Citations

Abstract Background: Up to 68% of patients will experience CIPN. There are no FDA or ASCO recommended therapies. The pain (P), numbness (N), and tingling (T) can persist for month, years or even lifetime. Duloxetine reduces pain scores by 0.6-1.0 on the 0-10 scale but does not help N or T. Scrambler therapy (ST) is a novel form of neuromodulation that uses EKG electrodes on the dermatomes to capture the pain c-fiber receptors, and generate an action potential of “non-pain” information to replace the pain information. It appears to reset central sensitization by altering cerebral blood flow and re-establishing the balance of neuropeptides (e.g., NGF, GDNGF) in the blood (Smith et al NEJM 2023). Yet many professionals and patients are unaware of it. Methods: We reviewed all available studies. Results: Smith et al (2010, VCU) noted a 59% P reduction (5.8 to 2.4 at the end of 10 days (P<0.0001)) in 16 subjects, and 4 had 0 pain at day 10. Pachman et al (2015, Mayo) in 37 subjects showed a 53% P reduction by day 10; a 44% reduction in T; and a 37% reduction in N. In a randomized trial of 50 patients using ST versus TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), Loprinzi et al (2020, Mayo), in a randomized trial, showed more than twice as many ST patients reported a 50% improvement (36-56%) vs. TENS (16-28%). At 8 weeks the reductions were important: 33%P, 28%N, 41%T. In a subsequent crossover trial (Childs 2021) of the TENS patients to ST, 6 of 12 ST patients achieved a 50% reduction in P and T. Smith et al (2021 Hopkins) did a randomized sham-controlled trial with 35 patients but observed no lasting effect; in retrospect, the electrodes and electrode placement were incorrect in this trial. Abdi et al (2024, MDACC) did a Phase II trial of ST in 10 patients and found symptoms of N, T, trouble walking, and disturbed sleep had significant improvements at 6 months. Worst pain was reduced at 6 months by 3 points. Pain medication use decreased by 70% at the end of treatment and by 42% at 6 months. Patient satisfaction was high (82%) and no adverse events with ST treatment were reported. Wang Z. et al (Hopkins, unpublished data 2025) showed a 60% reduction in pain (6.2 to 2) in twelve subjects, with one achieving complete remission. Strouse et al (2025, UCLA) will soon report similar results in over 60 patients. Wang E. et al (2023, Hopkins) reviewed 1152 patients treated with ST and found just 3 adverse events: one hematoma and two red spots under the EKG electrodes. The only other therapy that reduces all the symptoms of CIPN is spinal cord stimulation (Gupta 2024) but that is invasive, expensive, and can cause a multitude of adverse events. Conclusions: Scrambler Therapy is a safe and effective treatment for the P, N, and T of CIPN with rare and minimal side effects in a syndrome with no other effective treatment. It is hindered by reimbursement ($32/30 minutes, the same as TENS even though the technology is completely different). Scrambler Therapy should become more available in the future. Citation Format: Z. Wang, C. L. Loprinzi, S. Abdi, T. B. Strouse, T. J. Smith. Scrambler Therapy: a safe and effective way to treat chemo-induced neuropathy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-02-17.

Abstract Advancements in the understanding of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have transformed patient care, leading to the development of novel targeted therapies. Traditionally, patient fitness for treatment was based on the tolerability of chemoimmunotherapy such as fludarabine–cyclophosphamide–rituximab. As the CLL patient population is predominantly older, age has historically been a major factor in how a physician selects a patient's treatment. However, as a patient's fitness goes beyond age, the definition of patient fitness should also evolve. Here, we provide suggestions for the current best practice on assessing fitness for treating CLL. Considerations for treatment include assessment of polypharmacy, history of infections, cardiovascular and renal comorbidities, functional status, cognitive and psychological status, nutritional status, and social support. The flow of assessments can start with a typical clinical evaluation followed by geriatric, cardiovascular, and renal reviews, if needed, and include collecting a patient's full history to evaluate their risk of complications with specific CLL treatments. The severity of a patient's cardiovascular profile can range from low to high risk; for those at high risk, collaboration with a cardiologist is recommended. Geriatric assessment is advised to determine baseline frailty and resilience to tolerate treatments, to avoid inappropriate treatment or undertreating patients based on chronological age, and to align the patient's fitness status with the most optimal treatment. Continuous monitoring and assessment, regardless of therapy, are recommended. Patient preferences are also integral to this decision‐making process. Looking beyond a patient's age and basing treatment selection on their fitness is key in the new era of treatment in CLL.

