65 (SD CUAβ‐≤65 ). The dynamic range was calculated as the SD across all subjects (SD range ). A lower the NRR (=SD CUAβ‐≤65 /SD range ) indicates more detectability. Analyses were performed at both region‐of‐interest and voxel‐wise levels. Results Across the whole cohort, [ 18 F]MK6240 exhibited lower NRR than [ 18 F]FTP in all regions. Voxel‐wise, differences were most pronounced in the frontal medial temporal regions (Figure 1). Within the four‐tracers subset, [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]FTP showed the highest NRR in Braak II, followed by [ 18 F]RO948 and [ 18 F]MK6240. In Braak IV‐VI, [ 18 F]MK6240 consistently demonstrated the lowest values, followed by [ 18 F]PI2620, [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]RO948. Similarly, in metatemporal‐ROI and Braak III, [ 18 F]MK6240 remained the lowest, however followed by [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948 (Figure 2). Lower [ 18 F]MK6240 NRR was due to larger SD range , while [ 18 F]FTP's lower values stemmed from smaller SD CUAβ‐≤65 . Conversely, high [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948 values are driven by larger SD CUAβ‐≤65 . Longitudinal analyses further confirmed that [ 18 F]MK6240 exhibited the lowest NRR across the entire brain, including AD‐related regions, with voxel‐wise differences mainly in the temporal and parietal lobes. Conclusion Tau‐PET tracers exhibit significant variability in detectability. [ 18 F]MK6240 consistently demonstrated lower NRR, implying better detectability across all regions, cross‐sectionally and longitudinally. Despite differences in NRR, [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]RO948 and [ 18 F]PI2620 followed similar pattern. These results provide insights into the differential tracer detectability, helping guide their optimal use in detecting and tracking tau pathology. Ongoing follow‐up scans will further clarify longitudinal tracer detectability and its implications for tau progression in AD.

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has shown remarkable success in the treatment of some malignancies, particularly leukemia. However, there are multiple factors that limit the durability of ACT in solid tumors, including dose-limiting toxicities, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and T-cell exhaustion. As the manufacture and preparation of adoptive T-cell therapies allows time and adequate conditions for ex vivo T-cell engineering, forward genetic screens can identify novel genetic targets that could improve their effectiveness. CRISPR is a commonly used functional genomics tool that has been successfully used to both enhance our understanding of mechanisms of resistance and to discover potential genetic edits to improve ACT. A complementary approach, Sleeping Beauty transposon mutagenesis provides additional opportunities to identify novel genetic edits without being constrained by the annotated human genome. Here, we summarize forward genetic screens and their tools to uncover strategies to enhance ACT. Complementary approaches can be combined and improved on to identify translatable genetic editing strategies through studies that accurately recapitulate disease-specific challenges.