Citations

Introduction: Clonal dendritic cell (DC) aggregates in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are seen in approximately 20-30% patients at diagnosis. Previously, these were thought to be comprised of CD123+ plasmacytoid DCs but our data has suggested that these are heterogenous and comprise of myeloid DCs, monocytes, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Furthermore, these aggregates uniformly express immune checkpoints such as indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 (IDO), associate with an IDO-specific systemic impact (increased trytophan catabolism), and expanded regulatory T cell population in CMML, suggesting a role in inducing immune tolerance. DC aggregates are also associated with increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation and resistance to hypomethylating agents, highlighting that they are important for disease progression in CMML (Mangaonkar A et al. Blood Adv 2020). We performed this study to decipher the architecture of a CMML DC aggregate to understand the complex inter-cellular interactions, and assess their impact on the adaptive immune system. Methods: In this study, we used archival fresh-frozen paraffin-embedded (FFPE) bone marrow biopsy specimens obtained from CMML patients, and isolated monocytes (CD14+ magnetic bead sorting) and lymphocytes (CD14-ve fraction) from untreated CMML and age-matched normal control (NC) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). DCs were cultured from monocytes using a commercial protocol. Spatial architecture of the CMML BM microenvironment was interrogated through multiplex imaging of FFPE samples by co-detection by indexing (CODEX) using 30 markers (CCR6, CD107a, CD11c, CD20, CD21, CD31, CD3e, CD4, CD44, CD45, CD45RO CD56, CD68, CD8, E-Cadherin, FoxP3, HLA-DR, CD14, CD16, CD11b, CD33, CD15, CD66b, CD123, CD303, CD34, CD163 and IDO). Single-cell transcriptomic signatures were analyzed using the 10X single cell Fixed RNA profiling platform, and validated using bulk RNA seq (Illumina stranded mRNA prep) from isolated and cultured cells. Impact of DCs on lymphocytes was assessed via autologous mixed DC-T culture experiments. Results: BM FFPE samples from 5 CMML cases (3 with DC aggregates) were included for multiplex imaging via CODEX. Results confirm the significant interactions of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells with CD123+/HLA-DR+ DCs within a CMML DC aggregate (Fig. 1A). Upon quantitative assessment of cell-cell interactions, IDO+/CD8+T ( P=0.006), IDO+/MDSC ( P=0.005), and IDO+/macrophage ( P=0.001) interactions were significantly increased in CMML samples with versus without DC aggregates . Specific findings were validated using single-stain immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunoflourescence staining. Next, in order to assess transcriptomic signatures within BM at the single-cell level, we chose two cases; CMML (BM aspirate blast% 1, WBC 49.6 x 10 9/L, ASXL1/GATA2/SETBP1/SRSF2 mutations) and AML transformed from CMML (BM aspirate blast% 81, WBC 152 x 10 9/L, NPM1/DNMT3A/TET2 mutations). Approximately, 10,000 cells were obtained and analyzed with cell type annotation through human PBMC reference (Azimuth). Results show an expanded regulatory T cell population in AML compared to CMML (UMAP plot, Fig. 1B), suggestive of immune tolerance. In order to validate findings and perform functional experiments, we used sorted monocytes and cutured DCs from CMML and NC. DC phenotype was confirmed both through visual inspection and flow cytometry, and clonality was confirmed through Sanger sequencing (for previously identified mutations). Differential gene expression analysis through bulk RNAseq showed significant differences between CMML and NC lymphocytes with immunoinhibitory receptor, LILRB2 (log2fold change=7.05, adjusted P=0.0002) being one of the top five significantly upregulated genes, further confirming immune tolerance. Finally, mixed autologous DC-lymphocyte reaction (1:4 ratio) experiments demonstrated that DCs induce T cell tolerance in CMML (expansion of exhausted PD1/TIM3/LAG3+ CD8 T cells) when compared to NC. Conclusion: Clonal dendritic cell aggregates within the CMML bone marrow microenviroment interact with T cells and induce immune tolerance. This represents a novel mechanism of disease progression in CMML with potential therapeutic targets (IDO, LILRB2, and/or CD123).

