Citations

These NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management discuss the identification and treatment of psychosocial problems in patients with cancer. They are intended to assist oncology teams to identify patients who require referral to psychosocial resources and to give oncology teams guidance on interventions for patients with significant distress. These guidelines also provide guidance for social workers, certified chaplains, and mental health professionals by describing treatments and interventions for various psychosocial problems as they relate to patients with cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding standards of care for distress management in patients with cancer and implementation of these standards, including application of evidence-based care delivery models, such as the collaborative care model.

Introduction Angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) affects millions and is frequently under-recognised because diagnostic pathways and risk tools predominantly target obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). This protocol describes shared methods for two machine-learning (ML) studies: (1) differentiating ANOCA from stable angina with obstructive CAD and (2) predicting long-term mortality among patients with ANOCA and obstructive CAD. Methods and analysis We will develop and cross-site validate ML classification models using a multicentre retrospective cohort drawn from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry and institutional datasets from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute and the University Health Network. Eligible participants are adults (≥18 years) undergoing initial cardiac catheterisation for chest pain/anginal equivalents since 1995, excluding prior revascularisation, major structural heart disease and predefined non-anginal indications. Outcomes are (1) ANOCA (0% to <50% stenosis) versus obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) and (2) 1, 3 and 5-year mortality, modelled separately for ANOCA and obstructive CAD. Model development will use nested cross-validation with stratified k-fold inner-loop tuning and leave-one-site-out cross-validation for repeated external validation. Candidate predictors will be harmonised across sites, filtered for missingness and refined using expert/directed acyclic graph-guided selection plus Boruta and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator. Preprocessing includes appropriate encoding, missing-data imputation (multivariate imputation by chained equations) and feature scaling. Algorithms will include elastic-net logistic regression, random forest, LightGBM and multilayer perceptron models; hyperparameters will be optimised via Bayesian optimisation. Performance and threshold tuning will be reported. Explainability and subgroup fairness will be assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations. Final models will be deployed as a web-based clinical risk calculator. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval has been obtained from the University of Calgary and the University Health Network (#24-5916). Analyses will use deidentified data in secure environments; only aggregate results will be reported. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conferences and a web-based calculator.

Abstract Modern radiation therapy (RT) technologies allow for improved sparing of normal tissues, decreasing the risk of both acute and long-term toxicities. Existing RT dose constraints for prospective trials within the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) were formulated in the context of solid malignancies. As patients with hematologic malignancies are often treated with lower RT doses and are usually younger with more favorable prognoses, customized dose constraints are needed. The NRG Oncology Hematologic Malignancies Working Group (NRG HEME) commissioned a review of existing organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints from published primary literature, the NRG Center for Innovation in Radiation Oncology (CIRO), and national guidelines. Customized constraints were developed by iterative review by NRG HEME. Final recommendations were approved by radiation oncology representatives from all the lymphoma NCTN groups (NRG Oncology, Children’s Oncology Group, Alliance, ECOG-ACRIN, SWOG, Canadian Cancer Trials Group). For 49 OARs, a strict recommended constraint was determined, of which 20 were not present in CIRO. Of the remaining 29 constraints, 20 were lower, 2 were the same, and 5 used different metrics; 2 were higher than at least 1 CIRO trial constraint. Acceptable variations were determined and unacceptable variations were added for select critical OARs for plan scoring. While doses to OARs without explicit unacceptable variations should not exceed acceptable variations, violations should not be considered for plan quality assessment on trials. This consensus list of standard OAR constraints should be incorporated for all future NCTN trials in hematologic malignancies. Strict dose constraints will minimize long-term toxicities in this patient population.

