Citations

2053 Background: Recurrent gliomas are highly aggressive brain tumors, often resistant to conventional treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as promising therapeutic agents by targeting tumor cells through immune modulation. However, clinical trials have demonstrated limited efficacy in recurrent gliomas. This study aimed to identify potential factors influencing treatment efficacy of ICIs in recurrent gliomas. Methods: This retrospective study, conducted across the Mayo Clinic following IRB approval, included patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with adult-type diffuse gliomas. Eligible patients received treatment with at least 2 cycles of ICI for recurrent glioma between 2014 – 2024. Patients treated with ICIs as initial therapy were excluded. Clinical, radiographic, histological, and molecular data were analyzed, with missing information excluded. Responders to ICI were defined as patients who did not meet iRANO criteria for progressive disease based on first radiographic response assessment (and confirmatory follow up imaging as needed for possible pseudo-progression). Survival outcomes [Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS)] and potential predictive variables were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox-Regression Analyses. Results: 67 patients met eligibility criteria (mean age: 45.1 ± 15.0 years; 64.2% male; 94% white). 64 (95.5%) patients received Pembrolizumab, 2 (3%) Nivolumab, and 1(1.5%) combined Ipilimumab/Nivolumab, with a median treatment duration of 2.77 (1.39 – 19.4) months. All had prior alkylating chemotherapy. The OS (from diagnosis) for IDH wildtype (IDH-WT, n = 36), IDH mutant, 1p/19q non-co-deleted (IDH-MUT, n = 17) and IDH mutant, 1p/19q co-deleted (OLIGO, n = 14) gliomas were 3.1, 9.2, and 18.6 years, respectively. The median PFS from time of ICI was 2.23 (0.69 – 27.3) months. 24 (36.9%) patients were identified as Responders. PFS was not significantly different between patients with IDH-MUT and IDH-WT gliomas (2.30 vs 2.07 months, p = 0.593). However, patients with OLIGO gliomas had a significantly higher PFS compared to IDH-WT gliomas (5.16 vs 2.07 months, p = 0.021). The proportion of responders was greatest in OLIGO gliomas, however, did not reach statistical significance (IDH-WT, 31.4%; IDH-MUT, 29.4%; OLIGO, 61.5%, p = 0.120). Overall PFS was not impacted by patient age, sex, and extent of initial resection. When analyses were limited to Responders, the PFS for IDH-WT, IDH-MUT and OLIGO gliomas were 5.75, 7.01 and 10.8 months, respectively ( p = 0.434). Conclusions: Patients with recurrent OLIGO gliomas may have a longer PFS with ICI therapy compared with recurrent IDH-WT and IDH-MUT gliomas. However, there is significant variability in ICI treatment efficacy between patients. Further molecular profiling is in progress to evaluate additional predictive biomarkers of response.

TPS2092 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. GBM is universally recurrent and associated with dismal outcomes. Re-irradiation (reRT) is ideal for evaluating combination therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM) due to its multifactorial mechanism of action, including downstream immunomodulatory activity. RT (especially multi-fraction) increases immunogenicity in preclinical models by promoting immune activation, immune migration, and antigen uptake. Additionally, a recent study demonstrated enhanced PD-L1 expression in the glioma tumor microenvironment (TME) following RT, and combining stereotactic RT with a PD-1 inhibitor improved survival in murine models. Retifanlimab is a humanized monoclonal anti-PD1 IgG4 antibody that received FDA approval for adults with metastatic or recurrent locally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, is a treatment for radiation necrosis/cerebral edema with less immune suppression than corticosteroids. In a previous Phase 2 study, hypofractionated RT (HFRT), retifanlimab, and bevacizumab was associated with a 9-month overall survival (OS) rate of 71.4%. To demonstrate the efficacy of this regimen compared to HFRT and bevacizumab, we have designed a new randomized controlled Phase 2 trial. We hypothesize that combination reRT with retifanlimab will produce a more robust anti-tumor immune response and improve OS compared to reRT without retifanlimab. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled Phase 2 study of retifanlimab, bevacizumab, and HFRT for adult patients with rGBM. Patients are randomized 1:1 to the experimental (bevacizumab + retifanlimab + HFRT) or control cohort (bevacizumab + HFRT). Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60, ≥ 4 months since administration of any prior bevacizumab, and dexamethasone dose ≤ 4 mg at the time of randomization. The primary endpoint is 9-month OS. Secondary endpoints include OS, progression-free survival, objective response rate, neurologic assessment by NANO criteria, and adverse events profile. Protocol treatment will continue up to two years, or until progression or intolerable toxicity. Survival follow up will continue every two months, up to four years. Seven of the planned 94 patients have been enrolled as of submission on 1/28/25. Clinical trial #: NCT06160206. Funding provided by Incyte. Clinical trial information: NCT06160206 .

