Citations

Abstract Background and aims Benefit of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) correction and timing of intervention are unclear. This study aimed to compare survival rates after surgical or transcatheter intervention to conservative management according to a TR clinical stage as assessed using the TRI-SCORE. Methods A total of 2,413 patients with severe isolated functional TR were enrolled in TRIGISTRY (1217 conservatively managed, 551 isolated tricuspid valve surgery, and 645 transcatheter valve repair). The primary endpoint was survival at 2 years. Results The TRI-SCORE was low (≤3) in 32%, intermediate (4–5) in 33%, and high (≥6) in 35%. A successful correction was achieved in 97% and 65% of patients in the surgical and transcatheter groups, respectively. Survival rates decreased with the TRI-SCORE in the three treatment groups (all P < .0001). In the low TRI-SCORE category, survival rates were higher in the surgical and transcatheter groups than in the conservative management group (93%, 87%, and 79%, respectively, P = .0002). In the intermediate category, no significant difference between groups was observed overall (80%, 71%, and 71%, respectively, P = .13) but benefit of the intervention became significant when the analysis was restricted to patients with successful correction (80%, 81%, and 71%, respectively, P = .009). In the high TRI-SCORE category, survival was not different to conservative management in the surgical and successful repair group (61% and 68% vs 58%, P = .26 and P = .18 respectively). Conclusions Survival progressively decreased with the TRI-SCORE irrespective of treatment modality. Compared to conservative management, an early and successful surgical or transcatheter intervention improved 2-year survival in patients at low and, to a lower extent, intermediate TRI-SCORE, while no benefit was observed in the high TRI-SCORE category.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Severe aortic-stenosis (AS) is the guideline-based indication for aortic-valve-replacement (AVR) performance, which has markedly increased with transcatheter approaches, suggesting possible increasing AS incidence. However, reported secular trends of AS incidence remain contradictory, uncertain and lacking quantitative Doppler-Echocardiographic ascertainment. Thus, population-based trends in presentation, treatment and outcome are unknown. Methods All adults residents our County (MN,USA) diagnosed with incident (first-diagnosis) severe AS based on quantitative Doppler-Echocardiography (aortic-valve-area≤1cm2, aortic-valve-area-index≤0.6cm2/m2, mean-gradient≥40mmHg, peak-velocity≥4m/s, Doppler-velocity-index≤0.25) between 1997–2016, were accounted for and trends for incidence, presentation, treatment and outcome analysed. Results Incident severe-AS was diagnosed in 1069 community-residents over 20-years. Incidence-rate was 52.5[49.4–55.8] per 100.000 patient/year, slightly higher in male vs. female and was almost unchanged after age and sex adjustment for the US population 53.8[50.6–57.0] per-100000 residents/year. Over 20-years severe AS-incidence remained stable (p = 0.20) but absolute-burden of incident-cases markedly increased (p = 0.0004) due to population growth. Incidence-trend differed by sex, stable in men (incidence-rate-ratio 0.99, p = 0.72) but declining in women: (incidence-rate-ratio 0.93, p = 0.024). AS clinical-presentation, age, symptoms, comorbidity, ventricular size/function, valve-area-index, low-flow or low-ejection-fraction AS, remained stable. Over the study 20 years, AVR performance grew (1997–2001 to 2012–2016, at 3-month:14% to 21%, p = 0.02; at 1-year 19% to 33%,p<0.0001), and was more prompt (from 1.3[0.11–3.3]years in 1997–2001 to 0.48[0.15–2.11]years in 2013–2016, p = 0.001) but severe AS undertreatment remained prominent (>40%). Early-AVR (within 3-months) was associated with survival benefit (adjusted-hazard-ratio 0.55[0.42–0.71], p<0.0001) stable throughout the 20-years. Despite these improvements, overall mortality, 8.3% within 3-months, 17.8% within 1-year, 36% within 3-years, was swift, considerable and unabated (all p≥0.44) throughout the 20-year study. Conclusion Over 20 years, the population incidence of severe-AS remained stable with increased absolute case-burden purely related to population growth. Despite stable severe-AS presentation, AVR performance grew notably, but while declining, undertreatment remained substantial and disease-lethality did not decline. These findings have important population-health management implications.

