Citations

OBJECTIVE Common peroneal (fibular) neuropathy is the most common mononeuropathy of the lower extremity. Despite this, there are surprisingly few studies on the topic, and a knowledge gap remains in the literature. As one attempts to address this knowledge gap, a core outcome set (COS) is needed to guide the planning phases of future studies to allow synthesis and comparability of these studies. The objective of this study was to develop the COS–common peroneal neuropathy (CoPe) using a modified Delphi approach. METHODS A 5-stage approach was used to develop the COS-CoPe: 1) stage 1, consortium development; 2) stage 2, a literature review to identify potential outcome measures; 3) stage 3, a Delphi survey to develop consensus on outcomes for inclusion; 4) stage 4, a Delphi survey to develop definitions; and 5) stage 5, a consensus meeting to finalize COS and definitions. The study followed the COS–STAndards for Development (COS-STAD) recommendations. RESULTS The Core Outcomes in Nerve Surgery (COINS) Consortium comprised 23 participants, all neurological surgeons, representing 13 countries. The final COS-CoPe consisted of 31 data points/outcomes covering domains of demographics, diagnostics, patient-reported outcomes, motor/sensory outcomes, and complications. Appropriate instruments, methods of testing, and definitions were set. The consensus minimum duration of follow-up was 12 months. The consensus optimal time points for assessment were preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS The COINS Consortium developed a consensus COS and provided definitions, methods of implementation, and time points for assessment. The COS-CoPe should serve as a minimum set of data that should be collected in all future neurosurgical studies on common peroneal neuropathy. Incorporation of this COS should help improve consistency in reporting, data synthesis, and comparability, and should minimize outcome reporting bias.

Abstract Introduction/ Background Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an increasingly popular size-independent technique of treating male voiding dysfunction due to benign prostatic hypertrophy. Some patients after HoLEP may develop clinically significant prostate cancer and opt for definitive treatment with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Little is known about the safety of EBRT after HoLEP and how it may functionally impact voiding after HoLEP has altered the anatomy of the prostate. Our study aimed to assess patient-reported voiding outcomes following EBRT after HoLEP with a focus on incontinence related patient outcomes. Methods/ Materials This study was conducted with approval from our hospital’s institutional review board. Patients that underwent HoLEP followed by EBRT were identified and data was collected in a retrospective nature from a single surgeon HoLEP cohort over the past 4 years (2019–2023). Patient demographics, disease and radiation therapy characteristics, radiation therapy, and baseline voiding symptoms were recorded. Current functional voiding outcomes were also collected via phone-call or portal communication in a cross-sectional manner with questions pertaining to type of incontinence, IPSS quality of life score, and administration of the Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index (M-ISI). Adverse events encountered during follow-up were recorded. Results 24 patients were identified who received RT for prostate cancer after HoLEP with an average age of 73.6 (+/- 5.3). One third of patients reported no incontinence whatsoever after radiation and of those who experienced incontinence, the majority felt that it was not worsened after radiation. Median IPSS QoL score following radiation was 1 (range 0–6), median M-ISI Severity Score was 4 out of a maximum of 32, and median M-ISI Bother Score was 0 out of a maximum of 8. One patient developed a bladder neck contracture (BNC) approximately 1 year following his radiation therapy (approximately 18 months after HoLEP) causing bothersome incontinence and LUTS. Conclusions In our cohort most patients who received RT after HoLEP reported a high urinary-symptom related quality of life and a low rate of urinary incontinence. One patient who received SBRT suffered a BNC which is a known adverse event with RT but given our small sample size it remains unclear if the risk is higher in patients receiving RT after HoLEP. Larger studies should focus on examining the rate of bladder neck contracture in patients receiving RT after HoLEP, particularly focusing on whether the degree of dose fractionation may impact their development.

