Citations

Abstract RTOG 9402 demonstrated procarbazine (P), lomustine (CCNU/C), and vincristine (V), collectively PCV, added to radiation therapy significantly improved survival for patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors. The improvement was most pronounced in 1p19q codeleted cases, and to a lesser extent, IDH-mutant cases, with no survival benefit in cases with neither biomarker. Analogous results were observed in other phase III trials. However, vincristine (V) can cause substantial toxicity and requires intravenous administration, both negatively affecting quality of life, with debatable contribution to PCV efficacy. As a randomized trial comparing PCV to PC is unlikely to be conducted, we explored correlations between survival and V-dosing in patients randomized to PCV in RTOG 9402. We performed post-hoc analyses of all evaluable participants (n = 143) randomized to PCV on RTOG 9402, supplemented by restricting the analyses to the chemosensitive molecular subsets (IDH-mutant and/or 1p/19q codeleted, n = 118). Total V dose by quartile (Q) was calculated. Survival from six months post-randomization was compared among V dose groups, adjusting for age, extent of resection (EOR), and Karnofsky Performances Status (KPS) in a Cox proportional hazards model. Higher V dose received correlated with longer survival in multivariate analyses (n = 134, median-Q3 vs. < Q1, HR 0.40 (0.22, 0.73), p = 0.003; ≥Q3 vs. < Q1, HR 0.39 (0.22, 0.72), p = 0.002). Excluding chemoresistant cases (IDH wild-type/not codeleted), survival was also significantly longer in evaluable participants receiving the highest doses of vincristine (≥Q3 vs. < Q1 HR 0.42 (0.21,0.81), p = 0.01). In this post-hoc analysis, higher overall V-dose received correlated with longer survival in evaluable patients with anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors receiving PCV chemotherapy in RTOG 9402. Of note, as vincristine dosing was not assigned by randomization, confounding due to differences in patient characteristics among V dose groups cannot be ruled out. Caution should be exercised when considering discarding V from the PCV regimen.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: TTFields are electric fields that disrupt processes necessary for cancer cell survival and can stimulate an antitumor immune response in preclinical NSCLC models. TTFields therapy is a noninvasive and locoregional treatment approved for glioblastoma, which has recently demonstrated a survival benefit when applied to the thorax with standard of care (SOC) systemic therapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC that progressed on/after platinum. Here we describe the pivotal METIS study (EF-25, NCT02831959) evaluating the efficacy and safety of TTFields therapy applied to brain metastases from NSCLC. TRIAL DESIGN: Patients (270) with 1–10 brain metastases from NSCLC will receive stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), followed by 1:1 randomization to TTFields (NovoTTF-200M [150 kHz] applied to the head ≥ 18 h/day) with best SOC, or best SOC alone. Key inclusion criteria are life expectancy ≥ 3 months, a new diagnosis of 1 inoperable or 2–10 supra and/or infratentorial brain metastases from NSCLC, that are amenable to SRS. Patients who had prior whole brain radiotherapy, or have single operable, leptomeningeal, or recurrent brain metastases, certain genetic mutations, or severe comorbidities or contraindications, are not eligible. The primary endpoint is time to first intracranial progression. Secondary endpoints include time to neurocognitive failure, overall survival, radiological response rate, time to second intracranial progression, time to first/second intracranial progression by modified RECIST v1.1, rate of intracranial progression, time to distant progression, rate of cognitive decline, quality of life, neurocognitive failure-free survival, and safety. The study is powered at 80% (2-sided alpha of 0.05) to detect a hazard ratio of 0.57. In July 2021, an independent Data Monitoring Committee reviewed the study data and recommended continuation. The study includes 128 sites in Europe, Israel, mainland China, North America, and Hong Kong. The final patient was enrolled in March 2023.

PURPOSE The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time, some limitations of these criteria were identified, and challenges emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. METHODS Informed by data from studies evaluating the different criteria, updates to the RANO criteria are proposed (RANO 2.0). RESULTS We recommend a standard set of criteria for both high- and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the postradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), rather than the postsurgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for comparison with subsequent scans. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks after radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, are required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for the evaluation of treatment for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (two-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH wild-type glioblastoma, the nonenhancing disease will no longer be evaluated except when assessing response to antiangiogenic agents. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant nonenhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and nonenhancing tumor components for response assessment. CONCLUSION The revised RANO 2.0 criteria refine response assessment in gliomas.

