Citations

4131 Background: NETTER-2 (NCT03972488) is the first randomized study to evaluate radioligand therapy ([177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE; hereafter 177Lu-DOTATATE) at first line (1L) in patients (pts) with advanced, well-differentiated higher grade (G2 and G3) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Significant improvements in progression-free survival and objective response rate (ORR) were observed for pts receiving 177Lu-DOTATATE. This sub-analysis of NETTER-2 assessed safety and time to response (TTR). Methods: Eligible pts (n=226) were newly diagnosed with somatostatin receptor-positive high G2 or G3 (Ki67 ≥10% and ≤55%) advanced GEP-NETs and were randomized (2:1) to receive 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE (4 × 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks [Q8W]) plus 30 mg octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) Q8W during 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment then Q4W (177Lu-DOTATATE arm), or 60 mg octreotide LAR Q4W (control arm). Hematologic adverse events (AEs) and laboratory toxicities were scored according to CTCAE grade. Response was assessed centrally based on conventional imaging (RECIST 1.1 criteria). Results: The AE pattern in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm was consistent with the established safety profile. Among laboratory abnormalities, grade 3/4 decreases in lymphocytes (38.1% vs 2.7%), leukocytes (4.1% vs 0), neutrophils (3.4% vs 0), platelets (2.0% vs 0) and hemoglobin (1.4% vs 2.7%) were observed in 177Lu-DOTATATE (n=147) and control (n=73) arms, respectively; median time to first occurrence of hematologic toxicities was 4.4 months among pts with immediate hematotoxicities. These events were transient and manageable. There was no notable difference in infection rates between treatment arms (31.3% 177Lu-DOTATATE and 27.4% control). One case of myelodysplastic syndrome was observed (177Lu-DOTATATE arm ~14 months after first cycle). Five fatal AEs occurred during the randomized treatment period; all considered unrelated to treatment and attributed to GEP-NET progression. AEs leading to 177Lu-DOTATATE dose interruption, reduction and discontinuation occurred in 14 (9.5%), 2 (1.4%) and 3 (2.0%) pts, respectively. Among 65 responders in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm (ORR 43 %), median TTR (Q1, Q3) was 5.7 months (4.1, 8.3). Most responses occurred during the 4-cycle treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE. Conclusions: In pts with advanced G2 and G3 (Ki67 ≥10% and ≤55%) GEP-NETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE at 1L the most common hematologic toxicity was lymphopenia, but infection rates were similar vs control. With a median TTR of 5.7 months, most responses to 177Lu-DOTATATE occurred during scheduled treatment. Overall, the study confirmed the safety profile of 177Lu-DOTATATE and supports its use at 1L for this pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT03972488 .

4099 Background: A+B is standard of care for advanced HCC in the first line setting, although was only evaluated in patients with CP class A liver function in IMbrave150. We sought to determine outcomes of patients in the real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a multi-institution retrospective analysis of patients with HCC who received A+B as first-line systemic therapy between March 2018 and November 2023, at Mayo Clinic and University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center. Treatment response was evaluated, and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using the Kaplan Meier method. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazard regression method. Results: Among patients with HCC (n=322), 226, 86, and 10 had CP-A, -B, and -C liver function, while 120, 177, and 25 had ALBI grade 1, 2, and 3 liver function. Median age was 66.5 years, 78.6% were male, and 82.6% were white. Liver disease causes included hepatitis B (5.3%) and C (34.8%), ethanol use (26.1%), and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (15.5%). Macrovascular invasion was seen in 42.9%, and 30.4% had extrahepatic metastatic disease. Median OS for patients with CP-A5/6 was 21.6 months, B7 (n=49) was 9.1 months, and B8-C12 was 4.7 months ( p<0.0001). Median OS by ALBI grade was 34.9, 11.7, and 4.7 months for grades 1, 2, and 3. Median PFS was 8.9, 6.4, and 2.7 months for CP-A5/6, B7, and B8-C12 ( p<0.0001). Median PFS by ALBI grade was 11.0, 6.4, and 3.7 months for grades 1, 2, and 3 ( p=0.0001). Among patients with CP-A, those with ALBI grade 1 had mOS of 34.9 months versus 14.2 months for those with grade 2. Partial response was seen in 29.2%, 19.8% and 10.0% of patients with CP-A, -B, and -C, while 32.7%, 33.7%, and 40.0% had stable disease. In a univariate analysis, factors predictive of shorter OS included CP-B7 or CP-B8-C12, ALBI grade 2 or 3, hepatitis B, poorer ECOG performance status (PS), macrovascular invasion, non-white race, and lack of prior surgery or embolization. In multivariate analyses, CP score, ALBI grade, hepatitis B, ECOG PS, and macrovascular invasion were significantly associated with survival. There was significant interaction between CP and ALBI grade (Table). Conclusions: A+B remains a viable option in patients with CP-B7 liver function, although benefit is significantly less than those with CP-A. ALBI score has predictive value and can identify two prognostic groups among those with CP-A liver function. [Table: see text]

