Citations

Abstract Background The LIBERTY-CD study demonstrated a broad level of benefit for subcutaneous (SC) infliximab (IFX) maintenance therapy compared with placebo in patients (pts) with moderate-to-severe active Crohn’s disease (CD) who responded to intravenous IFX induction. Characterising subgroups of pts with different levels of response could help to better position SC IFX therapy. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of 231 pts from the CT-P13 SC arm of the randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled LIBERTY-CD study (NCT03945019). Unsupervised group-based trajectory modelling (GBTM) was conducted to deconvolute cohort-level data into response trajectories. Longitudinal patient reported outcomes (PRO-2: abdominal pain and stool frequency) were used to investigate whether pts who received SC IFX maintenance therapy cluster into response trajectories. Efficacy endpoints (clinical remission, endoscopic response and remission, corticosteroid-free remission and comprehensive disease control [CDC] rate) were analysed and compared between different trajectories. Trough levels of IFX (TLI) were evaluated by trajectory throughout the treatment period. Baseline characteristics were analysed in a descriptive manner to explore predictors for super-response. Results Four distinct trajectories were clearly separated and stabilised around Week (W) 10–14 (Figure): rapid and sustained improvement (super-responders, n=61), rapid, but slightly less drastic than super-responders, then sustained improvement (fast responders, n=56), gradual then sustained improvement (slow responders, n=63) and partial improvement during the maintenance phase (limited responders, n=51). Super-responders had the highest rates of W54 clinical remission (73.8%; p=0.002), endoscopic response (63.9%; p=0.009), corticosteroid-free remission (63.6%; p=0.007), endoscopic remission (42.6%; p=0.094) and CDC (37.7%; p=0.013) among trajectories (Table). Super-responders also maintained the highest TLI from W10 throughout the maintenance period. Super-responders showed a trend towards lower baseline body weight, body mass index and oral corticosteroid use, but higher Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score and prior biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor use compared to other trajectories. Conclusion Distinct subpopulations with different levels of responses were detected by GBTM using data from a large group of pts with moderate-to-severe active CD who were treated with SC IFX for 1 year. Super-responders with rapid and sustained improvements during SC IFX therapy had a higher likelihood of achieving desirable long-term outcomes, with substantial individual benefit (CDC). Baseline characteristics and TLI were associated with super-response.

Abstract Background Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous work has shown age can impact treatment safety and efficacy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.1 This post hoc analysis investigated the impact of age on the safety and efficacy of etrasimod in patients with UC in the phase 3 ELEVATE UC clinical programme. Methods Data pooled from the ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) and ELEVATE UC 12 (NCT03996369) trials were analysed in patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg QD and placebo. ELEVATE UC 52 had a treat-through design comprising a 12-week induction period followed by a 40-week maintenance period. ELEVATE UC 12 was a 12-week induction trial. Proportions and incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years from pooled data of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and events of interest were stratified by age (<40 years, 40–59 years, ≥60 years) and analysed in patients who received ≥1 dose of etrasimod or placebo. Efficacy analyses were evaluated in patients with baseline Modified Mayo score (MMS) 5–9 for the primary efficacy endpoint (clinical remission) and select secondary endpoints at Week 12 (both trials) and Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52) stratified by age. Results There were 787 patients enrolled in the ELEVATE UC programme, of whom 420 (53.4%) were aged <40 years, 276 (35.1%) were aged 40–59 years and 91 (11.6%) were aged ≥60 years. The proportions and IRs of TEAEs and events of interest were mostly similar between age groups and treatment arms (Table). IRs of arthralgia, fatigue, hypertension and pyrexia were higher in older age groups, regardless of treatment arm. Serious AEs and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were low and consistent across all age subgroups. Serious infections and infection events of interest were balanced across age groups and treatment arms. Regardless of age subgroup, significantly more patients treated with etrasimod 2 mg QD vs placebo achieved the primary and select secondary efficacy endpoints at Week 12 and Week 52 (Figure). Conclusion The safety profile of etrasimod 2 mg QD in the UC population was consistent across age groups, and with no new risks other than the estimated risks associated with increasing age.2 Patients receiving etrasimod in the ELEVATE UC programme showed significant clinical benefit as assessed by clinical remission, symptomatic remission and endoscopic improvement compared with placebo, regardless of age. References 1. Lichtenstein GR et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 27–41. 2. Luo J et al. JMIR Med Inform 2016; 4: e30.

