Citations

In recent years, the landscape of healthcare delivery has evolved significantly, with a growing emphasis on innovative approaches to patient care. The specialty of hospital medicine is new but evolving quickly over the past couple years. Also a new concept of advanced care at home has gained traction as a viable option for managing certain medical conditions traditionally treated in hospital settings. This presentation aims to explore the benefits, challenges, and implications of hospital medicine in healthy system with advanced care at home programs. During the session, we will delve into key aspects such as: • The evolution of hospital medicine and its current role in healthcare systems. • Overview of advanced care at home programs: objectives, scope, and patient selection criteria. • Comparative analysis of outcomes between hospital-based care and advanced care at home. • Technological advancements and infrastructure necessary to support advanced care at home initiatives. I believe this topic is particularly relevant while discussing innovation and the future of medicine

Abstract Background: Sub-Saharan African immigrants (SSAI) in the United States (US) constitute one of the fastest-growing segments of the immigrant population. Between 2010 and 2018, the SSAI population in the US increased by 53%, significantly outpacing the 12% growth rate for the overall foreign-born population in the US during that period. We define SSAI as the 2 million individuals living in the US originally from the region of the African continent located south of the Saharan desert. Despite their growing numbers, little is published about the extent to which SSAI adapt to health behaviors more common in the US or remain immersed in the values, beliefs, and practices reflective of their country of origin. Importantly, no study has comprehensively examined the social determinants of health factors among this population and its influence on health-seeking behaviors and decision-making regarding prostate cancer care and treatment. Aim: This study seeks to better understand the lived experiences, unmet needs and the impact of migration on the quality of life of SSAI cancer survivors in the US. Methods. We employ a qualitative approach guided by grounded theory. Selective sampling was used to identify potential participants from a database obtained via the Florida and Minesota cancer registries. We proceeded to conduct in-depth interviews with 16 cancer survivors recruited from the two caner registries. Results. We developed a conceptual framework illuminating the full range of social, behavioral, environmental, and structural factors associated with the experiences of SSAI prostate cancer survivors. From the data, the post diagnosis experiences of study participants can be categorized into three domains: 1) health behaviors; 2) treatment decision and antecedents; 3) challenges of being an immigrant. Characteristics of health behaviors include using informal care teams for social support and second opinions before treatment. Selective disclosure of diagnosis, changes to diet, exercise and searching for information about the diseases were other manifestation of behavior. While some participants made decisions about treatment soon after diagnosis, others took a more deliberative approach and relied on faith and family for social support. Some challenges in terms of being an immigrant include knowledge gaps about the US health system, lack of health insurance and transportation to hospital during treatment. Implication for public health practice. Some of the unmet needs of study participants include transportation cost to and from hospital for radiotherapy and other treatment and reducing the high out of pocket cost for co-payment and drugs. The knowledge deficit about navigating the US health system can be addressed through community-based intervention in partnerships with immigrant groups, advocacy organizations and faith-based organizations. The focus of this intervention should be to educate and empower SSAI men on how to navigate the US health system and be more assertive about their health needs and desires for treatment during doctor’s visit. Citation Format: Ernie Kaninjing, Gladys Asiedu, Kaitlin Van Voorhis, Daniel Lee, Rakinya Hinson, Mary Ellen Young. Conceptual framework on health behaviors and experiences of Sub-Saharan African immigrant prostate cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B144.