4032 Background: RATIONALE-306 (NCT03783442) is the first global study to investigate anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy in combination with different chemotherapy (chemo) options in the first-line (1L) treatment of advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). At interim analysis (IA), tislelizumab (TIS) plus chemo demonstrated a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) versus placebo (PBO) plus chemo, with a manageable safety profile. Here, we report updated efficacy and safety data with minimum 3 years’ follow-up after study unblinding at IA. Methods: Adults with unresectable locally advanced recurrent/metastatic ESCC and no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were enrolled and randomized (1:1; stratified by region, prior definitive therapy, and investigator [INV]-chosen chemo) to receive TIS 200 mg (Arm A) or PBO (Arm B) IV every 3 weeks plus chemo (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine or platinum plus paclitaxel), until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR), all per INV, and safety. Results: In total, 649 patients (pts) were randomized (Arm A, n=326; Arm B, n=323). At a minimum study follow-up of 36.0 months, improvements in OS, PFS, and DoR in Arm A versus B (Table) were maintained relative to the IA. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS with TIS plus chemo versus PBO plus chemo was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.59, 0.83). Similar to the IA, incidences of any-grade (96.6% vs 96.3%) or grade ≥3 (67.0% vs 64.5%) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were comparable between Arms A and B, respectively; treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were higher in Arm A (32.1%) versus B (22.1%). In Arm A versus B, respectively, serious TRAEs occurred in 29.9% vs 19.6% of pts; TRAEs leading to death occurred in 1.9% and 1.2%. Conclusions: After minimum 3 years’ follow-up, 1L TIS plus chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS and durable antitumor response benefit versus PBO plus chemo in pts with advanced/metastatic ESCC, with no new safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT03783442 . [Table: see text]

4017 Background: Combined MEK inhibition (MEKi) and PD-L1 blockade significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) following first-line chemotherapy (NCT03201458). Further study has shown MEKi enhances tumor immunogenicity but impairs host T cell activation/priming. The addition of immune agonists, e.g. a CD27 agonist, can rescue T cell function in the setting of systemic MEKi in vivo and may be an effective strategy to optimize MEKi’s immunomodulatory potential when used in combination with checkpoint blockade. Methods: We conducted a randomized ph 2 trial (NCT04941287) evaluating Atezolizumab in combination with the CD27 immune agonist (CDX-1127 [Varlilumab]) with or without the addition of a MEKi (Cobimetinib) in patients with unresectable, previously treated, BTC. Adults with pathologically-confirmed BTC, s/p at least 1 prior line (no more than 2) of systemic therapy, measurable disease, and ECOG PS ≤1 were enrolled. Patients who had received previous PD-[L]1 were eligible. The study was planned for 64 evaluable subjects randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by BTC site, to either AV (Atezolizumab [840mg IV days 1,15])+ Varlilumab [3mg/kg IV days 1, 15]) or CAV (Cobimetinib [60mg oral daily days 1-21, off 22-28] + Atezolizumab + Varlilumab). Overall response rate (ORR) and PFS were co-primary endpoints. The primary correlative outcome was treatment-related changes in CD8+ infiltrating T cells. Results: A preplanned interim analysis based on objective response rates did not meet the threshold for continuance in either treatment arm, so the trial was closed early for futility. In total, 57 patients were enrolled (n = 29 [CAV], n = 28 [AV], 67% had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 33% had received previous PD-[L]1. Both CAV and AV regimens were well-tolerated without new safety signals. Adding CDX-1127 did not appear to meaningful increase immunotoxicity beyond established PD-L1 toxicity profiles. ORR was 0% (CAV) and 4% (AV). With a median follow up time of 6.2 months, median PFS was 2.2 (CAV) and 1.8 (AV) months (HR 0.71 [0.40,1.25]). In PD[L]1-experienced patients, median PFS was 3.6 (CAV) and 1.7 (AV) months (HR 0.44 [0.14,1.33]). Median OS was 10.2 (CAV) and 6.1 (AV) months (HR 0.76 [0.37,1.55]). In PD[L]1-experienced patients, median OS was 6.4 (CAV) and 4.4 (AV) months for CAV and AV (HR 0.68 [0.19,2.42]). Primary correlative endpoint and updated survival will be reported at time of meeting. Conclusions: The combination of Atezolizumab and Varlilumab with or without Cobimetinib was safe but did not improve clinical outcomes in advanced stage BTC patients treated in later lines. Though not statistically significant, treatment with CAV demonstrated numerically favorable PFS/OS compared AV among immunotherapy-experienced patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03201458 .