Abstract BACKGROUND The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time some limitations of these criteria were identified, and uncertainty emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS Informed by data from a cohort of glioblastoma patients and other evaluations of RANO criteria that allowed evaluation of features of the different criteria, the RANO working group developed updates to the RANO criteria (RANO 2.0). RESULTS Based on the 2021 WHO classification of gliomas, we recommend a standard set of criteria for both high and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the post-radiotherapy MRI, rather than the post-surgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for future comparison. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks following radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, is required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (2-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, the non-enhancing disease will no longer be evaluated. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant non-enhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and non-enhancing tumor components for response assessment. CONCLUSION These criteria represent a work in progress that will hopefully improve the assessment of response in glioma trials. Future updates will incorporate novel developments, advanced imaging techniques, and endpoints as they become validated.

Abstract Patients with H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma (DMG) have no proven effective therapies. ONC201 has recently demonstrated efficacy in these patients, but the mechanism behind this finding remains unknown. We assessed clinical outcomes, tumor sequencing, and tissue/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) correlate samples from patients treated in two completed multisite clinical studies. Patients treated with ONC201 following initial radiation but prior to recurrence demonstrated a median overall survival of 21.7 months, whereas those treated after recurrence had a median overall survival of 9.3 months. Radiographic response was associated with increased expression of key tricarboxylic acid cycle–related genes in baseline tumor sequencing. ONC201 treatment increased 2-hydroxyglutarate levels in cultured H3K27M-DMG cells and patient CSF samples. This corresponded with increases in repressive H3K27me3 in vitro and in human tumors accompanied by epigenetic downregulation of cell cycle regulation and neuroglial differentiation genes. Overall, ONC201 demonstrates efficacy in H3K27M-DMG by disrupting integrated metabolic and epigenetic pathways and reversing pathognomonic H3K27me3 reduction. Significance: The clinical, radiographic, and molecular analyses included in this study demonstrate the efficacy of ONC201 in H3K27M-mutant DMG and support ONC201 as the first monotherapy to improve outcomes in H3K27M-mutant DMG beyond radiation. Mechanistically, ONC201 disrupts integrated metabolic and epigenetic pathways and reverses pathognomonic H3K27me3 reduction. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 2293

Abstract The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve the reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time some limitations of these criteria were identified, and uncertainty emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. Informed by data from a cohort of glioblastoma patients and other evaluations of RANO criteria that allowed evaluation of features of the different criteria, we propose updates to the RANO criteria (RANO 2.0). Based on the 2021 WHO classification of gliomas, we recommend a standard set of criteria for both high and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the post-radiotherapy MRI, rather than the post-surgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for future comparison. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks following radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, is required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is an option. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (2-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, the non-enhancing disease will no longer be evaluated. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant non-enhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and non-enhancing tumor components for response assessment.

2017 Background: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade and low-grade glioma (HGG and LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Several limitations of the original RANO criteria have been reported. Methods: To address limitations of the original RANO criteria, a large cohort of patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma were evaluated comparing RANO-HGG with modified RANO (mRANO) and immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria to inform the following proposed updates (RANO 2.0). Results: Based on the 2021 WHO classification of glioma, we recommend a single common set of criteria for all gliomas regardless of WHO grade and IDH mutational status. These criteria will be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In newly diagnosed glioblastoma, the post-radiotherapy MRI, usually obtained approximately 4 weeks after completion of radiotherapy, rather than the post-surgical MRI as proposed in original RANO criteria, will be used as the baseline for comparison of subsequent scans. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the first 3 months following radiotherapy, confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI (in 4-8 weeks) will be required for determining radiographic progression of disease (PD) if the patient is clinically stable. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for recurrent tumors since these scans do not appear to improve reliability in determining progression. For agents with a high likelihood of producing pseudoprogression such as viral therapies and some other immunotherapies, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is an option. The primary measurement will remain the 2-dimensional maximum cross-sectional area of tumor as the simplest method, but where resources are available, volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH wild-type tumors with contrast enhancement, non-enhancing tumor will no longer be evaluated with the possible exception of patients receiving antiangiogenic therapies. However, in tumors with a significant non-enhancing component, both the contrast enhancing and non-enhancing components will be evaluated as target lesions. Conclusions: We hope that these and other proposed changes by the RANO working group will improve response assessment in glioma clinical trials and help the development of more effective therapy for patients.

