Citations

Clear

3309 citation(s) found for "Do, Alexander".

360° to the Petrous Apex: Comprehensive Surgical Anatomy and Limitations of Open and Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to the Petrous Apex
Alexander, A. Yohan , Agosti, Edoardo, Plou, Pedro, Graepel, Stephen , Pinheiro-Neto, Carlos D., Leonel, Luciano C. P. C., Gompel, Jamie J. Van, Link, Michael J., Peris-Celda, Maria, Eide, Jacob G. , Alexander, A Yohan , Agosti, Edoardo , Plou, Pedro , Pinheiro‐Neto, Carlos , Gompel, Jamie J. Van , Link, Michael J. , Peris‐Celda, Maria

Mayo Clinic

Operative Neurosurgery | March 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1227/ons.0000000000001976 | PMID 41823405 Get It

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Contemporary skull base surgeons must understand transcranial and endoscopic endonasal approaches to the petrous apex (PA). We provide an anatomic overview and comparison of main approaches to the PA through illustrative anatomic dissections. METHODS: On 10 sides of 5 specimens, transcranial approaches to the PA including the anterior petrosal, transcochlear, and retrosigmoid with suprameatal extension were performed. For endoscopic endonasal approaches, the transclival approach was performed in the midline of 5 specimens and its contralateral transmaxillary extension was performed on 10 sides. RESULTS: The anterior petrosal approach offers an anterolateral view of the PA bounded by petrous ridge posteromedially, internal auditory canal posterolaterally, greater superficial petrosal nerve anterolaterally, and lateral boundary of cranial nerve V, the Gasserian ganglion, and V3 anteromedially; it exposes the middle fossa and, once the PA is removed, the superomedial cerebellopontine angle. The transcochlear approach affords a lateral view of the PA defined medially and inferiorly by inferior petrosal sinus, posteriorly by posterior fossa dura, anteriorly by the petrous internal carotid artery, and superiorly by the superior petrosal sinus and middle fossa dura. Through a retrosigmoid approach, the PA is bounded by the superior petrosal sinus superiorly, the sagittal plane of cranial nerve VI medially, and the axial and sagittal plane of the internal auditory canal porus inferiorly and laterally, respectively. It affords a panoramic view of the posterior fossa and access to Meckel's cave after PA drilling. Endoscopic endonasal approaches target the anteromedial PA, and it is demarcated by a triangle consisting of cranial nerve VI posterolaterally, the paraclival segment of the internal carotid artery anteriorly, and the petroclival synchondrosis inferiorly and medially. The addition of the contralateral transmaxillary approach enhances lateral access up to the internal auditory canal. CONCLUSION: We provide a comprehensive overview of the main approaches to the PA through illustrative anatomic dissections and representative cases.
Abdominal arterial calcification profile in kidney transplant candidates: a comparison between patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and those with other causes of kidney failure
Ghanem, R, Yazbek, Albaraa, Idilbi, Amro , Alhalabi, Alaa , Hanouneh, Tareq, Hassoun, Ali, Nasrini, Tala , Mawaldi, Mohammad, Haddad, Walid, Hallak, Mohammad Hussam, Sella, David M., Alexander, Lauren F. , Li, Zhuo, Chebib, Fouad T, Li, Zhuo , Ghanem, Roaa , Hassoun, Alia A L, Jarmi, Tambi , Alexander, Lauren F , Alhassoun, Alia, Hallak, Mohamed Hussam, Chebib, Fouad T. , Jarmi, Tambi

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Nephrology | March 10, 2026 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 399-407