Abstract Few prospective benchmark studies exist to characterize the evolving contemporary real-world practice for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). We report the patterns of first-line care and outcomes for 720 patients with systemic PTCL enrolled in 2 related prospective cohort studies, Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) from 2015 to 2020 and Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) from 2002 to 2015, both followed to 2024. The primary end points were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox regression model. Secondary end points included correlations of clinical and treatment factors with survival. The most common induction regimens were CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) based (70%), given as CHOP (36%), CHOP plus etoposide (23%), or CHOP-like plus novel agents (11.5%, including 5% BV-CHP [brentuximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone]). Consolidative autologous stem cell transplant was performed in 102 patients (14%). Within nodal PTCL, EFS and OS were adversely associated with International Prognostic Index 2 to 5, prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma score 1 to 4, and non–anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) subtypes. Within LEO, which captured increasing first-line etoposide and brentuximab vedotin, adding etoposide to CHOP was associated with better OS in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative ALCL. BV-CHP showed a trend toward OS improvement in ALCL. Patients failing EFS6 and EFS24 had 5-year subsequent OS of 12% and 17%, respectively. The inferior outcomes in non-ALCL subtypes and patients failing EFS6 and EFS24 highlight unmet needs with CHOP-based induction, where clinical trials with targeted therapy should be prioritized. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02736357.

Abstract Objectives: In the RadComp randomized trial, we compared radiation dose to cardiac substructures in patients treated with proton versus photon radiation therapy (RT) ; evaluated changes in cardiac-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes from baseline to 6 months following RT; and determined associations between radiation dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters and changes in cardiac-specific HRQOL. Methods: The study cohort included patients with locally advanced breast cancer enrolled on RadComp who completed treatment per protocol, had available radiation DVH metrics for all cardiac substructures, and completed both the baseline and at least one follow-up cardiac-specific HRQOL over the 6 months post-RT. Cardiac-specific HRQOL measures included PROMIS fatigue, PRO-CTCAE shortness of breath (SOB) (severity and interference with daily activities), and PRO-CTCAE chest pain, chest tightness, and angina (frequency, severity, and interference). Detailed dose volume histograms (DVH) for cardiac substructures included the whole heart, left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), left atrium (LA), right atrium (RA), and left anterior descending artery (LAD) were derived. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare dose distributions between photon and proton RT. Associations between DVH metrics and HRQOL outcomes were evaluated using repeated-measures linear regression via generalized estimating equations with an independent working correlation structure. All models were adjusted for RT type, age, cardiovascular risk factors, surgery type, laterality, ethnicity, education, timepoint, and race. Additional stratified analyses was performed according to laterality (right versus left + bilateral). Results: Across 1160 RadComp participants, RT exposure to cardiac substructures differed significantly between proton and photon RT and by laterality. Median mean heart dose was lower with protons, 0.9 Gy (Q1, Q3 0.49, 1.46), compared to photons 2.83 Gy (Q1, Q3 1.49, 4.52) (p< 0.001), and lower for right-sided disease, 0.91 Gy (Q1, Q3 0.44, 1.55), compared to left and bilateral 1.99 Gy (Q1, Q3 1.11, 3.63) (p<0.001). Similarly, for the LAD, LA, LV, and RA, mean proton dose was significantly lower (p<0.001). However, for the whole heart, RA, and RV, maximum doses to small-volume parameters and dose to 0.03cc were higher with proton RT. PRO-CTCAE measures of HRQOL