Citations

Summary Stag Beetle Knife (SB Knife) is increasingly being utilized for Zenker’s Diverticulectomy (ZD). Our study assessed the effectiveness and safety of the SB Knife for the management of ZD. Ovid EBM reviews, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to identify studies that utilized SB knife for ZD. Pooled proportions (PP) were calculated using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics. A total of 7 studies with 268 patients were included in the final analysis. Dysphagia and regurgitation were the most common clinical symptoms. The mean size of the ZD was 2.8 ± 0.7 cm and 28 (of 148) patients had undergone previous treatments. The PP of technical success was 98% (95% CI: 92.3–99.5; I20) with a mean procedure duration of 26.2 ± 8.3 minutes. The PP of clinical response at first follow-up and relapse after index procedure was 87.9% (95% CI: 81.6–92.3; I219) and 13.5% (95% CI: 9.6–18.6; I22), respectively. At final follow-up, the PP of clinical remission was 96.2% (95% CI: 91–98.4; I230.6) while the PP of procedure failure was 3.6% (95% CI: 1.6–8.1; I20). No severe adverse events (AEs) were noted while using the SB Knife. However, the PP of intraprocedural and postprocedural AEs was 13.2% (95% CI: 9.6–17.8; I20) and 9.3% (95% CI: 5.7–14.9; I2 < 20.9), respectively. SB Knife is highly safe and effective for Zenker’s Diverticulectomy with a failure rate of only 3.6%.

BACKGROUND: Aggressive angiomyxoma is a very rare mesenchymal tumor most commonly found in the pelvic and perineal regions. Although many are estrogen and progesterone hormone receptor positive, the pathogenesis is unknown. Due to its rarity, there is a paucity of literature relating to this pathology. This article presents a case series on the management of aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvis. OBJECTIVE: To present a 35-year experience managing aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvis. DESIGN: This was a retrospective single-system analysis. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a quaternary referral academic health care system. PATIENTS: All patients treated for aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvis. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent surgical or medical management of their disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were disease recurrence and mortality. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (94% women) were identified with a median follow-up of 65 months. Thirty patients (94%) underwent operative resection and 2 patients were treated solely with medical management. Fifteen achieved an R0 resection (negative microscopic margins) at the index operation, of which 4 (27%) experienced tumor recurrence. There were no mortalities. No risk factors for disease recurrence were identified. LIMITATIONS: Limitations to our study include its nonrandomized retrospective nature, single health care system experience, and small patient sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive angiomyxoma is a rare, slow-growing tumor with locally invasive features and a high potential for recurrence even after resection with negative margins. Imaging modalities such as CT or MRI should be obtained to aid in diagnosis and surgical planning. Workup should be paired with preoperative biopsy and testing for hormone receptor status, which can increase diagnostic accuracy and guide medical treatment. Close posttreatment surveillance is imperative to detect recurrence. See Video Abstract. ANGIOMIXOMA AGRESIVO DE PELVIS: EXPERIENCIA DE 35 AÑOS ANTECEDENTES: El angiomixoma agresivo es un tumor mesenquimal muy raro que se encuentra más comúnmente en las regiones pélvica y perineal. Aunque muchos son positivos para los receptores hormonales como el estrógeno y la progesterona, la patogénesis es aún desconocida. Debido a su rareza, existe escasa literatura relacionada con esta patología. Este artículo presenta una serie de casos sobre el tratamiento del angiomixoma agresivo de pelvis. OBJETIVO: Presentar una experiencia de 35 años en el manejo del angiomixoma agresivo de pelvis. DISEÑO: Este fue un análisis retrospectivo de sistema único. AJUSTES: Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un sistema de salud académico de referencia de nivel cuaternario. PACIENTES: Todos los pacientes tratados por angiomixoma agresivo de pelvis. INTERVENCIONES: Todos los pacientes se sometieron a tratamiento quirúrgico y/o médico de su enfermedad. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Los resultados primarios fueron la recurrencia de la enfermedad y la mortalidad. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron factores de riesgo de recurrencia. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron un total de 32 pacientes (94% mujeres) con una mediana de seguimiento de 65 meses. Treinta (94%) fueron sometidos a resección quirúrgica y dos fueron tratados únicamente con tratamiento médico. Quince lograron una resección R0 (márgenes microscópicos negativos) en la operación inicial, de los cuales cuatro (27%) experimentaron recurrencia tumoral. No hubo mortalidades. No se identificaron factores de riesgo para la recurrencia de la enfermedad. LIMITACIONES: Las limitaciones de nuestro estudio incluyen su naturaleza retrospectiva no aleatoria, la experiencia de un solo sistema de atención médica y el tamaño pequeño de la muestra de pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: El angiomixoma agresivo es un tumor raro, de crecimiento lento, con características localmente invasivas y un alto potencial de recurrencia incluso después de una resección con márgenes negativos. Se deben obtener modalidades de imágenes como CT y/o MRI para la ayuda diagnóstica y la planificación quirúrgica. El estudio debe combinarse con una biopsia preoperatoria y pruebas del estado de los receptores hormonales, que pueden aumentar la precisión del diagnóstico y guiar el tratamiento médico. Es imperativa una estrecha vigilancia posterior al tratamiento para detectar recurrencia. (Traducción—Dr Osvaldo Gauto)

The value of the crossmatch test in assessing pretransplant immunological risk is vital for clinical decisions, ranging from the indication of the transplant to the guidance of induction protocols and treatment with immunosuppressants. The crossmatch tests in transplantation can be physical or virtual, each with its advantages and limitations. Currently, the virtual crossmatch stands out for its sensitivity and specificity compared to the physical tests. Additionally, the virtual crossmatch can be performed in less time, allowing for a reduction in cold ischemia time. It shows a good correlation with the results of physical tests and does not negatively impact graft survival. Proper communication between clinicians and the transplant immunology laboratory will lead to a deeper understanding of each patient’s immunological profile, better donor–recipient selection, and improved graft survival.

ABSTRACT Histoplasma and Blastomyces antigen detection assays are commonly used diagnostic tools. However, a high level of cross-reactivity between these antigens prevents definitive pathogen identification by these assays alone. Retrospective analysis of 3,529 patients with Histoplasma and Blastomyces antigen testing performed on the same serum sample yielded an overall percent agreement of 99.3% (3,506 of 3,529; kappa: 0.859) between the two assays, suggesting that use of a single assay to detect both antigens may be an alternative diagnostic approach. We assessed performance of the Gotham BioTech Blastomyces antigen (GBA) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Portland, Maine) for detection of Blastomyces and Histoplasma antigens in serum. Comparison to the MiraVista Diagnostics Blastomyces (MVB) EIA showed 100% positive (24 of 24), negative (57 of 57), and overall (81 of 81) percent agreement. Additionally, 171 sera were used to compare the GBA EIA to the MiraVista Diagnostics Histoplasma (MVH) EIA, which showed 91.3% (63 of 69), 98% (100 of 102), and 95.3% (163 of 171) positive, negative, and overall percent agreement, respectively. Among eight patients with discordant GBA/MVH EIA results, seven had additional fungal testing performed, and results suggested that the MVH and GBA results were inaccurate for two and five samples, respectively. Overall, this study suggests that the GBA EIA has a high level of agreement with both of the commonly used, individual Blastomyces and Histoplasma antigen EIAs. By taking advantage of the high level of cross-reactivity between Blastomyces and Histoplasma antigen EIAs, utilization of a single antigen detection assay for these fungi provides an opportunity to optimize test utilization and decrease patient cost while maintaining a high level of diagnostic accuracy.