Abstract Background Despite advances in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of meningioma progression and innovations in systemic and local treatments, recurrent meningiomas remain a substantial therapeutic challenge. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide a historical baseline, contemporary analysis, and propose a “rate of probable interest” to inform future clinical trial design and development on behalf of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology meningioma group. Methods PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ASCOpubs databases were screened for clinical trials evaluating the activity of systemic therapies for adults with recurrent meningiomas. The pooled progression-free survival at 6-months and 1-year (PFS-6 and PFS-1 year) values were calculated using the random effects technique with I2 indices. Results The pooled PFS-6 and PFS-1 year rates for recurrent WHO grade 1 meningiomas were 43.6% (95% CI: 22.7-67.0%, I2 = 80%) and 21.7% (95% CI: 6.2-53.9%, I2 = 76%), and for grades 2-3 meningiomas, the PFS-6 was 38.0% (95% CI: 28.3-48.8%, I2 = 68%). In the targeted therapy group, PFS-6 and PFS-1 year rates stood at 62.0% (I2 = 58%) and 49.0% (I2 = 63%) for grade 1, while for grades 2-3 tumors, the PFS-6 rates with targeted therapy and immunotherapy were 42.1% (I² = 60%) and 46.0% (I² = 0%), respectively. The benchmarks were set at 67% and 54% for PFS-6 and PFS-1 year for grade 1 tumors, and PFS-6 of 49% for grades 2-3 tumors. Conclusions Several studies have reported outcomes in patients with recurrent meningiomas testing a variety of agents with modest, but variable and progressively increasing activity. In this context, we recommend new benchmarks for future trials to define efficacy of future investigational therapies.

Importance Molecular techniques, including next-generation sequencing, genomic copy number profiling, fusion transcript detection, and genomic DNA methylation arrays, are now indispensable tools for the workup of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Yet there remains a great deal of heterogeneity in using such biomarker testing across institutions and hospital systems. This is in large part because there is a persistent reluctance among third-party payers to cover molecular testing. The objective of this Review is to describe why comprehensive molecular biomarker testing is now required for the accurate diagnosis and grading and prognostication of CNS tumors and, in so doing, to justify more widespread use by clinicians and coverage by third-party payers. Observations The 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for CNS tumors incorporates specific molecular signatures into the essential diagnostic criteria for most tumor entities. Many CNS tumor types cannot be reliably diagnosed according to current WHO guidelines without molecular testing. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network also incorporates molecular testing into their guidelines for CNS tumors. Both sets of guidelines are maximally effective if they are implemented routinely for all patients with CNS tumors. Moreover, the cost of these tests is less than 5% of the overall average cost of caring for patients with CNS tumors and consistently improves management. This includes more accurate diagnosis and prognostication, clinical trial eligibility, and prediction of response to specific treatments. Each major group of CNS tumors in the WHO classification is evaluated and how molecular diagnostics enhances patient care is described. Conclusions and Relevance Routine advanced multidimensional molecular profiling is now required to provide optimal standard of care for patients with CNS tumors.