TPS3641 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines vserial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Current accrual (as of 02-02-2024) is 240/1,912. NCT05174169. Support: U10-CA-180868, -180822; UG1CA-189867; Natera, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

e15589 Background: Most patients with mCRC eventually develop disease progression or intolerance to first- and second-line therapy. Fruquintinib, a selective oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs 1, 2, and 3, has emerged as a novel treatment option for refractory mCRC. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of Fruquintinib for the treatment of refractory mCRC compared to placebo in specific patient subgroups of interest. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting Fruquintinib efficacy. The data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines and our protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023477783). Summary hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using a random-effects model. The likelihood of Fruquintinib being associated with adverse events (AEs) was expressed by odds ratios (ORs). Results: Of the 1138 studies yielded by the search, three were included, totaling 1178 patients, of whom 786 (67%) received Fruquintinib. This meta-analysis of three randomized trials assessed the clinical outcomes of Fruquintinib in the intervention group compared with placebo in refractory mCRC. Pooled results from all three studies suggested the superiority of Fruquintinib in PFS (HR: 0.29 [0.25, 0.34], 95% CI, I² = 10%, p < 0.01) and OS (HR: 0.66 [0.57, 0.76], 95% CI, p < 0.01). Notably, subgroup analysis showed that Fruquintinib was associated with improved PFS in patients with prior use of VEGF inhibitors (HR: 0.32 [0.27, 0.38], 95% CI, p < 0.01) and those with more than three prior lines of treatment (HR: 0.37 [0.25, 0.53], 95% CI, p < 0.01), RAS wild-type status (HR: 0.25 [0.13, 0.35], 95% CI, p < 0.01), or RAS mutated (HR: 0.33 [0.28, 0.40], 95% CI, p < 0.01). In the safety analysis, fruquintinib and placebo showed no significant differences in serious AEs; nonetheless, the VEGFR inhibitor was associated with more frequent grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR: 3.13 [1.15, 8.53], 95% CI, p = 0.03). Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports the efficacy of Fruquintinib for refractory mCRC regardless of previous use of VEGF inhibitors, the number of previous treatment lines, and gene RAS mutational status, without a significant increase in serious adverse events. [Table: see text]

