Citations

7510 Background: The randomized Phase 3 CANOVA study’s (NCT03539744) primary analysis showed multiple numerically improved efficacy endpoints with VenDex v PomDex, but the primary endpoint of mPFS by IRC was not statistically significant. Here, we report correlative biomarker analyses from CANOVA. Methods: CANOVA is a randomized, global, open-label Phase 3 study of VenDex v PomDex in pts with t(11;14)+ RRMM and ≥2 prior lines of therapy (LOTs). The primary endpoint was mPFS by IRC. Key secondary endpoints included ORR, ≥VGPR, mOS, and MRD negativity (<10-5). In post hoc mPFS sensitivity analysis, disease progression, death, and start of next LOT were defined as events. BCL2 gene expression by RNAseq (3.7 log2 FPKM prespecified median cutoff for BCL2high v BCL2low) and chr1q abnormalities by whole-exome sequencing (normal, gain, or amp) were assessed centrally from pretreatment, CD138-enriched BM aspirates. Results: mPFS, post hoc mPFS, and mOS in the VenDex arm were similar by BCL2 status, with numerically higher ORR, ≥VGPR, and MRD negativity rates in the BCL2highsubgroup. In contrast, mPFS and mOS within the PomDex arm were numerically longer in the BCL2lowsubgroup, despite equal ORR in both subgroups (Table). Presence of 1q abnormalities was evenly distributed across BCL2high v BCL2low subgroups in the VenDex arm (51% v 45%) but not in the PomDex arm (59% v 31%). Normal 1q and gain(1q) subgroups had numerically improved mPFS, mOS, ORR, ≥VGPR, and MRD negativity with VenDex; pts with amp(1q) had poor outcomes regardless of treatment, albeit the sample size was small. Conclusions: Pts with BCL2high or gain(1q) had numerically improved clinical efficacy with VenDex v PomDex. Clinical benefit was consistent across BCL2 subgroups ( BCL2high or BCL2low) with VenDex but not PomDex. Pts with amp(1q) fared poorly irrespective of treatment arm. Clinical trial information: NCT03539744 . [Table: see text]

7508 Background: Idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) has demonstrated excellent efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, outcomes in patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) remain to be better characterized. Methods: We included patients from 11 US academic centers, who were evaluated for EMD and were infused with ide-cel between May 2021 and April 2023. Patients with soft tissue or visceral lesions non-contiguous from bony lesions were classified as having true EMD, with paraskeletal disease classified as non-EMD. Disease responses were evaluated using the IMWG criteria. Time-to-event analyses were performed from the date of ide-cel infusion. Results: Among 351 patients with RRMM treated with ide-cel, 84 (24%) had EMD prior to infusion. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 18.2 months (95% CI: 17-19.3). Baseline characteristics at ide-cel infusion for EMD and non-EMD cohorts are depicted in the table. For the EMD and non-EMD cohorts, the Day 30 objective response rates (ORR) were 58% vs. 69% (p=0.1), Day 30 ≥complete response rates were 16% vs 24% (p=0.11), the Day 90 ORR were 52% vs 82% (p<0.001), and best ORR were 58% vs 82%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months (95% CI: 4.1-6.9) for the EMD cohort vs. 11.1 months (95% CI: 9.2-12.6; p<0.0001) for the non-EMD cohort. The median duration of response for EMD among day 30 responders was 6.4 months (95% CI: 5.1-8.4). In a multivariable analysis, EMD was an independent predictor of inferior PFS [hazard ratio 1.8 (95% CI: 1.2-2.5), p<0.001] after adjusting for ECOG status, revised ISS stage, penta-drug refractoriness, elevated