Citations

Background: Aspirin is the most frequently used antiplatelet monotherapy for secondary prevention in patients with established ASCVD. Trials comparing monotherapy with a P2Y12i versus aspirin have shown variable results. Methods: Medline, Embase, & Cochrane Central databases were searched to identify RCTs comparing monotherapy with a P2Y12i versus aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with established ASCVD (ischemic stroke, coronary, or peripheral artery disease). The primary outcome of interest was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, all-cause mortality, & major bleeding. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) & the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the Higgins I 2 value. Results: 9 eligible RCTs (5 with clopidogrel & 4 with ticagrelor) with 62,336 patients were included in our analyses. Monotherapy with P2Y12i significantly reduced the risk of MACE by 11% (0.89, 95% CI 0.84 - 0.95, I 2 =0), & MI by 19% (0.81, 95% CI 0.71 - 0.92, I 2 =0) as compared with aspirin monotherapy (Figure). There was no significant difference in the risk of stroke (0.85, 95% CI 0.73-1.01), & all-cause mortality (1.01, 95% CI 0.92 - 1.11) between the 2 treatment groups. There was no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding with P2Y12i monotherapy as compared with aspirin (0.97, 95% CI 0.66 - 1.43, I 2 =0). Results were consistent irrespective of the P2Y12i. Conclusion: P2Y12i monotherapy is associated with a significant reduction in atherothrombotic events as compared with aspirin alone without an increased risk of major bleeding.

Introduction: Remote monitoring using implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) can be used as an adjunctive diagnostic tool to traditional hospital and clinic visits to monitor the volume status of patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through February 4th, 2021) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ICDs/CRT-D remote monitoring versus standard of care in patients with HF. Of 642 articles retrieved after removing duplicate items, we included 11 RCTs encompassing 5,965 patients. Absolute risk difference (ARD) with 95% credible interval (CrI) was estimated. Pooled (posterior) risk difference was computed using Bayesian hierarchical methods, random effects model and weakly informative prior. Results: The ARD for mortality was centered at -0.01 (95%CrI: -0.03; 0.01, Tau: 0.02), with 82% probability of ARD of ICD/CRT-D remote monitoring with respect to control being less than 0. The ARD for cardiovascular mortality was centered at -0.03 (95%CrI: -0.11; 0.05, Tau: 0.10), with 84% probability of ARD of ICD/CRT-D remote monitoring with respect to control being less than 0. The ARD for HF admissions was centered at -0.00 (95%CrI: -0.07; 0.06, Tau: 0.08), with 57% probability of ARD of ICD/CRT-D remote monitoring with respect to control being less than 0 [Figure]. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that ICD/CRT-D remote monitoring in patients with HF is associated with a higher probability of reduced all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality compared with standard care. However, ICD-CRT/D remote monitoring was associated with minimal probability of difference in HF hospitalizations.

Introduction: The predictive value of left atrial (LA) volume and reservoir function (ResF) post-atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has been scarcely studied. Hypothesis: Abnormal LA volume and ResF post-ablation are associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Methods: We analyzed LA maximum (LAVImax) and minimum (LAVImin) volume index, and 2 measures of ResF, emptying fraction (LAEF) and expansion index (LAEI), prospectively measured at 3-month post-procedure in patients in sinus rhythm who underwent AF ablation between 2007-2016. Composite endpoint (CE) at follow up was all-cause mortality, cardiac hospitalization (heart failure or acute ischemic event) and stroke. Results: 792 patients were studied ( age 60±10 years, 25% women ; Table 1) . Over 7.5 years [IQR 3.0-9.7], 96 (12%) patients experienced CE, which was more prevalent in patients with enlarged LA and reduced ResF. Impaired LA volumes and ResF were each independently associated with CE ( Fig.1 ), even after adjustment for clinical, demographic and echo characteristics (Model A, Fig.2 ) (LAVImax ≥35 ml/m 2 : HR 2.15 [95% CI, 1.35-3.43], p=0.001; LAVImin≥20.5 ml/m 2 : HR 2.88 [1.77-4.69], p<0.0001; LAEF<39%: HR 2.00 [1.31-3.05], p=0.001; LAEI<65%: HR 1.95 [1.27-3.01], p=0.003). ResF measures (LAEF and LAEI) were incremental to LAVImax (all p<0.05), but not LAVImin (all p>0.05; Fig.2 ). In patients with normal LA (LAVImax <35 ml/m 2 ; n=408), increased LAVImin (≥20.5 ml/m 2 ) remained associated with CE (HR 3.11 [1.45-6.67], p=0.004) and cardiac hospitalization (HR 5.81 [1.87-18.01], p=0.002). These findings were independent of AF recurrence. Conclusions: In these patients, enlarged LA and impaired ResF at 3-month post-ablation were strongly associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, regardless of AF recurrence. Measures of LA ResF were incremental to LAVImax. Notably, LAVImin showed the strongest associations and even identified a high-risk subgroup among patients with non-dilated LA.