Abstract Cancer is the leading cause of mortality within the Latino population. Projections suggest a 142% increase in cancer incidence among Latinos over the next two decades. This trend is concerning given that Latinos, the largest minority group in the United States, are expected to constitute at least 28% of the nation's populace by 2060. To address the need for enhanced comprehension of these trends and to identify equitable interventions targeting Latino health disparities, the Institute of Health Promotion Research and the Mays Cancer Center jointly established the biennial Advancing the Science of Cancer in Latinos (ASCL) Conference. The fourth ASCL Conference convened in San Antonio, TX from February 21-23, 2024. The conference objectives were twofold: 1) Examine the intersection of health equity and biological underpinnings in cancer control, prevention, and treatment; and 2) Foster collaborative initiatives among attendees aimed at addressing cancer-related health disparities within the Latino community. The 2024 conference attracted 286 participants compared to 251 attendees in 2022, encompassing guest speakers, researchers, physicians, healthcare professionals, patient advocates, researchers, and students. It comprised 23 sessions (3 keynotes, 6 plenaries, 6 breakouts, 3 general sessions, 1 special session, 1 lunch panel session) featuring insights from 51 speakers, alongside a poster session highlighting 80 research abstracts and a rapid-fire session tailored for early-career investigators. Sessions encompassed multiple topics relevant to Latino cancer research, spanning health disparities, clinical trials, survivorship, patient advocacy, climate change impacts on cancer, precision medicine, health policy and social determinants of health. A post-conference survey from a cohort of 48 respondents underscored high levels of satisfaction, with 90% expressing pronounced contentment regarding the conference experience, compared to 85% in 2022. Moreover, nearly all respondents (98%) rated the relevance of conference content to Latino cancer science as excellent, with 93% regarding the conference as an exceptional platform for information exchange, compared to 79% in 2022. Impressions regarding session quality were overwhelmingly positive, with 90% of respondents indicating a high level of satisfaction, and all survey respondents acknowledging the objectivity, balance, and absence of commercial bias in the session content. Our results showed that the resounding positivity in attendee feedback reflects the conference's success in fostering meaningful engagement among researchers committed to alleviating Latino cancer health disparities. The ASCL conference facilitated an understanding of cultural nuances and barriers specific to the Latino community, stimulating collaborative efforts aimed at enhancing Latino health outcomes. Overall, this retrospective analysis affirms the conference's success in achieving its stipulated objectives and underscores the need of having consistently coordinated research endeavors to reduce Latino health disparities. Citation Format: Amelie G. Ramirez, Rebecca T. Jones, Matthew P. Banegas, Maria C Camargo, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Cliff Despres, Laura Fejerman, Filipa Lynce, Martin Mendoza, Patricia I. Moreno, Alejandro Recio-Boiles, Barbara Segarra-Vazquez, Sandi Stanford, Mariana Stern, Katherine Y. Tossas, Edward J. Trapido, Nicolette M Orozco. Advancing the science of cancer in Latinos conference [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B032.

Abstract Introduction: Tribal Nations across the Southwest have striking disparities in cancer incidence and mortality. Compounded by disproportionately low rates of cancer screening and limited access to healthcare, Native Americans are more often diagnosed at later stages of disease and have the poorest outcomes in all types of cancer when compared to any other racial and ethnic group in the United States. At the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, the Participant Engagement Cancer Genomic Sequencing (PE-CGS) Center is developing culturally appropriate materials and strategies to enhance the engagement and recruitment of Native Americans into genomic research. This effort aims to determine participant knowledges, attitudes, cultural beliefs, and communication preferences regarding clinical genomics testing. Ultimately, targeting improvement of cancer outcomes in Southwestern Tribal communities. Cultural adaptations are crucial with regards to biospecimen collection, storage, and usage, due to historical mistrust of research among Native communities. (i.e., Havasupai Tribe v. the Arizona Board of Regents). A Tribal Advisory Committee, consisting of Tribal leaders, Native physicians, and patient advocates oversee all aspects of the research study. The goal is to identify appropriate optimized health literacy strategies for engaging Native peoples in cancer genomic research. Methods: The team conducted semi-structured discussions with participants to understand their perspectives on motivations to join, cultural safety components, and effectiveness of engagement strategies. With participant consent, the discussions were recorded and transcribed. Analysis included the transcripts and notes taken by the interviewer and followed Grounded Theory principles. All transcripts and notes followed line-by-line analysis by three of the authors (JS, JR and TG) who met regularly to identify and discuss emergent themes. Results: As of May 31, 2024, the PE-CGS study has enrolled 112 participants and completed 39 discussions. Participants emphasized altruistic motives tied to family and community, echoing traditional values, in their decision to participate in the study. This notion emerged during interactions with Native team members, where comfort stemmed from shared experiences (healthcare system, barriers), use of Native language, and adherence to Native social norms. Additional considerations included present autonomy throughout various stages of the study (sample use, data sharing, discussions). Return of genetic testing results improved understanding of treatment options, hereditary risk, and health literacy. Conclusion: Feedback highlights the importance of aligning cultural beliefs with Western medicine through a strengths-based approach. The findings will inform improvements in respectful engagement, communication, information exchange, and recruitment processes with Native American cancer patients and cancer survivors to genomic testing studies. Citation Format: Jessica Sanchez, Koby Blackwater, Joseph Rodman, Tamar Ginossar, Andrew Sussman, Shiraz Mishra, Cindy Blair, Mallery Quetawki, Debra MacKenzie, V. Shane Pankratz, Ursa Brown-Glaberman, Jeffery Trent, Cheryl Willman. Journey to understanding indigenous peoples engagement in cancer genomic research [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A084.