were generally favorable at all timepoints across all participants, and grade ≥3 toxicity was rare (≤5.5%) for all measures. The PROMIS Fatigue T-Score increased from baseline (median 49 [Q1, Q3 46, 57]) to end of RT (55 [Q1, Q3 49, 63]), and returned to baseline levels at 6 months (p<0.001). While there were no significant differences in PRO-CTCAE SOB severity (p=0.24) and interference (p=0.11) over time, PRO-CTCAE chest pain worsened compared to pre-RT with respect to frequency (p<0.001), severity (p<0.001), and interference (p=0.008). However, the absolute changes were small. No DVH metrics were significantly associated with any cardiac-specific HRQOL outcomes. Stratification by laterality yielded similar results. Conclusions: Proton RT generally conferred significantly lower doses to the heart and cardiac substructures compared to photon RT. HRQOL outcomes were favorable across all participants, with fatigue returning to baseline, no change in SOB parameters, and a slight worsening of chest pain outcomes over 6 months following RT. Cardiac-specific HRQOLs appear not to be significantly affected by RT dose to cardiac substructures within the first 6 months post-RT. Other organs at risk that could also impact cardiac HRQOL endpoints, longer follow-up, and major cardiac events will be evaluated in future analyses. Citation Format: J. L. Wright, K. Ko, W. Kenworthy, W. Bosch, L. Braunstein, G. Freedman, E. Gillespie, R. Jimenez, S. Pugh, H. Lu, M. Pankuch, N. Remmes, W. Straube, W. Zou, E. Berlin, L. Fang, S. MacDonald, N. Taunk, J. Kim, A. Thukral, A. Taghian, M. Mishra, R. Mutter, V. Croog, D. Boggs, J. Urbanic, N. Ohri, A. Chawla, T. Meier, L. Rosen, M. Fegundes, O. Cahlon, K. Hoffman, A. Ferriozzi, J. Bekelman, A. Lin, B. Ky. Associations Between Cardiac Radiation Dose Volume Metrics and Cardiac Specific Health Related Quality of Life for Patients with Breast Cancer Randomized to Proton versus Photon Radiation on the RadComp Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF6-04.

Abstract PURPOSE: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), used in combination with endocrine therapy (ET), are standard of care for advanced and higher risk early stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. PALLAS investigated the addition of 2 years (y) of palbociclib to adjuvant ET (ET/P) compared to ET alone in patients (pts) with stage II-III HR+/HER2- breast cancer. We now present overall survival (OS) with 7-y outcomes and impact of post-recurrence therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This global phase III trial randomized pts to ET for at least 5 y with or without 2 y of P. Primary endpoint was iDFS; distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and OS were preplanned endpoints. Kaplan Meier estimates and hazard ratios (HR) from Cox and Fine & Gray models were performed. Post-recurrence OS was analyzed as time from first distant recurrence (DR) until death. The post-recurrence OS model adjusted for both clin/path factors (including DR-free y, DR site) and time-dependent post-DR therapy (chemo, CDK4/6i). Results: 5,796 pts enrolled at 406 centers in 21 countries worldwide over 3 y. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, with a median follow-up of 82.7 months (mo), 7-y outcomes for iDFS, DRFS and OS are shown in the table. DR occurred in 781 pts (377 ET/P, 404 ET alone) with balanced pt/disease characteristics between arms. ET/P had more visceral (46% vs. 36%) and fewer non-visceral (61% vs. 68%) DR compared to ET alone (p=0.03). Unadjusted post-recurrence OS was significantly worse for ET/P vs. ET (median 22.6 vs. 27.9 mo, HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01-1.46, p=0.04). However, receipt of any post-recurrence CDK4/6i was significantly higher on ET vs. ET/P arms (41% vs. 66%) and time to post-progression CDK4/6i initiation was significantly shorter for those in the ET vs. ET/P arms (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.61, p<0.001) adjusting for region, bone/visceral DR type, DR-free time and age. Conversely, time to post-progression chemotherapy initiation was significantly longer for ET alone vs. ET/P arms (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07-1.61, p=0.01). However, after adjustment for clinical factors and post-DR treatment, the OS difference was no longer seen (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.85-1.28, p=0.65). 