Background MEDI5395 is a recombinant attenuated Newcastle disease virus engineered to express a human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor transgene. Preclinically, MEDI5395 demonstrated broad oncolytic activity, augmented by concomitant programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis blockade. Durvalumab is an anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of various solid tumors. We describe the results of the first-in-human study combining intravenous MEDI5395 with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods This phase I, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation, dose-expansion study recruited adult patients with advanced solid tumors, who had relapsed or were refractory or intolerant to ≥1 prior line of standard treatment. MEDI5395 was administered intravenously as six doses over 15–18 days. The dose-escalation phase assessed four-dose levels (108, 109, 1010, 1011 focus forming units (FFU)) of MEDI5395, with sequential or delayed durvalumab. Durvalumab 1500 mg was administered intravenously every 4 weeks up to 2 years. The dose-expansion phase was not initiated. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the dose and schedule of MEDI5395 plus durvalumab administration. Secondary objectives included the assessment of the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of MEDI5395. Results 39 patients were treated with MEDI5395; 36 patients also received durvalumab. All 39 patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), most commonly fatigue (61.5%), nausea (53.8%) and chills (51.3%). Grade 3–4 TEAEs occurred in 27 (69.2%) patients; these were deemed MEDI5395-related in 12 (30.8%) patients. Two patients experienced a DLT, and the maximum tolerated dose of MEDI5395 with sequential and delayed durvalumab at study termination was 1011 and 1010 FFU, respectively. Four patients (10.3%) achieved a partial response (PR). Patients with PR or stable disease tended to have higher baseline PD-L1 and CD8+ levels in their tumor tissue. A tendency to dose-dependent pharmacokinetics of the viral genome was observed in whole blood and a tendency to dose-dependent viral shedding was observed in saliva and urine. Neutralizing antibodies were observed in all patients but did not appear to impact efficacy negatively. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of MEDI5395 with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registration number NCT03889275

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with meningiomas that have progressed after surgery and/or radiation have limited treatments. Loss of NF2 and CDKN2A/B are common in higher-grade meningiomas and promote meningioma progression. We evaluated the efficacy of abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, as part of Alliance A071401, a genomically-driven phase II trial in recurrent or progressive meningiomas. METHODS Eligible patients (pts) with grade 2/3 tumors and NF2 mutations or CDK pathway alterations were treated with abemaciclib 200 mg orally twice daily. Two co-primary endpoints were used: progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and response rate (RR); the trial would be declared positive if either endpoint was met. Twenty-four evaluable pts provided ≥85% power to detect a PFS6 ≥41.5% (vs. null 15%; alpha=0.02), and ≥89% power to detect RR ≥20% (vs. null 2.5%; alpha=0.021). RESULTS Of 83 pts screened while the abemaciclib arm was open between September 15, 2021 and October 3, 2022, 36 eligible pts received abemaciclib. The observed PFS6 rate in the first 24 evaluable pts was 54% (95% CI 33-75%), thus the study met PFS6 endpoint. Of all 35 evaluable pts, median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 3.6-17.1 months), estimated 6-month PFS was 55% (95% CI 40-75%) and estimated 6-month OS was 88% (95% CI 77-100%). No objective responses were observed. Of the 36 pts who started treatment, two had a grade 4 adverse event at least possibly related to treatment which included ALT elevation(1), AST elevation(1) and vomiting(1). Patients with NF2 alterations (n=24) had favorable PFS6 outcomes (58%, 95% CI 37-78%) compared to those with CDK (n=4, 25%, 95% CI 1-81%) and CDK+NF2 alterations (n=7, 29% 95% CI 4-71%), (Fisher’s Exact p=0.036). CONCLUSIONS Abemaciclib was well-tolerated and resulted in improved PFS6, meeting the trial’s co-primary endpoint. Abemaciclib warrants further investigation for the treatment of patients with progressive meningiomas.

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with meningiomas who have progressed after multimodal treatments face a significant shortage of viable therapeutic options. Recent advancements in the molecular understanding of meningiomas have identified the FAK and RAF/MEK signaling pathways as potential promising targets for progressive meningiomas. METHODS In vitro, we tested two human meningioma cell lines, IOMM-Lee (NF2 wild-type and CDKN2A loss) and CH157-MN (NF2 mutant). The cells were plated in Matrigel-coated wells, treated with defactinib (FAK inhibitor), VS-6766 (RAF/MEK inhibitor, avutometinib) and the combination over a 7-day period and assessed for cell viability using the CellTiter-Glo 3D assay. In vivo, we tested the efficacy of the FAK inhibitor VS-4718 (possessing favorable pharmacokinetic properties in mice) and RAF/MEK inhibitor VS-6766, both given daily via oral gavage, in athymic nude mice bearing IOMM-Lee or CH157-MN tumors. RESULTS In the matrigel assay, VS-6766 suppressed IOMM-Lee and CH157-MN cells in a dose dependent manner. The drug combination was mostly additive in IOMM-Lee cells. However, CH157-MN cells showed a strong synergistic response across all drug concentrations tested. In the IOMM-Lee flank tumor model, VS-4718 alone had no effect, while VS-6766 alone or in combination significantly reduced tumor growth and extended median survival from 25 days to 47 days (p < 0.05). In the CH157 flank tumor model, VS-4718 monotherapy did not affect tumor growth or survival, but VS-6766 monotherapy slowed tumor growth and increased median survival from 10 days to 31 days (p < 0.001). Combining both drugs further reduced tumor growth and extended median survival to 42 days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Treatment with FAK and RAF/MEK inhibitors showed synergistic or combination effects in the NF2 mutant CH157-MN model in vitro and in vivo. RAF/MEK inhibitor monotherapy was effective for the IOMM-Lee model (NF2 wild-type), without clear benefit of combining with the FAK inhibitor. Investigations in intracranial tumor models are underway.

