Citations

This case report describes a 65-year-old man who experienced complete remission of cavin-4 immunoglobulin G (IgG) rippling muscle disease after receiving rituximab therapy.

Abstract Purpose: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is an attractive target for radiopharmaceutical therapy. Phase I of the LuMIERE study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04939610) investigated the safety of [177Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 (177Lu-FAP-2286) in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors and identified the recommended phase II dosage (RP2D). Patients and Methods: LuMIERE is a prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, phase I/II, multicenter study. Phase I followed a Bayesian optimal interval design evaluating four escalating activity levels of 177Lu-FAP-2286 (3.70, 5.55, 7.40, and 9.25 GBq). Patients were selected by positive [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 (68Ga-FAP-2286, also known as [68Ga]Ga-HKG301) PET/CT imaging on all target lesions [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥1.5× SUVmean of mediastinal blood pool]. 177Lu-FAP-2286 was administered intravenously every 6 weeks for ≤6 cycles. The primary endpoint was dosage-limiting toxicities (DLT) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). Results: Of 35 patients imaged with 68Ga-FAP-2286, 27 received 177Lu-FAP-2286 (3.70 GBq, n = 3; 5.55 GBq, n = 6; 7.40 GBq, n = 7; 9.25 GBq, n = 11). Two DLTs were observed: one patient who received 5.55 GBq of 177Lu-FAP-2286 experienced grade 4 lymphopenia, and one patient who received 9.25 GBq experienced grade 3 hemoptysis; these were the only treatment-related grade ≥3 TEAEs. All-cause grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported for 11 patients (40.7%). The RP2D for 177Lu-FAP-2286 monotherapy was determined to be 9.25 GBq. Preliminary Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors efficacy findings demonstrated a partial response in 1 patient and stable disease in 10 patients (maintained for at least two assessments in 6 patients). Conclusions: 177Lu-FAP-2286 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. The safety and preliminary efficacy findings support its continued development in phase II.

Background The pathophysiology of CS is complex and is associated with increased inflammation and impaired vascular tone. Corticosteroids are recommended in septic shock and have been proposed as a potential treatment for other types of shock. Objectives We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with early corticosteroid use in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods Using a nationally representative database including over 1000 hospitals, we identified adults ≥18 years of age admitted from 2015–2023 with a diagnosis of CS. Patients with adrenal insufficiency, chronic rheumatologic conditions, COVID-19 infection and acute COPD exacerbation were excluded. Using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), we assessed for the association of receiving early corticosteroids (within the first 2 days of admission) versus no early corticosteroids and in-hospital mortality. Results Of the 167,721 identified patients with CS, the mean (SD) age was 65.5 (±15.2) years and 35.0% were women. A total of 13.2% received any corticosteroid within the first 2 days of admission. The most common corticosteroid was hydrocortisone (73.9%). Mortality for those receiving and not receiving early corticosteroids was 48.8% and 29.6% ( p < 0.001), respectively. After IPTW, early corticosteroid use remained associated with a 3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4% to 3.8%, p < 0.001) higher mortality. Among patients with CS and concomitant sepsis, 27.6% received early corticosteroids, which was similarly associated with a higher mortality (weighted mean 5.8% [95% CI: 4.6% to 7.0%, p < 0.001]). Conclusions Approximately 1 in 7 patients with CS received corticosteroids early during their admission, which was associated with higher in-hospital mortality.

Introduction Women residing in rural areas or belonging to lower socioeconomic status (SES) strata experience disproportionately low rates of breast cancer screening, contributing to delayed diagnoses and poorer prognoses. In addition, their participation in clinical trials remains markedly limited, reducing opportunities to access preventive and screening interventions. Promoting research preparedness among women before disease onset may empower them to make informed decisions regarding their health and willingness to participate in clinical research with fewer emotional and logistical barriers. Methods and analysis This project applies a community-based participatory research approach to develop and refine the WeCARE (Women’s Engagement for Cancer Awareness, Resources and Education) intervention for women aged 50–74 years who have either never undergone breast cancer screening or have not received screening in the past 5 years and who reside in rural areas or belong to low SES groups. The intervention consists of two components. Component 1 is a single-day, in-person community forum that includes (a) an educational seminar led by an oncologist to address breast cancer risk and screening guidelines, (b) survivor storytelling to enhance emotional engagement and cultural resonance and (c) facilitated navigation to breast cancer screening and future research participation. Component 2 involves structured post-forum follow-up through multiple touchpoints (phone calls and mailed boosters) to reinforce knowledge, address barriers and support screening completion and research enrolment. Quantitative data (eg, screening completion, satisfaction and follow-up engagement) will be summarised using descriptive statistics to assess feasibility and reach on 50 participants. Qualitative feedback from participants will undergo thematic analysis to identify barriers, facilitators and perceived cultural relevance. Integrated mixed-method interpretation will inform iterative refinement of the WeCARE intervention and guide design of subsequent larger trials. Ethics and dissemination Approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB #25–008934). All participants will provide informed consent. Procedures ensure confidentiality, cultural sensitivity and participant safety. Data will be stored in REDCap and disseminated through publications, conferences, local town halls and community reports.