Abstract Background Long-term corticosteroid (CS) use is not recommended for patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC). Receiving early advanced therapy (AT) may help limit CS overuse, but there is a need to identify pt populations who may benefit most from receiving early AT as monotherapy. Previous post hoc analyses of the phase 3 True North (TN) study (NCT02435992) demonstrated ozanimod (OZA) efficacy in 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA)–exposed, AT-naive, immunomodulator (IMM)–naive pts. This analysis further assessed the efficacy of OZA induction therapy with and without concomitant CS in this pt population by baseline (BL) endoscopic disease severity. Methods In TN, pts in Cohort 1 (C1) were randomised to OZA or placebo (PBO); pts in Cohort 2 (C2) received open-label OZA through Week (W) 10. Pts were on stable doses of oral 5-ASA and/or CS for ≥2 wk before screening and continuing through W10. 5-ASA–exposed, AT-naive, IMM-naive pts were grouped as moderate (Mayo endoscopy subscore [MES]=2 at BL) or severe (MES=3 at BL). Data were analysed in all moderate and severe pts and by concomitant CS use. Clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement, mucosal healing, and histologic remission were assessed at W10. Results Of the 464 5-ASA–exposed, AT-naive, IMM-naive pts, 237 had moderate (PBO, n=47; OZA C1, n=108; OZA C2], n=82) and 227 had severe (PBO, n=54; OZA C1, n=97; OZA C2, n=76) BL endoscopic disease. BL pt characteristics were generally similar between moderate and severe pts with or without concomitant CS use. Overall, OZA was significantly more effective in moderate pts and numerically more effective in severe pts vs PBO in C1, with numerically greater treatment differences in moderate vs severe pts (Figure 1A). The moderate and severe groups each had 51 pts (~22%) on concomitant CS. In moderate pts, numerically greater OZA vs PBO C1 treatment differences were observed in those without concomitant CS use vs those with concomitant CS use for clinical remission and clinical response; treatment differences were significant for all endpoints in pts without concomitant CS use (Figure 1B). In contrast, severe pts with concomitant CS use demonstrated greater OZA vs PBO C1 treatment differences vs those without concomitant CS use for all endpoints (Figure 1C). Results in OZA C2 were generally similar to OZA C1. Conclusion OZA treatment was efficacious in 5-ASA–exposed, AT-naive, IMM-naive pts with UC, with numerically greater efficacy in moderate pts than severe pts. Additionally, the results suggest that concomitant CS may not provide additional benefit over OZA monotherapy in moderate pts. These findings support OZA positioning after 5-ASA, but before CS, in pts with moderate UC.

Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL), an oral, once-daily, Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, was approved for Ulcerative Colitis (UC) treatment after the phase 2b/3 SELECTION trial (NCT02914522). In SELECTION, a greater proportion of FIL200 mg (FIL200)-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved comprehensive disease control (CDC), a stringent multi-component endpoint. We examined the long-term outcomes of achieving CDC in patients continuing on FIL200 in the ongoing long-term extension (LTE) study SELECTIONLTE (NCT02914535). Methods This interim analysis included adult patients with UC who completed SELECTION and received ≤144 weeks of FIL200 in the LTE (up to data cut-off 24/02/22). CDC (biomarker remission, endoscopic improvement, IBDQ remission and partial Mayo Clinic Score [pMCS] remission achieved concurrently) was assessed at SELECTION week 58 (LTE baseline [BL]). Mean pMCS and IBDQ score, use of corticosteroids (CS) and incidence of TEAEs and serious TEAEs in the LTE were compared between SELECTION CDC achievers and non-achievers. A mixed model for repeated measures was fitted on pMCS and IBDQ score, with CDC achiever status, study visit and the interaction between CDC achiever status and study visit as fixed effects; p values were nominal. Results We analysed 148 patients (CDC achievers, n=41; CDC non-achievers, n=107). Mean pMCS was stable in CDC achievers (0.44, LTE BL; 0.50, LTE week 144) and decreased in CDC non-achievers (1.49, LTE BL; 0.77, LTE week 144; Figure). Mean IBDQ score was stable in CDC achievers (204.05, LTE BL; 197.21, LTE week 144) and increased in CDC non-achievers (181.55, LTE BL; 196.37, LTE week 144; Figure). There was a significant beneficial effect of achieving CDC on pMCS and IBDQ score overall (pMCS: fixed effect estimate: −0.5542, p=0.0025; IBDQ score: fixed effect estimate: 13.1585, p=0.0042). There was a significant interaction between achieving CDC and study visit for IBDQ score (p=0.0183), with the benefit of achieving CDC lessening by week 144. Generally, a lower proportion of CDC achievers used CS than non-achievers; 2.4–7.3% of CDC achievers used CS vs 1.9–15.9% of CDC non-achievers. Incidence of TEAEs and serious TEAEs were stable over time and similar between CDC achievers and non-achievers. Conclusion Follow-up for ~3 years showed high levels of long-term benefit with continued FIL200 treatment. Achieving comprehensive disease control at the end of the randomized trial with FIL200 was associated with long-term efficacy, improved HRQoL and low overall use of CS. This may demonstrate the value of filgotinib-induced achievement of CDC in UC disease course. The safety profile of FIL200 was consistent between CDC achievers and non-achievers, suggesting an acceptable long-term benefit–risk profile.

Abstract Background Recent evidence challenges the current standard of offering surgery to patients with ileocecal Crohn’s disease only when they present complications of the disease. Methods A retrospective, multicenter comparative analysis was performed including patients operated for primary ileocecal CD at 12 referral centers. Patients were divided in 2 groups, according to indication of surgery for inflammatory (ICD) or complicated (CCD) phenotype. Short-term results were compared. Patients operated on for primary isolated ileocaecal CD (last 50 cm of the terminal ileum and cecum), either for predominantly inflammatory phenotype or for complications of the disease (stricturing or fistulizing pattern), between January 2012 - December 2021 were considered eligible to participate in this study. Patients with previous abdominal procedures for CD, and patients who had activity of the disease in other intestinal segments other than the ileocaecal region at the time of surgery, were excluded from the study. Results 2013 patients were included, 291 (14.5%) in the ICD group. No differences were found between groups in time from diagnosis to surgery or in the levels of exposure to biologic drugs before indication of surgery. CCD patients had higher rates of low BMI, anemia (40.9 vs. 27%, p: < 0.001), and low albumin (11.3 vs. 2.6%, p: < 0.001). CCD patients had longer operations, lower rates of laparoscopic approach (84.3 vs. 93.1%, p: 0.001), and higher conversion rates (9.3 vs. 1.9%, p: < 0.001). CCD had longer hospital stay and higher postoperative complication rates (26.1 vs. 21.3%, p: 0.083). Anastomotic leakage and reoperations were also more frequent in this group. More patients in the CCD group required an extended bowel resection (14.1 vs. 8.3%, p: 0.017). In multivariate analysis, CCD was associated with prolonged surgeries (OR: 3.44, p: 0.001) and requirements of multiple intraoperative procedures (OR: 8.39, p: 0.030). Conclusion Indication of surgery in patients who present an inflammatory phenotype of CD was associated with better outcomes when compared to patients operated on for complications of the disease, without a difference between groups in time from diagnosis to surgery.

