Citations

Abstract OBJECTIVE We sought to define the mechanisms by which purines regulate DNA repair and therapy response. METHODS Phosphoproteomics was used to identify GTP-dependent (de)phosphorylation events after radiation (RT) and antibodies generated against novel sites. Animal models of glioblastoma (GBM) and normal tissues were used to assess DNA repair and treatment responses in vivo. RESULTS Pharmacogenomic inhibition of GTP (but not ATP) synthesis sensitized GBM cells to RT by inhibiting the activity of non-homologous end joining, but not homologous recombination. We found a GTP-dependent RT-induced dephosphorylation event on Abl interactor 1 (Abi-1) serine 323 (S323) using phosphoproteomics. We generated a new antibody for p-Abi-1 (S323), validated its specificity, and confirmed that RT causes a GTP-dependent dephosphorylation of Abi-1 (S323). Knockout of Abi-1 slowed RT-induced double-strand break (DSB) repair, and this was rescued by re-expression of dephosphomimetic Abi-1 (S323A) but not phosphomimetic Abi-1 (S323D). Abi-1 canonically binds to G protein Rac1. Expression of constitutively active Rac1 promoted but dominant negative Rac1 blocked the dephosphorylation of Abi-1 (S323) and DSB repair. Knock-down or inhibition of protein phosphatase 5 reversed the GTP- and Rac1-mediated dephosphorylation of Abi-1 and DSB repair. In GBM PDX samples, p-Abi-1 (S323) levels negatively correlated with Rac1 activity and predicted favorable efficacy of genotoxic treatments. In orthotopic GBM mouse models, inhibiting Rac1 enhanced RT responses and suppressed Abi-1 (S323) dephosphorylation. Abi-1 knockout enhanced efficacy of genotoxic treatments and could be rescued by Abi-1 S323A (but not Abi-1 S323D) re-expression. This regulation is generalizable beyond brain cancer, as GTP supplementation promoted DNA repair and p-Abi1 (S323) dephosphorylation in non-malignant cells and protected mice from RT-mediated gastrointestinal injury and bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. CONCLUSION The GTP-Rac1-PP5-Abi-1 signaling axis links metabolism and DNA repair. Disrupting this pathway can overcome GBM resistance to genotoxic therapy while augmenting it can mitigate genotoxic injury of normal tissues.

Abstract PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE We seek to establish the feasibility of using spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) allowing for spinal cord dose constraint relaxation as the primary management of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) in inoperable patients monitoring for radiation myelopathy (RM) and radiographic local control (LC). MATERIAL/METHODS Patients with radiation naïve MESCC were enrolled on this prospective Phase 1 trial. Single fraction SSRS was delivered to a dose of 18 or 24 Gy. Spinal cord constraint relaxation was performed in sequential cohorts from an initial allowable Dmax cohort of 10 Gy up to 16 Gy only if tumor progression occurred without RM. RESULTS Thirty two patients enrolled on the trial of which 4, 12, 8 and 8 were in the 10 Gy, 12 Gy, 14 Gy and 16 Gy cord Dmax cohorts, respectively. At baseline, there were 10 sites with MESCC Grade 1B, 10 sites with Grade 1C, 9 sites with Grade 2, 2 sites with Grade 1A, and 1 site with Grade 3 disease. Of the 28 evaluable patients, the median overall survival was 32.3 months (range 5.8-122.6 mo). The 1-year and 5-year LC was 84.5% and 79.5%. The 2-year LC did not statistically differ between the 14-16 Gy cord Dmax combined cohorts and the 10-12 Gy cord Dmax combined cohorts (92.9% vs. 62.9%, p = 0.15). With a median clinical follow-up of 22.7 months (range 3-122.3 mo), there were no cases of RM including in the 13 patients who survived at least 3 years. In the cohort receiving a cord Dmax of 16 Gy, there were no cases of RM with a median follow-up of 18.6 mo (range 9.0-97.1 mo). CONCLUSION With long-term follow-up, these data demonstrate that SSRS is a safe and effective tool in patients with MESCC. Cord constraint relaxation may be considered in inoperable patients with MESCC.