Background: Regional analgesia is a critical component of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways for cystectomy, but there is little research comparing different modalities. Transversus abdominis plane block is a well-established procedure used for postoperative regional analgesia, whereas erector spinae plane block is a recently described technique that some contend improves pain control. Objective: We sought to compare these modalities in patients undergoing cystectomy, with primary end points of pain scores and total narcotic utilization measured in morphine milliequivalents. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 77 consecutive patients who underwent open radical cystectomy. Patients who did not undergo erector spinae plane block or transversus abdominis plane block or who used chronic narcotics were excluded. Pain intensity scores were measured immediately postoperatively and in 24-hour intervals until 72 hours postoperatively. Cumulative narcotic utilization at 72 hours, return to bowel function, and length of stay were measured. Results: Fifty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Seventeen patients underwent erector spinae plane block and 34 transversus abdominis plane block. Erector spinae plane block patients reported lower pain scores immediately postoperatively (P = .046), at 48 hours (P = .019), and 72 hours (P = .019). Erector spinae plane block patients used less narcotics after 72 hours than transversus abdominis plane block patients (median: 62.50 morphine milliequivalents vs 146.25 morphine milliequivalents, P = .008). Conclusions: Compared with transversus abdominis plane block, erector spinae plane block reduced total narcotic utilization by 234% while also reducing subjective patient pain scores. Increased adoption of erector spinae plane block could have major impacts on both clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Abstract Objectives SSc is characterized by widespread microangiopathy and fibrosis of skin and visceral organs. Left ventricle involvement is usually subclinical, characterized by systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction. The global longitudinal strain (GLS), a validated and reliable technique for the measurement of ventricular longitudinal deformation by means of echocardiography, may detect subclinical systolic dysfunction of SSc myocardium. The improvement of myocardial perfusion by means of intravenous Iloprost administration could ameliorate the contractility of SSc heart. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate GLS in a series of SSc patients prior and after Iloprost infusion. Methods Fifteen consecutive SSc patients (age: 54 ± 11 years; 12 females) treated with Iloprost because of the presence/history of digital ulcers underwent echocardiography, including GLS technique. This evaluation was conducted immediately before Iloprost administration and at the end of the 6-h infusion session. Results Significant improvement in the mean GLS was observed after Iloprost administration (from −13.5 ± 2.5 to −15 ± 3.3; P = 0.011). The echocardiographic data obtained from the four-chamber view showed the best quality for GLS analysis and showed a highly significant improvement of the strain after Iloprost administration (from −13.4 ± 2.2 to −15.6 ± 3; P = 0.001). The degree of GLS improvement did not correlate with any SSc parameters. Conclusion Iloprost administration improved GLS, suggesting that the increase of myocardial perfusion allowed, at least in part, a correction of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings, further exploring the mid/long-term effects of Iloprost on myocardial contraction.

Summary: Exosomes, or extracellular vesicles, represent the latest cell-free addition to the regenerative medicine toolkit. In vitro preclinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of exosomes, which vary based on source and biomanufacturing, for a myriad of potential therapeutic applications relevant to skin and soft tissue reconstruction. Primary search was performed in September 2021 on the MEDLINE database via PubMed and Ovid, with focus on articles about therapeutic application of exosomes or extracellular vesicles. In total, 130 articles met criteria for applicability, including early-stage clinical trials, preclinical research studies with in vivo application, and articles applicable to plastic and reconstructive surgery and dermatology. Most studies used animal models of human disease processes, using either animal donor cells to isolate exosomes, or human donor cells in animal models. Exosome technology has catapulted as an acellular therapeutic vehicle with off-the-shelf accessibility. These features eliminate prior threshold for broad adoption of regenerative cell-based therapies into surgical and medical practice. To date, there are no exosome products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This review highlights exosomes as the new frontier in regenerative medicine and outlines its preclinical therapeutic applications for cutaneous repair and restoration.