Introduction: Despite governmental and industry-sponsored efforts, clinical trial participation among rural residents and racial and ethnic minorities remains low. The NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 directed the NIH to establish guidelines for inclusion of women and minorities in clinical research. In 2015, the Food and Drug Administration launched an action plan to improve the quality of demographic subgroup data collection, identify barriers to enrollment, employ strategies to increase participation, and promote transparency of related data. However subsequent studies (Green et al. Health Aff. March 2022, Kanapuru et al. Blood Advances. March 2022.) showed no improvement in participation of racial minorities, including Blacks and Hispanics since this plan was enacted. Various complex system- and individual-based factors, including lack of clinical trial availability; lack of diversity in the investigator work force; scant patient and provider awareness of clinical trials; lack of trust in the health care system; and issues with access to care-often driven by financial, geographic, or social constraints (Allison et al. Cureus. Apr 2022.), and stringent eligibility criteria are deemed responsible. The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) IMPACT (Influential Medicine Providing Access to Clinical Trials) research grant strives to bridge this unrelenting care gap. Methods: The LLS IMPACT program includes a 5-year research grant which was launched in 2021. The IMPACT grants support the establishment of clinical trial networks involving academic cancer centers (“Hubs”) linked to community clinics and oncology centers (“Spokes”). The program's overall goal is to provide patients access to trials through participation at the community sites. Initially, 3 institutional sites were selected to participate. These institutions had unique and tailored strategies to improve engagement of underrepresented patients, including black, indigenous, people of color, Hispanic, Latina/Latino, and people from rural communities in vastly different climates and local cultures. The IMPACT grant expanded to encompass 4 additional sites given the imminent needs and clamor of the hematology clinical trials community (Figure 1A). The catchment areas and strategies employed at each institution are summarized in the table (Figure 1B). Results: At the start of the grant period, focus was on building clinical research infrastructure and opening non-interventional clinical trials to teach personnel about clinical research and create relationships with patients. Other programs such as webinar series, tumor boards, technological advancements, and educational workshops were also established to enhance engagement among physicians, match patients to clinical trials, and to provide clinical trial education to potential patients. One trial that has seen early success is the CHIVE IMPACT trial, a non-interventional registry and biorepository which has enrolled 24 patients at a rural and underserved site as of July 2023. The purpose of CHIVE is to enroll patients who have clonal hematopoiesis (CH) or are at risk of CH and follow prospectively in efforts to understand risk of progression and potential for early intervention. The Universal Protocol is another biorepository trial which has more than tripled its enrollment number at a community site between 2021 and 2022. Of the 63 patients enrolled in 2022, 66% of them identified as a race other than White. As our core goal is to increase access to interventional trials, we hope to bring industry sponsored phase II and phase III studies to underrepresented areas that serve a broad patient population. Lack of financial resources, lack of transportation and distance to trial sites, and residual distrust of the medical community (e.g., legacy of Tuskegee experiments) are barriers the grantees are focused on overcoming to enroll the intended populations into clinical trials. Conclusion: The innovative strategies employed to expand access to clinical trials for underrepresented population at the various institutions through the LLS's IMPACT research grant can be utilized during clinical trials design and implementation phases to improve generalizability of clinical trials in hematologic malignancies. In the third year of this program, 7 participating sites are engaging impactful strategies (Figure 1B) which will be reported at the end of the grant period.