ferritin, prior BCMA-directed therapy and use of bridging therapy. Pattern of progression in the EMD cohort (n=68/84) included EMD site only (21%), hematologic only (22%), or both (57%), with comparable PFS for type of progression (p=0.19). The median overall survival (OS) was 14.8 months [95% CI: 9-Not reached (NR)] for EMD and 26.9 months [95% CI: 26.3 vs NR, p=0.006)] for the non-EMD group. Rates of Grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity syndrome were comparable between the two cohorts. Conclusions: Patients with EMD demonstrate significantly inferior Day 90 ORR and presence of EMD is an independent risk factor for inferior PFS. [Table: see text]

TPS7100 Background: Despite the promising efficacy of CAR-T for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL), more than 60% of patients will relapse, the majority of which occur in the first 6 months. Approximately 30% of patients with LBCL treated with CAR-T achieve a partial response (PR) on day 30 (D30) PET-CT assessment. Of patients in a D30 PR, 70% will eventually progress, yet the standard of care remains close observation. Early consolidative treatment strategies utilizing therapies with a different mechanism of action may improve outcomes, but there are currently no reliable biomarkers. Epcoritamab (Epco), a bispecific antibody directed against CD20 and CD3, has been approved by the FDA for LBCL patients who relapse after at least 2 lines of therapy. In the phase 2 study, Epco was associated with an overall response rate (ORR) of 63% and a complete response (CR) rate of 39%, including similar responses in a subset of patients who were relapsed 100 days post CAR-T. This study is a trial-in-progress that will evaluate the efficacy of epco compared to observation for patients with LBCLs achieving a PR on D30 post CAR-T PET-CT assessment. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, randomized, phase II, multicenter, open-label study (NCT06238648) evaluating epco monotherapy for a fixed duration of 12 cycles compared to observation for LBCL patients with D30 PR after standard of care CAR-T. A maximum of 120 patients will be randomized 1:1 to epco or observation across 10 academic centers. Stratification factors include line of CAR-T (second vs third line) and costimulatory domain (CD28 vs 4-1BB). Key inclusion criteria include PET evidence of a D30 PR. non-bulky disease ( <7.5cm), ANC of >1000, hemoglobin >7 g/dL if asymptomatic or >8 if symptomatic, platelet count >50,000. G-CSF, pRBCs and platelet transfusions are allowed. Key exclusion criteria include prior anti CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody therapy, ongoing or uncontrolled CRS or ICANS, and active or symptomatic CNS disease. Epco is administered subcutaneously at a dose of 0.16mg on day 1, 0.8mg on day 8, prior to full dose of 48mg on day 15. Epco is administered weekly in 28 day cycles (C) for C1-3, on day 1 and 15 of C4-9 and on day 1 of C10-12. PET-CT response is assessed by the 2014 Lugano criteria after 2 cycles, and then every 3 months during active treatment. The primary objective is efficacy, measured as conversion from D30 PR to CR. The secondary endpoints include frequency and severity of treatment emergent adverse events, ORR, duration of response, duration of complete response, progression free survival, event free survival, and overall survival. Peripheral blood samples will be collected pre-treatment and during treatment to assess for biomarkers of response and resistance. The study was activated in January 2024 and recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT06238648 .