Abstract Pediatric brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children. Even to date, with the advances in multimodality therapeutic management, survival outcomes remain dismal in some types of tumors, such as pediatric-type diffuse high-grade gliomas or central nervous system embryonal tumors. Failure to understand the complex molecular heterogeneity and the elusive tumor and microenvironment interplay continues to undermine therapeutic efficacy. Developing a strategy that would improve survival for these fatal tumors remains unmet in pediatric neuro-oncology. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are emerging as a feasible, safe, and promising therapy for brain tumors. The new paradigm in virotherapy implies that the direct cytopathic effect is followed, under certain circumstances, by an antitumor immune response responsible for the partial or complete debulking of the tumor mass. OVs alone or combined with other therapeutic modalities have been primarily used in adult neuro-oncology. A surge in encouraging preclinical studies in pediatric brain tumor models recently led to the clinical translation of OVs with encouraging results in these tumors. In this review, we summarize the different virotherapy tested in preclinical and clinical studies in pediatric brain tumors, and we discuss the limitations and future avenues necessary to improve the response of these tumors to this type of therapy.

AbstractObjectivesThe prevalence of celiac disease (CeD) is increasing, yet it is still underdiagnosed, in part because of its heterogeneous presentation. Diagnostic criteria are evolving and management with strict adherence to a gluten‐free diet is challenging for many. We aimed to characterize the clinical presentation of CeD among a large multicenter cohort of pediatric patients and to identify factors associated with gluten‐free diet adherence.MethodsPatients with CeD aged 0–18 years were recruited from 11 United States health centers. Parents completed surveys about gluten‐free diet adherence and patient electronic health records were reviewed. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with gluten exposure.ResultsCharts were reviewed for 460 children with a median age of 6.4 years. Abdominal pain was reported in 57% of the cohort, but diverse symptoms were identified. Parent surveys were completed for 455 participants. Sixty‐five (14%) participants were at high risk for gluten exposure based on parental reports of weekly or daily gluten exposure or eating gluten by choice in the past year. Participants under the age of 5 years had a lower risk of gluten exposure, while participants without repeat serology testing 18 months after initial diagnosis were at higher risk of gluten exposure.ConclusionsIn a large, multicenter cohort of pediatric CeD patients, clinical presentation is highly variable, necessitating a high index of suspicion to make a diagnosis. Parent surveys indicate that 14% of patients are at high risk of gluten exposure, with patient age and lack of close follow‐up associated with gluten‐free diet adherence.

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor diagnosed in children. This inaugural version of the NCCN Guidelines for Neuroblastoma provides recommendations for the diagnosis, risk classification, and treatment of neuroblastoma. The information in these guidelines was developed by the NCCN Neuroblastoma Panel, a multidisciplinary group of representatives with expertise in neuroblastoma, consisting of pediatric oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists from NCCN Member Institutions. The evidence-based and consensus recommendations contained in the NCCN Guidelines are intended to guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate treatments for their patients with this clinically heterogeneous disease.

The determination of an optimal treatment plan for an individual patient with rectal cancer is a complex process. In addition to decisions relating to the intent of rectal cancer surgery (ie, curative or palliative), consideration must also be given to the likely functional results of treatment, including the probability of maintaining or restoring normal bowel function/anal continence and preserving genitourinary functions. Particularly for patients with distal rectal cancer, finding a balance between curative-intent therapy while having minimal impact on quality of life can be challenging. Furthermore, the risk of pelvic recurrence is higher in patients with rectal cancer compared with those with colon cancer, and locally recurrent rectal cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Careful patient selection and the use of sequenced multimodality therapy following a multidisciplinary approach is recommended. These NCCN Guidelines Insights detail recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Rectal Cancer, including the addition of endoscopic submucosal dissection as an option for early-stage rectal cancer, updates to the total neoadjuvant therapy approach based on the results of recent clinical trials, and the addition of a “watch-and-wait” nonoperative management approach for clinical complete responders to neoadjuvant therapy.