Objectives Unbiased information regarding the surgical management of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) at the nationwide level are scarce and mainly US-based. The Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d’Information, a mandatory national database, offers the unique opportunity to assess the presentation and outcomes of all consecutive mitral valve (MV) surgeries performed in France in the contemporary era. Methods We collected all MV surgeries performed for MR in France in 2014–2016. MR aetiology was classified as degenerative (DMR), secondary (SMR) or Other (rheumatic or congenital disease and infective endocarditis). Results During the 3-year period, 18 167 MV surgeries were performed in France (55% repair and 45% replacement; 52% isolated). Age was 66±12 years and 59% were male. Aetiology was DMR in 42%, SMR in 16% and other in 42% including 19% with uncertain aetiologies. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 6.5% and increased with age, female gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, type of surgery (replacement vs repair), associated surgery (combined vs isolated) and MR aetiology (all p<0.01). In-hospital mortality and rate of death/readmission for heart failure (HF) at 1 year were 3.4% and 13%, respectively for DMR (2.4% and 11% for isolated DMR) and 7.8% and 27%, respectively for SMR (5.5% and 23% for isolated SMR). Repair rate was 55% overall, 68% in DMR and 72% for isolated DMR surgery (70% of all DMR). Repair rates decreased with age, Charlson Comorbidity Index and female sex (all p<0.0001). Conclusion In this cross-sectional contemporary prospective nationwide database, in-hospital mortality and 1 year rate of death and HF readmission were considerable overall and in all subsets. Repair rates were suboptimal overall especially in the elderly and women subsets. These results underline the need to develop strategies to improve management and outcomes of patients with both DMR and SMR.

Background Although US recent data suggest that mitral regurgitation (MR) is severely undertreated and carries a poor outcome, population‐based views on outcome and management are limited. We aimed to define the current treatment standards, clinical outcomes, and costs related to MR at the nationwide level. Methods and Results In total, 107 412 patients with MR were admitted in France in 2014 to 2015. Within 1 year, 8% were operated and 92% were conservatively managed and constituted our study population (68% primary MR and 32% secondary MR). The mean age was 77±15 years; most patients presented with comorbidities. In‐hospital and 1‐year mortality rates were 4.1% and 14.3%, respectively. Readmissions were common (63% at least once and 37% readmitted ≥2 times). Rates of 1‐year mortality or all‐cause readmission and 1‐year mortality or heart failure readmission were 67% and 34%, respectively, and increased with age, Charlson index, heart failure at admission, and secondary MR etiology; however, the event rate remained notably high in the primary MR subset (64% and 28%, respectively). The mean costs of hospital admissions and of readmissions were 5345±6432 and 10 080±10 847 euros, respectively. Conclusions At the nationwide level, MR was a common reason for admission and affected an elderly population with frequent comorbidities. Less than 10% of patients underwent a valve intervention. All subsets of patients who were conservatively managed incurred high mortality and readmissions rates, and MR represented a major societal burden with an extrapolated annual cost of 350 to 550 million euros (390–615 million US dollars). New strategies to improve the management and outcomes of patients with both primary and secondary MR are critical and warranted.

Abstract Aims More evidence is needed to quantify the association between tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods and results Between 2008–2017, using the Optum longitudinal database, a patient-level database that integrates multiple US-based electronic health and claim records from several health care providers, we identified 435 679 patients with new HF diagnosis and both an assessment of the left ventricular ejection fraction and at least 1 year of history. TR was graded as mild, moderate or severe and classified as prevalent (at the time of the initial HF diagnosis) or incident (subsequent new cases thereafter). For prevalent TR, the analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model with adjustment for patient covariates. Incident TR was modelled as a time-updated covariate, as were other non-fatal events during follow-up. Prevalence of mild, moderate and severe TR at baseline was 10.1%, 5.1% and 1.4%, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 1.5 years, 121 273 patients (27.8%) died and prevalent TR was independently associated with survival. Compared to patients with no TR at baseline, the adjusted hazard ratios for mortality were 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97–1.01], 1.17 (95% CI 1.14–1.20) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.28–1.39) for mild, moderate and severe TR, respectively. In the 363 270 patients free from TR at baseline, incident TR (at least mild, at least moderate, or severe) developed during follow-up in 12.1%, 5.1% and 1.1%, respectively. Adjusted mortality hazard ratios for such new cases were 1.48 (95% CI 1.44–1.52), 1.92 (95% CI 1.86–1.99) and 2.44 (95% CI 2.32–2.57), respectively. Findings were consistent across all patient subgroups based on age, gender, rhythm, associated comorbidities, prior cardiac surgery, B-type natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Conclusions In this large contemporary patient-level database of almost half-million US patients with HF, TR was associated with a marked increases in mortality risk overall and in all subgroups. Future randomized controlled trials will evaluate the impact of TR correction on clinical outcomes and the causal relationship between TR and mortality.