Abstract WSD0922-Fu is an oral, CNS-penetrant, small molecule EGFR inhibitor which potently inhibits EGFR aberrations specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high-grade astrocytoma (HGA). MC1914 (NCT04197934) is a first-in-human phase 1 trial in patients with EGFR aberrant recurrent HGA and NSCLC. Adult patients with either recurrent EGFR mutant NSCLC with CNS metastases or recurrent EGFR aberrant HGA were enrolled and treated across six cohorts (40 mg once daily to 320 mg twice daily, 28-day cycles) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). 25 patients (17 HGA, 8 NSCLC) were enrolled (median age = 57 years; 24% female; 36% ECOG 0). All patients with HGA received prior radiation and temozolomide. All patients with NSCLC had previous disease progression on EGFR inhibitor therapy (prior osimertinib 88%). The median duration of WSD0922-Fu exposure among all patients was 55 days (range 3 to >279 days) [NSCLC median = 131 days; HGA median = 51 days]. Common treatment-related adverse events are comparable to other EGFR inhibitors (fatigue, acneiform rash, diarrhea, nausea, pruritis). At Cycle 1 Day 15 for patients treated at MTD (160 mg twice daily), the mean terminal elimination half-life (%CV) in the plasma was 31.6 h (102%) (median 14.5 h). The mean Cmax, Tmax, oral clearance at steady state, and AUC (0-12 h) (%CV) were 4513 ng/mL (50%), 2.0 hr (69%), 6.9 L/hr/m2 (42%), and 28084 h*ng/mL (52%), respectively. Among patients with NSCLC treated at MTD or higher dose levels and with available response data, 100% (5/5) of patients demonstrated clinical benefit (SD + PR) while 60% of patients had partial responses. Intracranial and extracranial efficacy was concordant. Furthermore, prolonged stable disease (9 cycles) was observed in a patient with EGFRvIII mutant GBM. Expansion cohorts are in progress to optimize WSD0922-Fu dose and schedule for future phase 2 development.

Abstract BACKGROUND Dexamethasone is commonly used to manage peritumoral edema and alleviate neurologic symptoms in patients with intracranial tumors. The optimal dexamethasone dose for brain metastases is unknown and widely variable. Recent literature reports the most common regimen is 4 mg four times daily. However, the half-life of dexamethasone is 35-54 hours, suggesting that such frequent dosing may be unnecessary. We explored the dose-effect relationship of dexamethasone on brain metastases patient outcomes to improve quality of care. METHODS We retrospectively identified 100 patients (1/1/2016 – 12/31/2022) with brain metastases who were treated with dexamethasone and had adequate follow-up. All patients received standard oncologic care including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or surgical intervention. We evaluated the association between dexamethasone dosing regimens (< 4 mg twice daily versus > 4 mg three times daily), clinical outcomes (performance status, clinical and radiographic response to corticosteroids, survival), and dexamethasone adverse effects during the acute presentation and at first neuro-oncologic follow-up. RESULTS Seventy-two patients received less frequent dexamethasone dosing (< 4 mg twice daily), while 28 received more frequent dexamethasone dosing (> 4 mg three times daily). Patients with higher frequency dexamethasone dosing were more likely to have radiographic evidence of midline shift (p < 0.001), compression of ventricles (p < 0.001), and herniation (p = 0.0020) at presentation. Those with more frequent dosing more often demonstrated radiographic response to dexamethasone (67.9% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.0323), but there were no differences in symptomatic improvement, Karnofsky Performance Status, seizure reduction, survival, or the frequency of adverse events (e.g., hyperglycemia, hypertension, infection, psychosis) between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that for most patients with brain metastases, less frequent dexamethasone dosing may lead to clinical outcomes that are similar to those patients who received more frequent dosing. However, higher doses of dexamethasone can be considered for those with more concerning radiologic features.

Abstract Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is emerging as an abundant source of candidate biomarkers, including proteins, for gliomas. Longitudinal CSF access may enable insights into treatment response and resistance. To that end, we have established a growing biobank of CSF samples, many of which have been obtained longitudinally via CSF access devices, such as Ommaya reservoirs, through our ongoing biomarker discovery clinical trials (NCT04692337, 04692324). We have previously presented our initial data demonstrating a conserved proteomic signature of HGG that decreased with resection and increased with recurrence. Since then, samples have been acquired throughout individual patients’ treatment course toward our goal of identifying CSF-derived biomarkers of treatment response. CSF samples obtained prior to, during, and throughout treatment underwent global proteomics analysis via the SomaScan® assay by Somalogic. Fold-changes for each protein were calculated between different timepoints and ranked for each comparison of interest. Treatment with pembrolizumab alone results in increased IL-23 (5.01x), IL-12 (4.25x), lymphocyte activation gene 3 protein (LAG3) (3.26x), and granzyme A (2.93x), suggesting potential for combination with multiple agents. Chemoradiation, with or without pembrolizumab, consistently downregulated NAD kinase, acetyl CoA transferase, and Bcl-2 and upregulated proteins related to neuronal signaling, such as neurexins and cerebellins, in addition to LAG-3, suggesting potential for synergy between chemoradiation and anti-LAG-3 antibodies currently in clinical trials. Interestingly, pembrolizumab and chemoradiation decreased MMP-12 and MMP-9 abundance as compared to chemoradiation alone (0.25x vs. 18.5x; 0.54x vs. 4.99x). Finally, bevacizumab treatment consistently increased VEGF-A (7.32x), VEGF-B (2.21x), and MMP-3 (2.99x) abundance, while decreasing the presence of our previously reported plasma-associated protein signature in CSF. In conclusion, the global CSF proteome can be longitudinally accessed to evaluate response to standard-of-care and experimental therapies. Further studies are ongoing to identify signatures of therapeutic resistance and to assess the impact of novel immunotherapeutic combinations on the CSF proteome.