ABSTRACT Cancer mortality is inequitably distributed across the U.S. and globally, with historically marginalized groups, particularly racial and ethnic minorities, being disproportionately affected. Disproportionate representation in clinical cancer research is a consequence of inequitable access as well as a central factor contributing to outcome disparities; it limits efficacy and safety data for underrepresented groups while directing drug development to be most beneficial for those enrolled. To tackle this problem and improve the efficacy and safety of commercially available therapies, a consensus conference on strategies to promote Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) in cancer research was empaneled in September 2022. The resulting “Indianapolis Black Paper” presented here is an international collaborative white paper with authors from industry, academia, and the government, as well as patient advocacy and community health groups. First, it outlines the roles and responsibilities of key groups involved in clinical cancer research, as they relate to representation and equity. The Black Paper then delineates five steps to promote diversity in clinical research. This actionable strategy is called “DRIVE,” and it involves: incorporating a Diversity officer into clinical research studies, Ranking clinical studies for diversity, developing an Individual diversity, equity, inclusion, and access plan, a process for Verifying study diversity, and Elevating and Enhancing training of minority investigators and research team members. Finally, we outline the timeline and milestones of implementation. Purposefully ambitious and crosscutting industry, academia, and governmental policy, the Black Paper aims to address “injustices in health” with enhanced safety, purpose, and humanity.

Objective We aim to identify risk factors to enable stratification of patients' susceptibility to inflammatory arthritis immune‐related adverse events (IA‐irAEs). This retrospective study mainly examines whether preexisting osteoarthritis (OA) increases the likelihood of de novo IA‐irAEs. Methods The prevalence of OA among immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–treated patients who developed IA‐irAE, those who developed other types of irAEs but not IA (non‐IA irAEs), and those who did not develop any irAEs (non‐irAEs) were compared. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. Group comparisons and logistic regression analyses were performed. Results A total of 181 de novo IA‐irAE patients, 140 non‐IA irAE patients, and 170 non‐irAE patients were included. The prevalence of OA was significantly higher in the IA‐irAE group (69%) than in the non‐IA irAE group (48%) and the non‐irAE group (48%) (both P < 0.001). The IA‐irAE group demonstrated a higher frequency of multisite OA, with more predominant hand involvement (62%) than the non‐IA irAE with OA group (13%) and the non‐irAE with OA group (13%) (both P < 0.001). A family history of autoimmune disease (AID) (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–4.05), preexisting OA (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.85–4.52), and melanoma (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.56–4.47) were identified as risk factors for the development of IA‐irAE. Conclusion OA was more prevalent among ICI‐treated patients developing IA‐irAE than those who were not. Hand OA was the most common OA pattern in IA‐irAE patients. Preexisting OA, melanoma, and a family history of AID were associated with IA‐irAE.

Abstract Darier disease (DD) is a rare autosomal dominant genodermatosis. This comprehensive review, developed by the Darier Disease International Task Force (DDITF), consolidates current knowledge on the genetic basis, molecular pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of DD, offering a global perspective that unites shared expertise. The disease arises from pathogenic variants in the ATP2A2 gene, which encodes sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ ‐ATPase isoform 2 (SERCA2), leading to disrupted calcium homeostasis and impaired desmosomal integrity. Clinically, DD is classified based on lesion type (classic vs. non‐classic) and is often accompanied by significant extracutaneous manifestations. Management remains challenging and requires a multifaceted approach, including topical therapies, systemic retinoids and lifestyle modifications. Emerging treatments that target the underlying molecular mechanisms offer promise for improved outcomes. This review aims to provide an updated reference and practical guidance for clinicians involved in the care and study of DD.