Background: It is uncertain whether presence of CAD has a prognostic implication in patients (pts) with CLI. We sought to compare the trends and outcomes of pts with CLI based on presence of history of CAD. Methods: Temporal trends in hospitalization for CLI based on history of CAD were determined using the 2000-2018 NIS database. A multivariable regression analyses of outcomes was performed based on the CAD status and revascularization type. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes based on type of revascularization. Primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Results: Among 13,570,000 pts with CLI (41% female, 69% whites, mean age 69 years), 23% had concomitant CAD and 9.6% underwent revascularization (42.6% endovascular & 57.4% surgical). In pts with CLI, there was an increasing trend in the prevalence of CAD (Figure; Panel A). Furthermore, in pts with CLI + CAD, the frequency of endovascular revascularization increased from 15% to 48% while there was a decreasing trend of surgical revascularization (85% to 52%). After multivariate adjustments, CLI + CAD was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.40; CI: 1.32-1.47) & bleeding requiring transfusion (OR: 1.10; CI: 1.06-1.12) than those with CLI without CAD (Figure; Panel B). Among both patients with CLI + CAD & CLI without CAD, endovascular revascularization was associated with lower likelihood of in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.69; CI: 0.63- 0.76 & OR: 0.71; CI: 0.67-0.76) & bleeding requiring transfusion (OR: 0.40; CI: 0.38- 0.43 & OR: 0.44; CI: 0.43- 0.46) than surgical revascularization. Conclusions: Increasing prevalence and poor prognosis of CAD among patients with CLI warrants immediate attention to optimize preventive and treatment strategies.

Introduction: We validated the “Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) Decision Aid” to promote shared decision making (SDM) about lipid lowering therapy, based on patient-clinician encounters. Methods: Validation of the DA included an assessment of whether the content and design of the tool facilitated SDM and patient engagement and to determine how well the tool integrated with clinical workflow. Validation was conducted during patient-clinician encounters in the Mayo preventive cardiology clinic. As inclusion criteria we considered an upcoming appointment in the clinic, an LDL-C level ≥ ~160 mg/dL, and no prior diagnosis of FH. Prior to the encounters, each clinician viewed a demonstration of the online, interactive DA. During the encounters, the DA was shared with patients using the clinic room computer screen, either in-person or virtually. Patient-clinician encounters were video recorded for further analysis by two design researchers and experts in SDM. Results: Ten patients were enrolled in the study (7 male; average age 51 years). The average patient LDL-C level was 207 mg/dL, range 157 - 248 mg/dL. Review and qualitative analysis of the encounter recordings yielded 4 key findings: i) clinicians primarily used the cardiovascular risk estimate in the DA to guide conversation with patients; ii) highly trained specialists needed to change their usual approach to care and conversation to integrate the DA with their clinical workflows; iii) as clinicians became more familiar with the DA, they moved through the tool at a more efficient pace; and iv) each clinician developed his/her own style of navigating the DA, either moving through it one screen at a time or focusing on one specific section for the duration of the conversation. The DA effectively guided conversation and facilitated active patient engagement in 6 of 10 encounters. Social distancing and use of telemedicine encounters, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, limited patient engagement in 2 of 10 encounters. Overall, the DA promoted SDM regarding FH management in 9 of 10 encounters. Conclusion: Using patient-clinician encounters, we found the FH DA to facilitate SDM regarding lipid-lowering therapy. The tool has potential to improve care of FH patients and increase patient engagement and knowledge.