10.1093/joneph/aajaf046 | PMID 41806024 Get It

Abstract Background Abdominal arterial calcification is a well-established predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality in kidney failure. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), a common genetic cause of kidney failure, presents with a distinct vascular profile. However, the burden of abdominal arterial calcification in ADPKD remains inadequately characterized. Clarifying these differences may improve cardiovascular risk stratification and transplant timing. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 4088 adult patients listed for kidney transplant at three Mayo Clinic sites (2005–2024). Patients were categorized by kidney failure cause: ADPKD vs. non-ADPKD. Abdominal arterial calcification was quantified on non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans using a modified Agatston scoring method. Propensity score matching (1:1) adjusted for age, sex, race, lipid levels, left ventricular ejection fraction, dialysis exposure, coronary artery disease, neurovascular disease, and smoking history, was performed. Abdominal arterial calcification scores were compared between matched groups, and subgroup analyses evaluated abdominal arterial calcification severity across dialysis durations in ADPKD patients. Results After matching, 309 patients with ADPKD were compared with 309 non-ADPKD chronic kidney disease (CKD) controls. Abdominal arterial calcification scores were significantly lower in the ADPKD group (median: 425.3; IQR: 0.0–2033.5) than in the non-ADPKD group (median: 1256.8; IQR: 96.5–5033.8). Among ADPKD patients, abdominal arterial calcification scores increased with dialysis duration (P < .001). Conclusion ADPKD patients exhibit lower abdominal arterial calcification scores than their non-ADPKD counterparts after adjusting for clinical variables. Abdominal arterial calcification progression with dialysis highlights the importance of early transplant evaluation. This study introduces a novel adaptation of coronary calcium scoring software for quantifying abdominal calcification, offering a standardized approach to vascular risk assessment in kidney transplant candidates.
Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Features of Diffuse Hemispheric Glioma, H3 G34-Mutant: An International Multi-institutional Study
Crowell, Cameron , Mankuzhy, Nikhil P. , Bennett, Julie , Bandopadhayay, Pratiti , Sturm, D., Green, Adam L. , Gupta, Tejpal , Chatterjee, Abhishek , Epari, Sridhar , Chinnaswamy, G., Prasad, Maya , Patel, Sonal, MacNeil, Mary , Vanan, Magimairajan , Larouche, Valérie , Renzi, Samuele , Jones, Jacquelyn , Perreault, Sébastien , Mata-Mbemba, Daddy , Sangatsuda, Yuhei , Yoshimoto, Koji , Lin, Emily , Feddersen, Charlotte R., Pavon-Mengual, Miriam, Vizzini, Olivia, Zápotocký, Michal, Popovacki, Aimee, Schlosser, Mary-Pat , Omene, Egiroh , Alexander, Kimberley L., Satgunaseelan, Laveniya, Williams, Andrew , Yao, Kristin, Ronsley, Rebecca , Cheng, Sylvia, Eisenstat, David, Andre, N., Matheson, K., Chan, Aimee , Lim-Fat, Mary Jane, Lapointe, Sarah , Cayrol, Romain , Coleman, Christina , Juretic, Nikoleta , McThenia, Sheila, Khan, Sara , Salloum, Ralph , Galvin, Robert , Hawkins, Cynthia, Karajannis, Matthias A. , Jones, David T.W., Ligon, K. L., Jabado, Nada, Erker, Craig , Sturm, Dominik , Chinnaswamy, Girish , Patel, Sohil H , Vanan, Magimairajan Issai , Feddersen, Charlotte , Cruz, Ofelia , Pavon-Mengual, Miriam , Vizzini, Olivia , Zápotocký, Michal , Popovacki, Aimee , Klawinski, Darren , Hansford, Jordan R , Schlosser, Mary-Pat , Omene, Egiroh , Alexander, Kimberley L , Satgunaseelan, Laveniya , Williams, Andrew , Yao, Kristin , Ronsley, Rebecca , Cheng, Sylvia , Ludlow, Louise , Eisenstat, David , Khuong-Quang, Dong-Anh , Tabouret, Emeline , André, Nicolas , Matheson, Kara , Chan, Aimee , Lim-Fat, Mary Jane , Lapointe, Sarah , Cayrol, Romain , Coleman, Christina , Juretic, Nikoleta , McThenia, Sheila , Khan, Sara , Wright-Nadkarni, Mariah , Salloum, Ralph , Galvin, Robert T , Sener, Ugur , Hawkins, Cynthia , Imber, Brandon S , Karajannis, Matthias A , Jones, David T W , Ligon, Keith L , Jabado, Nada , Erker, Craig , Larouche, Valérie , Hansford, Jordan R. , Satgunaseelan, Laveniya , Sener, Uğur , Hawkins, Cynthia