3614 Background: Conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) yields a pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of about 15%–- 30% for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This PRECAM study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy combined with CAPEOX plus Envafolimab in Patients with Microsatellite Stable (MSS) LARC, redefining the standard of care (SOC) for LARC. Methods: The study is an open-label, prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical study . Eligible patients with MSS LARC were consecutively enrolled. Participants received short-course radiotherapy (25Gy/5f) with subsequent two cycles of CAPEOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) and 6 cycles of Envafolimab (subcutaneous injection, 150 mg, QW ) followed by total mesorectal excision surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate, and the secondary endpoint was major pathologic (MPR) rate and safety. Results: From April to December 2022, 34 patients were enrolled, of whom 32 completed the study. Remarkably, The pCR rate was62.5% (20/32), and the (MPR) rate was 75% (24/32). Furthermore, 65.6% (21/32) patients achieved a neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score below 8, suggesting an effective treatment response. Common adverse events included tenesmus (78.1%), diarrhea (62.5%), and leukocyte decrease (40.6%), with two cases of Grade 3 adverse events. Surgical procedures were performed in all 32 cases, with minor complications observed. During the follow-up period of up to 20 months, no recurrence or death were reported. Conclusions: Short-course radiotherapy combined with CAPEOX plus Envafolimab showed favorable pCR rate with manageable adverse effects and surgical complications in LARC, underscoring the potential of the combination therapy for MSS LARC. A Randomized controlled trial is warranted for further exploration and validation. Clinical trial information: NCT05216653 .

3594 Background: The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in MSI-H mCRC has not been replicated in MSS mCRC. Therefore, additional interventions are needed to convert immunologically “cold” MSS CRC to “hot” tumors resembling MSI-H tumors. PolyPEPI1018 is an off-the-shelf, multi-peptide vaccine containing 12 immunogenic epitopes derived from 7 shared tumor antigens which demonstrated early evidence of clinical activity in first-line MSS mCRC. Methods: Patients with MSS mCRC who have progressed on 2-3 lines of prior chemotherapy regimen received PolyPEPI1018 (1.2 mg, sc) and atezolizumab (1,200 mg, iv) Q3W until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. A Simon 2-stage design was applied. Data on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and correlation studies will be presented. Results: 18 patients (66 % female) were enrolled for stage 1 of the study. Median age was 54 years (range 38–79), 50% had liver metastases and 67% received at least 3 lines of prior therapies. PD-L1 expression was <1% for 85% of patients. The combination was well-tolerated; most common side effect related to treatment was Grade (Gr) 1-2 local skin reaction (n=22). Gr 2 events (n=2) at least possibly related to treatment were nausea, pyrexia and increased blood alkaline phosphatase. There were no Gr 3-5 events or study discontinuation due to treatment AE. The ORR was 0% and the DCR was 61%. The mPFS was 2.7 months (95%CI 1.4-4.0) and the mOS was not reached (95%CI 8.75 – NE months) at the data cut-off date. Ex-vivo FluoroSpot identified 13/16 subjects with robust, vaccine-specific CD8+ and/or CD4+ T cell responses detected against multiple vaccine antigens. For patients with available biopsy pairs (n=8), both the average PD-L1 expression (IC%, p=0.029) and the density of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs, p=0.019) were significantly increased, post-treatment. Patients with increased PFS (> 12 weeks) had both higher levels of post-treatment PD-L1 (p=0.007) and TILs (p=0.016) than patients with PFS ≤ 12 weeks. Conclusions: PolyPEPI1018 in combination with atezolizumab was well-tolerated with no Grade 3 AEs observed. Despite no objective tumor responses could be detected, correlative data suggest contribution of PolyPEPI1018-induced immune responses to the modulation of tumor microenvironment and to improved disease control. The study did not proceed to stage 2; it is on-going for the collection of survival data. Clinical trial information: NCT05243862 .