Introduction: BCMA-directed CAR-T and Bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) therapies have shown remarkable overall response rates in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This has led to the approval of idecabtagene vicleucel, ciltacabtagene autoleucel and teclistamab by the FDA, EMA and other regulatory agencies. We performed a global survey on accessibility, practice patterns, and toxicity management of commercially available CAR-T and BiTE therapies. Methods: An online survey was completed by clinicians attending the International Myeloma Society's Immune Effector Cell Therapies in Multiple Myeloma Workshop, in-person or virtually, made available for 30 days after the meeting held in March 2023, Boston, MA. Results: 87 clinicians from 16 countries completed the survey, most practicing in an academic practice (86%) and in an urban environment (89%). Sixty-four percent of the respondents practice in North America followed by Europe (25.3%) including Germany, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, France, Greece, and Cyprus, and 6.9% from Asia and 3.4% from Australia. Seventy-seven percent reported CAR-T cell therapy was approved in their country with 44.8% treating 1-5 patients and 14.9% treating >5 patients per month; 67% reported BiTE therapy was approved in their country with 14.9% treating >5 patients per month. Of evaluable responses (n = 40), 62% administered CAR-T therapy inpatient and 15% administered CAR-T therapy outpatient ≥ 50% of the time. Length of time between decision to treat with CAR-T therapy to infusion was 6-12 weeks for 42% of responders and <6 weeks for only 20%. Most (75%) reported inpatient administration of BiTE therapy step-up dosing; 17.5% reported outpatient step-up dosing administered ≥ 50% of the time. Use of institutional or practice SOPs for CAR-T and BiTE therapy patient selection was reported by 85% and 58%, respectively, with the factors influencing SOP outlined in Table 1. Of available CAR-T therapies, 53% prefer cilta-cel and 23% reported CAR-T therapy preference depended most on patients' co-morbidities/frailty (89%), timing of next available apheresis (67%), age (56%), CNS disease (44%) and other factors. Maintenance therapy after CAR-T therapy was reportedly used by 25% and 5% of respondents in 1-10% and 11-50% of their patients, respectively, to “maintain level of response achieved” (50%) or “achieve a deeper level of response” (25%). About half (43%) of the respondents reported using an SOP or particular criteria for secondary Hemophagocytic Lympho-Histiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome/CAR-related-HLH (sHLH/MAS/CarHLH) management that varied between the use of ASTCT Working Group IEC associated HLH-like syndrome Criteria (47%) (Hines 2023), CARTOX HLH Criteria (24%) (Neelapu 2017) and HLH-2004 criteria (6%). Tocilizumab was used as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) prophylaxis only by one responder. Keppra neurologic prophylaxis was used by 47.5% and 15% of responders for CAR-T and BiTE therapy, respectively. Delayed neurotoxicity with CAR-T was reported in 1-5% of patients by 57.5% of responders and 6-10% of patients by 15% of responders; most common manifestations were other movement/neuromuscular disorder (62%), nerve palsy (55%), and Parkinsonism (45%). Infectious prophylaxis was used to protect against HSV (92.5%), PJP (90%), bacterial pathogens (55%), fungal pathogens (60%), and IVIG (77.5%). However, criteria for infectious prophylaxis use varies widely incorporating IgG levels, infectious history, CD4+ count, B-cell aplasia and cytopenias (48.1 - 88.9%). Most respondents (46.3 - 86.5%) reported completing an infectious work-up including CMV, EBV, Hep B/C, and HIV ( Table 2). Conclusions: Trends of CAR-T and BiTE therapy use and patterns of concurrent prophylactic and supportive care in MM vary widely among academic centers across the globe, demonstrating a need for further understanding of toxicity pathogenesis, toxicity management and consistent guidelines. This survey also demonstrates the great unmet need for access beyond urban centers among the international myeloma community. Prospective studies and claims data analysis should be utilized to evaluate the longitudinal cost of care, quality of life, duration of response and management of infectious disease, neurological or related complications of CAR-T and bispecific TCE therapies.

Purpose: Improved predictive tools are desired in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) to improve prognostication and to better risk stratify patients (pts) for clinical trials. In younger pts who tolerate intensive therapies, focus has been on limiting late treatment toxicity through risk-adapted, PET-guided treatment strategy. In older pts, acute treatment toxicities are limiting factors for optimal disease control. Due to these fundamental differences, predictive tools may perform differently in younger and older pts. In particular, tools developed in younger pts may be suboptimal in older populations and vice versa. The primary objective of this study was to assess the performance of the A-HIPI (development was limited to 18-65 years of age) against the international prognostic score (IPS) for modelling overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in younger and older pts with cHL. Methods: This study utilized data from the population-based, nationwide Danish National Lymphoma registry. Pts with advanced-stage cHL (Ann Arbor stage III-IV or IIB with extra nodal disease) were included and categorized by age in two groups: ages ≤65 years vs. >65 years. In the primary analysis, all pts regardless of therapy were included. A sensitivity analysis restricting to pts starting on BEACOPP or ABVD was performed (Only ABVD in the >65 cohort). Concordance index (C-index) and calibration were used to assess model performance and generalizability. Calibration was visualized using calibration plots and quantified by calibration in the large (CITL) and calibration slope (CS) at 5-years post diagnosis. Results: A total of 893 advanced-stage HL pts fulfilled the inclusion criteria (634 in the ≤65 cohort and 259 in the >65 cohort). The 5-year OS and PFS in the >65-year cohort were 44% (Confidence intervals (CI); 37-51%) and 35% (CI; 30-42%), respectively. Fifty-six pts in the >65 cohort were classified as low-intermediate-risk (IPS; 1-2), 128 intermediate-risk (IPS; 3-4), and 75 high-risk (IPS; 5-7). For the ≤65 cohort, the 5-year OS and PFS was 88% (CI; 85-90%) and 76% (CI; 73-80%), respectively. Twenty-three pts were classified as low-risk (IPS; 0), 244 low-intermediate-risk, 286 intermediate-risk, and 81 high-risk. The A-HIPI had a C-index of 0.74 and 0.63 for OS and PFS, respectively in the ≤65 years cohort vs. 0.65 and 0.64 for OS and PFS, respectively, in the >65 cohort. The IPS had a C-index in the ≤65 cohort of 0.66 and 0.60 for OS and PFS, respectively, vs. 0.58 and 0.59 for OS and PFS, respectively, in the >65 cohort (i.e., the IPS performed better in the ≤65 cohort in terms of OS and PFS but was inferior to the A-HIPI). When restricting to pts treated with ABVD or BEACOPP, the A-HIPI C-index in the >65 cohort (116 pts) were reduced to 0.55 for OS and 0.54 for PFS. For the ≤65 cohort (595 pts), the A-HIPI C-index was stable at 0.75 and 0.62 for OS and PFS, respectively. In terms of A-HIPI calibration in the >65 cohort, CITL and CS were -0.78 and 0.39 for OS vs. -0.98 and 0.80 for PFS. In the ≤65 cohort, CITL and CS were -0.06 and 0.99 for OS vs. 0.21 and 1.18 for PFS. Visual inspection of the calibration plot (Figure 1) for the >65 cohort showed that the A-HIPI underestimated the observed proportion for both OS and PFS (i.e., the observed events were higher than the predicted). Calibration plot for the ≤65 cohort (Figure 2) indicated that the A-HIPI accurately modelled the observed proportion for both OS and PFS (i.e., the predicted probability was consistent with the observed proportion). Conclusion: The newly developed A-HIPI was validated in a large population-based cohort of Danish pts with advanced-stage cHL. Performance of the A-HIPI was high in the ≤65 cohort and superior to the IPS for OS prediction. Calibration of A-HIPI was excellent in pts ages ≤65 years. However, A-HIPI performed significantly worse among pts >65 years and attained poor performance in pts receiving ABVD or BEACOPP, which is not surprising since patients older than 65 were not included in the development. This study emphasizes the importance of further efforts to develop or update models that apply specifically in older individuals. The inclusion of additional variables reflecting comorbidities and pts fitness into a prognostic model may be necessary to effectively deliver accurate prognoses and risk assessments for the older pt.

Background: Emavusertib (CA-4948) is a novel oral inhibitor of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4), which is essential for toll-like receptor (TLR) and interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) signaling in B cell proliferation. Additional inhibitory activity against FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and CDC-like kinases (CLK1/2/4) is also present in emavusertib. IRAK4 forms a Myddosome complex with MYD88 adaptor protein and drives overactivation ofnuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), causing inflammation and tumor growth. Emavusertib has been reported to be well tolerated and active as monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (Nowakowski 2020). Preclinical studies demonstrated that tumor resistance and survival via IRAK4 activation could be delayed or reversed. Emavusertib crossed the blood-brain barrier in a murine PDX model of PCNS lymphoma, blocked the activated IRAK4 pathway, and induced tumor response and prolonged survival (von Roemeling 2022). In combination with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, emavusertib showed in vitro synergy and re-sensitization of resistant cell lines, overcoming BTK resistance (Guidetti 2023a and 2023b). In vivo synergy in B-cell NHL was also demonstrated. Adaptive chemotherapy treatment resistance through IRAK4 upregulation and activation was also described in other disease models (Melgar 2019, Li 2019). This abstract presents preliminary efficacy and safety data of emavusertib + ibrutinib in R/R NHL patients. Aim:Assessment of safety and clinical activity of emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib. Methods: This is an ongoing open-label trial (NCT03328078) of emavusertib as monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib. Part A1 - completed; dose escalation of emavusertib as monotherapy; the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) is 300 mg BID with continuous oral dosing (Nowakowski 2020). Part A2 - completed; dose escalation of emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib at 420 and 560 mg QD (Joffe 2022). Part B - ongoing; an expansion cohort of PCNSL patients with resistance to prior BTK inhibitors for additional safety and efficacy related to exposure: emavusertib at 100 or 200 mg BID + ibrutinib at 560 mg QD in 28-Day cycles. Results:As of 19 July 2023, 18 heavily pretreated NHL (including five PCNSL) patients received emavusertib at 100, 200, or 300 mg BID in combination with full ibrutinib doses per label. Median age was 63.5 years (range 50-92). Median number of prior lines of anti-cancer therapies was 3 (range 1-10). Eleven of 18 patients failed prior BTK inhibitors. Median treatment duration was 95.5 days (21-587 days), suggesting acceptable safety and tolerability. No DLTs were observed at the 200 mg BID dose level, and two reversible DLTs (stomatitis and syncope) were observed at the 300 mg BID dose level. The preliminary efficacy data of 16 evaluable patients in combination with ibrutinib showed 5 CRs (2 MCL, 3 PCNSL) and 1 PR (1 CLL). All 3 PCNSL patients with CR were previously treated with BTK inhibitors. Conclusion: The combination ofemavusertib plus ibrutinib (ema+ibr) is well tolerated with an acceptable long-term safety profile and promising efficacy, showing several objective responses in heavily pretreated and/or BTK inhibitor resistant patients. Emavusertib may have the potential to overcome BTK inhibitor resistance and the combination of ema+ibr has the potential to show increased anti-cancer activity compared to ibrutinib monotherapy.

Background: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous Hematopoietic stem cell disorder and standard therapy being intensive chemotherapy (IC) followed by consolidation with either high dose Cytarabine or Allogeneic Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in intermediate and high-risk patients. Though the outcome in younger & fit patients with IC in terms of CR rates and survivability are reasonable, however patients above 60 years may not benefit owing to increasing frailty, co-morbidities, adverse disease risk factors, chemo resistance and toxicities. Newer approaches with Novel/Targeted agents are being incorporated in treatment strategies in order to acheive better results and long-term survival. We report outcome of AML patients treated on standard chemotherapy at our institution. Methods: Total 208 Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients were treated at our institution between January 2017 and December 2022 and analyzed after institutional review board (IRB) approval. Data was collected from institutional data base and summarized by medians and Range for continuous variables, numbers and percentages for categorical variables & Survival estimates were obtained by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Median age of our cohort was 46.5 years (range,17-90), Male patients were 57% (n-118) and 43% (n-90) were Female. Seventy-five (36%) were locals and 133 (64%) of other nationalities. Median WBC 11.5 x10^9/L (range 0.60-381); Hemoglobin 83 g/L (range 27-103), Platelets 53x10^9/L (range 2-791), Median Bone marrow blast were 50% and median LDH 357 U/L. Normal cytogenetics was present in 54.4% (n-111); 19%(n-39) were Core binding Factor (CBF), 3.5% trisomy 8 and 3.5% were complex cytogenetics. Major molecular mutations included FLT3-ITD (21%), NPM1 (18.3%), DNMT3A (11%), IDH1&2 (7%), TET2(5%), TP53(3.5%) and ASXL1(3%). As per European Leukemia Net (ELN 2017) risk stratification, Intermediate risk were 50% (n-104), Favorable 30% (n-63) and Adverse 20% (n-41). Total of 164 (79%) patients received intensive chemotherapy, 13(7%) Azacytidine and Venetoclax, 16(8%) low intensity and 12(6%) best supportive care (BSC). Intensive chemotherapy included Anthracyclines +Cytarabine and FLAG/FLAG-Ida (Fludarabine, Idarubicin, Cytarabine and G-CSF). Total of 136(65%) of patients achieved Complete Remission (CR/Cri) after 1 or 2 inductions. Major adverse events during induction were grade 4 cytopenia's and pneumonias. There were 26(13.6%) deaths during induction. Majority of patients received consolidation therapy with high dose cytarabine 1-3 g/M2 twice a day for 3 days for two to 3 cycles and 28(14%) underwent Allogeneic stem cell Transplantation. At a median follow up of 9.1 months, the 2 year and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 65% and 57% in whole cohort. ELN Favorable Risk group had a better survivability at 2 years (80%). Two-year OS in Patients above 60 and less than 60 years were 37% and 75% respectively. Conclusion: Intensive chemotherapy resulted in significant survival improvement in AML and has been standard of care for more than 3 decades. However significant advances in understanding the biology, risk categorization and development of newer novel therapies has led to alter the treatment strategy with better outcome. Our study underlines the fact that we need to incorporate the newer therapies in treatment plan to achieve these goals.