e19076 Background: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) is the seventh most prevalent cancer and has sixth highest malignancy mortality in United States. Owing to the advances in treatment of NHL including targeted therapies, the survival of NHL patients has increased over the past decades. However, inequalities may exist in the access to advanced care, clinical trials, and subspecialist appointments in certain patient populations. We aim to study the racial disparities in major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in NHL patients. Methods: Using ICD-10 codes, patients with NHL were identified from National Inpatient Sample 2019 database. We included all-cause in-hospital mortality (ACIHM), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), atrial fibrillation (AF), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and sudden cardiac death (SCD) as MACCE for the outcomes. Baseline characteristics including demographics, comorbidities; and MACCE outcomes were studied using chi-square for categorical or ANOVA for continuous data (statistical significance determined as p-value <0.05) and results were stratified based on patient’s races. Results: Out of the total sample size of 205220 patients admitted with a diagnosis of NHL, 74.94% (153785) were White, 8.95% (18370) were Black, 9.46% (19415) were Hispanic, 3.48% (7140) were Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.42% (875) were Native American, while 2.75% (5635) belonged to other races. When compared to White patients, ACIHM was significantly higher in Black patients with adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.294 (95% CI 1.099-1.523, p=0.002) and Asian/Pacific Islander patients (aOR 1.279, 95% CI 1.005-1.628, p=0.045). Risk of AMI was lower in Black patients (aOR 0.751, 95% CI 0.587-0.96, p=0.023) as compared to White patients. AF risk was significantly lower in Black, Hispanic, and Other race patients compared to White patients. The odds of developing CVA are higher in Asian/Pacific Islander patients (aOR 1.285, 95% CI 1.002-1.649, p=0.048) and of having SCD are higher in Black patients (aOR 2.052, 95% CI 1.5-2.806, p<0.001) when compared to White patients. Conclusions: In patients with NHL, Black patients had higher ACIHM and SCD while Asian/Pacific Islander patients had higher ACIHM and CVA when compared to White patients. Although the reason of disparity is likely multifactorial, the findings of this study highlight the need for development of healthcare strategies stratified by race which may aid to mitigate the increased risk of MACCE in certain races. Further research involving possible genetic influences and social determinants of health contributing to poorer outcomes in Black and Asian/Pacific Islander patients with NHL becomes imperative.

e19075 Background: Orbital diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is a rare entity accounts for less than 1% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases. Large-scale studies describing and evaluating the effect of different type of treatments on survival outcome are lacking. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with primary orbital DLBCL between 2004 and 2020. All patients aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with primary orbital DLBLC were included. We excluded patients with unknown chemotherapy and radiation therapy status or lost to follow-up (unknown vital status of last contact). Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression were used in the analyses. Results: The total cohort consisted of 404 patients with primary orbital DLBCL. Out of whom 233 (58%) were females, 326 (81%) were White non-Hispanic, 29 (7%) were White Hispanic and 16 (4%) were African Americans. 113 (28%) received chemotherapy only, 76 (19%) received radiation only, 113 (28%) received chemoradiation, 79 (20%) did not receive any treatment and 23 (6%) had unknown treatment status. The median age at diagnosis was 71 years (range 28-90). The median follow-up time was 132 months (95%CI 117-147), the median overall survival (mOS) for the whole cohort was 110 months (95%CI 82-138). Among patients with known treatment status and vital status of last contact (N=381), patient who received chemoradiation had significantly better mOS compared to patients who received radiation only (169 vs 67 months, P=0.002), but there was no statistically significant difference in mOS between chemoradiation and chemotherapy only (169 vs 124 months, P=0.068) or between chemotherapy only and radiation only (124 vs 67 months, P=0.213). On multivariate analysis, older age and Charlson-Deyo score of 2 were associated with worse OS (HR 1.072 95%CI 1.055-1.089; P<0.001, HR 2.292 95%CI 1.099-4.778; P=0.027, respectively). Compared to no treatment, only chemoradiation was associated with better OS (HR 0.509 95%CI 0.332-0.778; P=0.002), whereas chemotherapy only and radiation only did not add a survival benefit (HR 0.909 95%CI 0.598-1.381; P=656 and HR 0.766 95%CI 0.496-1.185; P=0.231). Conclusions: This large real-world analysis shows a survival benefit with combined treatment of chemoradiation in primary orbital DLBCL compared to single treatment modality.

