Citations

Clear

258 citation(s) found for "Grothey, Axel".

Improved Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Adoption of Hepatic Resection and Improved Chemotherapy
Kopetz, Scott , Chang, George J. , Overman, Michael J. , Eng, Cathy , Sargent, Daniel J. , Nagorney, David M. , Larson, David W. , Grothey, Axel , Vauthey, Jean‐Nicolas , McWilliams, Robert R. , Sargent, Daniel J , Kopetz, Scott , Eng, Cathy

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2009 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 3677-3683

10.1200/jco.2008.20.5278 | PMID 19470929 Get It

Purpose Fluorouracil/leucovorin as the sole therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) provides an overall survival of 8 to 12 months. With an increase in surgical resections of metastatic disease and development of new chemotherapies, indirect evidence suggests that outcomes for patients are improving in the general population, although the incremental gain has not yet been quantified. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients newly diagnosed with metastatic CRC treated at two academic centers from 1990 through 2006. Landmark analysis evaluated the association of diagnosis year and liver resection with overall survival. Additional survival analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database evaluated a similar population from 1990 through 2005. Results Two thousand four hundred seventy patients with metastatic CRC at diagnosis received their primary treatment at the two institutions during this time period. Median overall survival for those patients diagnosed from 1990 to 1997 was 14.2 months, which increased to 18.0, 18.6, and 29.3 months for patients diagnosed in 1998 to 2000, 2001 to 2003, and 2004 to 2006, respectively. Likewise, 5-year overall survival increased from 9.1% in the earliest time period to 19.2% in 2001 to 2003. Improved outcomes from 1998 to 2004 were a result of an increase in hepatic resection, which was performed in 20% of the patients. Improvements from 2004 to 2006 were temporally associated with increased utilization of new chemotherapeutics. In the SEER registry, overall survival for the 49,459 identified patients also increased in the most recent time period. Conclusion Profound improvements in outcome in metastatic CRC seem to be associated with the sequential increase in the use of hepatic resection in selected patients (1998 to 2006) and advancements in medical therapy (2004 to 2006).
In Reply
Grothey, Axel, Sargent, Daniel J. , Kozloff, Mark, Sargent, Daniel J

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 3, 2009 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1733-1733

10.1200/jco.2009.21.2795 Get It

Pooled Safety and Efficacy Analysis Examining the Effect of Performance Status on Outcomes in Nine First-Line Treatment Trials Using Individual Data From Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Sargent, Daniel J. , Köhne, Claus Henning, Sanoff, Hanna K. , Bot, Brian M. , Seymour, Michel , Gramont, Aimery de , Porschen, R, Saltz, Leonard B. , Rougier, Philippe, Tournigand, C., Douillard, Jean‐Yves , Grothey, Axel, Goldberg, Richard M. , Stephens, Richard J. , Sargent, Daniel J , Saltz, Leonard , Seymour, Matthew T , Sanoff, Hanna

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 3, 2009 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1948-1955

10.1200/jco.2008.20.2879 | PMID 19255311 Get It

PurposePerformance status (PS) is a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clinical trials typically enroll less than 10% of patients with a PS of 2 (PS2); thus, the benefit of systemic chemotherapy in PS2 patients is uncertain.Patients and MethodsIndividual data from 6,286 patients (509 PS2 patients) from nine clinical trials were used to compare treatment efficacy by PS. Progression-free survival (PFS), grade ≥ 3 adverse events, 60-day all-cause mortality, overall survival (OS), and response rate (RR) were explored in the full set of nine trials and in the five trials comparing first-line monotherapy with combination therapy.ResultsCompared with patients with PS of 0 or 1, PS2 patients had significantly higher rates of grade ≥ 3 nausea (8.5% v 16.4%, respectively; P < .0001) and vomiting (7.6% v 11.9%, respectively; P = .006) and 60-day all-cause mortality (2.8% v 12.0%, respectively; P < .0001). PS2 was prognostic for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.52; P < .0001; median PFS, 7.6 months for PS 0 or 1 v 4.9 months for PS2), OS (HR = 2.18; P < .0001; median OS, 17.3 months for PS 0 or 1 v 8.5 months for PS2), and RR (odds ratio = 0.61; P < .0001; 43.8% for PS 0 or 1 v 32.0% for PS2). The relative benefit and toxicity of experimental versus control treatment and monotherapy versus combination therapy were not different in PS 0 or 1 patients versus PS2 patients.ConclusionIn clinical trials, PS2 patients derive similar benefit from superior treatment as patients with PS of 0 to 1 but with an increased risk of toxicities and 12% 60-day mortality. Although current treatment provides benefit, new approaches are required to approach 1-year median survival for PS2 patients.
Evidence for Cure by Adjuvant Therapy in Colon Cancer: Observations Based on Individual Patient Data From 20,898 Patients on 18 Randomized Trials
Sargent, Daniel J. , Sobrero, Alberto , André, Thierry , Green, Erin , Labianca, Roberto , O’Callaghan, Chris J. , Seitz, Jean François, Francini, Guido, Haller, Daniel G. , Yothers, Greg , Goldberg, Richard M. , Gramont, Aimery de , Grothey, Axel , O’Connell, Michael J. , Buyse, Marc , Zheng, Yan , Sargent, Daniel J , André, Thierry , Yothers, Greg