Abstract Background Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for meningioma, the most common primary intracranial tumor, but improvements in meningioma risk stratification are needed and current indications for postoperative radiotherapy are controversial. Recent studies have proposed prognostic meningioma classification systems using DNA methylation profiling, copy number variants, DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing, histology, or integrated models based on multiple combined features. Targeted gene expression profiling has generated robust biomarkers integrating multiple molecular features for other cancers, but is understudied for meningiomas. Methods Targeted gene expression profiling was performed on 173 meningiomas and an optimized gene expression biomarker (34 genes) and risk score (0 to 1) was developed to predict clinical outcomes. Clinical and analytical validation was performed on independent meningiomas from 12 institutions across 3 continents (N = 1856), including 103 meningiomas from a prospective clinical trial. Gene expression biomarker performance was compared to 9 other classification systems. Results The gene expression biomarker improved discrimination of postoperative meningioma outcomes compared to all other classification systems tested in the independent clinical validation cohort for local recurrence (5-year area under the curve [AUC] 0.81) and overall survival (5-year AUC 0.80). The increase in area under the curve compared to the current standard of care, World Health Organization 2021 grade, was 0.11 for local recurrence (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07–0.17, P < 0.001). The gene expression biomarker identified meningiomas benefiting from postoperative radiotherapy (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.37–0.78, P = 0.0001) and re-classified up to 52.0% meningiomas compared to conventional clinical criteria, suggesting postoperative management could be refined for 29.8% of patients. Conclusions A targeted gene expression biomarker improves discrimination of meningioma outcomes compared to recent classification systems and predicts postoperative radiotherapy responses.

Abstract BACKGROUND The assessment of BM response to WBRT and its impact on NCF in clinical trials has been limited by lack of standardized imaging protocols. NRG-CC001 is a randomized clinical trial requiring pre-specified MRI protocols at baseline and 6-months, providing a uniform dataset to investigate if RR correlates with NCF changes. METHODS NRG-CC001 randomized patients with BM to hippocampal avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT) or WBRT. NCF was analyzed using 6-month standardized change scores and deterioration, defined using the reliable change index. Chi-square and t-tests were used for pretreatment characteristic comparisons. Inter-rater reliability between central and institutional assessment of RR was assessed with weighted kappa, κ. Linear regression was used to test trends in NCF change scores across types of response and multivariable logistic regression was used to test the association of RR to NCF deterioration. RESULTS 149 and 135 patients were evaluable for RR and NCF assessment, respectively. Pretreatment characteristics were well-balanced, except for post-high school education (70.6% HA-WBRT vs. 52.5% WBRT, p=0.023). Inter-rater reliability between central and institutional assessment of RR was fair (κ=0.36). There was no difference between arms in RR (p=0.41) with overall rates of 14.1% CR, 42.2% PR, 17% SD, and 26.7% PD. Patients with CR had improved 6-month NCF change as measured by HVLT-R Total Recall (p=0.0005), HVLT-R Delayed Recall (p=0.0003), HVLT-R Delayed Recognition (p=0.011), TMT-B (p=0.033), COWA (p=0.016), and Clinical Trial Battery Composite score (p=0.0011). Multivariable analysis demonstrated less deterioration in HVLT-R Delayed Recall for CR (p=0.019) and PR (p=0.0086) vs. SD/PD and HVLT-R Recognition for PR (p=0.031) vs. SD/PD. CONCLUSIONS HA-WBRT and WBRT result in similar RR at 6-months. CR or PR is associated with better NCF preservation. This suggests investigation into treatment escalation for patients with SD/PD may provide further NCF benefit along with HA-WBRT and memantine.Grant support from NCI-UG1CA189867 and U24CA180803.

Abstract BACKGROUND Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9802 was a phase III trial for patients with centrally confirmed LGG (WHO grade II). Participants ³ 40 years or those with neurosurgeon defined less than gross total resection (GTR) were randomized to radiotherapy (RT) +/- PCV. In a separate cohort, adults age &lt; 40 years with neurosurgeon defined GTR were observed by MRI every 6 months without adjuvant therapy. At last report, outcome for the observation cohort was immature with median follow-up of only 4.4 years. Here, we present mature outcomes for the observation arm. METHODS Eligible adults (as above) were observed by MRI every 6 months. OS and PFS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and estimated hazard ratios to characterize the prognostic variables. RESULTS There were 111 eligible patients (median age 30; median KPS = 100). Median follow-up was 16.1 years with 71 (64%) alive at the last follow-up. 79 patients (71%) had progressed with median PFS of 6.9 years. 5, 10, and 15 year-PFS and OS rates were 54%, 39%, 28% and 94%, 77%, and 65%. 1p19q status was codeleted in 32%, IDH1/2 mutant in 78% and MGMT promoter methylated in 39% of tested cases. Multivariate Cox analyses showed that preoperative tumor size ³ 4 cm (HR = 2.43 for PFS, p = 0.001; HR = 2.58 for death, p = 0.016) and residual disease on imaging ³ 1 cm (HR = 2.97 for PFS, P &lt; 0.001; HR = 2.02 for death, p = 0.05) were associated with worse outcomes. Analyses based on molecular results will be presented. CONCLUSION A subset of low-grade gliomas can be observed after the initial resection based on younger age, smaller tumor size, and no residual disease on neuroimaging. This can likely be further refined by prognostic molecular markers. Patients with the most favorable prognostic factors can avoid or delay the acute and long-term side effects of RT and chemotherapy for several years.