e19057 Background: In ELM-2 (NCT03888105), a Ph 2, single arm, open label trial, odronextamab demonstrated robust efficacy, generally manageable safety, and overall maintenance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in R/R FL pts (Villasboas et al. ASH 2023). In FL, pts with disease progression within 2 yrs of frontline chemoimmunotherapy (POD24) are hard to treat with poor clinical outcomes, representing an unmet need. We report PROs by POD24 status in pts with Grade 1–3a R/R FL from ELM-2. Methods: Pts received IV odronextamab in 21-day cycles (C): 80 mg QW in C1–4, with C1 dose step up to mitigate cytokine release syndrome, then 160 mg Q2W (Q4W if complete response ≥9 mo) until progression. PROs were collected at baseline (BL), Wks 2–4, 10, then Q8W in Yr 1, and Q12W in Yr 2. Post-hoc POD24 subgroup analyses were performed on six EORTC QLQ-C30 scales, the EQ-5D-3L VAS, and FACT-Lym LymS. Estimated mean change from BL (CFB) was analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM) through Wk 42 (≥10 pts at last assessment). Published meaningful CFB thresholds were used to define deterioration/improvement in responder analyses. Results: By Jan 31, 2023, 140 pts with R/R FL had received odronextamab. Pts with POD24 (n=70) were younger than pts without POD24 (n=70; median age 57.5 vs 62.0 y), had fewer prior Tx lines (median 2 vs 3), and a higher proportion double refractory to anti-CD20 Ab + alkylator (53% vs 29%). Objective response rate was similar in evaluable pts with (n=63; 79%) and without (n=65; 80%) POD24. PRO questionnaire completion ranged from 52–95% through Wk 42 across groups. Descriptive analyses suggest BL PRO scores were similar by POD24 status, showing good HRQoL/functioning and low symptom burden, and were generally maintained through Wk 42 with minimal between-group differences (overlapping 95% CIs for LS mean CFB [Table]). In both groups, more pts reported PRO maintenance or improvement vs deterioration across visits, except for fatigue at Wk 10 in pts without POD24. Conclusions: In pts with heavily pretreated R/R FL, odronextamab Tx maintained HRQoL, functioning, and symptoms irrespective of POD24 status. Clinical trial information: NCT03888105 . [Table: see text]

e19008 Background: Bispecific antibodies (BsAb) have emerged as a new treatment modality for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas (R/R NHL). They exert their effect by binding to CD3 on T-cells and CD19 or CD20 on lymphoma cells, activating the T-cell to exert cytotoxic effects against the tumor and normal B-cells. Treatment related adverse events (TRAE) include infections, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity (ICANS). This meta-analysis was conducted to assess prevalence of TRAEs from prospective clinical trials that evaluated BsAb in R/R NHL. Methods: A systematic review was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane to identify BsAb clinical trials in NHL through October 2023. Eligible studies included phase I-III trials evaluating BsAb in any type of NHL, either as monotherapy or combination therapy irrespective of prior lines of treatment. Primary outcomes of interest include infection, neutropenia, CRS, and ICANS. All studies were weighted equally. Pooled prevalence estimates of TRAE were calculated using common and random effects models. Heterogeneity tests were performed using Cochran’s Q test. Subgroup analysis examined infection rates in monotherapy versus combination therapy cohorts. Results: After screening 1039 studies, 36 clinical trials with 2162 patients were included. The lymphoma subtypes were diffuse-large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma. The BsAbs included mosunetuzumab (13 studies), epcoritamab (10 studies), blinatumomab (5 studies), glofitamab (5 studies), odronextamab (2 studies), and AFM11 (1 study). The median age of patients was 66 years, and patients had received a median of two prior lines of therapy. Median follow-up duration was 9.1 months. The prevalence of all-grade infections was 35% (95% CI: 0.33-0.38; I2 = 79%). For grade ≥3 infections, the prevalence was 16% (95% CI: 0.14-0.18, (I2 = 77%). There were higher rates of all-grade infections in the combination therapy cohort (41%, 95% CI: 0.36-0.47) compared with the monotherapy cohort (33%, 95% CI: 0.30-0.36). All-grade and grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 31% (95% CI: 0.29-0.34; I2 = 80%) and 22% (95% CI: 0.20-0.24, I2 = 61%) of patients. CRS was observed in 45% of patients (95% CI: 0.43-0.48, I2 = 85%). Grade ≥3 CRS occurred in only 2% of patients (95% CI: 0.02-0.03, I2 = 0%, p = 0.99). ICANS occurred in 12% (95% CI: 0.10-0.14, I2 = 90%) while grade ≥3 ICANS was rare, at 3% (95% CI: 0.02-0.03, I2 = 0%, p = 0.99). Conclusions: BsAb is associated with nontrivial rates of infections and neutropenia. The rates of high grade CRS and ICANS are low. The heterogeneity of the findings could be attributed by an underreporting of TRAE and small sample sizes from various studies. These results highlight the need for vigilant practices to diagnose and treat infections early and consideration for antibacterial prophylaxis in this immunocompromised population.