Abstract Purpose: The Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center (MCCCC) serves its communities through every pillar of the cancer continuum from prevention to survivorship. To effectively educate our communities along this continuum, MCCCC partnered with a trusted community partner, leveraged the stories of survivors, and addressed stigma in a safe space for community members to ask vulnerable questions. Methods: The MCCCC partnered with Pamoja Women on the Friend-to-Friend initiative. Pamoja Women is a trusted community partner supporting East African women and their families, some of whom are refugees. They provided the space to hold each event, an environment where the women were comfortable with support from their community. The program highlighted cancer education, screening, and risk reduction through culturally appropriate discussions between friends. Topics were identified based on community interest and the cancer incidence in the community. Survivors shared their personal stories and medical experts discussed prevention, risk reduction, screening, addressed myths, answered questions, and showcased discoveries in research and treatment methods. Results: We have held 3 events covering breast, cervical, and HPV vaccination. Each event saw an increase in participation with almost 50 participants attending the series. Furthermore, there was an increase in awareness of screening methods, prevention, and risk reduction. Pamoja Women provided navigation to screening through transportation to and advocacy during appointments. This continuity from education to screening led to heading the call to action for screening. Due to its success, the four-part series has been expanded to include the topics of endometrial, prostate cancer, and breast cancer for a second time. Conclusion: Partnering with trusted community organizations has led to safe spaces for cancer education with friends. This approach has led to successful education and navigation to screening in communities that do not always have access to this essential information. Citation Format: Adeline Abbenyi, Manal Abbadi, Khadija Ali, Fatuma Ahmed. Friend-to-friend: Culturally tailored health education for East African communities [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B103.

Abstract Introduction: Black men experience a significant burden and face greater hurdles in the prevention, detection, treatment, and survival of prostate cancer (CaP). To address barriers and systemic issues associated with CaP, we have established Community Living Lab (CoLLab) Learning Health Systems through a partnership with the American Legion Post (ALP) and Mayo Clinic. The focus is on providing comprehensive prostate health resources, education, amenities, and community health services (REACH). This initiative represents a proactive approach to addressing health disparities in prostate cancer prevention, detection, and treatment to improve CaP health equity for Black men. This study has three primary aims: (1) Co-develop a user-centric CoLLab Learning Health System with collaborating ALPs, (2) Evaluate the impact of the CoLLab Learning Health System using a pretest-posttest design, and (3) Explore the feasibility of replicating the CoLLab Learning Health System in Black communities nationally. Methods: Three ALPs in Northeast Florida are currently included in this pilot study. The study timeline spans 30 months, from October 2023 to March 2026. The target recruitment is 150 Black men aged 30 to 80 years. Community Health Workers (CHWs) are currently recruiting participants to complete the ALP Neighborhood assessment four times over 12 months to measure changes in CaP-related knowledge, attitudes, health beliefs, perceived control, intentions, and cues to action. Participants will be able to access prostate health REACH services at the designated ALPs through education, navigation, and support services. The program will be continuously evaluated for continuous improvement. The reach of the prostate health REACH services, including extent and patterns of use, demographics of participants reached, and successful navigation for social determinants of health (SDOH), clinical trials, and healthcare, will be evaluated. Additionally, participation in the Community Research Registry, indicating interest in being matched with clinical trials at Mayo Clinic, will be assessed. Results: To date, we have trained 10 CHWs for the study who will serve as community navigators to provide REACH services at their designated ALPs. We have had 49 Black men recruited into the study, and they have completed the baseline assessment at various events held at the ALPs. CaP survivors support group, led by ALP, has begun providing survivorship support services, including healthcare navigation, wellness programs, and grocery distribution to Black men and their households in the community surrounding the ALPs. Conclusion: The CoLLab initiative represents a proactive approach to addressing health disparities and improving outcomes for Black men in CaP prevention, detection, treatment, and survivorship. This study represents a crucial step towards eliminating CaP disparities experienced by Black men, contributing to improved health equity and outcomes in this population. Citation Format: Floyd B Willis, Collisa Mahin, Opeyemi O Bolajoko, Caleb Ramirez, Shannon Pressey, Shaina Flynn, Arnold J Merriweather, Toshiko Moultrie, Vermelle Smith, Wayne Ford, Derry Green. Utilizing Community Living Labs (CoLLab) to address prostate cancer disparities in Black men: An innovative partnership with the American Legion Post and Mayo Clinic [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B073.