Abstract Background Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common heart valve disorder worldwide. The contrast between the large burden of MR and the overall low number of performed mitral valve surgery suggest a marked undertreatment of MR patients. Large and comprehensive contemporary data assessing the management and outcome of patients with MR as well as the societal burden of the disease at the Nationwide level are currently lacking. Methods Based on a French mandatory administrative hospital-discharge database, we collected all admissions in France both in public and private hospitals in 2014 and 2015 with MR as primary or secondary code. Patients with infective endocarditis, congenital or rheumatic disease were excluded. Cost were calculated for patients admitted in public hospitals. Results In 2014–2015, 107,412 patients with MR were admitted in France in 1238 public and private hospitals; 74,098 patients (69%) presented with primary MR (PMR) and 33,314 patients (31%) with secondary MR (SMR). Overall 8,676 patients (8%) were operated on (81% PMR) within 1 year and 98,736 (92%) were conservatively managed and constituted our study population. Mean age was 77±15 years (50% were ≥80 years and 12% ≥90 years) and 53% were female. Most of the patients presented with comorbidities and Charlson Index was ≥2 in 53% of the population. In-hospital and one-year mortality were 4.1% and 14.3% respectively. Readmission were very common and one-year mortality/readmission all cause, and one-year mortality / CHF readmission rates were 67% and 34% respectively and increased with age, Charlson Index, CHF at presentation and SMR etiology but events rate remained notably high in the PMR subset (64% and 28% respectively). The total annual cost in public hospitals (initial hospitalisation and readmissions) was 325,716,311 euros. When only readmissions for heart failure were considered (43% of all readmissions), total annual cost was 202,904,869 euros. Conclusion In this large administrative contemporary nationwide database, 1) MR was a common reason for admission and affected an elderly population with frequent comorbidities, 2) less than 10% of patients were offered any intervention, 3) MR was associated with high mortality and readmissions rates in all subsets; 4) MR represented a major societal burden with an extrapolated annual cost between 250 and 400 million euros. These finding highlight the critical need to develop strategies to improve the overall management and outcomes of patients with both primary and secondary MR. Acknowledgement/Funding Edwards Lifesciences

Abstract Background Contemporary and unbiased information regarding the surgical management of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) at the Nationwide level are scarce. The PMSI, a mandatory administrative database, offers the unique opportunity to assess the presentation and outcomes of all consecutive mitral valve (MV) surgeries performed in France in the contemporary era. Methods We collected all (isolated or combined) MV surgeries performed for MR in France both in public and private hospitals between 2014 and 2016. Based on an algorithm we developed, MR etiology was classified as degenerative (DMR), secondary (SMR) or OTHER (rheumatic, congenital, infective endocarditis or unknown). Results Between January 2014 and December 2016, 18,167 mitral valve surgeries were performed in France (55% repair and 45% replacement; 52% isolated MV surgery). Mean age was 66±12 years and 59% were male. Etiology was DMR in 42%, SMR in 16% and OTHER in 42%. Among DMR, repair rate was 68% overall and 72% in the subset who underwent an isolated MV surgery (70% of all DMR). Repair rates decreased with age, Charlson index and sex (female) (all P<0.0001). Among SMR, a repair was performed in 39% and a combined surgery in 51%. In-hospital mortality and rate of death / readmission for CHF at one year were 3.4% and 13% respectively for DMR (2.4% and 5.5% respectively for isolated DMR) and 7.8% and 17.8% respectively for SMR (5.5% and 12.4% respectively for isolated SMR). Center volume was associated with a lower in-hospital mortality (p=0.002) but not with higher DMR repair rate (P=0.85). Conclusion In this large administrative contemporary nationwide database, 1) DMR surgery was twice as frequent as SMR and more frequently performed isolated; 2) Repair rates in DMR were suboptimal overall but more critically in the elderly and women subsets. 3) Operative mortality and one-year rate of death and readmission were approximately twice as high in SMR than in DMR and overall considerable even for isolated DMR surgery; and 4) In DMR, center volume had no impact on repair rate but an independent impact on outcome. These results underline the need to develop strategies to improve management and outcomes of patients with both degenerative and secondary MR.