3-mo landmark analysis showed similar effect on OS after adjusting for CDK4/6i initiation within 3 mo from DR (unadjusted HR 1.24, p=0.03 vs. adjusted HR 1.15, p=0.22). CONCLUSION: The PALLAS trial revealed significant differences in treatment post-DR that impact OS. Reduced/delayed use of metastatic CDK4/6i after adjuvant P was associated with significantly poorer OS, suggesting that patients who relapse after adjuvant CDK4/6i may still benefit from metastatic CDK4/6i. This has implications for optimal treatment in those who relapse after adjuvant CDK4/6i and warrants further study to determine if this is therapy-specific or an overarching biological effect. SUPPORT: AFT, ABCSG, NRG, PrECOG; Pfizer Citation Format: A. DeMichele, A. Dueck, M. Gnant, D. Hlauschek, M. Martin, A. Wolff, G. Rubovsky, F. Henao, O. Hahn, A. Chan, A. Brusky, P. Morris, H. Burstein, G. Huber, D. Anderson, L. Garcia-Estevez, G. Pfeiler, H. Rugo, N. Zdenkowski, S. Gampenrieder, N. Wolmark, D. Sabanathan, K. Miller, D. Cameron, E. Winer, C. Brunner, E. Gauthier, P. O’Brien, C. Fesl, E. Mayer. Adjuvant Palbociclib for ER+ Breast Cancer in the PALLAS Trial (ABCSG-42/AFT-05/PrE0109/BIG-14-13): Post-Recurrence Treatment and Overall Survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF7-07.

Abstract Background: Fatty Acid Synthase (FASN) is a key lipogenic enzyme co-regulated with HER2 and highly expressed in ER+ and HER2+ BC. Its targeting downregulates HER2 expression. Our preclinical studies revealed that FASN inhibition can sensitize or restore sensitivity to trastuzumab, paclitaxel and ET in HER2+ BC models. Denifanstat (deni, formerly TVB-2640) is a novel FASN inhibitor that demonstrated promising clinical activity and safety in a prior phase I trial as either monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the objective tumor response rate (ORR) of deni plus trastuzumab (H) in combination with paclitaxel (T) or ET. Methods: Two independent, phase II clinical trials were initiated to assess the efficacy and safety of deni plus H in combination with T (Cohort A) or ET (Cohort B). Key inclusion criteria included HER2+ MBC resistant to HER2-directed therapy, measurable disease, unlimited ET, ≤6 prior chemotherapy or antibody drug conjugate regimens, and confirmation of HER2+ MBC on a pre-registration biopsy. Deni was administered 100 mg/m2 orally once daily. HP or H plus ET (fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitor) was administered at standard dose and schedule. Blood was collected on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), C1D8 and C2D1 for serum FASN analysis. An additional MBC tumor biopsy was collected on C2D1 for correlative studies. A 2-stage Simon design with a safety-run in was used to test the null hypothesis that the true ORR is at most 5% against the alternative it is at least 20%. With a sample size of 32 patients (pts) per cohort, if ≥4 responses are seen, this design has a 90% chance of rejecting the true ORR is <5% when the true ORR is ≥20% at a 0.10 level of significance. The decision to close both trials to enrollment early was multifactorial. Results: From August 2017 - February 2024, 33 pts with HER2+ MBC pre-registered, among which 17 were eligible and 16 were evaluable (15 pts in Cohort A and 1 pt in Cohort B). The most common reason for ineligibility was HER2-negative status on central review of the pre-registration biopsy. Median age was 57 years (range 35-80). All pts were non-Hispanic and 13 (81.3%) were White. Median prior lines of therapy was 5 (range 0 - 11). In Cohort A, there were 5 partial responses; thus, the primary endpoint was met with the ORR estimated to be 33.3% (90% CI: 14.2-57.7%). The median PFS time was 7.0 months (95 %CI: 3.7 - 11.3), and median OS was 25.7 months (95%CI: 10.2 - NE). No dose limiting toxicities were observed during the C1 safety run-in (6 pts). In Cohort A, 7 (46.7%) developed a grade 3 or 4 adverse event (AE) attributed to combination therapy. Grade ≥2 AEs regardless of attribution occurring in ≥20% of all pts included anemia, fatigue, neutropenia, palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), and peripheral neuropathy. Treatment was discontinued due to progression (12; 80%) or AE (3; 