Abstract Background Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Adverse events (AEs) pertaining to tolerability, laboratory and serious AEs are described elsewhere1,2; we present a post hoc analysis of the incidence, onset and duration of the most commonly occurring non-serious AEs in the etrasimod UC clinical programme. Methods Data from the pooled Placebo-controlled UC cohort, derived from the phase 2 OASIS (NCT02447302) and phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) and ELEVATE UC 12 (NCT03996369) double-blind clinical trials, were included. Cohorts comprised OASIS and ELEVATE UC 12 12-week induction periods alongside the ELEVATE UC 52 12-week induction and 40-week maintenance periods utilising a "treat-through" design. Patients (pts) with moderately to severely active UC were eligible for the etrasimod UC clinical programme. Pts were randomised to etrasimod 1 mg once daily (QD; OASIS only), etrasimod 2 mg QD or placebo. Proportions and incidence rates (IRs) of non-serious AEs (MedDRA v24.1 Preferred Terms of headache, pyrexia, nausea, fatigue and dizziness) were analysed in the Placebo-controlled UC cohort. Results Among 943 pts (any dose of etrasimod, N=629 [288.1 pt years (PY)]; placebo, N=314 [115.1 PY]), there were 77, 36, 30, 15 and 23 headache, pyrexia, nausea, fatigue and dizziness AEs, respectively. All were non-serious and did not lead to treatment discontinuation, apart from one case of pyrexia in which early termination visits were incomplete. Proportions and IRs (per 100 PY) for headache and dizziness AEs were higher with etrasimod (any dose) vs placebo (IRs: 13.45 vs 8.63 and 6.52 vs 1.69, respectively); IRs for other non-serious AEs were similar in etrasimod (any dose) and placebo groups (Table). Onset of AEs varied over time and most AEs were short in duration (Figure shows onset and duration for headache and dizziness AEs). Most AEs were deemed not related to study treatment by the site investigator. Pts with dizziness on Days 1–3 had similar changes in heart rate vs those with dizziness after Day 3. No consistent trend in heart rate was observed in pts receiving etrasimod with early dizziness. Conclusion Among pts in the etrasimod UC clinical programme, all headache, pyrexia, nausea, fatigue and dizziness events were non-serious. IRs were similar for most non-serious AEs across treatment groups, excluding headache and dizziness. Most non-serious AEs were short in duration and judged as not related to study treatment, suggesting they may not impact on the overall tolerability of etrasimod. References 1. Sandborn WJ et al. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 550–61. 2. Sandborn WJ et al. Lancet 2023; 401: 1159–71.

Abstract Background Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) are at higher risk of developing dysplastic lesions and colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite the use of high-definition endoscopes, dysplasia is not always detected at colonoscopy. This study aims to determine the rate of dysplastic lesions detected only at colectomy in IBD patients and to identify the characteristics of patients with undetected dysplasia. Methods We retrospectively identified IBD patients that underwent total or sub-total colectomy at Mayo Clinic, between January 2013 and December 2022. Patients with a confirmed IBD diagnosis, with at least one colonoscopy report prior to surgery available, were included. Data collected was demographics, comorbid conditions, colonoscopy, surgery, and their pathology reports. Concordance between dysplasia found at colonoscopy and dysplasia found at surgery was evaluated, noting dysplasia sites and grade. Patients were then divided into three groups: those with at least one undetected dysplastic lesion at surgery, those with dysplasia detected at colonoscopy and no further lesions at surgery, and those without dysplasia at both. Results Seven hundred-four patients were included: 387 (55%) were male, 450 (64%) had ulcerative colitis, 197 (28%) had Crohn’s disease and 57 (8%) had indeterminate colitis. In 42 patients (6%) dysplasia was undetected at colonoscopy, 136 (19.3%) had dysplasia detected at colonoscopy, and 526 (74.7%) had no dysplasia at both. In the group with dysplasia detected, 40 patients (30%) had dysplasia only at colonoscopy while 96 (70%) had dysplasia at surgery as well. Among those with undetected dysplasia, in 17 (40%) dysplasia was identified only at surgery: 14 (82%) had low grade dysplasia and 3 (18%) had cancer. All cancers were stage 1. Three of these patients (18%) had primary sclerosing cholangitis and 4 (23%) had a family history of cancer. In the other 25 patients (60%), dysplasia was detected at colonoscopy but further dysplastic foci were identified at surgery. In 13 (52%) patients dysplasia was upgraded, in 2 (8%) was downgraded and in 10 (40%) the grade was confirmed. Compared to those with detected dysplasia, these patients more frequently had moderate-severe disease activity, and less frequently a prior history of dysplasia. There was no difference in age at surgery, but those with undetected dysplasia had less years of disease at colectomy. Further results are shown in Table 1. Conclusion The rate of dysplastic lesions found at colectomy and missed at colonoscopy is 6%. Dysplastic lesions tend to be undetected when endoscopic disease activity is more severe and regardless of the use of extensive nontargeted biopsies.