Abstract BACKGROUND In GBM, effective chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy remains a challenge; immunosuppressive components within the tumor microenvironment (TME) inhibit CART cells. EphA3 is a receptor tyrosine kinase with low expression in adult tissues but is highly expressed in tumor neovasculature and tumor stromal cells in GBM and other solid tumors. METHODS We performed RNA sequencing and Immunohistochemical staining for of EphA3 in a clinically annotated GBM PDX biobank and M01 M1 and M2 polarized macrophages. We then investigated the suppressive capability of M2 macrophage on EphA3-CART in an SNB-19 GBM cell co-culture. We tested the antiantitumor potential of EphA3-CART against luciferase+ SNB-19 GBM cells in vivo with flank and orthotopically engrafted NOD-SCID-ɣ-/- (NSG) mice. Engraftment was confirmed by bioluminescent imaging (BLI) and vernier caliber (flank) for 7-14 days post-injection. Mice were randomized to be treated with EphA3-CART or untransduced T-cells (UTD). Subsequently tumor size and mouse survival was monitored to determine the antitumor effect. RESULTS EphA3 was highly expressed on GBM PDX models as well as M2 macrophages. Compared to M0 and M1 macrophages, M2 macrophages significantly suppressed EphA3-CART However, despite the suppressive activity of the M2 macrophage, EphA3-CART exhibited significant antitumor activity . In both flank and orthotopically implanted mouse models, there was an observed reduction in tumor volume with EphA3-CART treated model compared to the UTD counterpart. EphA3-CART treatment resulted in significantly improved survival of the treated models compared to UTD models (hazard ratio = 0.053 **p = 0.005). CONCLUSION We demonstrate that EphA3 is expressed on GBM cells as well as on M2 macrophages. EphA3 CART is able to overcome and ameliorate the effect of a major component of the tumor microenvironment (TME), M2 macrophages. EphA3 CART appears effective in flank and orthotopic mouse models of GBM.

Abstract PURPOSE For large brain metastases, it is unknown whether single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS) or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) is optimal. We aimed to compare rates of local progression and necrosis between sSRS and fSRS for large brain metastases. METHODS Patients with intact or resected brain metastases with a target volume ≥ 4.2 cc (corresponding to a diameter ≥ 2 cm) treated with Gamma Knife (GK) or linear accelerator-based SRS from 2014-2022 were included in this retrospective review. RESULTS A total of 343 large brain metastases in 276 patients were included; 171 lesions were treated with sSRS (96% with GK) and 172 lesions with fSRS (100% with linear accelerator). Median lesion volume was 19.8 cc and 8.4 cc for fSRS and sSRS, respectively. Resection was performed prior to SRS in 228 (66%), with the remaining 115 metastases treated intact. There was no difference in rate of local progression between sSRS versus fSRS, or between resected versus intact targets (p >0.8 for both). Cumulative incidence of local progression (with death as a competing risk) at 1 and 3 years for patients receiving sSRS was 24% and 30%, respectively, compared to 22% and 34% for fSRS. FSRS was associated with significantly higher rates of necrosis than sSRS (HR 5.58, 2.38-13.08, p < 0.001). This association remained significant after controlling for target volume. Cumulative incidence of necrosis (with death as a competing risk) at 1 and 3 years for patients receiving sSRS was 1% and 3%, respectively, compared to 10% and 18% for fSRS. Necrosis rates were significantly higher with fSRS for both intact and resected targets (P < 0.02 for both). CONCLUSION While local control for large resected or intact brain metastases appears similar after sSRS or fSRS, this retrospective study shows higher rates of necrosis after fSRS. Prospective validation is needed.