20% - pneumonitis; neuropathy; PPE). In Cohort B, the pt maintained stable disease through 8 cycles with grade 3 ALT increase, and she remained alive 31.2 months post-registration. Median C1D1 FASN level was 32.7 ng/mL (IQR: 18.7 - 49.6 ng/mL). There was minimal association between C1D8 and C2D1 FASN levels and time to disease progression (C1D8 n=9, Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r s) = 0.040; C2D1 n=13, r s = -0.019). Analyses of changes in MBC tumor expression of FASN, phospho-AKT, and phospho-S6 are in progress. Conclusion: Deni combined with HP provided clinical antitumor activity in pts with HER2+ MBC resistant to trastuzumab. Expected paclitaxel-associated AEs were observed. Nearly half of pts experienced a grade 3 or 4 AE attributed to the combination therapy, and 20% stopped treatment due to AE. Further study of deni, H plus ET is necessary to draw safety and efficacy conclusions. Citation Format: T. C. Haddad, V. J. Suman, R. R. Roa, B. J. Ernst, R. Lupu, T. Vander Steen, M. H. Solanki, M. Keeney, D. W. Northfelt, K. S. Anderson, T. J. Hobday, S. Chumsri, J. E. Hoppenworth, J. L. Carroll, K. V. Giridhar, C. C. O’Sullivan, R. A. Leon-Ferre, M. P. Goetz. Phase II Trial of the FASN Inhibitor, Denifanstat (TVB-2640), Plus Trastuzumab in Combination with Paclitaxel or Endocrine Therapy (ET) in Patients with HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Resistant to Trastuzumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-01-16.

Abstract Background: PALLAS (PALbociclib CoLlaborative Adjuvant Study, NCT02513394) is a randomized phase III trial comparing two years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib combined with the physician’s choice of adjuvant endocrine therapy, versus endocrine therapy alone for patients with Stage II-III hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. Molecular residual disease (MRD) detection via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing was a predefined biomarker analysis to identify patients at highest risk of recurrence. Methods: PALLAS participants with available tumor block, at least a baseline (pre-study treatment) plasma sample, and either whole blood or buffy coat were randomly selected from the overall study population. Plasma samples on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1), cycle 6 day 1 (C6D1), and at the end of treatment (EOT) were collected, processed, and stored. Nucleic acids were extracted from primary tumor tissue or, when primary tissue was insufficient, from post-neoadjuvant tumor tissue, provided the sample had sufficient material and tumor cellularity (>25 mm2 tissue area with ≥20% tumor nuclei). Data from next generation sequencing of tumor tissue and matched normal DNA were used to create a personalized ctDNA SignateraTM assay (Natera, Inc.) for MRD assessment in the peripheral blood. ctDNA was reported as mean tumor molecules/mL (MTM/mL) of plasma. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) based on ctDNA status. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to evaluate prognosis and predictive interactions. To minimize bias, the biorepository and laboratory teams were blinded to participant identity. Results: In total, 1280 participants were randomly selected for inclusion in this preplanned ctDNA sub-study. WES and WGS are being conducted on tissue, and Signatera results will be generated. Results for association of MRD status (positive/negative) and MTM/mL with DRFI in the context of 7 year median follow up of this study cohort will be reported. Conclusions: The planned analysis is ongoing and the presented work will provide data from the first randomized phase 3 adjuvant study in HR+/HER2- breast cancer to report MRD status by treatment arm. Citation Format: H. A. Parsons, K. Ballman, E. Heitzer, M. Watson, M. Balic, D. Hlauschek, D. Renner, E. Kalashnikova, G. Steger, J. M. Balko, Y. Novik, M. Martin, A. A. Rodriguez, Z. Dayao, A. Chan, E. Nili Gal-Yam, M. C. Liu, C. Isaacs, M. Los, M. Gil Gil, B. Felder, C. Denkert, P. Fasching, F. Liu, T. O'Donnell, E. L. Mayer, M. Gnant, W. F. Symmans, A. DeMichele. Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA analysis to assess molecular residual disease for prognosis and prediction of benefit from palbociclib in the PALLAS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF3-04.