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Breast Cancer Education Intervention (BCEI) program in increasing knowledge and awareness of survivorship topics among survivor advocates and survivors, and to assess the impact of survivorship care plans on quality of life. Breast cancer survivorship care is crucial for improving the quality of life among survivors. Hispanic/Latino women face greater challenges and disparities in accessing survivorship care due to cultural, socioeconomic, and systemic barriers. The BCEI program, adapted from the National Cancer Institute’s model, aims to address these disparities through culturally tailored survivorship education and support. Methods: The BCEI program was piloted with a group of 8 Hispanic/Latino breast cancer survivors, in collaboration with Cancer Support Community Arizona (CSCAZ). This six-month program, created and delivered in Spanish, consisted of bi- monthly in-person sessions and phone check-ins. The educational sessions featured topics such as emotional and physical changes, lifestyle behaviors, nutrition, exercise, and psychological distress along with the introduction of a personalized survivorship care plan. These sessions provided a sense of community and emotional support with essential knowledge and understanding of the cancer journey, addressing gaps caused by language barriers in clinical settings, and the lack of Spanish language support groups. Survivor advocates underwent specialized training to effectively support the survivor participants. Data for the BCEI program was collected through pre and post survey evaluations, participant check-ins, and qualitative feedback. Survivors were paired with bilingual Patient Navigators, who connected them to resources in the community. Results: Preliminary results show a significant improvement in survivors’ knowledge and satisfaction with survivorship care. Participants demonstrated an increased awareness of the importance of survivorship care plans and showed positive changes in lifestyle behaviors. The results highlighted the program’s cultural tailoring and sense of community as key success factors. Conclusion: The Breast Cancer Education Intervention program demonstrates potential in addressing health disparities in breast cancer survivorship among Hispanic/Latino women. Building on this success, we are expanding the BCEI program to include a second iteration focused on Black and African American breast cancer survivors, who also face similar challenges and disparities. The program will be implemented in collaboration with the Coalition of Blacks Against Breast Cancer (CBBC). Citation Format: Idali Cuellar, Farhia M. Omar. Improving quality of life for Hispanic breast cancer survivors: A culturally tailored education intervention [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B043.

Abstract Introduction: The Community Engagement Internal Medicine Residents Rotation (IMRR) connects Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) medical professionals to partners in the Florida catchment area to better understand administrative operations, the referral processes of these organizations and how best they fit the needs of the communities they serve. The goal is to give residents exposure to a more diverse population including rural, Black and Hispanic/Latin as well as connecting them with partners where community- based research is conducted. This IMRR is also designed to encourage cancer-focused community based research (CBR). We learned that the lack of patient diversity at MCF was a drawback to resident recruitment and developing an interest in cancer focused health disparities research. We agreed to assist in this potential solution to the diversity deficit. Methods: The goal for the elective is to provide senior residents with an introduction to community engagement and cancer focused community engaged research. The elective consists of one week of didactics and one of experiential learning. The first week includes an introduction to cancer health disparities in our catchment areas and how to conduct cancer focused CBR. During the second week, residents interact with community partners focused on providing care and cancer education to those who otherwise may not have access to resources. Strategically, these partners are those with whom we are engaged in cancer research initiatives. Internal Medicine Residents (IMR) complete visitation paperwork that included Background Screenings and Sovereign Immunity Contracts. We limit the number of IMR to two in order to accommodate some of the smaller community clinic spaces. IMR visit community partners for no less than a half day each and at the end of the rotation they debrief and complete rotation evaluations. Data: Rotation evaluations aggregated to date indicate 91.67% of IMR feel the rotation meets the goals and objectives. In addition, evaluation comments indicate an improved understanding of population health as well as community resources for improved health and wellness in underserved populations. Anecdotal comments also show evidence of increased understanding of cancer focused CBR and cancer related health disparities. Conclusion: IMMR through community outreach and engagement visits have increased understanding of how partners address varying cancer burden needs. The IMRR has increased residents’ awareness of how environment impacts access to healthcare and improved cost-conscious ordering and treatment plans (medications). IMR better understand the significance of how social determinants of health (SDOH) resources impact community. IMR are better equipped to help patients and their families navigate to additional SDOH solutions and are familiar with the referral process for community safety net resources. The offer of this type of IMRR has enhanced recruitment to MCF training programs and significantly increased IM and fellow participation in cancer focused CBR initiatives and studies. Citation Format: Monica Albertie, Chelsea Reeves, Noreen Stephenson, Folakemi Odedina. Mayo Clinic Cancer Comprehensive Center Community Outreach and Engagement Internal Medicine Residents Rotations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B035.