Background Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a progressive disease, but the impact of baseline AS haemodynamic or anatomic severity on AS progression remains unclear. Methods In 149 patients (104 mild AS, 36 moderate AS and 9 severe AS) enrolled in 2 ongoing prospective cohorts (COFRASA/GENERAC), we evaluated AS haemodynamic severity at baseline and yearly, thereafter, using echocardiography (mean pressure gradient (MPG)) and AS anatomic severity using CT (degree of aortic valve calcification (AVC)). Results After a mean follow-up of 2.9±1.0 years, mean MGP increased from 22±11 to 30±16 mm Hg (+3±3 mm Hg/year), and mean AVC from 1108±891 to 1640±1251 AU (arbitrary units) (+188±176 AU/year). Progression of AS was strongly related to baseline haemodynamic severity (+2±3 mm Hg/year in mild AS, +4±3 mm Hg/year in moderate AS and +5±5 mm Hg/year in severe AS (p=0.01)), and baseline haemodynamic severity was an independent predictor of haemodynamic progression (p=0.0003). Annualised haemodynamic and anatomic progression rates were significantly correlated (r=0.55, p<0.0001), but AVC progression rate was also significantly associated with baseline haemodynamic severity (+141±133 AU/year in mild AS, +279±189 AU/year in moderate AS and +361±293 AU/year in severe AS, p<0.0001), and both baseline MPG and baseline AVC were independent determinants of AVC progression (p<0.0001). Conclusions AS progressed faster with increasing haemodynamic or anatomic severity. Our results suggest that a medical strategy aimed at preventing AVC progression may be useful in all subsets of patients with AS including those with severe AS and support the recommended closer follow-up of patients with AS as AS severity increases. Clinical trial registration COFRASA (clinicalTrial.gov number NCT 00338676) and GENERAC (clinicalTrial.gov number NCT00647088 ).

Background— Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is the intrinsic mechanism of valvular obstruction leading to aortic stenosis (AS) and is measurable by multidetector computed tomography. The link between sex and AS is controversial and that with AVC is unknown. Methods and Results— We prospectively performed multidetector computed tomography in 665 patients with AS (aortic valve area, 1.05±0.35 cm 2 ; mean gradient, 39±19 mm Hg) to measure AVC and to assess the impact of sex on the AVC–AS severity link in men and women. AS severity was comparable between women and men (peak aortic jet velocity: 4.05±0.99 versus 3.93±0.91 m/s, P =0.11; aortic valve area index: 0.55±0.20 versus 0.56±0.18 cm 2 /m 2 ; P =0.46). Conversely, AVC load was lower in women versus men (1703±1321 versus 2694±1628 arbitrary units; P <0.0001) even after adjustment for their smaller body surface area or aortic annular area (both P <0.0001). Thus, odds of high-AVC load were much greater in men than in women (odds ratio, 5.07; P <0.0001). Although AVC showed good associations with hemodynamic AS severity in men and women (all r >0.67; P <0.0001), for any level of AS severity measured by peak aortic jet velocity or aortic valve area index, AVC load, absolute or indexed, was higher in men versus women (all P ≤0.01). Conclusions— In this large AS population, women incurred similar AS severity than men for lower AVC loads, even after indexing for their smaller body size. Hence, the relationship between valvular calcification process and AS severity differs in women and men, warranting further pathophysiological inquiry. For AS severity diagnostic purposes, interpretation of AVC load should be different in men and in women.