Citations

AbstractBackgroundThere is a dearth of studies investigating the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of either anogenital lichen sclerosus or extragenital lichen sclerosus, a condition that, if left untreated, could lead to a greater degree of scarring and malignant transformation.ObjectiveThis study aims to analyze the demographic characteristics, clinicopathological features, treatment response, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with either anogenital or extragenital lichen sclerosus who received hydroxychloroquine therapy.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted involving 70 patients diagnosed with lichen sclerosus who underwent treatment with hydroxychloroquine at our institution between 2018 and 2023.ResultsAmong the cohort, 67 patients were female, and 3 were male. Extragenital lichen sclerosus was diagnosed in 23 patients, with 16 exhibiting concomitant morphea overlap. Itching was the predominant clinical presentation (67%). A notable proportion of patients (36%) had a connective tissue disorder, prompting hydroxychloroquine therapy. Among the 30 patients treated solely for lichen sclerosus, 21 demonstrated response and 9 had no response. From a broader comparison of response to hydroxychloroquine, the overall anogenital response rate was 84.6% as opposed to 50% in extragenital lichen sclerosus. The median time to initial response was 4 months. Adverse effects, predominantly mild, were observed in 10 (14.3%) patients.LimitationThis study is constrained by its retrospective nature and reliance on data from a single center, resulting in a limited sample size.ConclusionHydroxychloroquine demonstrates promise as a therapeutic option for anogenital lichen sclerosus because of its favorable response rates and low incidence of adverse effects. However, further investigations, including larger‐scale or prospective studies, are imperative to ascertain its definitive efficacy.

Abstract: Paratesticular mesothelioma (malignant mesothelioma arising from the tunica vaginalis of the testis) represents a small proportion of mesothelial neoplasms, and cutaneous involvement by paratesticular mesothelioma is very rare. Cutaneous involvement can manifest as scrotal subcutaneous nodules from regional spread, distant metastasis, or direct extension through surgical scars. Mesothelioma has 3 histopathologic classifications that include epithelioid, biphasic, and sarcomatoid, which is rarely seen in paratesticular mesothelioma. Given the rarity of this condition, cutaneous mesothelioma may be misdiagnosed as histologic mimics, such as metastatic adenocarcinoma or adnexal neoplasms; thus, appropriate immunohistochemical workup and clinical correlation are required to make an accurate diagnosis. In this case, a 75-year-old man with a history of paratesticular mesothelioma, status postorchiectomy, presented with right-sided scrotal swelling, erythema, and subcutaneous nodules. These nodules were identified as local recurrence with cutaneous involvement by paratesticular mesothelioma on histopathologic examination. This case highlights the clinical and histopathologic features of this diagnosis and underscores the importance of dermatopathologists being aware of this condition to ensure accurate diagnosis.