Introduction: The process of engaging stem cells towards a cardiopoietic (CP) state was established using a protein-based cocktail consisting of multiple growth factors. Although this regenerative enhancement protocol has been successfully tested in advanced clinical trials, it remains resource-intensive. Recent efforts have focused on streamlining cardiopoiesis through a protein-independent alternative that leverages a transfection-based mRNA approach. Microencapsulated modified messenger RNA (M3RNA) was utilized to deliver brachyury (T), an early mesodermal transcription factor to provoke early lineage specification in pluripotent cells. Hypothesis: Transfection of a human pluripotent stem cell source with T induces early expression of CP transcription factors to accelerate cardiac differentiation. Methods: Human pluripotent stem cells were transfected with T and maintained for 14 days. Expression of the cardiopoietic markers MEF2C, GATA4, and Nkx2.5 was analyzed using RT-qPCR, in tandem with MYH6 at days 10 and 20. Differentiation proficiency was independently corroborated by assessing Mef2c and Nkx2.5 expression by IF. Results: Following transfection with T, Nkx2.5, MEF2C and GATA4 were significantly induced at 72h (60-, 20- and 40-fold, respectively, p<0.01 for all 3 markers vs baseline), reflecting timing of differentiation initiation. At 5 days post differentiation, expression of the cardiac-specific Nkx2.5 increased by 5 fold vs control and the cell cycle regulator CHIR (p<0.01), suggesting successful persistent induction of cardiopoeisis. At 10 and 20 days of differentiation, RNA expression of MYH6 was 10-15 times induced in human pluripotent cells transduced with T (p < 0.0001, and p < 0.001 vs control, respectively), compared to 2 times (p<0.05, p<0.01 vs control, respectively) in CHIR treated cohorts. Accordingly, at 42 days post-induction of differentiation, a greater number of cells expressed MLC2V and cTnT (p<1e-05, <1e-07, respectively vs control), driving a robust beating pattern. Conclusion: This study implements a single gene T M3RNA-based approach to readily induce cardiac differentiation from pluripotent sources, exceeding available commercial platforms.

Introduction: Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is a rare sequelae of hormonally active neuroendocrine tumors that often requires cardiac surgical intervention. Little is reported on cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in the CHD patient population. Hypothesis: We sought to establish the safety and efficacy of CIED implantation in patients with CHD. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with a diagnosis of CHD who underwent CIED implantation at our institution (Mayo Clinic) and evaluated indications for implant, perioperative complications, and mortality. Results: A total of 27 patients with a cumulative follow up of 75 patient-years were identified during the study period. The most common indication for device implant was high grade atrioventricular block (n=18, 66.7%). 14 (51.8%) had baseline conduction disease and 26 (96.2%) underwent cardiac surgery prior to CIED implant. The majority of devices implanted were dual chamber permanent pacemakers (PPM) (n=17, 63.0%), while other devices included single chamber PPM, epicardial PPM, chronic resynchronization devices, and intracardiac defibrillators. Peri-operative complication occurred in 6 patients (22.2%), with 2 patients requiring ICU level care. No patient suffered carcinoid crisis during implantation and there was no peri-implant mortality. Long term, 3 patients required device extraction: 1 for infection, 1 for lead related pain, and 1 for generator migration. The median time to death from implant was 2.5 years, with one-year mortality at 15%. Conclusions: In this unique cohort of patients with CHD, CIED can be performed safely. CIED most often occurred in the post cardiac surgical period and carcinoid crisis was uncommon.

Introduction: Somatic mutations accrue in hematopoietic stem cells with age and can lead to selective clonal expansion, a process termed Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP). CHIP has been associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and myocardial infarction (MI). Whether CHIP is a risk factor for incident heart failure is unclear. Methods: The presence of CHIP was assessed in exome sequence data from 200,628 UKB participants using the Genome Analysis Toolkit pipeline and filtering somatic mutations from a pre-specified list within DNMT3A , TET2 , and ASXL1 . CHIP was defined as somatic mutations in these 3 genes with variant allele fraction (VAF) >10%. We ascertained incident heart failure (overall, ischemic, and non-ischemic), death, cardiovascular death, and coronary heart disease (CHD defined as of MI and/or coronary revascularization) as determined by UKB algorithms, self-report, and diagnosis/procedure codes. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, sex, self-reported race/ethnicity, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and BMI were used to assess whether CHIP was associated with incident adverse events. Results: We identified 3,885 participants with CHIP in DNMT3A , TET2 , and ASXL1 at a VAF of >10%. Over a median follow-up of 9 years, 2,055 participants developed incident heart failure. CHIP was associated with both ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure. We replicated previously reported associations of CHIP with death and incident CHD ( Table ). Conclusions: CHIP was associated with increased risk of both ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure. The association with ischemic subtype is likely mediated by the increased risk of CHD. The basis for the increased hazard of non-ischemic heart failure is unclear but may be due to an inflammatory milieu in CHIP carriers.