Importance The prognosis for patients with glioblastoma is poor following standard therapy with surgical resection, radiation, temozolomide, and tumor-treating fields. Objectives To evaluate the combination of veliparib and temozolomide in glioblastoma based on preclinical data demonstrating significant chemosensitizing effects of the polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase 1/2 inhibitor veliparib when combined with temozolomide. Design, Setting, and Participants Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with MGMT promoter hypermethylation who had completed concomitant radiation and temozolomide were enrolled between December 15, 2014, and December 15, 2018, in this Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trial. The data for this analysis were locked on April 21, 2023. Interventions Patients were randomized and treated with standard adjuvant temozolomide (150-200 mg/m 2 orally, days 1-5) combined with either placebo or veliparib (40 mg orally, twice daily, days 1-7) for 6 cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point for the phase 3 portion of the trial was overall survival (OS). Results There were 322 patients randomized during the phase 2 accrual period and an additional 125 patients randomized to complete the phase 3 accrual, for a total of 447 patients in the final phase 3 analysis. The median (range) age for patients was 60 (20-85) years and 190 patients (42.5%) were female. The median OS was 24.8 months (90% CI, 22.6-27.7) for the placebo arm and 28.1 months (90% CI, 24.3-33.3) for the veliparib arm ( P = .17). The difference in survival did not meet the prespecified efficacy end point. However, there was a separation of the survival curves that favored the veliparib arm over 24 to 48 months of follow-up. The experimental combination was well tolerated with an acceptable elevation in grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance This trial found that adding veliparib to adjuvant temozolomide did not significantly extend OS in patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT -hypermethylated glioblastoma. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02152982

2071 Background: Brigimadlin (BI 907828) is a potent small molecule inhibitor of the p53-MDM2 pathway currently in a phase 0/1 clinical trial in combination with radiotherapy in newly diagnosed MGMTunmethylated glioblastoma (GBM). To inform development of brigimadlin for GBM, we developed a pharmacokinetic (PK)/ pharmacodynamic (PD)/ efficacy model using GBM patient derived xenografts (PDXs). Methods: Brigimadlin PK parameters were evaluated in FVB wild-type and knockout (Mdr1a/b-/-Bcrp1-/-) mice and in athymic nude mice. Drug binding was measured by rapid equilibrium dialysis, and drug levels quantified by LC/MS-MS. Dose-response relationships were evaluated in subcutaneous and orthotopic PDXs across a range of doses. Response to brigimadlin (2 mg/kg weekly) +/- RT (2 Gy x 10 fractions) was evaluated in orthotopic PDXs. Results: Brigimadlin significantly delayed median time to regrowth of GBM108 ( MDM2amplified) subcutaneous tumors (vs. placebo; p<0.05) at dose levels of 0.25 mg/kg (1.3-fold), 0.5 mg/kg (1.5-fold), 1 mg/kg (2.6-fold), and 2 mg/kg (5.3-fold). A single dose of brigimadlin resulted in corresponding intra-tumoral drug levels 24 hours post-dose: 84 nM (0.25 mg/kg), 175 nM (0.5 mg/kg), 398 nM (1 mg/kg) and 924 nM (2 mg/kg) and dose-dependent upregulation of p53 target genes (p21 and PUMA). In contrast, GBM14 ( MDM2non-amplified) showed regrowth delay (1.6-fold) only at 2 mg/kg (p=0.008). Brigimadlin was highly bound (fraction unbound = 0.0006 in brain; 0.0017 in GBM tumor tissue), and CNS distribution was limited by efflux; in wild-type mice Kp,uu_brain = 0.002 ± 0.003; in Mdr1a/b-/-Bcrp1-/- mice Kp,uu = 0.043 ± 0.025. Efficacy of brigimadlin was compared in orthotopic GBM108 PDXs grown in athymic nude mice vs. immuno/efflux-deficient (Rag2-/-Mdr1a-/-Bcrp1-/-) mice. In nude mice, median survival was extended at 2 mg/kg brigimadlin (1.4-fold, p=0.009), with corresponding intra-tumoral drug levels of 29 nM. In efflux deficient mice, median survival was extended (p<0.05) at 0.25 mg/kg (1.5-fold), 0.5 mg/kg (1.5-fold), 1 mg/kg (1.8-fold), and 2 mg/kg (>4-fold). Measurement of intra-tumoral drug levels is in progress. In combination with RT in GBM108, brigimadlin (2 mg/kg x 2 weeks) extended median survival vs. vehicle (66 vs. 50 days; p=0.012) and enhanced median survival following RT (128.5 vs. 82 days; p=0.009). In GBM14, 2 mg/kg brigimadlin (2 mg/kg x 12 weeks) extended median survival (39.5 vs. 32.5 days; p=0.0004) and enhanced survival following RT (97 vs. 81 days; p<0.0001). Conclusions: Efficacy of brigimadlin is dependent on adequate CNS delivery. Studies in subcutaneous PDX demonstrated intra-tumoral total drug levels in the mid-nanomolar range provide meaningful tumor effects in a highly sensitive, MDM2 amplified PDX. In orthotopic PDXs with and without MDM2 amplification, brigimadlin provided further benefit in combination with RT. These data support ongoing clinical evaluation of brigimadlin in GBM.