Background Complete blood count (CBC) is the most common test performed in hematology-oncology. A typical CBC report contains over 10 elements. Simplifying the report by removing nonessential elements may benefit clinicians and patients. Little is known about what elements are reported by various hospitals in the US. The objective of our study was to describe how hospitals in the US report CBC. Methods After approval from the Mayo Clinic institutional review board, we obtained hospital CBC reported elements from the Epic electronic medical records Care Everywhere health information exchange. CBCs from 2020-2023 were included. For each hospital, we determined the city and state where it's located. We obtained the number and type of elements reported in the CBC and compared the findings between academic and community hospitals. Results We collected CBC data from 139 hospitals across 43 states and 102 cities (Figure 1). Fifty-four percent were community hospitals while 46% were academic hospitals. The median number of elements reported by all hospitals was 21 (range, 12-24). This was not different (P=0.98) between academic (median 22 [range, 12-24]) and community hospitals (median 21 [range, 14-24]; Figure 2). The distribution of hospitals according to the number of CBC elements reported were as follows: 12-15 (6%), 16-19 (13%), 20 (25%), 21(6%), 22 (18%), 23 (19%), and 24 (13%). A minority of the hospitals did not report % white blood cell differential count (9.4%) or mean platelet volume (20.9%). Nucleated red blood cell and immature granulocyte count were reported frequently, 46.0% and 56.8%, respectively. However, the frequency of reporting these four elements were similar between academic and community hospitals. Conclusions We found substantial variations in CBC reporting among US hospitals even within academic and community hospitals. Most hospitals reported 20 or more elements, twice as many as the hospitals reporting the least number of elements. There is an opportunity to simplify and standardize CBC reporting, which will minimize physician burnout and distraction as well as decrease patient concern and query.

Background: DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (dMMR), which leads to genomic and microsatellite instability, is a biomarker that predicts response to immunotherapies and has variable prognostic effects for chemotherapies in solid tumors. The dMMR can be detected using gene sequencing or immunohistochemistry for four essential MMR proteins: MSH6, MSH2, MLH1, and PMS2. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma. Previous studies have suggested the role of MMR gene variants in DLBCL lymphomagenesis, yet the prognostic role of dMMR in DLBCL has not been well studied. Methods: We performed targeted next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry for MSH6, MSH2, MLH1, and PMS2 in a large cohort of DLBCL patients treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy. Gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarray (data in GSE31312). Fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) was performed using MultiOmyx multiplexing immunofluorescence staining protocols and antibodies against 13 immune markers. We investigated the frequencies of dMRR and MMR protein expression and correlated the mutation status and expression levels with patient survival and DLBCL biology, including the number of mutated genes, GEP data, previously analyzed DLBCL biomarkers, and immune cell immunophenotypes. Results: MMR gene mutations and loss of MMR protein expression were infrequent in DLBCL (Figure A) and did not show a significant prognostic impact. MMR proteins were commonly expressed in DLBCL samples and the germinal centers of reactive tonsil controls (Figure B), with higher mean and median percentages of tumor cells expressing MSH6 and MLH1 proteins than in the solid tumor samples used for comparison. High expression of MMR proteins was associated with Ki-67, MYC, and p53 overexpression as determined by immunohistochemistry. GEP analysis identified significantly upregulated genes involved in the mitotic cell cycle and DNA metabolism and prominent downregulated immune gene signatures in DLBCL with high MMR protein expression. Fluorescent mIHC confirmed the associations with decreased T cell abundance in MSH6/MSH2/MLH1/PMS2 highly expressing DLBCL (Figure C) independent of p53 and MYC expression status, whereas MSH6/ MLH1 mutations were associated with increased T cell frequencies. High versus low expression of MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2 showed significant unfavorable prognostic effects in DLBCL when the optimal cutoffs were used for high expression. However, when the median percentages were used as cutoffs, the prognostic effects were not significant; nonetheless, MSH6 and PMS2 high expression showed significant adverse prognostic effects in the MYC¯ DLBCL subset. Interestingly, when we used Ki-67, MYC + or BCL2 + percentages in DLBCL assessed by immunohistochemistry to subtract MMR protein percentages and then correlated the differences to survival, we found significant favorable prognostic impact by higher percentage expression differences between MMR proteins and BCL2, or by intermediately higher differences between MMR proteins and MYC. For MSH2/MLH1/PMS2, the higher percentages compared with MYC/BCL2 showed no significant correlations with T cell infiltration levels, whereas the higher differences between MSH6 and MYC/BCL2 were associated with significantly lower T cell frequencies (Figure D). Conclusions: This study revealed that high expression of MMR proteins is a common feature of DLBCL associated with lower tumor-infiltrating T cells, MYC and p53 overexpression, and context-dependent prognostic effects. In contrast, dMMR and loss of MMR proteins are infrequent and have no significant prognostic effects in DLBCL treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy. These results may have implications for understanding DLBCL biology and the low efficacy of PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in DLBCL.