Introduction: Multi-disciplinary care with integration of the palliative care services (PCS) in acutely ill cardiac patients is known to improve resource utilization and overall patient care. However, there are limited data on the role of PCS in the care of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with cardiac arrest (CA). Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2017) to identify adult AMI admissions with concomitant CA. We evaluated temporal trends and predictors of PCS use, and in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and discharge disposition in AMI-CA admissions with and without PCS use. A propensity matching analysis using 1:1 nearest neighbor matching was performed between cohorts with and without PCS use to derive a propensity-matched sample with standardized differences <5% for all baseline characteristics. Results: During the study period, there were a total of 584,263 AMI-CA admissions, of which 26,919 (4.6%) received PCS. PCS use increased from <1% in 2000 to 11.5% by 2017. AMI-CA admissions that received PCS were on an average older (70.1 ± 13.0 vs 66.7 ± 13.5), had greater comorbidity with higher rates of cardiogenic shock (44.5% vs 26.6%) and non-cardiac organ failure (80.6% vs 41.6%)(all p<0.001). Admissions receiving PCS had lower rates of angiography (48.6% vs 63.3%) and percutaneous coronary intervention (37.4% vs 46.9%) use (p<0.001). Older age, greater comorbidity, and acute organ failure were independently associated with PCS use. In-hospital mortality was higher in the PCS cohort (84.6% vs 42.9%, adjusted odds ratio 3.62 [95% CI 3.48-3.76]; p<0.001). Similar findings were seen in the propensity-matched cohort with higher in-hospital mortality for AMI-CA admissions receiving PCS (84.7% vs 66.2%, p<0.001) The PCS cohort had higher do-not-resuscitate status use (47.6% vs. 3.7%), shorter hospital stays (4 vs 5 days), and more frequent skilled nursing facility discharges (73.6% vs. 20.4%); p<0.001. Conclusions: Despite an increase in PCS use in AMI-CA, it remains significantly underutilized, highlighting the need to further integrate PCS specialists into the care of high-risk conditions such as cardiac arrest to deliver holistic patient care.

Introduction: Acceleration time (AT) and Doppler Velocity Index (DVI) are critical parameters in assessment of bioprosthetic aortic valve dysfunction (BAVD). AT>100ms and DVI < 0.25 are highly suggestive of prosthetic obstruction and are incorporated in all triage algorithms. Little is known about their relationship with flow. Hypothesis: AT and DVI may be affected by transprosthetic flow in patients with significant bioprosthetic aortic valve dysfunction (BAVD). Methods: Single center, retrospective analysis of patients with severe BAVD (confirmed at surgical re-replacement, transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation, or successfully treated bioprosthetic valve thrombosis). Standard prosthetic parameters (AT, DVI, effective orifice area (EOA), mean gradient, presence and degree of regurgitation), flow (stroke volume index, Svi; transprosthetic flow rate, FR) were measured on the transthoracic echocardiogram at the time of diagnosis with severe BAVD. Results: A total of 266 patients with severe BAVD underwent treatment between 2008-2020. BAVD mechanism was obstruction (N=192, 72%), regurgitation (n=48, 18%) mixed stenosis and regurgitation (n=15, 6%) and patient-prosthetic mismatch (n=12, 5%). DVI was moderately correlated with FR (r=0.50, p<0.001); AT had a weak but significant inverse correlation with FR (r=0.24, p<0.001). SVi had a weaker influence on DVI (r=0.35, p<0.001) and no correlation with AT. Conclusions: AT and DVI are influenced by transprosthetic flow rate. This flow-dependency should be considered when assessing the mechanism of BAVD.