ABSTRACT Importance Rural-urban disparities in chronic disease prevalence are well established; however, the extent to which individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) contributes to these disparities remains unclear. Objective To examine the associations of rurality and SES with the prevalence of five most burdensome chronic diseases among adults. Design We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of adults across 27 Upper Midwest counties using the Expanded Rochester Epidemiology Project (E-REP) medical record data linkage system to evaluate associations between rurality, SES and chronic disease prevalence. Prevalence of clinically diagnosed asthma, diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and mood disorders was identified from International Classification of Diseases ICD9/10 codes over a five-year period (2014-2019). Setting Population based Participants Adults over 18 years residing in the 27 E-REP counties, excluding those missing rural-urban residence status. Exposure HOUSES index, an individual-level measure of SES, served as the primary measure, while rurality based on Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes 4-10 was the secondary measure. Main Outcome Prevalence of the five clinically diagnosed chronic diseases was identified using ICD9/10 codes from 2014–2019. Mixed effect logistic regression models were used and adjusted for demographics and general medical examination receipt, to assess rural-urban and SES differences for prevalence of each chronic disease. Results Among 455,802 adults with available HOUSES index, 42.8% lived in rural areas, 53.8% were female and 87.4% were non-Hispanic White. In the unadjusted analysis, rural and urban populations showed comparable asthma and CHD prevalence, while mood disorders, hypertension, and diabetes were more common in urban areas. After adjusting for demographic factors and healthcare utilization, rural-urban differences were no longer statistically significant, whereas SES remained strongly associated with all diseases in a dose response manner (e.g., adjusted Odds Ratio for hypertension (ref: HOUSES index Q4): 1.14, 1.27, and 1.42 for HOUSES index Q3, Q2, and Q1, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance Individual-level SES measured by the HOUSES index, was more strongly associated with chronic disease prevalence than rurality, supporting its integration into population health assessment and risk stratification.

Abstract Background: HPV16 (human papillomavirus) is a leading cause of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) in the US. Antibodies to HPV16 early antigens are detectable in serum samples up to two decades before diagnosis and are potential biomarkers for early detection. In this study, we have developed and compared three custom HPV16 serology platforms for detection of OPC: MSD (Meso Scale Discovery) electrochemiluminescent detection, RAPID ELISA, and a novel semi-quantitative lateral flow assay (LFA) using a custom android application. Methods: For the MSD platform, recombinant HPV 16 antigens (E1, E2, E6, E7) were synthesized in mammalian cells and printed on multiplexed arrays. In RAPID ELISA, GST-tagged antigens (E1, E2, E6, E7) were expressed using mammalian in vitro transcription and translation and bound IgG detected. For the LFA, His-tagged recombinant proteins (HPV16 CE2 184-365aa and HPV16 E7) were synthesized, printed, and antibodies detected with protein G conjugated nanoparticles. Archived serum samples drawn from newly-diagnosed OPC patients (n = 60), with matching saliva samples (n=54, MSD assay only) were obtained from Mayo Clinic. Unmatched controls (n = 46) were obtained from AT Still. For the lateral flow assay, colorimetric image analysis was done using a titration curve of known concentration of monoclonal antibody. We optimized the biomarker panel (E2, E6, and E7 for MSD and ELISA, and for LFA E2, and E7) by using multiparametric analysis and plotting the receiver operating curves to the test performance, and assays were compared using the Cohen’s kappa statistic. Results: At 98% specificity, the MSD HPV16 serologic assay achieved 88% sensitivity, similar to RAPID ELISA, and the LFA assay at 85% sensitivity. The signal intensities for saliva samples were weaker at 24% sensitivity. The Cohen’s kappa value ranged from 0.74 to 0.78 for the comparison between all three assays. There was only one sample among all the cases that was negative by all three serology tests. Conclusion: All three assays have strong concordance for the detection of HPV16 early antigen serology. All the tests can facilitate large scale HPV serology research. Citation Format: Akshansh Kaushik, David Routman, Tej Patel, Joshua Eger, Padhmavathy Yuvaraj, Kathleen R. Bartemes, Marisa D. Griesel, Danielle E. Hunter, Katie Van Abel, Anu Mathew, Mingyue Wang, Leonid Dzantiev, Martin Stengelin, Jacob N. Wohlstadter, Ann Spolarich, Kristina R. Dahlstrom, Jennifer Blain Christen, Erich Sturgis, Karen Anderson. HPV serology for rapid detection of HPV positive oropharyngeal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5099.