Abstract Introduction Addressing cancer disparities by meeting people where they are is a crucial aspect of community-engaged research. The impact of this has been seen through the community outreach and engagement efforts of cancer centers across the country, with many focusing on churches, community events, and other trusted places. In the past four years, Mayo Clinic’s Cancer Health Equity Program (CHERP) has made a specific effort to decentralize clinical trials and community-engaged research by going to the places our community trusts and frequents. As a result, we partnered with a trusted leader in Jacksonville, Florida to engage with barbershops as sites for health information dissemination. We re-engaged a cohort of barbers who had previously worked with our outreach initiatives as part of the Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL) Against COVID-19 Disparities and recruited new ones for this phase of work. Methods Our community partner completed a training hosted by Florida A&M University on working with barbershops for community outreach and engagement research. The community partner then trained each barber on sharing health information, incorporating feedback from the previous cohort. Barbers were also trained to collect engagement and pre/post-test information to measure outcomes. Health information included COVID-19 prevention/ vaccine information and general cancer prevention information used in other community outreach and engagement initiatives. Results A total of 19 barbers engaged in this initiative; 9 were a part of our previous work with barbers and 10 were recruited for the new year of funding. The barbers all identified as Black and engaged with a total of 497 clients. Of the 497 clients, 91% identified as Black, and less than 5% identified as White, Asian, or Native American. 344 clients identified as male (69%), 147 as female (30%), 1 as transgender (0.2%), and 5 did not disclose their gender. The majority of participants were born between the 1960s and 2000s, with most reporting having a high school degree or GED (55%). Post-test information found evidence of knowledge change, including a 3.4% increase in those who responded understanding how COVID-19 is spread and a 4% increase in those who reported vaccines to be safe. Barbers also expressed their appreciation for being included in this initiative. Conclusion CHERP, in partnership with the community, is addressing disparities at different levels. One of the barriers the barbers had to overcome was hesitancy in sharing health-related topics. However, sustained initiatives, such as this one might overcome this barrier. This study’s engagement with barbershops to reach communities most impacted by cancer disparities points to the impact of barbershops as a site for cancer disparities research. Citation Format: Jessica Otero Machuca, Opeyemi Bolajoko, Jocelyn Turner, Folakemi Odedina. Decentralizing cancer disparities research: Barbershops as a foundation for community outreach and engagement [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B088.

Abstract The Cancer Advocacy Training Program aimed to enhance participants' knowledge, skills, and confidence in cancer advocacy, particularly addressing disparities in cancer health outcomes. This evaluation assesses the program's impact through pre- and post-training survey comparisons. The program included 25 participants from various states and focused on comprehensive training. Surveys measured changes in knowledge, attitudes, self-perceived skills, and confidence. Results showed that accurate identification of cancer's main categories increased from 83% to 96%, and awareness of the NCI's mammogram recommendations rose from 70% to 96%. Recognition of the root causes of health disparities remained at 100%, and belief in the inclusivity of cancer advocacy roles was consistently high. Understanding of trust dynamics in advocacy increased by 50%, and recognition of essential political advocacy components improved by 14%. Specific learning outcomes indicated consistent identification of research advocates, a 23% increase in knowledge of strategic funding sources, a 31% improvement in understanding health communication audiences, a 19% rise in awareness of patient advocacy benefits, and a 13% increase in comprehension of informed consent. Confidence in advocacy skills also saw significant improvements. "Extremely confident" participants increased to 33% in problem-solving, adaptability, and communication with stakeholders. Confidence in fundraising and partnership building rose to 19%, evaluation of advocacy outcomes to 24%, identifying key issues to 29%, presentation skills to 33%, and using digital tools to 29%. Self-efficacy results demonstrated notable gains: confidence in solving difficult problems related to cancer advocacy increased with participants reporting "extremely confident" rising from 11% to 33%. Confidence in adaptability under stress improved significantly, with "extremely confident" participants rising from 11% to 33%. Effective communication with stakeholders saw a significant increase, with "extremely confident" participants rising from 17% to 33%. Fundraising and partnership-building confidence increased from 6% to 19%, and confidence in evaluating advocacy outcomes improved, with "extremely confident" participants rising from 6% to 24%. The program effectively enhanced participants' knowledge, attitudes, and advocacy skills, integrating theoretical and practical learning. Gains in confidence across problem-solving, adaptability, and communication skills underline the program's success in preparing participants for real-world advocacy. Participant feedback confirmed the program's relevance and efficacy, suggesting future iterations should emphasize diversity in advocacy and deepen content on key topics. This program serves as a valuable model for empowering cancer advocates and addresses the critical need for targeted training to reduce cancer health disparities. Citation Format: Manisha Salinas, Monica Albertie. Empowering cancer advocates: Evaluating the impact of a comprehensive training program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B112.