Citations

Cholangiopathies comprise a spectrum of chronic intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary tract disorders culminating in progressive cholestatic liver injury, fibrosis, and often cirrhosis and its sequela. Treatment for these diseases is limited, and collectively, they are one of the therapeutic “black boxes” in clinical hepatology. The etiopathogenesis of the cholangiopathies likely includes disease-specific mediators but also common cellular and molecular events driving disease progression (eg, cholestatic fibrogenesis, inflammation, and duct damage). The common pathways involve cholangiocytes, the epithelial cells lining the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts, which are central to the pathogenesis of these disorders. Current information suggests that cholangiocytes function as a signaling “hub” in biliary tract-associated injury. Herein, we review the pivotal role of cholangiocytes in cholestatic fibrogenesis, focusing on the crosstalk between cholangiocytes and portal fibroblasts and HSCs. The proclivity of these cells to undergo a senescence-associated secretory phenotype, which is proinflammatory and profibrogenic, and the intrinsic intracellular activation pathways resulting in the secretion of cytokines and chemokines are reviewed. The crosstalk between cholangiocytes and cells of the innate (neutrophils and macrophages) and adaptive (T cells and B cells) immune systems is also examined in detail. The information will help consolidate information on this topic and guide further research and potential therapeutic strategies for these diseases.

AbstractBackgroundHemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is caused by maternal alloantibody‐mediated destruction of fetal/neonatal red blood cells (RBCs). While the pathophysiology has been well‐characterized, the clinical and laboratory monitoring practices are inconsistent.MethodsWe surveyed 103 US institutions to characterize laboratory testing practices for individuals with fetuses at risk of HDFN. Questions included antibody testing and titration methodologies, the use of critical titers, paternal and cell‐free fetal DNA testing, and result reporting and documentation practices.ResultsThe response rate was 44% (45/103). Most respondents (96%, 43/45) assess maternal antibody titers, primarily using conventional tube‐based methods only (79%, 34/43). Among respondents, 51% (23/45) rescreen all individuals for antibodies in the third trimester, and 60% (27/45) perform paternal RBC antigen testing. A minority (27%, 12/45) utilize cell‐free fetal DNA (cffDNA) testing to predict fetal antigen status. Maternal antibody titers are performed even when the fetus is not considered to be at risk of HDFN based on cffDNA or paternal RBC antigen testing at 23% (10/43) of sites that assess titers.DiscussionThere is heterogeneity across US institutions regarding the testing, monitoring, and reporting practices for pregnant individuals with fetuses at risk of HDFN, including the use of antibody titers in screening and monitoring programs, the use of paternal RBC antigen testing and cffDNA, and documentation of fetal antigen results. Standardization of laboratory testing protocols and closer collaboration between the blood bank and transfusion medicine service and the obstetric/maternal‐fetal medicine service are needed.

Purpose of review The use of implantable medical devices (IMDs) continues to increase with estimates that 10% of the American population will have an IMD in their lifetime. IMDs require special considerations for management in the perioperative period to ensure optimal patient care and patient safety. This review summarizes the current perioperative considerations for IMDs. Recent findings This review summarizes perioperative recommendations for spinal cord stimulators, deep brain stimulators, peripheral nerve stimulators, vagus nerve stimulators, muscle stimulators, intrathecal drug delivery systems, implantable infusion pumps, artificial pancreas devices, continuous glucose monitors, and cochlear implants. There are multiple publications and guidelines regarding the perioperative considerations of cardiac implantable electronic devices; thus, this review excludes those devices. This review includes recommendations on management of the device perioperatively, the potential complications, and postoperative care of the device. Summary There are very few guidelines regarding the perioperative management of IMDs. Given the significant impact that these devices have on patient care and safety, evidence-based guidelines should be established.

Purpose of review Although necessary for treatment of acute pain, opioids are associated with significant harm in the perioperative period and further intervention is necessary perioperatively to mitigate opioid-related harm. Recent findings Opioid-naive patients are often first exposed to opioids when undergoing surgery, which can result in significant harm. Despite their benefits in reducing acute postsurgical pain, they are also associated with risks ranging from mild (e.g., pruritis, constipation, nausea) to potentially catastrophic (e.g. opioid-induced ventilatory impairment, respiratory depression, death). Overprescribing of opioids can lead to opioid diversion and drug driving. In this review, we will discuss opioid-related harm and what strategies can be used perioperatively to mitigate this harm. Interventions such as optimizing nonopioid analgesia, implementing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery programs, effective respiratory monitoring, patient education and opioid stewardship programs will be discussed. Summary We will review policy and guidelines regarding perioperative opioid management and identify challenges and future directions to mitigate opioid-related harm.

AbstractBackgroundCardiac tamponade or pericardial tamponade (PT) can be a complication following invasive cardiac procedures.MethodsPatients who underwent various procedures in the cardiac catheterization lab (viz. coronary interventions) were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Edition, Clinical Modification (International classification of diseases [ICD]‐9‐Clinical modification [CM] and ICD‐10‐CM, respectively) from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Patient demographics, presence of comorbidities, PT‐related events, and in‐hospital death were also abstracted from the NIS database.ResultsThe frequency of PT‐related events in the patients undergoing CI from 2010 to 2017 ranged from 3.3% to 8.4%. Combined in‐hospital mortality/morbidity of PT‐related events were higher with increasing age (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]: chronic total occlusion (CTO) = 1.19 [1.10‐1.29]; acute coronary syndrome (ACS) = 1.21 [1.11‐1.33], both p < 0.0001) and female sex (OR [95%CI]: CTO = 1.70 [1.45‐2.00]; ACS = 1.72 [1.44‐2.06], both p < 0.0001). In‐hospital mortality related to PT‐related events was found to be 8.5% for coronary procedures. In‐hospital mortality was highest amongst the patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for ACS (ACS vs. non‐CTO PTCA vs. CTO PTCA: 15.7% vs. 10.4% and 14.4%, p < 0.0001 and ACS vs. non‐CTO PTCA vs. CTO PTCA: 12.1% vs. 8.1% and 5.6%, p = 0.0001, respectively).ConclusionsIn the real‐world setting, PT‐related events in CI were found to be 3.3%−8.4%, with in‐hospital mortality of 8.5%. The patients undergoing PTCA for ACS were found to have highest mortality. Older patients undergoing CTO PTCA independently predicted higher mortality.