Abstract Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by a germline mutation in the TP53 gene that confers an increased risk of developing cancers, including brain tumors. There is continued need to understand how LFS diagnosis impacts clinical management and outcomes of gliomas. We report the clinical course of two patients from our Neuro-Oncology. Patient 1 is a male who was diagnosed with a low-grade astrocytoma, IDH1 mutant at age 20 status post gross total resection. Given radiographic concern for tumor progression, he underwent re-resection 8 years later. Pathology showed gliosis with TP53-mutant cells. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was positive a germline TP53 mutation, consistent with LFS. He is currently in surveillance 12 years after diagnosis without need for radiation or chemotherapy. Patient 2 is a female who was diagnosed with glioblastoma, IDH wildtype, MGMT promoter unmethylated at age 40. She was asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis as the tumor was found during routine screening. She underwent gross total resection, radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. She is now 5 years from last treatment without recurrence. These cases illustrate the clinical spectrum of glioma in LFS. Both patients have had prolonged periods of survival without progression, even accounting for respective tumor type. Patient 1 was only diagnosed with LFS after radiographic concerns for progression. Using NGS to diagnosis LFS was clinically important, as previous reports have shown greater propensity for malignant transformation of low-grade glioma in LFS. Patient 2 was diagnosed with glioblastoma during screening and has had no recurrence. This highlights the value of early diagnosis and treatment of gliomas in patients with LFS, even if asymptomatic at discovery. Further research is needed to understand the clinical spectrum of glioma in LFS and to optimize the care of this unique patient population.

Abstract BACKGROUND Dexamethasone is commonly used for symptomatic management in primary central nervous lymphoma (PCNSL). The optimal dosing scheme for dexamethasone is unknown and practice patterns widely vary among clinicians. In this study, we explored the dose-effect relationship of dexamethasone on PCNSL outcomes to better influence quality care for these patients. METHODS We retrospectively identified 24 Mayo Clinic patients (1/1/2018 – 12/31/2022) with pathologically confirmed PCNSL who received dexamethasone. All patients otherwise received standard oncologic care including methotrexate-based systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The association between dexamethasone dosing regimens and clinical outcomes (performance status, clinical and radiographic response, survival) in addition to potential adverse effects were evaluated in the acute phase of presentation and at first post-treatment oncology follow up. RESULTS Nine patients received less frequent dexamethasone dosing (4 mg twice daily or less), while 15 received more frequent dexamethasone dosing (4 mg four times daily). Fourteen patients received dexamethasone prior to biopsy, 2 of which (1 in each cohort) had a non-diagnostic biopsy and required a second procedure 3 weeks to 3 months later to confirm PCNSL diagnosis. There were no statistically significant differences in time to diagnosis from presentation or clinical and radiographic improvement including Karnofsky Performance Status, reduction in seizures, or survival between the two cohorts. Additionally, there were no differences in the frequency of adverse events (e.g., hyperglycemia, hypertension, infection, psychosis) between the two dosing regimens. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that more frequent dexamethasone dosing is not associated with better clinical outcomes in the symptomatic management of PCNSL. Twice daily or less frequent dosing can be considered without compromising patient outcomes.

Abstract Clinical management of IDH wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) and tumefactive multiple sclerosis (tMS) is drastically different. GBM requires maximal safe resection followed by chemoradiation, while tMS outcome is worsened by surgery and radiotherapy. Misdiagnosis of brain lesions may expose patients to unnecessary anxiety, surgery, or radiotherapy. Noninvasive methods to help with accurate diagnosis of tumor and non-tumor etiologies are needed. tMS subjects were identified by the Mayo Clinic Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology (CMSAN). GBM subjects were matched to tMS by age at diagnosis, index MRI date, and sex. Inclusion criteria included one cm minimal lesion size and pre-operative post-contrast T1 and T2 images available for analysis. To identify potential experimental design bias, MRI technology and clinical characteristics were compared across groups. A 3D-DenseNet121 was used to develop a classification model using prespecified parameters: 600 epochs, batch size 16, learning rate 10-3, cross entropy loss, and AdamW optimizer. The stopping rule was defined as three sequential epoch cross entropy loss < 0.02. Five-fold cross validation (CV) was utilized to obtain an unbiased estimate of predictive performance (overfitting) and sensitivity of the 3D-DenseNet121 algorithm was evaluated. 224 subjects (114 GBM, 110 tMS) were analyzed: 40% male, median age 46. After one round of CV, the average unbiased estimate of sensitivity and specificity for predicting GBM from the final classification model was 0.86 and 0.73, respectively. To assess the reproducibility of the deep learning algorithm (3D-DenseNet121), the exact same CV folds were rerun resulting in average sensitivity and specificity of 0.82 and 0.75, respectively. Obtaining unbiased estimates of model performance using internal validation is critical before evaluating a final model on an external dataset. Understanding sensitivity of a deep learning algorithm is important for model validity. Differentiation of GBM and tMS appears reasonable with MRI; external validation is in progress.