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | March 9, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2243-2254

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-3764 | PMID 41801141 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Knowledge of prognostic factors and long-term survival in patients with diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34–mutant (DHG, H3 G34), remains limited in this tumor with a poor prognosis. Experimental Design: This retrospective, multi-institutional study investigated prognostic variables for patients with DHG, H3 G34, and their association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were applied with multiple imputed datasets. Results: A total of 153 patients (142 G34R, 9 G34V, 2 via DNA methylation) were included. The median age at diagnosis was 17 years (range, 2–45). Initial gross/near total resection (GTR/NTR) was achieved in 43% of patients. Radiation was given in 91% (85% focal irradiation), and initial chemotherapy was given in 87% [70% temozolomide-based (TMZ), 25% TMZ/lomustine, 5% non-TMZ]. Median OS was 24 months [interquartile range (IQR), 22–28] with a median PFS of 14 months (IQR, 12–19). Twelve patients (8%) were found to be long-term survivors (≥5 years). Exploratory multivariable analysis showed that adjuvant radiotherapy [HR, 0.076; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.033–0.17] and achieving GTR/NTR compared with < NTR (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33–0.78) were associated with improved PFS. Multivariable analysis showed improved OS with increasing age at diagnosis (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57–0.87), initial radiotherapy (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15–0.96), and initial GTR/NTR compared with < NTR (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37–0.97). Conclusions: This cohort highlights prognostic factors for patients with DHG, H3 G34, and describes relapse patterns and therapy approaches. Clinical trials and prospective registries are needed to improve outcomes.
Strategies for Inclusive Practices in Clinical Procedure Training
Olson, Emily M. , Lui, Justin K. , Santhosh, Lekshmi , Camac, Erin , Garbarino, Alexander

Mayo Clinic

The Clinical Teacher | March 8, 2026 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/tct.70390 | PMID 41793375 Get It

Gene Portals: A Framework for Integrating Clinical, Functional, and Structural Evidence into Rare Disease Variant Classification
Brünger, Tobias , Krey, Ilona , Kim, Suyeon, Klöckner, Chiara , Myers, Scott J, Johannesen, Katrine M. , Stefanski, Arthur , Taylor, Gary, Macnee, Marie , Dahl, Rebekka S., Yuan, Hongjie, Kim, Sukhan, Helbig, Ingo, Pan, Jen, Kurganov, Erkin , Baez, David, Zuberi, Sameer M., Lerche, Holger, May, Patrick, Ivaniuk, Alina, Meskis, Mary Anne , Hood, Veronica , Schust, Leah F., Freed, Amber, Froelich, Steven, Deng, Alexander T., Bouman, Arjan , Hajianpour, M.J. , Pal, Deb K. , Danvoye, Leslie, Lederer, Damien , BALCI, TUĞÇE, Hagebeuk, Eveline , Heidlebaugh, Alexis R. , Oetjens, Kathryn F., Striano, Pasquale, Williams, Sarah Drewes, Engelen, Kalene van , Howell, Katherine B. , Khoury, Jean , Benke, Tim A., Strehlow, Vincent , Platzer, Konrad, Ramsey, Amy J, Manaster, Lisa, Malepati, Sunitha, Fox, Pangkong M., Noebels, Jeffrey, Chung, Wendy, Poduri, Annapurna, Stripe, Laina Lusk, Ruggiero, Sarah M., Cohen, Stacey, Wilmarth, Olivia, Prentice, Anna Jenne, Cha, Esther, Budnik, Nikita , Kramer, Audra A. , Gh, Zhang, Palotie, Aarno, Daly, Mark J., Møller, R., Lemke, Johannes R., Lal, Dennis , Møller, Rikke S. , May, Patrick , Bruenger, Tobias , Pan, Jen Q , Farrant, Mark , Wyllie, David J A , Bosselmann, Christian , Mantegazza, Massimo , May, Patrick , Ivaniuk, Alina , Goodspeed, Kimberly , Trinidad, Marena , Aledo-Serrano, Ángel , Pal, Deb K , Platzer, Konrad , Ruggiero, Sarah M , Daly, Mark J. , George, Alfred L , Brunklaus, Andreas , Møller, Rikke S , Myers, Scott J. , Taylor, Gary, Pérez‐Palma, Eduardo , Schorge, Stéphanie , Dahl, Rebekka S. , Perszyk, Riley E. , Bajaj, Sunanjay , Helbig, Ingo , Wollmuth, Lonnie P. , Báez-Nieto, David , Zuberi, Sameer M. , Boßelmann, Christian M. , Mantegazza, Massimo , Cestèle, Sandrine , Ivaniuk, Alina , Kang, Jing‐Qiong , Gati, Cornelius , Montanucci, Ludovica , Wüster, Arthur , Deng, Alexander T. , Borovikov, Artem O. , Sharkov, Artem A. , Bouman, Arjan , Hoffman, Trevor L. , Howell, Katherine B. , Benke, Tim A. , Platzer, Konrad , Ramsey, Amy J. , Fox, Pangkong , Noebels, Jeffrey L. , Chung, Wendy K. , Poduri, Annapurna , Lusk, Laina G. , Cohen, Stacey , Smith, Lacey A. , Boesch, Sylvia , Prentice, Anna Jenne , Hommersom, Marina P. , Vanoye, Carlos G. , Nothnagel, Michael , Palotie, Aarno V. , George, Alfred L. , Zárate, Yuri A. , Brunklaus, Andreas , Traynelis, Stephen F. , Lemke, Johannes R.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | March 6, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.03.05.26347086 | PMID 41822692 Get It