Abstract Background: While there are abundant data on the surgical management of BC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), there is less guidance regarding surgical management of BC after NET, particularly with respect to lymph node (LN) surgery. While pathologic complete response (pCR) is common with NAC, it is a rare event with NET. In this analysis we assess the surgeons’ approach in the context of NET. Methods: The ALTERNATE trial is a phase III study that randomized postmenopausal patients (pts) with clinical stage II/III ER+ HER2- BC to receive neoadjuvant anastrozole (A), fulvestrant (F), or both for 6 mos. before surgery. The primary objective was to determine if neoadjuvant F or A+F increases the rate of pCR or ypT1-2N0/N1mic/Ki67 <2.7% residual disease over A alone. Breast surgery was per standard of care. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with or without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was required to determine preoperative endocrine prognostic index PEPI score and residual cancer burden (RCB). Surgeons were required to indicate if the patient would be eligible for breast- conserving surgery (BCS) prior to NET. Patient accrual occurred from 2014-2018. The surgical outcomes are reported for the entire group. Results: Among the 3 treatment arms, 933 patients completed 6 cycles of NET. The clinical T stage at diagnosis was 73.6% T2, 22.6% T3and 3.8% T4. Initial tumor size was assessed by mammogram and ultrasound. Primary tumor histology was ductal in 64.8% and lobular in 25.4%.568 pts (60.9%) were clinically node negative (cN0), 36.2% cN1, 2.6% cN2 with 0.3% cN3. LNs were palpable in 25.2%. 383 had LN needle biopsy pre NET, of which 80.9% were positive. The surgeons’ initial impression of the patient’s eligibility for BCS was 74% while 0.6% were considered inoperable.75.5% of pts had post-NET imaging performed. Of those with tumor size recorded, 52.9% were T1 or not visible. Overall, 69.9% of the 933 patients had BCS. Of those 330 pts without post-NET imaging or who had post-NET imaging without a size noted, 64.8% underwent BCS. For pts undergoing BCS, 80.2% required only one surgery for margin clearance. Of the 690 pts deemed eligible for BCS pre NET, 79% had BCS. Of the 240 pts deemed ineligible for BCS pre-NET, 43.8% had BCS. Of the pre-NET cT2 tumors, 79% had BCS while only 45.5% of T3 tumors and 37.1% of T4 tumors had BCS. On surgical pathology, 474 (50.8%) pts were LN+ compared to pre-NET cN+ 39.1% and needle biopsy-proven 33.2%. For pts with pN0, 93.3% had SLNB alone. 6.7 % of pN0 had ALND alone or SLNB+ALND. For those with pN1-3 , 36.3% had SLN only; 37.3% SLN+ ALND; 26.4% ALND alone. Only 0.8% of the patients had no ALND or SLNB performed. Pts undergoing BCS were more likely to have SLNB alone for a +SLN compared to mastectomy pts (62.9% vs. 37.6%; chi-square p<0.0001). For pts with pre-NET +LN on needle biopsy, only 26.8% underwent SLNB alone, while 37.4% underwent ALND alone. Of the 204 LN-positive pts having SLNB alone, 55.9% had only 1 + LN and 27% had only 2+ LNs. For pN+ pts who underwent SLNB +ALND, 42.1% had 1-2 + LNs. Conclusion: With NET, 69.9% of pts achieved BCS, including 43.8% deemed ineligible pre-NET. Given the low rate of pCR to NET, there should not be the expectation of pCR in +LNs. Based on the procedures performed in pts with +SLNs, it appears that surgeons were applying ACOSOG Z0011 criteria for pts having BCS, but were less likely to omit ALND for +LN in pts having mastectomy. The finding of only 1-2 +LNs in many of the LN+ pts suggests that omission of ALND may be a reasonable approach post-NET. Longer follow-up is required to assess local-regional recurrence. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588 Citation Format: A. M. Leitch, T. Dockter, V. suman, A. Weiss, G. W. Unzeitig, J. Guenther, S. Sanati, K. Vij, J. Hoog, A. Caudle, A. Tiersten, M. Mita, W. Razaq, T. J. Hieken, Y. Wang, M. Rimawi, M. J. Ellis, E. Winer, K. K. Hunt, A. H. Partridge, L. A. Carey. Surgical outcomes in the ALTERNATE trial (Alliance A011106) -a randomized phase 3 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) trial in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF1-02.