3553 Background: Immuno-STATs are modular fusion proteins designed for the selective activation of tumor antigen specific CD8+ T cells. CUE-102, the second Immuno-STAT in clinical trials, is composed of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex, HLA-A*0201, a peptide epitope derived from the Wilms Tumor 1 (WT1) protein, and 4 molecules of reduced affinity human interleukin-2 (IL-2). In preclinical studies CUE-102 binds, activates and expands WT1-specific CD8+ T cells with the potential to enhance anti-tumor immunity in patients with WT1+ cancers. Here we present the results of the dose-finding portion (Part A) of the CUE-102-01 study. Methods: CUE-102-01 is a 2 part phase 1 study. HLA-A*02:01 positive patients with WT1+ advanced colorectal (CRC), gastric (GA) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), pancreatic (PDAC) or ovarian (OvCa) tumors refractory to standard therapies were eligible for participation. WT1 status is determined by IHC via central testing. CUE-102 monotherapy was administered intravenously every three weeks in doses ranging from 1 mg/kg to 8 mg/kg following 3+3 design rules with a Bayesian Logistic Regression Model overlay. Dose levels that exhibit an immune or tumor response may be expanded to further characterize activity and toxicity as allowed by safety rules. Results: Dose escalation was successfully completed in 28 patients with CRC (17), PDAC (6), GA/GEJ (3) and OvCa (2). No DLTs were observed. Three dose levels (2, 4 and 8 mg/kg) exhibited evidence of immune activity and were expanded up to 9 patients each for further evaluation. CUE-102 was well-tolerated with > 96% of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) grade ≤2. The most common TRAEs, were fatigue, infusion reactions, nausea and vomiting. There were no cases of CRS Grade ≥ 2. Preliminary PK data demonstrate dose dependent increases in exposure across the dose range assessed. Preliminary analysis of patient samples demonstrates selective expansion of WT1-specific CD8+ T cells. Stable disease of ≥ 6 weeks (range 6-36 weeks), as determined by RECIST 1.1, has been observed in 10 of 23 patients (DCR 43.5%). Conclusions: CUE-102 is a novel T cell engager that demonstrates acceptable tolerability, favorable PK, and supportive preliminary PD readouts. No DLTs or drug-related SAEs have been observed in doses up to 8 mg/kg as of the data cut-off. Adverse events have been manageable and consistent with the CUE-102 mechanism of action and underlying disease. Early signs of disease stabilization and anti-tumor activity in late-stage patients are encouraging. Part B is a dose expansion that further evaluates safety, PK/PD, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), antitumor efficacy and is currently enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05360680 .

TPS3173 Background: ELU001, pasifolate exatecan, is an ultra-small nanoparticle drug conjugate, known as a CDC (~6 nm), designed to target and penetrate into solid tumors. Due to its size, ELU001 exhibits rapid renal elimination which is expected to reduce or eliminate the toxicities associated with many antibody drug conjugates. ELU001 has ~13 folic acid targeting moieties and ~21 cathepsin-B cleavable exatecan topoisomerase-1 inhibitor payloads covalently bound to short polyethylene glycol chains surrounding a silica core, the C’Dot. ELU001 binds to cancer cells expressing FRα and is internalized into the lysosome where it releases the exatecan payload. ELU001’s dose escalation study reported at ESMO Congress 2023 (1), examined weekly, bi-weekly (Q2W), and tri-weekly schedules over a range of doses in 42 patients. The study revealed that ELU001 could be administered safely and identified a dose level and schedule for the Expansion Studies described below. 22 of the patients with ovarian or endometrial cancers had >1 post-baseline scan(s), of these 2 had a PR and 19 had SD by RECIST v1.1 criteria. ELU001 demonstrated activity against tumors across a range of FRα expression levels, from low to high, retrospectively assessed using the VENTANA FOLR1 RxDx assay and the PS2+ scoring system. Methods: The current multicenter, Tumor Group Expansion open-label phase 1/2 clinical trial investigates ELU001 in patients with ovarian and endometrial cancers and is enrolling three cohorts; 1) ovarian cancer with high FRα expression, 2) ovarian cancer with moderate and low expression and 3) endometrial cancer with low to high expression with assessments based upon the PS2+ scoring system (high = ≥ 75%, moderate = ≥ 50% to < 75%, low = 25% to < 50%, negative = <25% of tumor cells with 2+ or 3+ staining intensity). An initial exploratory dose of 2.0 mg/m2 Q2W was employed in all three cohorts and a second dose of 1.7 mg/m2 Q2W will be studied in the ovarian cancer cohorts. Patients will ultimately be randomized to one of two or more doses to optimize dosing for registration. Primary endpoint: Objective Response Rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include DOR, PFS, TFST, PFS2, OS, adverse events, PK, and ADA assessments. Approximately 20 patients per tumor group will be recruited in the U.S. 1. Ann. Oncol. (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S458-S497. Clinical trial information: NCT05001282 .