7080 Background: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is an uncommon type of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. PMBCL has distinct clinicopathologic features compared to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma but shares some clinical and biologic features with nodular sclerosis classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is exceedingly rare in cHL, therefore one may expect that CNS relapse in PMBCL is also uncommon. Herein, we examined the incidence of CNS relapse in patients with PMBCL. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed PMBCL seen at Mayo Clinic between 1/2002 and 4/2023 were identified from the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Database. Clinical features, treatment details and outcomes were abstracted from medical records. The CNS relapse rate was calculated using a competing risk model, with death considered as a competing risk. Results: A total of 154 PMBCL cases were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 38 years (range 18-77) and 60.4% were female. The distribution of CNS-IPI was low-risk in 80 (51.9%) patients, intermediate-risk in 43 (27.9%), and high-risk in 3 (1.9%), and data were missing for 28 patients (18.2%). 78 patients (50.6%) received R-CHOP and 76 patients (49.4%) received R-DA-EPOCH as frontline therapy. High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) for CNS prophylaxis was administered to 5 patients (all treated with R-CHOP). 20 patients received intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy (methotrexate and/or cytarabine) for CNS prophylaxis (4 with R-CHOP [1 received HD-MTX too],16 with R-DA-EPOCH). The median follow-up was 39 months (95% CI 28.2-49.8). Only 3 patients had CNS relapse, all associated with systemic relapse (1 concurrent, 1 had CNS relapse 8.8 months after systemic relapse, 1 had CNS relapse 2 months before systemic relapse). The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse for the entire cohort was 1.43% (95% CI 0.3%-4.6%) at 1 year and 2.21% (95% CI 0.6%-5.8%) at both 2 and 5 years. For those who did not receive CNS prophylaxis (n=130), the incidence was 0.86% (95% CI 0.1%-4.3%) at 1 year and 1.82% (95% CI 0.4%-5.8%) at both 2 and 5 years. All 3 patients who experienced CNS relapse had R-CHOP as frontline therapy; two patients did not receive any CNS prophylaxis, while 1 patient received IT CNS prophylaxis. Conclusions: The risk of isolated CNS relapse in PMBCL appears to be very low, even in patients who did not receive CNS prophylaxis. While some patients may experience CNS relapse associated with systemic relapse, the overall incidence was low (1.43% at 1 year and 2.21% at 2 and 5 years). The rarity of isolated CNS relapse in PMBCL suggests that routine CNS prophylaxis may not be necessary as part of initial therapy.