Abstract Rare Mendelian disorders affect 300-400 million people globally. Although genetic testing has become widely adopted, gene-specific evidence for tailored variant interpretation remains scattered across resources. We present Gene Portals, a framework for gene-centered multimodal knowledge bases that co-localize expert-harmonized clinical data, functional assays, population variation, structural annotations and gene-specific ACMG/AMP specifications within a single resource. A modular interface integrates this unified evidence with VCEP-refined ACMG specifications to enable automated gene-specific variant classification, infer molecular mechanisms, and support cross-gene analyses. We demonstrate the framework’s utility across five Gene portals spanning eleven neurodevelopmental disorder-associated genes, integrating data from 4,423 individuals with 2,838 unique variants, 36,149 ClinVar submissions, and 1,044 expert-curated molecular readouts. By organizing evidence that is otherwise dispersed across multiple sources into a unified, queryable framework, the SCN, GRIN, CACNA1A, SATB2 and SLC6A1 Gene Portals became widely used community resources and provide an extensible template for standardized rare-disease variant interpretation and mechanism-aware discovery.
Posttraumatic Descending Thoracic Aortic Pseudoaneurysm
Rai, Pranjal , Necker, Fabien, Lakhani, Dhairya A. , Rai, Pranjal , Necker, Fabian , Lakhani, Dhairya

Mayo Clinic

Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging | March 5, 2026 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/ryct.250167 | PMID 41784489 Get It

Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines for the Administration of Neuromuscular Blockade in Adults With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Erstad, Brian L. , Cobas, Miguel Angel, Qadir, Nida , Alshamsi, Fayez, Sharif, Sameer, Devine, Elizabeth M., Einav, Sharon, Elmer, Jennifer, Fort, Alexander C., Harrod, Christopher G., Lamb, Keith D., Mehta, S., Mitchell, Dannette A., Paruk, Fathima, Sacha, Gretchen, Schell‐Chaple, Hildy , Sinha, Sharmili , Smith, S. Ray , TOPELİ, Arzu, Alshamsi, Fayez , Qadir, Nida , Sharif, Sameer , Devine, Scott , Heavner, Mojdeh S. , Lamb, Keith, Mehta, Sangeeta , Piraino, Thomas , Sacha, Gretchen , Smith, Susan E., Topeli, Arzu , Sarwal, Aarti