2017 Background: MDM2 inhibits tumor suppressor p53. Brigimadlin, a potent MDM2–p53 antagonist, restores wild-type (wt) p53 function and has shown early efficacy in pts with solid tumors (LoRusso et al Cancer Disc 2023). GBM is an area of unmet need with 5-year survival <10%. In p53 wt GBM pt-derived xenograft models, brigimadlin promotes tumor cell apoptosis and extends survival in combination with RT. Methods: NCT05376800 is a Ph 0/Ia open-label, single-arm trial that aims to measure brigimadlin concentration in brain tumor tissue in pts with histologically or radiologically newly diagnosed GBM eligible for resection (Ph 0) and determine the maximum tolerated dose of brigimadlin plus RT in pts with TP53wt, IDH wt, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM (Ph Ia). In Ph 0, pts received one brigimadlin dose (30 mg or 45 mg) ~12–24 h before resection. Ph 0 primary endpoints are the measured total concentration and the calculated unbound concentration of brigimadlin in brain tissue homogenate from non-contrast enhancing (NCE) and contrast enhancing (CE) regions. The predefined threshold for trial continuation is 0.5 nmol/L (corresponding to IC50 in GBM cell lines) unbound brigimadlin in CE samples in ≥50% of pts. Brigimadlin concentration was measured using LC/MS and corrected for amount of brigimadlin in residual blood. Unbound concentration was calculated using an in vitro estimate of unbound fraction (fu): 0.654% (rat brain slice). fu in human plasma was 0.22%. Kp,uu (ratio of unbound concentration in brain vs plasma) was calculated. Biomarker testing was performed. Results: Data are available for 11 pts (brigimadlin 30 mg: n=6; 45 mg: n=5). In the 30 mg group, median total brigimadlin concentration in NCE samples was 267 nmol/L (4 samples, range 86–316 nmol/L) and 332 nmol/L (6 samples, range 272–952 nmol/L) in CE samples. In the 45 mg group, median total brigimadlin concentration in NCE samples was 197 nmol/L (5 samples, range 140–347 nmol/L) and 603 nmol/L (5 samples, range 441–905 nmol/L) in CE samples. Unbound concentration exceeded the 0.5 nmol/L threshold in most cases (Table). Post-brigimadlin, an increase in selected p53 target gene expression was observed in CE vs NCE tissue. Conclusions: Unbound brigimadlin concentrations in CE regions in all pts receiving the low dose of 30 mg brigimadlin exceeded the 0.5 nmol/L threshold. Kp,uu in most patients was close to 1 in CE regions. Biomarker data support target engagement in brain tissue. Our findings support continued investigation of brigimadlin in GBM. Recruitment is ongoing. Updated data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT05376800 . [Table: see text]