Citations

Introduction: The Innovalve TMVR is a novel self-expandable trans-catheter mitral valve prosthesis, delivered trans-septally using femoral venous access. It is deployed in an intra-valvular posterior position after sub-valvular anchoring by rotation of 6 circumferential arms. LV outflow tract (LVOT) compromise is of great concern in TMVR. A predicted Neo LVOT area of 170 mm 2 is the currently accepted cut-off for LVOT obstruction. Hypothesis: CT can accurately predict the Neo LVOT area prior to Innovalve TMVR procedure. Methods: CT was performed as a screening tool to evaluate the Neo LVOT area prior to Innovalve TMVR procedure. CT protocol: Retrospectively ECG gated with full cardiac cycle coverage. CT was performed before and after the procedure. Predicted Neo LVOT (pNLVOT) was calculated using a dedicated simulation valve prior to TMVR, actual Neo LVOT (aNLVOT) was calculated with the inserted valve in place following TMVR. The native LVOT (nLVOT) area, the predicted % LVOT reduction (nLVOT area-pNLVOT area /nLVOT area), the actual % LVOT reduction (nLVOT area-aNLVOT area /nLVOT area) and the difference between them (pNLVOT%-aNLVOT%) were calculated. Results: One hundred patients were screened for Innovalve TMVR procedure based on Neo LVOT criteria. pNLVOT≥ 170 mm 2 was found in 11 patients (11%), (7 males) average age 68±10 years, these patients underwent Innovalve TMVR procedure. The median calculated LVOT was 647.8+/-260 mm 2 (range 373-1312), the median pNLVOT reduction was 16% ±15 (range 3-53), the median aNLVOT reduction was 5%±14 (range -5-40) and the median difference between the pNLVOT and aNLVOT was 8±12 (range -4-31). In 8/11 patients (73%), the aNLVOT was larger than the pNLVOT (range difference 1 to 31%). In 3/11 patients (27%), the aNLVOT was smaller than the pNLVOT (range difference -1 to -4%). Conclusions: Underestimation of neoLVOT reduction, was uncommon and documented only minor and clinically insignificant difference between the pNLVOT and aNLVOT. As overestimation of NLVOT reduction allows a margin of safety for MTVR, we conclude that CT can serve as reliable NLVOT screening tool.

Introduction: Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement (TMVR) using a trans-septal approach is a new therapeutic option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). However, both surgical as well as currently under-testing trans-catheter approach, are shown to cause decrease in LV function. The Innovalve TMVR is a novel self-expandable transcatheter mitral valve prosthesis, delivered trans-septally using femoral venous access. It is deployed in an intravalvular posterior position after subvalvular anchoring by rotation of 6 circumferential arms Hypothesis: TMVR procedure (Innovalve system) leads to LV anatomical and functional changes Methods: CT was performed before the Innovalve TMVR procedure, and after 3 to 6 months. CT protocol included retrospective ECG gating with full cardiac cycle coverage. LV end diastolic and end systolic diameters (LVEDD, LVESD) were measured in the left ventricular outflow tract orientation at the most basal level. Tip to tip papillary muscle distance was measured in the short axis orientation at the most basal slice demonstrating the papillary muscle tips. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated using the end systolic and end diastolic volumes. All measurements were performed at end systole and end diastole before MTVR and after 3-6 months using a dedicated platform (3Mensio). Results: Ten patients (7 males) average age 69+/-10 years, underwent the Innovalve TMVR procedure. Average LVESD decreased from 52±15 mm at baseline to 44±15mm (P=0.016) at 3-6 months. Similarly, LVEDD decreased from 60±14 mm at baseline, to 52±13mm at 3-6 months (P=0.039). Average papillary muscle tip to tip distance at end diastole (ED) decreased from 31.7±7mm at baseline to 28.4±6.5mm at 3-6 months (P=0.047).A trend of LVEF improvement was evident with an increase from 35%±12 average at baseline compared with 39%±12 average after 3-6 months (P=0.346). Conclusions: These preliminary results show that the TMVR procedure using the Innovalve system may result in favourable LV reverse remodelling changes including reduction of LVESD, LVEDD and ED papillary muscle distances, with improved LVEF. This encouraging data might suggest favourable postprocedural structural LV change.