Abstract Background The primary objective of the VIVID-1 trial (NCT03926130) was to demonstrate efficacy and safety of mirikizumab (miri), a p19-directed anti-IL-23 antibody, compared to placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease. Miri demonstrated statistically significant improvements in co-primary and all key secondary endpoints versus (vs) PBO1. Here we present the results of secondary endpoints on the comparisons of miri to ustekinumab (uste), a p40 directed anti-IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor from the Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active- and PBO-controlled, treat-through (TT) study, VIVID-1 (NCT03926130). Methods Adult pts (N=1065) were randomised 6:3:2 to miri (N=579) 900mg intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks (Q4W) to W12, then 300mg subcutaneously (SC) Q4W to W52, uste (N=287) one ~6 mg/kg IV dose, then 90mg SC Q8W to W52 or PBO (N=199). At W12 PBO responders continued PBO to W52; PBO non-responders received the same blinded miri regimen as described above (IV then SC). Efficacy of miri vs uste was assessed by the proportion of pts achieving endoscopic response and by the proportion of pts achieving clinical remission by Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at W52 (both gated). Additional non-multiplicity-adjusted endpoints included endoscopic remission, corticosteroid-free clinical remission by CDAI, and the composite of CDAI clinical remission and endoscopic response at W52. (Figure 1 for definitions). Results Baseline characteristics were overall balanced across the three treatment groups (table 1). Pts treated with miri achieved all key major secondary endpoints (p<.000001) compared to PBO (Figure 1). Miri achieved non-inferiority to uste for clinical remission by CDAI (p=0.113117) (Figure 1C). Although superiority to uste in endoscopic response was not achieved (p=0.51) (Figure 1A), in biologic failed pts miri demonstrated a numerical trend towards greater response rates compared to uste for endoscopic response and clinical remission by CDAI (Figure 1 B & D). The overall safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of miri. The proportion of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) were similar for miri (78.6%) and uste (77.3%); most common TEAEs were COVID-19, anaemia, arthralgia, headache, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis and injection site reaction. Instances of serious adverse events were comparable for miri (10.3%) and uste (10.7%). Conclusion In this phase 3 TT design study, miri achieved non-inferiority to uste for clinical remission by CDAI. In biologic failed pts miri had a numerical trend towards greater response compared to uste in clinical and endoscopic endpoints, with an acceptable safety profile. 1Ferrante et al., submitted to ECCO 2024

Abstract Background Darvadstrocel (DVS), a suspension of expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells, is approved for the treatment of complex Crohn’s perianal fistulas (CPF). INSPIRE (EUPAS24267) is a European observational post-approval study evaluating real-world effectiveness and safety of DVS in patients with complex CPF for up to 36 months. Here we report preliminary clinical and safety outcomes from INSPIRE. Methods Patients with complex CPF who had received DVS according to local standard practice were eligible to enrol. Clinical response (closure of ≥50% of external openings [EOs]) and clinical remission (closure of all EOs) of DVS-treated fistulas that were draining at baseline, were evaluated in the all-treated (AT; received ≥1 dose of DVS with an evaluation for fistula response after 6 months) and per-protocol (PP; received DVS as per label-approved guidelines) cohorts. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs and AEs of special interest were reported for the safety cohort (all patients treated with DVS). Results As of April 2023, 652 patients had enrolled (Table 1). Complete data to evaluate 12-month clinical response and remission were available for 134 (AT cohort) and 124 (PP cohort) patients, of whom 79.9% (AT, n = 107) and 79.8% (PP, n = 99) had a clinical response and 76.1% (AT, n = 102) and 76.6% (PP, n = 95) had clinical remission (Figure 1). From baseline to Month 12, there was a decrease in the mean (standard deviation [SD]) Perianal Disease Activity Index score (–3.5 [3.3]; n/N = 96/302 and –3.7 [3.2]; n/N = 89/249) and a decrease in the mean (SD) Harvey–Bradshaw Index for Crohn’s disease activity (-0.3 [2.8]; n/N = 102/302 and -0.4 [2.9]; n/N = 95/249) in the AT and PP cohorts, respectively. Complete safety data were available for 619 patients (median [min–max] follow-up 480 [6–1595]) days. Overall, 26% (n = 162) had ≥1 TEAE and 10% (n = 63) ≥1 serious TEAE. The most frequent TEAEs were anal abscess (6.9%), COVID-19 (1.9%) and proctalgia (1.1%). No deaths were reported. One breast cancer lymph node metastasis and one ovarian epithelial cancer were reported; both events were confounded by immunosuppressant treatment and were not considered related to DVS treatment. Conclusion These preliminary data are consistent with the pivotal ADMIRE-CD study and demonstrate a single dose of DVS in patients with complex CPF is associated with positive clinical outcomes in up to 80% of patients, and a favourable safety profile, both of which are maintained after 12 months. The inherent limitations of registry-based studies mean these data should be interpreted with caution. However, the ongoing INSPIRE study will provide longer follow-up data to confirm these observations with respect to any study limitations.

Abstract Background DEVELOP is a multi-center, global, prospective, observational, longitudinal registry of long-term safety of infliximab (and other treatments) in paediatric patients (pts) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) <18 years (yrs) at diagnosis. Over the course of follow-up, many pts required changes in therapy. Ustekinumab (UST) is approved for treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) in adults and is currently being evaluated for safety/efficacy in paediatric pts. This report focuses on assessment of safety of UST in paediatric pts with CD from DEVELOP. Methods Data included paediatric pts treated with UST from 31 May 2007 through 30 June 2022; data are collected every 6 months. The analyzed population included: all paediatric pts (all pts), pts weighing <40kg (<40kg group), and pts weighing ≥40kg (≥40kg group). Assessments included medical and treatment history, UST exposure, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), CD-related SAEs leading to hospitalization, IBD surgeries, serious and opportunistic infections, malignancies, and deaths. Results A total of 150 pts received UST (49.3% females); 31 in the <40kg group and 119 in the ≥40kg group (Table 1). Most treated pts (92.0%) were 12-17yrs. The majority (91%) of pts were initially dosed with UST every 8 weeks (q8w); at the last known dose, 64% received UST q8w and 22% q4w. Mean (SD) age of initial UST exposure was 15yrs (2.19). Prior IBD surgery was reported in 65.3% pts. The majority of pts (98%) had prior biologic therapy and 72% received ≥2 biologics prior to UST. Overall, 37/150 (24.7%) of pts discontinued UST during follow-up, with a mean (SD) time to discontinuation of 16.7 (17.00) months; 84/150 (56.0%) were exposed to UST for ≥24 months. Rates (events/100 pt-yrs) of AEs were higher in the ≥40kg group (177.62) than in the <40kg group (101.27). Rates of SAEs were slightly lower among the ≥40kg group (25.42) vs <40kg (32.67). There were no SAEs related to infusion or injection site reactions. Rates of serious infections and CD-related hospitalizations were low and similar between groups, and rates of IBD-related surgeries were similar between groups (Figure 1). One malignancy (malignant carcinoid tumor) was reported in a female (18yrs) in the ≥40kg group with a history of prior therapy with vedolizumab, methotrexate, and 6-MP. No deaths or opportunistic infections were reported. Conclusion The safety profile observed for this off-label use of UST in paediatric CD pts in DEVELOP was similar to that of the treated adult population, despite most paediatric pts having prior biologic exposure. No new safety signals are identified in this paediatric population.