Abstract Background: Most patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with endocrine therapy (ET) will ultimately develop resistance. A large unmet need exists especially when resistance occurs following treatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i), which is potentially driven by a mutation in the ERα-coding gene, ESR1. Lasofoxifene (LAS), an oral, next-generation ET and ER breast antagonist, was evaluated in two phase 2 studies of women with ER+/HER2- mBC and an ESR1 mutation who had disease progression on previous ET and CDK4/6i. In the ELAINE 1 trial, LAS monotherapy provided numerically greater progression-free survival (PFS, median 5.6 mos vs 3.7 mos; HR: 0.669 [95% CI, 0.445‒1.125], P=0.138), objective response rate (ORR, 13% vs 3%; P=0.124), and clinical benefit rate (CBR, 37% vs 22%; P=0.117) compared with the ER degrader fulvestrant (fulv), with a favorable safety profile (Goetz MP et al. Ann Oncol 2023;34:1141‒51). The single-arm, ELAINE 2 trial showed that LAS combined with abemaciclib (Abema) was well tolerated with a median PFS of ∼13 mos, ORR of 56%, and CBR of 66% (Damodaran S et al. Ann Oncol 2023;34:1131‒40). The phase 3, registrational, ELAINE 3 trial was initiated based on these promising earlier-phase data. Recent results from postMONARCH confirmed superior efficacy of fulv/Abema over fulv/placebo (mPFS 6.0 mos vs 5.3 mos, HR 0.73 [0.57‒0.95], nominal P-value 0.017) in non-biomarker‒selected, mBC patients after progression on a prior CDK4/6i and aromatase inhibitor (AI), with similar HR in an ESR1-mutated cohort (Kalinsky K et al. J Clin Oncol 2025;43:1101‒12). Additionally, recent data from EMBER-3 demonstrated meaningful PFS with a novel ET combined with abemaciclib after progression on AI/CDK4/6i (Jhaveri KL et al. N Engl J Med 2025;392:1189‒202). The ELAINE 3, global trial will compare LAS/Abema with fulv/Abema in a post-CDK4/6i, ESR1-mutation‒selected, mBC population. Methods: ELAINE 3 (NCT05696626) is an open-label, phase 3, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LAS plus Abema versus fulv plus Abema. Patients are being enrolled at approximately 152 sites in 13 countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Italy, Israel, Poland, Romania, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States). Key inclusion criteria are pre- and postmenopausal women and men aged ≥18 yrs; ER+/HER2-, locally advanced and/or mBC (measurable and/or non-measurable disease); ≥1 acquired ESR1 mutation; progression on an AI plus palbociclib or ribociclib as their first hormonal treatment for advanced/mBC; and ≤1 line of chemotherapy in the advanced/metastatic setting. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive LAS 5 mg/day plus Abema 150 mg BID, or fulv 500 mg IM (days 1, 15, and 29, then once monthly) plus Abema 150 mg BID. Treatment will continue until progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint is PFS per RESIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR); key secondary endpoints are ORR, overall survival, CBR, duration of response, and time to response. Safety, time to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and quality of life (including vaginal health) will also be evaluated. Blood samples for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) will be collected for genomic analyses at screening, at weeks 4 and 8 and every 8 weeks thereafter, and at the final visit. Outcomes with LAS/Abema and fulv/Abema will be compared using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model and stratified logrank test with an expected PFS hazard ratio of 0.68 at final analysis. Enrollment is currently ongoing to meet the target sample size of 500 patients. Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, S. A. Wander, T. Bachelot, G. Curigliano, A. de Nonneville, E. N. Gal-Yam, K. Jhaveri, S. L. Sammons, S. Shen, C. J. Twelves, G. Gasper, P. V. Plourde, D. J. Portman, S. Damodaran. Open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, ELAINE 3 study of the efficacy and safety of lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib for treating ER+/HER2-, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-07-30.