Citations

Background. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is a plasma product that contains factors II, VII, IX, X, protein C, and protein S. PCC can be used off-label to treat coagulopathy during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, its use comes with safety concerns regarding thrombosis. The purpose of our study is to determine the safety of PCC in OLT. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who received 4-factor PCC during OLT at our institution from January 1, 2018, to May 1, 2022, with a 1:1 match of 83 patients who received PCC and 83 patients who did not. We evaluated 30-d mortality, 1-y mortality, prevalence of thrombotic complications (portal vein thrombosis, deep venous thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolus), and postoperative intensive care (ICU) length of stay (LOS). Results. There was no significant difference in 30-d mortality (odds ratio [OR] 5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-42.8; P = 0.14), 1-y mortality (OR 3; 95% CI, 0.61-14.86; P = 0.18), or ICU LOS (OR –13.8; 95% CI, –39.2 to 11.6; P = 0.29). There was no increased incidence of thrombotic complications among patients receiving PCC 90 d after surgery, including portal vein thrombosis (OR 1.5; 95% CI, 0.42-5.32; P = 0.53), pulmonary embolus (OR 1; 95% CI, 0.14-7.1; P = 0.99), deep venous thrombosis (OR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.11-3.99; P = 0.66), and myocardial infarction (OR 1.67; 95% CI, 0.4-6.97; P = 0.48). Conclusions. Although there was a statistically insignificant increase in mortality after PCC administration during OLT, we did not see a significant increase in perioperative complications, including thrombotic events and increased ICU LOS.

Radiology has become a fundamental constituent of the modern medicine. However, it has been observed that medical students in Pakistan often lack sufficient guidance and education in this field. This study aims to establish whether Pakistani medical students possess the requisite basic knowledge required in radiology and their attitude and perception toward radiology as a potential career path. This cross-sectional study conducted a survey among 530 medical students of Pakistan via a self-reported online questionnaire from August 01, 2021 to September 01, 2021. The data collected were analyzed using the SPSS software, along with logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with interest in pursuing radiology as a career and possessing a comprehensive understanding of radiology among medical students. Of the 530 participants, 44.2% rated their understanding of radiology as “poor” with only 17% indicating interest to pursue a career in radiology. Logistic regression model showed significantly higher odds of radiology as a career among males (Crude odds ratio [COR] = 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17–2.72, P = .007), medical students of Punjab (COR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.01–2.40, P = .048), and those, who self-reported their knowledge of radiology as excellent (COR = 14.35, 95% CI = 5.13–40.12, P < .001). In contrast, medical students from Punjab (COR = 0.504, 95% CI = 0.344–0.737, P < .001) and second-year medical students (COR = 0.046, 95% CI = 0.019–0.107, P < .001) had lower odds of good knowledge. Our study suggests that the medical student’s knowledge of radiology is deficient. Thus, it is advised that radiological societies work with medical school boards to integrate thorough and early radiology exposure into the undergraduate curriculum.

Abstract Diversity, equity, and inclusion is a powerful goal which many of us strive toward in medicine, both in patient care and administrative leadership. As the world evolves, the practice of medicine must evolve with it. We are cognizant of the importance of the history of our medical specialties. If we do not acknowledge all parts of our history, we are doomed to repeat it. This special issue is unique and unlike anything that has previously been published in Diagnostic Cytopathology. This issue looks at some of the history of cytopathology. This historical review is followed by some of the present state of cytopathology. There are insights into global cytopathology. The final portion of this issue examines the critical need for cytotechnology schools in the United States. All of these areas are critical to the past, present, and future of cytopathology.

OBJECTIVE Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an FDA-approved antifibrinolytic that is seeing increased popularity in spine surgery owing to its ability to reduce intraoperative blood loss (IOBL) and allogeneic transfusion requirements. The present study aimed to summarize the current literature on these formulations in the context of short-segment instrumented lumbar fusion including ≥ 1-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). METHODS The PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were queried for all full-text English studies evaluating the use of topical TXA (tTXA), systemic TXA (sTXA), or combined tTXA+sTXA in patients undergoing PLIF. The primary endpoints of interest were operative time, IOBL, and total blood loss (TBL); secondary endpoints included venous thromboembolic complication occurrence, and allogeneic and autologous transfusion requirements. Outcomes were compared using random effects. Comparisons were made between the following treatment groups: sTXA, tTXA, and sTXA+tTXA. Given that sTXA is arguably the standard of care in the literature (i.e., the most common route of administration that to this point has been studied the most), the authors compared sTXA versus tTXA and sTXA versus sTXA+tTXA. Study heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 test, and grouped analysis using the Hedge’s g test was performed for measurement of effect size. RESULTS Forty-five articles were identified, of which 17 met the criteria for inclusion with an aggregate of 1008 patients. TXA regimens included sTXA only, tTXA only, and various combinations of sTXA and tTXA. There were no significant differences in operative time, TBL, or postoperative drainage between the sTXA and tTXA groups or between the sTXA and sTXA+tTXA groups. CONCLUSIONS The present meta-analysis suggested clinical equipoise between isolated sTXA, isolated tTXA, and combinatorial tTXA+sTXA formulations as hemostatic adjuvants/neoadjuvants in short-segment fusion including ≥ 1-level PLIF. Given the theoretically lower venous thromboembolism risk associated with tTXA, additional investigations using large cohorts comparing these two formulations within the posterior fusion population are merited. Although TXA has been shown to be effective, there are insufficient data to support topical or systemic administration as superior within the open PLIF population.