7078 Background: Lisaftoclax is a novel, oral, highly selective, potent BCL-2 inhibitor in development. In an ibrutinib-resistant patient-derived WM xenograft/preclinical model, lisaftoclax + ibrutinib has a strong synergistic effect. This report provides updated efficacy and safety data of lisaftoclax-based therapies (including combinations with ibrutinib) in pts with WM. Methods: In this global, open-label, phase 1b/2 multicenter study, pts with WM were enrolled in 3 arms: Arm A (lisaftoclax) included BTKi-resistant/intolerant pts; Arm B (lisaftoclax + ibrutinib), treatment-naïve pts; and Arm C (lisaftoclax + rituximab), BTKi-naïve relapsed/refractory pts. Lisaftoclax was escalated from 400 to 1,200 mg using a modified toxicity probability interval design. A 3-day ramp-up was used for pts at high risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Objectives were efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) assessments (responses assessed per IWWM criteria). Results: As of January 25, 2024, 46 pts were enrolled and treated at doses of up to 1,000 (Arm A), 1,200 (Arm B), and 800 mg (Arm C; Table). The median (range) treatment duration was 11 (1-28; Arm A), 23.5 (1-34; B), and 11.5 (5-33; C) months. Objective response rates (PR, VGFR, CR) were: 41.7% (Arm A), 90.9% (B), and 37.5% (C). In Arm A, pts with wild-type CXCR4 (n = 7) had better overall response to lisaftoclax than the CXCR4mut group (n = 3). No significant difference was observed between pts with/without CXCR4mut in Arms B and C. In Arm B, 1 DLT (grade 3 clinical TLS due to preexisting renal impairment) was reported at 1,200 mg; 1 grade 3 laboratory TLS, primarily attributed to dehydration and concomitant symptomatic therapies, occurred at 1,000 mg; abnormal electrolytes resolved after 1 day of drug interruption, without recurrence. Grade ≥ 3 lisaftoclax-related AEs included neutropenia (15.2%), thrombocytopenia (4.3%), decreased leukocytes (4.3%), TLS (4.3%), anemia (2.2%), weight loss (2.2%), and septic shock (2.2%). Ventricular arrhythmia was not observed. One pt required dose reduction because of neutropenia. The MTD was not reached. Lisaftoclax + ibrutinib showed a PK exposure comparable to lisaftoclax or ibrutinib alone, indicating no potential drug-drug interactions. Conclusions: Lisaftoclax alone and combined with ibrutinib or rituximab was well tolerated and demonstrated measurable effects in pts with naïve or BTKi-treatment-failed WM. (CT.gov: NCT04260217; Internal ID: APG2575WU101) *Co-first authors: ML and SA. Clinical trial information: NCT04260217 . [Table: see text]

7072 Background: LG-NHL is mostly incurable, imposing a prolong impact of cancer care burden for pts. This study aimed to quantify the burden of MH conditions in pts with newly diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), or marginal cell lymphoma (MZL). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using Optum Clinformatics Data Mart to identify pts ≥18 years with ≥1 new diagnosis for CLL, FL, MCL, WM, or MZL from 6/2016-6/2022 (index period). Pts were required to be continuously enrolled for 60 days pre- and 365 days post-index date, defined as the date of first cancer diagnosis. Incidence and prevalence of MH conditions of interest (anxiety, depression, stress reaction/adjustment disorder, insomnia, post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]) were categorized based on if diagnoses were post- or pre-index date. All-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs were measured during the 1-yr follow-up period. Results: Approximately half of newly diagnosed 36,054 LG-NHL pts (CLL/SLL=48.0%; FL=52.7%; MCL=57.2%; WM=50.5%; MZL=52.5%) had either an incident (19.4-25.7%) or prevalent (28.6-32.1%) MH condition diagnosis following their cancer diagnosis (Table). There were no significant demographic differences in pts with and without MH conditions. LG-NHL pts suffered most from anxiety (30.9-38.2%) and depression (27.5-31.9%), followed by insomnia (16-23.1%), stress (10.3-13.5%), and PTSD (1.4-1.9%). Median time from cancer diagnosis to onset of a MH condition was 334 days for CLL/SLL, 301 for FL, 248 for MCL, 351 for WM, and 328 for MZL. LG-NHL pts with an identifiable MH diagnosis had significantly higher costs and HCRU compared to those without; for example, in CLL/SLL pts with MH diagnosis, outpatient visits were 1.4 times higher, inpatient admissions 3.0 times higher, and costs 2.1 times higher than those without (all P=0.0001). HCRU and cost increases were also observed in MCL, FL, WM, and MZL pts with MH diagnosis. Conclusions: This real-world study uncovered a high proportion of LG-NHL patients suffer from MH conditions, incurring higher financial burden than those without. With advancements in new treatments, there remains unmet need of MH burden in these pts. [Table: see text]