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 5, 2009 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 872-877

10.1200/jco.2008.19.5362 | PMID 19124803 Get It

Purpose Limited data are available on the time course of treatment failures (recurrence and/or death), the nature and duration of adjuvant treatment benefit, and long-term recurrence rates in patients with resected stage II and III colon cancer. Methods The data set assembled by the Adjuvant Colon Cancer Endpoints Group, a collection of individual patient data from 18 trials and more than 20,800 patients testing fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy in patients with stage II or III colon cancer, was analyzed. Results A significant overall survival (OS) benefit of adjuvant therapy was consistent over the 8-year follow-up period. The risk of recurrence in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy never exceeds that of control patients, signifying that adjuvant therapy cures some patients, as opposed to delaying recurrence. After 5 years, recurrence rates were less than 1.5% per year, and after 8 years, they were less than 0.5% per year. Significant disease-free survival (DFS) benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was observed in the first 2 years. After 2 years, DFS rates in treated and control patients were not significantly different, and after 4 years, no trend toward benefit was demonstrated. This benefit was primarily driven by patients with stage III disease. Conclusion Adjuvant chemotherapy provides significant DFS benefit, primarily by reducing the recurrence rate, within the first 2 years of adjuvant therapy with some benefit in years 3 to 4, translating into long-term OS benefit. This reflects the curative role of chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. After 5 years, recurrence rates in patients treated on clinical trials are low, and after 8 years, they are minimal; thus, long-term follow-up for recurrence is of little value.
Efficacy of Oxaliplatin Plus Capecitabine or Infusional Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials
Arkenau, Hendrik‐Tobias , Arnold, Dirk , Cassidy, Jim , Díaz‐Rubio, Eduardo , Douillard, Jean‐Yves , Höchster, Howard S. , Martoni, Andrea , Hinke, Axel , Schmiegel, Wolff , Porschen, Rainer, Grothey, Axel , Schmoll, Hans‐Joachim

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | November 18, 2008 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 36 | Pages: 5910-5917

10.1200/jco.2008.16.7759 | PMID 19018087 Get It

Purpose Six randomized phase II and III trials have investigated the role of oxaliplatin (OX) in combination with capecitabine (CAP) or infusional fluorouracil (FU) in metastatic colorectal cancer. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of CAP/OX compared with infusional FU/OX. Patients and Methods This analysis compared all published CAP/OX versus infusional FU/OX regimens. A total of 3,494 patients (FU, n = 1,737; CAP, n = 1,757) were analyzed for response rate (RR), progression-free (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results The fixed-effect pooled estimate for RR showed higher RR for FU-based regimens (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.97; P = .02) whereas the analysis of chemotherapy-only trials, excluding the bevacizumab containing NO16966 and TREE 2 trials, led to an OR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.92; P = .007). However, for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.12; P = .17) and OS (HR = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.12; P = .41) all models suggested similar outcome within the range of noninferiority. Grade 3/4 toxicities (thrombocytopenia—HR = 2.07, 95% CI, 1.42 to 3.03; P < .0002; diarrhea—HR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.66; P < .0009; and grade 2/3 hand-foot-syndrome [HFS]—HR = 3.54; 95% CI, 2.07 to 6.05; P < .00001) were less prominent with FU-based regimens whereas neutropenia (HR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.19; P < .00001) was lower in the CAP regimens. Conclusion The combination of CAP and OX resulted in lower RR, but this did not affect PFS and OS, which were similar in both treatment arms. The toxicity analysis showed the characteristic toxicity of each of the different FU schedules, with thrombocytopenia and HFS consistently more prominent in the CAP regimens.
Bevacizumab Beyond First Progression Is Associated With Prolonged Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From a Large Observational Cohort Study (BRiTE)
Sugrue, Mary M., Purdie, David M., Dong, Wei , Sargent, Daniel J. , Hedrick, Eric, Kozloff, Mark, Grothey, Axel , Sargent, Daniel J

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 15, 2008 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 33 | Pages: 5326-5334