Abstract Background: Deletions in MTAP occur in 10-15% of cancers and are associated with poor prognosis. MTAP deletion (MTAPdel) leads to accumulation of MTA which causes partial inhibition of PRMT5, creating a synthetic lethality approach with PRMT5 inhibitors. Multiple investigational MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitors have demonstrated early clinical efficacy in MTAPdel NSCLC and other cancers. MTAPdel, PRMT5 expression, and clinical outcomes to standard of care immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chemotherapy (chemo) have not been well characterized. Methods: The Tempus Lens Platform (Tempus AI, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used to query the Tempus multimodal de-identified database and establish and subsequently analyze a cohort of patients (pts)with NSCLC and DNA (Tempus xT) and RNA (Tempus xR) testing, treated with front-line (1L) ICI with or without chemo (N=3,676). PRMT5 expression was normalized as transcripts per million (TPM) and reported as log2(TPM + 1). Pts were classified into high vs low groups based on median PRMT5 expression and into MTAPdel vs intact (MTAPwt) based on MTAP biallelic loss. Immune infiltration was estimated using Quantiseq. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was defined as the time from 1L start to death or last known follow-up. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was defined as the time from 1L start to death, progression or last known follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models and adjusted for age, sex, histology, smoking status and PDL1 status. Results: PRMT5 expression was moderately increased in pts with MTAPdel (6.65 v 6.70, p=0.012). Alterations in MYC, SMARCA4 and KEAP1 were enriched in PRMT5-high tumors in both MTAPdel and MTAPwt pts (p&lt;0.03). Pts with PRMT5-high tumors had decreased infiltrate of multiple immune cells, including B cells, macrophages (M1 and M2), NK cells, CD4 and CD8 T cells (p&lt;0.001). Pts with MTAPdel/PRMT5-high expression had shorter rwOS compared to MTAPwt/PRMT5-low when treated with ICI alone (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.11-2.24, p=0.011) or with ICI + chemo (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.34-2.03, p&lt;0.001). These associations persisted on multivariate analysis. Pts with MTAPdel/PRMT5-high expression were also associated with worse rwPFS when treated with ICI + chemo (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.22-1.86, p&lt;0.001) on univariate and multivariate analysis, but did not associate with rwPFS in pts treated with ICI alone (HR=0.97, 95% CI 0.66-1.42, p=0.9). Conclusion: PRMT5 expression defines an immune suppressed subpopulation of pts with NSCLC. Pts with elevated PRMT5 expression and MTAPdel have poor outcomes with ICI+/- chemo, indicating PRMT5 RNA expression levels can be used to inform clinical trial designs, particularly those that are testing novel combinatorial strategies. Citation Format: Natalie Vokes, Stamatina Fragkogianni, Pooja A. Shah, Santiago G. Trevino, Konstantinos Leventakos, Lei Deng, Matthew Lee, Tali Azenkot, KAYLA LAYNG, JACOB MERCER, Jyoti Patel, Jordi Rodon Ahnert. High PRMT5 expression is associated with decreased immune infiltrate and worse outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2446.

Abstract Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive and rare B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma with poor prognosis, even with treatment. Despite its clinical importance, the etiology of MCL remains largely unknown. Some studies have reported a positive association with family history, suggesting that genetic factors could contribute to risk. Methods: To identify germline genetic variants associated with risk, we conducted the first genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and GWAS meta-analysis for MCL, comprising 1,163 cases and 61,271 controls. The most significant loci were taken forward for replication in three independent studies, including 576 cases and 771,773 controls. To identify potential target genes and pathways of discovered loci, we conducted F-MAGMA, colocalization, and transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) analyses. To gain insight into underlying regulatory mechanisms, we performed integrative epigenomic analyses using DNase I hotspots and histone mark ChIP-seq data across diverse cell types applying the FORGE2 framework. Results: In the joint analyses, we identified eight genome-wide significant loci (P&lt;5x10-8) associated with MCL risk, several of which were located near genes with known DNA repair (ATM), telomere (TERT), or RNA-binding functions (RBM20). Further analyses using F-MAGMA, which uses DNase-seq data to prioritize genes from GWAS, identified genes that were significantly associated with risk, including SP140, a chromatin reader and immune regulator of pathogen response. This gene also displayed strong colocalization with our lead variant in whole blood (COLOC posterior probability PP4=0.97). TWAS demonstrated significant associations with SP140 and ACTA2, which has been linked to cell proliferation (P&lt;3x10-6). Enrichment for DNase I hotspots was observed in B and T lymphocytes (q-value&lt;0.05), providing evidence for a role in immune cell-specific regulatory regions. Enrichment for enhancer-associated histone mark H3K4me1 was observed in B cells (q-value&lt;0.01), highlighting a role for immune cell-specific enhancers. Transcription factor (TF) motif enrichment analysis pointed to TFs critical for B-cell development and differentiation, notably TCF3 and EP300 (q&lt;0.01 for both), suggesting an association between B-cell lineage regulation and MCL risk. Finally, genome-wide SNP-based heritability was estimated to be 17%, underscoring the importance of common variants in MCL risk. Conclusion: Our study provides novel insight into the inherited susceptibility of MCL by identifying eight significant loci and estimating substantial common variant heritability. These findings highlight a role for several distinct biological pathways -specifically DNA repair, telomerase function, and B-cell differentiation- in the etiology of MCL, offering new targets for mechanistic investigation. Citation Format: Charles E. Breeze, Alyssa Clay-Gilmour, Hanla A. Park, Ólafur B. Davíðsson, Angelica Macauda, Brenda M. Birmann, Elizabeth E. Brown, Murat Güler, Michelle A. T. Hildebrandt, Alexandra Nieters, Krystle Ong, Jojo Biel-Nielsen Dietz, Karin E. Smedby, Karl Smith-Byrne, Rosalie Griffin, Sophia S. Wang, Susan Slager, James R. Cerhan, Jonathan N. Hofmann, Qing Lan, Nathaniel Rothman, Ingrid Glimelius, Henrik Hjalgrim, James Mckay, Sonja I. Berndt. Genome-wide association study of mantle cell lymphoma identifies novel loci suggesting a critical role for B-cell chromatin readers and DNA repair mechanisms [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3602.

Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Prognostic models for HCC primarily rely on tumor burden and liver function, with limited consideration of inherited genetic contributions to survival variability. Identifying germline variants associated with survival could refine prognosis and reveal biological mechanisms underlying disease progression. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of overall survival among 864 patients with HCC from the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center cohort. Genotyping, quality control, and imputation procedures followed previously described protocols (PMID: 38381705). Associations between genetic variants and overall survival were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and the first five principal components. Genome-wide significance was defined as P &lt; 5×10-8. Functional annotation and pathway enrichment analyses (MAGMA) were employed to investigate the biological relevance of the identified loci. Results: After quality control, 8,525,017 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed. We identified seven new loci associated with HCC survival at the genome-wide significance level. Five out of seven loci are associated with anthropometric traits and hematological measurement traits, reflecting metabolism, hematopoiesis, immune function, and inflammation. A variant in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR3) of STX7 showed a genome-wide significant association with overall survival (HR = 3.23; P = 2.56 ×10-8). Carriers of the risk allele had significantly shorter survival times compared with noncarriers. Pathway analysis revealed enrichment in biologically relevant processes, including liver growth and regeneration (growth hormone and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) signaling pathway), implicating hepatocyte proliferation and IL-6/STAT3-mediated inflammatory signaling. Immune-related pathways, such as regulation of T cell activation and myeloid leukocyte migration, highlight the role of germline variation in immune surveillance. Moreover, pathways governing vascular remodeling and metabolic stress response (e.g., JAK activation, mitochondrial dynamics) suggest that inherited determinants of microenvironmental structure and hepatocyte resilience influence patient outcomes. Conclusion: This germline GWAS of HCC survival identifies seven new genome-wide significant loci and implicates pathways involved in liver regeneration, inflammation, and tissue remodeling. These findings support a role for inherited genetic variation in shaping HCC prognosis and underscore the potential of integrating germline genetics into prognostic modelling and therapeutic target discovery. Citation Format: Younghun Han, Jinyoung Byun, Lewis R. Roberts, Katherine A. McGlynn, Manal M. Hassan, Christopher I. Amos. Identification of survival-associated germline variants in hepatocellular carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3606.