Background: Robust models exist to predict risk-adjusted mortality following congenital heart surgery. It is known that underlying diagnosis modifies predicted risk of operations, and institution-level outcomes vary based on their unique case mix. We therefore evaluated risk-adjusted outcomes for a subset of diagnosis-procedure (D-P) combinations within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' (STS) congenital heart surgery database (CHSD). Methods: A clinician panel identified the most frequently encountered D-P combinations in CHSD between 07/2017 and 06/2021. Candidate modeling techniques were compared in a random 80% development cohort. Model performance was assessed using internal and cross-validation calibration, discrimination plots and optimism adjusted C-statistics. The final selected model was evaluated in the 20% validation sample. Results: The chosen subset of D-P combinations represented 45,384 of 87,589 (52%) unique episodes of surgical care in CHSD during this time-period. The development cohort (36,350 episodes) had 1.8% mortality (667 deaths). All candidate models had excellent discrimination with C-statistics ranging from 0.862 to 0.876. The model with the best combination of discrimination, calibration, and clinical face validity was a modified version of the current STS mortality risk model. This version included all current risk model variables with the addition of indicator variables for D-P combinations. In the 20% validation sample (9,034 episodes), this model was well calibrated (Figure) and had excellent discrimination (C = 0.879). Conclusion: We describe a cohort of D-P combinations widely encountered in the STS CHSD. Further, we refined the existing STS CHSD risk model for application to these D-P dyads to derive empirical risk-adjusted benchmark outcomes. This approach will benefit quality improvement efforts at an institutional level and may have implications for publicly reporting congenital heart surgery outcomes.

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective and potentially curative treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the recurrence of AF following CA treatment in cases of persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) remains a significant concern. This study aims to establish a correlation between the peak flow velocity of the left atrial appendage (LAAV) and the AF recurrence post-CA for PeAF. Methods: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases were systematically reviewed to find studies through June 2023 reporting data on the relationship between the LAAV and the recurrence of AF in individuals who have undergone CA for PeAF. Binary random effects models were used to estimate pooled outcomes. I2 statistics were used to interpret heterogeneity, with I 2 >75% indicating substantial inter-study variation. Leave-one-out meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of each study on the overall estimate. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 9 studies between 2000-2023 were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled univariate analysis revealed no association between LAAV and recurrence of AF in individuals who have undergone CA with a pooled OR of 1.09 (95CI 0.96-1.22) p=0.45, I2=86.59%. The multivariate analysis, after adjusting for overall modifiable risk factors, yielded significant results, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.41 (95CI 1.15-1.74) p<0.01, I2=85.24%. Sensitivity analysis, using the leave-one-out method&nbsp;demonstrated the robustness and stability of the results, indicating that no single study disproportionately influenced the overall&nbsp;findings with aOR 1.41 (95CI 1.15-1.74) p<0.01. Conclusions: This meta-analysis revealed that low LAAV is associated with high-risk of AF recurrence following CA. Identifying a specific subgroup of individuals at high risk of AF recurrence with the help of pre-CA LAA velocity will facilitate the early institution of alternative treatment strategies.

Introduction: Oncology societies have been contributing guidelines/recommendations to the limited yet growing body of literature in cardio-oncology. Research Questions: What are the levels of evidence (LOE) and classes of recommendation (COR) for cardiology-specific recommendations produced by major oncology societies? Methods: We reviewed cardiology-specific recommendations published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), American Society of Hematology (ASoH), NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network), and European Society of Cardiology (ESC). LOE and COR were noted for each recommendation. Results: The US oncologic societies have made 81 cardiac-specific recommendations (ASCO: 54 (67%); ASoH: 14 (17%); NCCN; 13 (16%) (Tables 1-3). For ASCO, 26 (48%) were COR 1, 23 (43%) COR 2, and 5 (9%) COR 3 supported by LOE A (9%), LOE B (39%), and LOE C (52%). For ASoH, 1(8%) was COR 1, 11(85%) COR 2, and 1(8%) COR 3 supported by LOE B (7%), and LOE C (93%). NCCN made 13 COR 2 recommendations and did not provide LOE classification. The most common recommendations addressed baseline (20%) and serial (24%) assessment, specific imaging modalities (9%), chemotherapy dosing (19%), and radiation therapy (20%). Most recommendations were unique without discrepant statements, but there were some redundancies. ESC produced 271 cardio-oncology recommendations (155 COR 1; 111 COR 2; 5 COR-3) with 3% LOE A, 21% LOE B, and 76% LOE C. The major areas for ESC recommendations included baseline (18%) and serial (33%) assessment, and medications (29%). Conclusions: Oncology and cardiology professional society guidelines have provided 352 cardiac related recommendations in the setting of cancer treatment and 73% have the lowest LOE. In this developing field with a limited evidence base, close collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists will be required to provide a cohesive set of recommendations for the cardiac issues associated with cancer treatment.