Mayo Clinic

Critical Care Medicine | March 3, 2026 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 634-643

10.1097/ccm.0000000000007002 | PMID 41773929 Get It

Rationale: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) show potential benefits on mortality and other complications of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in adult patients. Evidence-based decisions and processes ensure appropriate use of neuromuscular blockade in adult patients with ARDS. Objectives: The objective of these guidelines was to develop evidence-based recommendations for the administration of NMBAs in critically ill adult patients with ARDS. Design: The American College of Critical Care Medicine Board convened a 21-member multidisciplinary panel of experts in critical care medicine, nursing, respiratory therapy, pharmacology, surgery, neurology, and anesthesiology. The panel included two expert methodologists specialized in developing evidence-based recommendations in alignment with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Conflict-of-interest policies were strictly followed during all phases of guidelines development including task force selection and voting. Methods: The panel members identified and formulated five Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions. We conducted a systematic review for each question to identify the best available evidence, statistically analyzed the evidence, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE methodology. We used the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework to formulate the recommendations. Results: The panel generated two conditional recommendations. One recommendation is to use NMBAs in adults with ARDS with Pa o 2 /F io 2 less than 150. For the other recommendations, there was equipoise in the recommendation for and against using titratable vs. fixed-dose NMBA dosing, a monitoring-based strategy for assessing depth of sedation and analgesia in adults with ARDS before initiating or while receiving neuromuscular blockade, and administration of NMBAs for patients who are proned, due to overall lack of evidence in critically ill patients and due to considerations of patient safety and experience concerns. Conclusions: These guidelines provide additional perspectives on the use of NMBA in patients with ARDS, recognizing that institutional and patient-specific considerations must help to guide the decision-making process.
Timeliness of antiresorptive consolidation after anabolic therapy for primary fracture prevention: A US cohort study
Badour, Sanaa , McCoy, Rozalina G. , Takagi, Mark, Everhart, Alexander , Parimi, Joseph Theressa Nehu, Herrin, Jeph , Mandic, Pinar Karaca, Wermers, Robert A. , Rosen, Clifford J, Karaca-Mandic, Pinar , Brito, Juan P , McCoy, Rozalina Grubina , Herrin, Jeph , Karaca‐Mandic, Pinar , Rosen, Clifford J. , Brito, Juan P.

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism | March 3, 2026 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2320-2331