Our group has reported that transient CD19 antigen masking of leukemic cells with the CD19 monoclonal antibody (mAb), tafasitamab, resulted in reduction of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) apoptosis, enhanced CAR T proliferation, improved anti-tumor activity, diminished tumor pyroptosis, and reduced severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in preclinical models. In this report, we aimed to study the mAb characteristics responsible for these observations. Specifically, we hypothesized that binding affinity of CD19 mAbs might affect the subsequent activation and apoptosis of CART19 as well as tumor cell pyroptosis in preclinical models. To test our hypothesis, we first determined the affinities of the CD19-targeting antibodies tafasitamab, HD37 and FMC63 to recombinant human CD19 protein. Tafasitamab demonstrated the strongest binding affinity among the three tested antibodies [tafasitamab ( K D: 1.0±0.2 nM), HD37 ( K D: 4.1±0.3 nM), FMC63 ( K D: 3.4±1.2 nM)]. Next, we studied CART19 apoptosis in the presence of these CD19 mAbs with different binding affinities. Here, we co-cultured CART19, CD19 + mantle cell lymphoma JeKo, and 400 μg/mL of CD19 mAb for 1 hour and measured CD3 + 7-AAD - Annexin V + T cells with flow cytometry. The number of apoptotic CART19 cells was significantly reduced by tafasitamab co-treatment compared to HD37, FMC63, or control IgG [control IgG (mean = 19.1, standard deviation (SD) = 0.8), tafasitamab (mean = 13.1, SD = 2.9), HD37 (mean = 17.8, SD = 0.8), FMC63 (mean = 18.4, SD = 1.0)]. We also performed an in vitro high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) assay to assess if different affinities of the CD19 mAbs affect tumor cell pyroptosis triggered by CART19. Here, we co-cultured CART19, CD19 + JeKo, and 400 μg/mL of CD19 mAb for 24 hours and assessed HMGB1 on JeKo. In analogy to the apoptosis data, tafasitamab was the only mAb that prevented tumor cell pyroptosis, indicated by reduced HMGB1 expression (Fig 1A). Given these results, we aimed to study the impact of CD19 occupancy with different CD19 mAbs prior to CART19 infusion on tumor pyroptosis in vivo. We utilized a mouse model that mimics CAR T toxicities. Immunocompromised NSG mice were inoculated via tail vein with 5x10 6 leukemic cells derived from patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Two weeks later (day -7), tumor burden was assessed by peripheral blood sampling. Leukemic cells were defined as murine CD45 -, human CD45 + CD19 + CD20 + via flow cytometry, and volumetric absolute number was calculated. Mice were then randomized according to tumor burden to receive IgG control [Group 1 (G1)], tafasitamab (G2), HD37 (G3), or FMC63 (G4) (5 mg/kg, ip) at day -7. CRS was determined by weight loss, development of motor weakness, poor body posture, and elevated serum cytokine levels. At day 0, all mice received 3x10 6 luciferase + CART19 via tail vein. Mice were monitored with daily bioluminescent imaging (BLI) to track and quantify CART19 expansion and physical assessment to detect toxicity. BLI on day 4 revealed that CART19 expansion in the tafasitamab-treated group (G2, mean = 1x10 7, SD = 2.3x10 7) was significantly lower than in the control group (mean = 3.5x10 7, SD = 9.3x10 7), the HD37-treated group (G3, mean = 4x10 7, SD = 6.6x10 7), and the FMC63-treated group (G4, mean = 2x10 7, SD = 3.59x10 7), [G1 vs G2: 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5x10 7 to 1.1x10 8, p <0.0001, G1 vs G3: 95% CI -7.5x10 7 to -1.1x10 8, p=0.005, G1 vs G4: 95% CI -4.5x10 7 to 1.9x10 7, p=0.71] indicating that tafasitamab pretreatment significantly reduced early activation of CART19 compared to IgG control and HD37 in this model. Mice were bled on day 4 to analyze plasma cytokine. Tafasitamab-treated mice (G2) secreted significantly less IFNγ (Fig 1B), IL10 (Mean G1: 78, G2: 2.52, G3: 12.2, G4: 13.9 pg/mL), MDC (Mean G1: 4072, G2: 445, G3: 921, G4: 1364 pg/mL), and MIP1β (Mean G1: 283, G2: 59.1, G3: 148, G4: 123 pg/mL) compared to G1, G3, and G4. Satellite mice were euthanized on day 1 and spleens were harvested. Western blot analysis of splenocytes revealed that G1, 3, and 4 showed significantly lower expression of apoptosis-inducing protein gasdermin E on leukemic cells compared to G2, indicating reduced tumor pyroptosis in G2. In summary, application of the high affinity mAb tafasitamab prior to CART19 resulted in reduced CAR T apoptosis, diminished tumor cell pyroptosis, and reduction of CRS compared to lower affinity CD19 mAbs in preclinical models.