Introduction: Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] has been recognized as an independent predictor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, there is limited data on the association between Lp(a) levels and risk of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI)/coronary revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched for studies evaluating the association of Lp(a) with recurrent ischemic events from the year 2000-2023. Patients with coronary artery disease or ACS with baseline Lp(a) who underwent PCI or coronary stenting and had outcomes as recurrent MI/ coronary revascularization were included. Random effects models and I 2 statistics were used for pooled hazard ratios (HR), odds ratio (OR), and heterogeneity assessment. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was also performed. Results: The initial search resulted in 651 articles, of which nine studies with 27964 patients (mean age 58-66 years, 74.79% male) were included. Of the nine studies, six were retrospective and three prospective. Mean±SD/Median (IQ) follow-up duration was four years [range 2-7 years]. There was an increased risk of recurrent MI/coronary revascularization associated with Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL (OR, 1.44, 95% CI: 1.09-1.89, I 2 = 79.24%, p=0.009) (Fig 1a) and Lp(a) ≥10-30 mg/dL (OR, 1.19, 95% CI: 1.009-1.416, I 2 = 0%, p=0.039) (Fig 1b), but failed to reach significance with Lp(a) as a continuous variable (OR, 1.004, 95% CI: 0.998-1.009, I 2 = 85.02%, p=0.221) (Fig 1c). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis showed an equivalent result for various Lp(a) cutoffs (Fig 1a, 1b, and 1c). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests an association of raised Lp(a) with increased risk of recurrent MI/coronary revascularization in ACS patients who underwent PCI.

Introduction: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), independent of shared risk factors. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, clinical, and echocardiographic (TTE) features of HFpEF in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD in the Duke NAFLD Biorepository and Clinical Database. Study entry was at the time of liver biopsy and patients were followed until death or 5/1/2023. Clinical and echocardiographic data were abstracted via manual chart review. HFpEF was defined as: at least one TTE characteristic (left atrial volume index ≥ 29 ml/m 2 , septal wall thickness ≥ 1 cm, or evidence of diastolic dysfunction) and signs or symptoms of heart failure (diagnosis of heart failure on problem list, hospitalization for heart failure, elevated NT pro-BNP level, jugular venous distention, use of loop diuretics, pulmonary or peripheral edema, fatigue, or exertional symptoms). Descriptive statistics were evaluated. Results: A total of 742 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the cohort was 50 +/- 12 years, and 83% were White. 95 (13%) had TTE both prior to study entry and during follow up, while 279 patients (38%) had TTE only during follow up. A total of 185 patients met criteria for HFpEF during follow up. After removing patients with TTE evidence of HFpEF prior to study entry, there were 132 cases of incident HFpEF over a mean follow up of 9.1 years, representing 47% of those with TTE after liver biopsy, and 18% of the overall cohort. Considering only TTE criteria, 142 patients had incident HFpEF. During follow up, 12 patients were hospitalized for heart failure. Conclusions: HFpEF is common in patients with NAFLD and a small percentage of patients do not have a chart diagnosis despite meeting echocardiographic criteria, suggesting that HFpEF may be under-recognized. Screening for HFpEF and/or formal care pathways to address early heart failure will be important to prevent morbidity and mortality in this population.