10.1210/clinem/dgag092 | PMID 41778369 Get It

Abstract Context Osteoanabolic therapy for osteoporosis should be followed by antiresorptive treatment (“consolidation”) to preserve bone mass. Although osteoanabolic therapy is increasingly endorsed for primary fracture prevention, real-world implementation of consolidation remains unknown. Objective To assess patterns and predictors of timely consolidation after osteoanabolic therapy for primary fracture prevention. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using US commercial, Medicare Advantage, and traditional Medicare claims data. Adults aged ≥50 years who initiated romosozumab, teriparatide, or abaloparatide between 2011 and 2022 were included. The primary outcome was timely consolidation, defined as initiation of an antiresorptive medication within 3 months after osteoanabolic therapy. Secondary outcomes included delayed consolidation (initiation >3 months after completion), osteoanabolic restart following a treatment gap, and no consolidation therapy. We further distinguished participants who completed the full osteoanabolic course, defined as ≥12 months for romosozumab and ≥18 months for teriparatide or abaloparatide. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of consolidation patterns. Results Among 15 389 patients (mean age 70.6 years; 89% women; 85% White), 30% completed osteoanabolic therapy (median, 12.9 months for romosozumab; 23.4 months for teriparatide/abaloparatide). Overall, 25% had timely consolidation, 24% delayed consolidation, 12% restarted osteoanabolics, and 40% had no consolidation; only 12% completed therapy with timely consolidation. Timely consolidation was more likely with endocrinology (OR 1.31; 95% CI, 1.17-1.48) or rheumatology (OR 1.45; 1.30-1.62) vs primary care, and less likely among patients aged 50-64 years (OR 0.67; 0.58-0.77) vs 65-74, those enrolled in Medicare Advantage (OR 0.85; 0.74-0.98) vs traditional Medicare, or those recently hospitalized (OR 0.88; 0.80-0.97). Odds increased over time (OR 4.27; 3.63-5.05 for 2021 vs 2011 starts). Conclusion Only 1 in 4 patients received timely consolidation therapy after osteoanabolic treatment, and 1 in 8 completed the full sequence. Strategies to improve consolidation in primary fracture prevention are needed.
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) for participants with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are eligible for cisplatin: Randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-B15 study.
Galsky, Matthew D. , Valderrama, Begoña P. , Maruzzo, M., Pous, A. Font, Ciuleanu, Tudor-Eliade, Chatzkel, Jonathan Alexander, Koie, Takuya , Hoimes, Christopher J., Puente, Javier, Rosenbaum, Eli M., Loriot, Yohann, Bedke, Jens, Wirtz, Heidi, Mihm, Mike, Huang, Qinlei, Rogiers, Josh, Moreno, Blanca Homet , Lista, Alfonso Gomez De Liaño, Maruzzo, Marco , Ciuleanu, Tudor–Eliade , Hoimes, Christopher , Puente, Javier , Zakharia, Yousef , Rosenbaum, Eli, Böehm, Katharina , Loriot, Yohann , Bedke, Jens , Liaño, Alfonso Gómez de

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 2, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.lba630 Get It

LBA630 Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (pembro) is the established first-line standard of care for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma and represents a novel neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The randomized phase 3 KEYNOTE-B15/EV-304 study (NCT04700124) evaluates neoadjuvant and adjuvant EV + pembro followed by radical cystectomy plus pelvic lymph node dissection (RC + PLND) vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by RC + PLND in participants (pts) with MIBC who are eligible for cisplatin-based therapy. Methods: Pts with clinical stage T2-T4aN0M0 or T1-T4aN1M0 MIBC (confirmed by central pathology and central imaging assessment) who were eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy and RC + PLND were randomized 1:1 to receive either 4 cycles neoadjuvant EV 1.25 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8 + pembro 200 mg IV on day 1 Q3W, followed by RC + PLND, and adjuvant 5 cycles EV + 13 cycles pembro (EV + pembro arm) vs 4 cycles neoadjuvant gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 + cisplatin 70 mg/m 2 on day 1 Q3W, followed by RC + PLND (cis + gem arm). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) by blinded independent central review. Key secondary endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR) rate by blinded central pathological review and overall survival (OS). Safety was a secondary endpoint; AEs of special interest were based on distinct prespecified lists for each drug. Results: A total of 405 and 403 pts were randomized to EV + pembro and cis + gem, respectively. Median time from randomization to the data cutoff date of October 27, 2025 was 33.6 months (range, 22.5–53.6). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between groups. EV + pembro significantly improved EFS (median NR vs 48.5 mo; 24-mo estimated EFS rate 79.4% vs 66.2%; HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41–0.70; 1-sided P <.0001), OS (median NR vs NR; 24-mo estimated OS rate 86.9% vs 81.3%; HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48–0.89; 1-sided P =.0029), and pCR rate (55.8% vs 32.5%; estimated difference 23.4%, 95% CI 16.7–29.8; 1-sided P <.0001) vs cis + gem. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 75.7% of pts with EV + pembro and 67.2% with cis + gem. Most common grade ≥3 drug-related AE of special interest for EV was skin reactions (14.1%); most common grade ≥3 AE of special interest for pembro was severe skin reactions (13.9%). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant EV + pembro significantly improved EFS, OS, and pCR rate compared with neoadjuvant gem + cis in pts with MIBC who were eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The safety profile of EV + pembro was consistent with prior experience with the combination. These results support EV + pembro as an effective perioperative treatment option in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT04700124 .