Introduction: Nanotechnology for cancer therapy aims to increase drug delivery to tumor sites while lowering toxicity. AR160 is a novel 160 nm nano-immunoconjugate consisting of commercial grade nab-paclitaxel (NP) nanoparticles non-covalently coated with rituximab (R) for targeted delivery into tissues expressing CD20. The drug delivery system and clinical grade product was developed in the laboratory of Svetomir N. Markovic, M.D.,Ph.D. Single agent rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 in relapsed patients with aggressive lymphomas is not utilized and has limited activity in patients with multiple relapses. Taxanes (Younes 1995, Wilson 1995) have modest clinical activity as a single agent with overall response rates of 23% and 17%, respectively, when administered at doses of 200 mg/m 2 and 140 mg/m 2 in previously treated patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We hypothesized that utilizing the targeted ability of rituximab that the AR160 taxane nanoparticle would have activity in relapsed B-cell NHL and offer a new class of agents for relapsed B-cell NHL. Methods: A 3+3 phase I clinical trial was conducted in patients with relapsed refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma to determine the maximum tolerated dose of AR160 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were required to have had prior systemic treatment with no other therapy with clinical benefit. Patients with aggressive lymphoma were required to have a stem cell transplant if transplant eligible. AR160 was prepared on-site in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Research Pharmacy, and the product was reconstituted by mixing the two agents delivering as one combined infusion at a specific concentration. The starting dose level (DL1) was NP at 100mg/m 2 with R at 40 mg/m 2. These doses were significantly lower than standard doses. Disease evaluations were conducted after every 2 treatment cycles using CT based criteria from the revised 2014 Lugano Classification or PET scans. Patients were treated until disease progression or intolerability. Samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. Results: Nine (7 males and 2 females) patients with a median age of 61 (range 55-84 years) were enrolled (2 follicular lymphoma (FL), 1 previously transformed from FL to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) followed by FL relapse, 1 high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements transformed from FL, 1 transformed FL to DLBCL, 2 high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements, 1 high-grade B-cell lymphoma NOS and 1 mantle cell lymphoma. The median number of prior treatments was 4 (range 3-16). At dose level 1, all 3 of the first 3 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (C1D15, C4D1, and C1D15) with the C4D1 a grade 4 and unlikely related. After the first three patients, de-escalation to dose level -1 was implemented per protocol with NP at 75 mg/m 2 and rituximab at 30 mg/m 2. There was one patient with a grade 3 non-hematological adverse event all possibly related to treatment (anorexia, diarrhea, and enterocolitis). There were 6 partial responses (71%), 1 complete response (14%) with high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangement, 1 stable disease with mantle cell lymphoma and 1 patient had progressive disease. Six of the 9 patients were alive with subsequent therapies. PK evaluation is pending. Conclusion: AR160 therapy is a novel drug delivery system incorporating significantly lower doses of paclitaxel and rituximab that is safe and demonstrates promising clinical activity in patients with low-grade and high-grade previously treated B-cell lymphomas. This principle of treatment is applicable to other disorders. Further clinical testing is warranted in these patient populations.