Citations

Purpose: To systematically review the literature on the effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of genicular artery embolization (GAE) for knee joint osteoarthritis (OA) associated pain. Materials and Methods: After registering the protocol with the PROSPERO database, a search was conducted from inception until July 31, 2023, in MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ScienceDirect databases to gather studies evaluating GAE’s safety and efficacy in knee OA. A total of 4979 studies were identified and evaluated against the inclusion criteria. Data on study characteristics, success parameters, and adverse events were collected and synthesized. Results: Twenty-three studies, primarily single-center prospective studies with a total of 657 patients, were included. Most studies reported a 100% technical success rates, except one study reporting a rate of 84.2%. Clinical success rates, defined variably across studies, ranged from 30% to 100%, depending on the study’s follow-up period and outcome measures. The most frequent adverse events included skin discoloration without an ulcer (15.6%, n = 98) and transient post-procedural knee pain (10.2%, n = 64). Most studies were rated as fair in terms of quality, but the lack of robust randomized controlled trials highlighted the need for further comparative studies to standardize outcome reporting. Conclusion: GAE appears to be a promising option for knee OA pain, particularly for patients unresponsive to conservative treatments or ineligible for surgery. High-quality studies are needed to confirm long-term effectiveness and standardize outcome measures. Clinical Impact This study highlights the safety and efficacy of genicular artery embolization as a minimally invasive treatment for knee osteoarthritis, particularly in patients who are unresponsive to conservative treatments or unsuitable for surgery. By targeting neovascularization and reducing inflammation, genicular artery embolization provides pain relief and functional improvement. Clinicians can consider genicular artery embolization as an alternative to surgery for mild-to-moderate OA, offering a lower adverse event rate and faster recovery.

Obesity affects approximately 72 million Americans and is a significant contributor to ischemic heart disease (IHD). Given the scarcity of data, this observational study examines trends and disparities in IHD-related mortality among obese individuals in the United States from 2003 to 2019 using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research data. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were calculated for IHD as the underlying cause of death and obesity as a contributing cause of death, revealing an increase in IHD-related mortality among obese adults. AAMR rose from 2.1 in 2003 to 3.9 in 2019, with higher rates in men, non-Hispanic Black individuals, the elderly, and those in nonmetropolitan and Midwest regions. These findings underscore significant sex, racial, and regional disparities in mortality, suggesting a need for targeted health policies and resource allocation, improving overall cardiovascular health outcomes.

Background: Hypertriglyceridemia, a common lipid disorder linked to increased risks of cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome, remains a global health challenge. Traditional treatments, though widely used, often have limited efficacy and adverse effects. Olezarsen, a novel antisense oligonucleotide, targets apolipoprotein C-III and shows promise in significantly reducing triglyceride levels. Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis comparing Olezarsen with placebo in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Methods: We performed an extensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2024 to identify studies comparing Olezarsen and placebo in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, irrespective of comorbid cardiovascular disease. Effect estimates were pooled using a random-effects model and reported as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and standard mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each. Results: Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 334 participants were included. Olezarsen significantly reduced triglyceride levels at 6 months (SMD: -1.69; 95% CI -2.22 to -1.17; P < 0.00001; Figure ) and 12 months (SMD: -1.64; 95% CI -2.22 to -1.07; P < 0.00001; Figure ). VLDL levels also decreased at 6 months (SMD: -1.95; 95% CI -2.38 to -1.51; P < 0.00001) and 12 months (SMD: -0.83; 95% CI -1.13 to -0.53; P < 0.00001). Lipid profile improvements included reductions in total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apoB levels, with increases in HDL cholesterol and apoA-1. Adverse events were comparable between Olezarsen and placebo, although serious adverse events were significantly higher in the Olezarsen group (RR: 2.55; 95% CI 1.17 to 5.58; p = 0.02). Conclusion: Olezarsen demonstrates significant efficacy in reducing triglyceride and VLDL levels while improving overall lipid profiles in hypertriglyceridemia patients. Despite higher rates of serious adverse events, its overall safety profile remains acceptable.

Background: Del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) has extensively been used for pediatric population undergoing cardiac surgery. However, its use in adult cardiac surgeries have been limited thus, its benefits are not yet fully known. This analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of DNC versus any other type of cardioplegia in adult patients who are undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from database inception till March 2023, and moderate to high-quality randomized controlled trials were included which compared DNC to other cardioplegia. The primary outcome was postoperative stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary outcomes included spontaneous rhythm return, postoperative myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, postoperative atrial fibrillation, defibrillation after coronary reperfusion, postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump, postoperative kidney injury, postoperative low cardiac output syndrome, inotropic support, cardiopulmonary bypass time, cross-clamp time, blood transfusion, cardioplegia volume, hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation stay, postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, and cardiac markers. Results: In this meta-analysis, 13 studies were included with a patient population of 2207. Stroke and/or TIA studies (risk ratio [RR]: 0.54, 95% CI [0.29, 1.00]) and all-cause mortality studies (RR: 1.30, 95% CI [0.66, 2.56]) were insignificant. From the secondary outcomes, spontaneous rhythm return (RR: 1.58, 95% CI [1.02, 2.45]), defibrillation after coronary reperfusion (RR: 0.49, 95% CI [0.30, 0.79]), inotropic support (RR: 0.70, 95% CI [0.57, 0.85]), composite risk of stroke and/or TIA and/or acute kidney injury and mortality (RR: 0.72, 95% CI [0.53, 0.99]), cross-clamp time (mean difference [MD]: −6.01, 95% CI [−11.14, −0.89]), blood transfusion (RR: 0.73, 95% CI [0.60, 0.90]), cardioplegia volume (MD: −537.17, 95% CI [−758.89, −315.45]), troponin T (MD: −1.71, 95% CI [−2.11, −1.32]), creatine phosphokinase-MB (MD: −2.96, 95% CI [−5.84, −0.07]) were significant. Whereas all other secondary outcomes were found to be insignificant. Conclusion: No significant difference was observed between patients undergoing Del Nido administration in comparison to other cardioplegia solutions for the primary outcome, stroke or/and TIA.