Citations

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has significantly reduced morbidity and mortality in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aims to analyze the outcomes and factors associated with decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) in AIS patients who underwent MT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from an ongoing, multicenter database to investigate AIS patients who underwent MT for ICA, M1, or M2 occlusion. We compared clinical and procedural variables between patients who underwent DHC and those who did not. Propensity score (PS) matching between the two groups was conducted using age, sex, admission NIHSS, occluded vessel, ASPECTS, time from symptoms onset to arterial puncture, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and symptomatic ICH (sICH). Results: Among the 3,135 MT patients who met our inclusion criteria, 113 underwent DHC. A 1:3 propensity matching yielded a well-matched cohort of 113 in the DHC group versus 339 in the non-DHC group. The DHC group had a significantly higher rate of successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2C) (175 [51.6%] versus 36 [31.9%], P < 0.001) and a longer procedure duration, with a median of 30 minutes (IQR: 17-54) compared to 44 minutes (IQR: 25-78) in the non-DHC group (P = <0.001). Further comparison of patients with low ASPECTS (≤ 5) who underwent DHC (n = 36) with those who did not (n = 99) showed no significant difference in successful recanalization rates (15 [41.7%] versus 43 [43.4%], P > 0.90). However, procedure duration was significantly longer in the DHC group with a median of 29 minutes (IQR: 13-52), compared to 39 minutes (IQR: 27-86) in the non-DHC group (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Successful recanalization can help in preventing DHC in AIS patients with high ASPECTS, but not those with low ASPECTS. Procedure duration is independently related to DHC following MT, especially in low ASPECTS patients.

Introduction: While balloon guide catheters (BGCs) enhance safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusions, their impact on distal medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) remains underexplored. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of BGC vs non-BGC in DMVO thrombectomy. Methods: This retrospective study focused on DMVO cases defined as occlusions in M2-M4 middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, and posterior cerebral artery. Baseline characteristics and technical and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups, with subgroup analysis in first-line thrombectomy techniques, including ADAPT, stent retriever, and Solumbra. First pass effect (FPE) was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥ 2C after the first pass. Results: A total of 1,508 patients were included, of whom 231 (15.3%) were in the BGC group and 1,277 (84.7%) were in the Non-BGC group. The BGC group was associated with a lower mTICI score ≥ 2C (overall: 43.2% vs. 52.7%, p = 0.01; ADAPT: 42.2% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.01; Solumbra: 32.4% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.005), longer puncture to intracranial access time (overall: 15 vs. 8 min, p < 0.001; ADAPT: 17 vs. 8 min, p < 0.001; Solumbra: 12 vs. 8 min, p = 0.02), and longer puncture to recanalization time (overall: 97 vs. 35 min, p < 0.001; ADAPT: 100 vs. 28 min, p < 0.001; Solumbra: 78 vs. 46 min, p < 0.001; Stent retriever: 95 vs. 45 min, p < 0.001 ). The BGC group also had a lower FPE rate (17.4% vs. 30.7%, p = 0.03) in the Solumbra subgroup. In terms of clinical outcomes, the BGC group had a lower rate of distal embolization (overall: 8.8% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.02), but there were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes between the two groups in first-line thrombectomy techniques. Conclusions: Our findings showed that the use of BGC in DMVO had a lower mTICI score, reduced FPE rates, decreased distal embolization, and longer procedure times. Figure 1: Figure 2:

The HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist System has demonstrated a reduction in risk of pump thrombosis. The improved hemocompatibility of this device is largely attributed to the pump mechanics including a large-diameter outflow graft, increased retrograde flow through the pump during pump cessation, and the textured blood-contacting surfaces of the pump. We present a 55-year-old man with a HeartMate 3 device who presented with heart failure symptoms, prolonged pump cessation for 7 days, and subtherapeutic anticoagulation therapy. Despite prolonged pump cessation and interrupted anticoagulation therapy, there was no evidence of pump thrombosis as determined by both laboratory and imaging studies. This case suggests favorable hemocompatibility of the HeartMate 3 device, which clinicians may consider in the management of patients needing advanced therapies.

Background: Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is a highly morbid condition that can result after catheter ablation for PV isolation. We hypothesized that pulsed field ablation (PFA) would reduce PV stenosis risk and collateral injury compared with irrigated radiofrequency ablation (IRF). Methods: IRF and PFA deliveries were randomized in 8 dogs with 2 superior PVs ablated using one technology and 2 inferior PVs ablated using the other technology. IRF energy (25–30 W) or PFA was delivered (16 pulse trains) at each PV in a proximal and in a distal site. Contrast computed tomography scans were collected at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12-week (termination) time points to monitor PV cross-sectional area at each PV ablation site. Results: Maximum average change in normalized cross-sectional area at 4-weeks was −46.1±45.1% post-IRF compared with −5.5±20.5% for PFA ( P ≤0.001). PFA-treated targets showed significantly fewer vessel restrictions compared with IRF ( P ≤0.023). Necropsy showed expansive PFA lesions without stenosis in the proximal PV sites, compared with more confined and often incomplete lesions after IRF. At the distal PV sites, only IRF ablations were grossly identified based on focal fibrosis. Mild chronic parenchymal hemorrhage was noted in 3 left superior PV lobes after IRF. Damage to vagus nerves as well as evidence of esophagus dilation occurred at sites associated with IRF. In contrast, no lung, vagal nerve, or esophageal injury was observed at PFA sites. Conclusions: PFA significantly reduced risk of PV stenosis compared with IRF postprocedure in a canine model. IRF also caused vagus nerve, esophageal, and lung injury while PFA did not.