10.1200/jco.2008.16.3212 | PMID 18854571 Get It

Purpose Bevacizumab provides a survival benefit in first- and second-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In a large, observational, bevacizumab treatment study (Bevacizumab Regimens: Investigation of Treatment Effects and Safety [BRiTE]) in patients who had mCRC, a longer-than-expected overall survival (OS) of 25.1 months was reported. The association between various pre- and post-treatment factors (including the use of bevacizumab beyond first progression [BBP]) and survival was examined. Patients and Methods The 1,445 of 1,953 previously untreated patients with mCRC who were enrolled in BRiTE and who experienced disease progression (PD) were classified into three groups: no post-PD treatment (n = 253), post-PD treatment without bevacizumab (no BBP; n = 531), and BBP (n = 642). Relevant baseline and on-study variables, including BBP, were analyzed with a Cox model with respect to their independent effect on survival beyond first PD. Results Median OS was 25.1 months (95% CI, 23.4 to 27.5 months), and median progression-free survival was 10.0 months in the overall BRiTE population. Baseline and postbaseline factors were well balanced between the BBP and no-BBP groups. Median OS rates were 12.6, 19.9, and 31.8 months in the no post-PD treatment, no-BBP, and BBP groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses, compared with no BBP, BBP was strongly and independently associated with improved survival (HR, 0.48; P < .001). Hypertension that required medication was the only bevacizumab-related safety event that occurred more frequently in the BBP group (24.6% v 19.2%). Conclusion These results from a large, prospective, observational study suggest that continued vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition with bevacizumab beyond initial PD could play an important role improving the overall success of therapy for patients who have mCRC.
New Lessons From “Old” Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer
Grothey, Axel, Sargent, Daniel J. , Sargent, Daniel J

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 29, 2008 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 28 | Pages: 4532-4534

10.1200/jco.2008.17.8145 | PMID 18824704 Get It

Survival Following Recurrence in Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Findings From the ACCENT Data Set
Campbell, Megan E., Goldberg, Richard M. , Seitz, J. F., Benedetti, Jacqueline, André, Thierry , Haller, Daniel G. , Sargent, Daniel J. , O’Connell, Michael J. , Grothey, Axel , Sargent, Daniel J , André, Thierry

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 8, 2008 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 2336-2341

10.1200/jco.2007.15.8261 | PMID 18467725 Get It

Purpose This study was undertaken to examine five possible prognostic factors in patients with recurrent stage II and III colon cancer: time from randomization on an adjuvant therapy clinical trial to tumor recurrence (< 1 year, 1 to 2 years, 2 to 3 years, 3 to 4 years, > 4 years), initial stage (II v III), initial adjuvant treatment (fluorouracil [FU]-based v surgery alone), the era in which the patient entered an adjuvant therapy clinical trial (1978 to 1985, 1986 to 1992, 1993 to 1999), and patient age at recurrence. Methods The Adjuvant Colon Cancer End Points (ACCENT) data set was analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by study. Results 5,722 (32.9%) of 17,381 patients experienced recurrence. Median survival following recurrence was 13.3 months. Time from randomization to recurrence was highly prognostic of survival following recurrence (P < .0001). Longer survival following recurrence was seen in patients with initial stage II versus III disease (P < .0001; 14.3% 6-year overall survival after recurrence in initial stage II patients), patients entered more recently onto trials (P < .0001), and patients initially treated with surgery alone versus FU adjuvant treatment (P = .0005). All relationships were maintained in multivariate models. Conclusion Time from initial treatment to recurrence and initial stage are important prognostic factors in patients with recurrent colon cancer. Survival following recurrence increased modestly from 1978 to 1999. Patients who had a recurrence following adjuvant therapy had poorer prognosis than those who progressed after surgery alone. These prognostic factors may be useful for clinical trial design and treatment decisions in patients with recurrent colon cancer.
In Reply
Höchster, Howard S. , Grothey, Axel

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 28, 2008 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1189-1189

10.1200/jco.2007.15.4369 Get It

Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in early colorectal cancer from the clinician's perspective
Grothey, Axel

Mayo Clinic

Statistical Methods in Medical Research | February 18, 2008 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 529-535

10.1177/0962280207081853 | PMID 18285442 Get It

The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of stage III colon cancer to prolong disease-free survival (DFS) and increase overall survival (OS) has been clinical standard since the early 1990s. Recently, 3-year DFS was recognized as surrogate endpoint for OS based on a meta-analysis of trials utilizing 5-fluorouracil as only active chemotherapy component. The standard of care in adjuvant therapy, however, has moved on to modern combination regimens including oxaliplatin, and novel targeted agents such as angiogenesis inhibitors and antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor are currently undergoing rigorous testing in phase III adjuvant trials. For the practicing clinician, the use of surrogate endpoints to appreciate the efficacy of a specific adjuvant therapy contains various challenges, in particular, in discussions with patients. It is questionable whether 3-year DFS can still be considered an appropriate predictor of OS in complex clinical scenarios with continuous change in treatment standards in the adjuvant and palliative situation. Thus, the practicing oncologist needs to be aware of the limitations in the definition of surrogate endpoints in the adjuvant setting.