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is thesecond leading cause of death globally, accounting for approximately 11% of alldeaths, long-term disability, and functional impairments in survivors. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about its impact on AIS patients. Aim: This study aimed to assess the outcomes,including mortality and severity of disability in AIS hospitalizations withCOVID-19. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectionalanalysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS-2020) in adulthospitalizations for AIS to compare the outcomes [death & APRDRGseverity/disability] in COVID-19 patients using ICD-10 codes. We performedweighted analyses using chi-square, unpaired t-test, and multivariate logisticregression models to evaluate COVID-19-associated poor outcomes amongst AISpatients. Results: Out of 504,460 AIS patients, 7,590 had AIStriggered by COVID-19. Amongst AIS hospitalizations, COVID-19 was more frequentin age group >65 year old 63.2%, male 52.6%, White race (51.4%), patientwith Medicare (58.7%), median household income 0-25 percentile (33.6%), Southzone (43.4%), and hypertensives (83.7%). AIS patients with COVID-19 had ahigher mortality (10.93% vs 3.8%) and severe/extreme disability (93.21% vs37.43%) rates in comparison to patients without COVID-19. (p<0.0001) Inregression analysis COVID-19 was associated with 213% higher odds of mortality(aOR: 3.13, 95% CI: 2.90-3.38, p<0.0001, c:0.671) and higher odds of severe/extreme disability(26.85, 24.53-29.39, p<0.0001, c:0.686) compared to AIS patients withoutCOVID-19. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the substantialimpact of COVID-19 on AIS patients by elevating mortality and risk of severedisability compared to their counterparts. Efforts should be directed towards earlyidentification of stroke population that is at higher risk ofCOVID-19-associated poor outcome and prompt management tomitigate the burden of the both diseases.

Introduction and Importance: Current guidelines recommend against pre-procedural transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) prior to cardioversion in atrial fibrillation patients compliant with oral anticoagulants for at least 3 weeks. The relevance of these guidelines remain unclear in those undergoing repeat cardioversion. Case Presentation: 66-year-old male with a history of atrial fibrillation and an implanted left atrial appendage occlusion device(LAAO), compliant with apixaban, presented with dyspnea and lightheadedness. He was cardioverted into sinus rhythm 10 days prior to symptom onset with TEE unremarkable for thrombus. Vitals were remarkable for tachycardia and electrocardiogram revealed that the patient converted back into atrial fibrillation. Patient was then scheduled for cardioversion. At the patient’s request, a TEE was obtained which revealed a new thrombus in the left atrium located on his WATCHMAN device. Cardioversion was canceled and patient was admitted for coumadin initiation with lovenox bridge along with neurological monitoring due to increased stroke risk. Clinical Discussion: Restoration of sinus rhythm after cardioversion can lead to thrombus formation due to atrial stunning, a transitory dysfunction of the atrial appendage and atrium.Atrial stunning occurs immediately after cardioversion and can persist for several weeks. Time-span of preceding atrial fibrillation, presence of structural cardiovascular disease, and atrial size impact severity of atrial stunning and duration of anticoagulation needed.While anticoagulation decreases the risk of thrombus formation, it does not completely eliminate it, especially in those with increased stroke risk factors. Conclusion: Atrial fibrillation patients are susceptible to thrombus formation after cardioversion.Further studies should be done to assess the need for routine TEE after cardioversion in those with increased risk for stroke on anticoagulants or who have LAAO.

Introduction: Advanced imaging with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or computed tomography (CCT) can be helpful for planning of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation procedures by defining the arrhythmogenic substrate. The frequency with which these modalities are utilized in the pre-ablation setting and the associated outcomes remain poorly studied. Objectives: (1) Determine the utilization of advanced cardiac imaging prior to structural VT ablation; (2) establish factors associated with improved VT ablation outcomes Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all VT ablations performed in patients with structural heart disease at a tertiary referral institution during a 2.5 year period (1/2020 - 7/2022). We documented pre-ablation use of cardiac imaging modalities and investigated their association with acute and long-term ablation outcomes. The primary outcome was time to VT recurrence, cardiac transplant, or death. Results: Our dataset included n = 129 subjects. Median post-ablation follow-up was 17 months. Recent echocardiogram, CMR, or CCT (<3 months pre-ablation) had been performed in 113 (88%), 48 (37%), and 31 (24%) patients, respectively. CMR was not associated with procedural success, post-ablation VT recurrence (p = 1), or the composite primary outcome (p = 0.72). Similarly, recent CCT was not associated with procedural success (p = 0.5), VT recurrence (p = 0.3), or the composite primary outcome (p = 0.31). When adjusted for other variables, EF (p = 0.048), recent echo (p = 0.02), and procedural success (p = 0.013) were associated with the primary outcome, but recent CCT (p = 0.11) and CMR (p = 0.4) were not. These results did not differ significantly in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Conclusions: In this large tertiary care ablation center, CMR and CCT were utilized in only a fraction of patients prior to VT ablations. In multivariate analysis, CMR or CCT were not associated with improved acute or long-term ablation outcomes.