Abstract Introduction: COE has become the gold standard in addressing health disparities. COE’s value is emphasized by NIH and leading cancer-related organizations e.g., AACR. The Alliance for COE (The Alliance) mission is to advance the art, science, and impact of COE; promote community health and wellness; and reduce cancer burden and disparities. Methods: This abstract builds on the Alliance’s Science of Community Outreach and Engagement (SoCOE) Conference a NCI R13 funded series. SoCOE Conference is organized by 10 NCI-designated Cancer Centers to provide a platform for COE academic-clinical-policy-community stakeholders to share best practices for solution-focused community responsive cancer prevention, diagnostics, therapeutics and survivorship research and practice. Results: &gt; 500 researchers, clinicians, policymakers, healthcare administrators, with &gt;12% being survivors and/or advocates, participated in our SoCOE Conferences. The delegates’ recommendations are: Decentralize who/entities that hold all the power in science and clinical research (trials). Communities hold valuable, necessary wisdom and resources to inform and guide science Include multisectoral partners early and always Community capacity building and compensation with gratitude Mentoring of junior COE researchers, clinicians, policymakers, healthcare administrators, survivors and advocates with humility is a must Develop virtual communities to share best practices across cancer centers and within regions Develop working groups to identify and explore commonalities across COE work in rural/urban, diverse/homogenous spaces Publish Science of COE papers on various topics related to COE Frameworks and evidenced-solutions Provide community reports on best practice guide that can be widely available to be shared locally and in-person, and digitally Partner and learn from COE teams working with other cultural/ethnic groups Attend to, measure and remedy societal/social drivers of health disparities that mirror barriers to care, and research engagement and participation. Discussion: Informed by our community advisory boards and the findings for our SoCOE Conferences, we present the pillars of the Alliance to tackle population cancer burden and disparities: Training future COE leaders/advocates, Advocating for public health policies/guidelines, Increasing access to cancer prevention and care that will also increase access to studies, Engaging and partnering with multisectoral stakeholders and communities, Building community capacity, Advancing COE science through catchment-relevant research, and Leading bi-directional communication and information and resource sharing between catchment area communities and cancer centers. The expectation and impact of COE can only be achieved if COE teams are valued, supported cancer center members with community advisory boards and community as cancer centers’ priority population. Citation Format: Kimlin Ashing, CHARNITA ZEIGLER-JOHNSON, Hayley S. Thompson, Kim Rhoads, Nadine Barrett, Lisa Carter Bawa, Timiya S. Nolan, Monica Baskin, Vanessa B. Sheppard, Marvella E. Ford, Erica Phillips, Lorna H. McNeill, Folakemi T. Odedina. Advancing the science, practice and impact of COE [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7577.

Abstract Introduction: Pathological complete response (pCR) is a strong prognostic marker, but survival outcomes comparing treatment to control do not reliably align with treatment-control differences in pCR rates in breast cancer. A novel Bayesian hierarchical framework models treatments within trials, allowing us to predict treatment effects on distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) from pCR with greater accuracy. Methods: We analyzed 12 neoadjuvant breast cancer trials (6,000 patients, all HR/HER2 subtypes; including I-SPY2). The framework of Burzykowski, Molenberghs & Buyse (2005) is extended to a novel arm-based hierarchical structure providing a distribution of pCR and DRFS treatment effects controlling for subtype (HR/HER2), N and T stage, grade, and calendar year. Three held-out trials (877 patients; 26 regimens; med follow-up &gt;4 years) validate predictions of DRFS treatment benefit from pCR. All data was used to estimate treatment-effect correlation and the surrogate threshold effect (STE). Analyses were repeated for Residual Cancer Burden Index (binary RCB01, continuous RCB). Results: Predicted probability of DRFS benefit closely matched actual DRFS follow-up (mean absolute error 0.06; Pearson r = 0.9). Across all trials, pCR showed moderate surrogacy (ρ = 0.82, R2 = 0.67). A 60% increase in pCR odds achieves ≥95% probability of DRFS benefit (STE = OR of 1.60). RCB outperforms pCR across all metrics, with 92% sensitivity and 93% specificity for detecting DRFS benefit in 26 validation regimens (Table 1). Conclusion: This novel Bayesian meta-analytic framework reveals that pCR, RCB01 and continuous RCB reliably predict survival benefit across heterogeneous trials, with RCB performing the best in an external validation. This provides a statistical foundation for accelerated approval decisions using robust early biomarkers in modern neoadjuvant trial designs by accurately predicting survival at the treatment arm level. Citation Format: Keli S. Santos-Parker, Jessica R. Santos-Parker, W. Fraser Symmans, Laura J. Esserman, Christina Yau, Angie DeMichele, Laura van't Veer, Doug Yee, Fabien Reyal, Helena Earl, Jean Abraham, David Cameron, Peter Hall, Judy Boughey, Matthew Goetz, Gabe Sonke, Miguel Martín, Sara López-Tarruella, Priyanka Sharma, Rachel Freiberg, Jane Perlmutter, Aditya Bardia, Martin Eklund, Rachel Freiberg, Lajos Pusztai. A novel statistical framework for surrogate endpoint prediction of survival in neoadjuvant breast cancer trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1401.