Citations

PURPOSE In immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, amyloid fibrils cause organ dysfunction. Anselamimab, a monoclonal antibody, selectively binds to amyloid fibrils, accelerating their clearance. METHODS Newly diagnosed patients with European modification of Mayo 2004 stage IIIa or IIIb AL amyloidosis were randomly assigned to receive anselamimab or placebo with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (with or without daratumumab). The primary end point was a hierarchical composite of time to all-cause mortality (ACM) and frequency of cardiovascular hospitalizations (CVHs), analyzed using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld test and win ratio estimation. RESULTS Among 406 randomly assigned patients, the primary end point win ratio for anselamimab versus placebo was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.83, 1.50; P = .332) and the hazard ratio (HR) for ACM was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.57, 1.13; P = .290). CVH rates in the anselamimab and placebo groups were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.42, 0.83) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.55, 1.43), respectively ( P = .145). Among patients with kappa isotype (n = 72), the win ratio was 2.06 (95% CI, 0.98, 4.31; P = .100) and anselamimab reduced ACM by 62% versus placebo (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.86; nominal P = .012), and CVH by 71% (IRR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.87; nominal P = .028) with improvements in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Score. There was no clinical benefit observed in the lambda population. Anselamimab was generally well-tolerated; safety data were comparable between treatment arms overall. CONCLUSION Treatment with anselamimab, an antifibril antibody used alongside antiplasma cell dyscrasia therapy, while not meeting the primary end point in the overall population, significantly improved ACM and CVH in patients with kappa AL, potentially offering a new therapeutic option for this isotype.

7530 Background: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR-T therapy is a highly effective treatment with potential for long-term remission of RRMM with improved outcomes vs daratumumab-based regimens. CAR-T suitability may be limited by delays/manufacturing failure and changes in pt condition, financial situation, or access to specialized treatment centers. We characterized pts with RRMM who underwent leukapheresis to prepare for CAR-T and pt treatment waiting time, to understand the delays incurred prior to CAR-T infusion. Methods: A real-world study in the US using the PharMetrics Plus claims database (July 2020–September 2024) was performed. Eligible pts were aged ≥18 years with RRMM, had their first leukapheresis claim (index date) during the index period (March 2021–August 2024), were continuously enrolled in medical/pharmacy benefits for ≥180 days prior to and ≥30 days after index date, and were not clinical trial participants. Pt characteristics, rate of CAR-T receipt, and time to CAR-T receipt were assessed during the variable follow-up. Results: Overall, 337 pts who received leukapheresis were identified. Median (interquartile range) age was 62 (55–67) years, and 59.1% of pts were male. Mean National Cancer Institute (NCI) comorbidity index was 0.52. Most pts received care in the Midwest (31.8%) or Northeast (24.6%) regions. Most pts (95.9%) received leukapheresis in an outpatient setting. Median available follow-up time was 255 days (mean 337 days). During follow-up, 183 pts (54.3%) did not receive CAR-T after leukapheresis. Among pts who had ≥12 months of follow-up (n=143), the proportion of pts who did not receive CAR-T was similar at 53.1% (n=76). Among pts who received CAR-T during the follow-up (n=154; 45.7%), the median waiting time was 54.0 days (mean 56.7 days). The cohort of pts who did not receive CAR-T had a higher proportion of females (48.6%/31.8%), were more likely to have Medicaid (29.5%/7.8%), had higher NCI comorbidity index (scores 0.55/0.47), and most commonly received care in the Northeast (35.5%/11.7%) while pts who received CAR-T most commonly received care in the Midwest (23.0%/42.2%). The most common first classes of multiple myeloma medications after leukapheresis but prior to CAR-T infusion in pts who did/did not receive CAR-T were an alkylating agent (65.6%/36.1%), proteasome inhibitor (40.3%/30.6%), steroid (38.3%/39.3%), immunomodulatory drug (22.7%/27.3%), anti-CD38 (20.8%/20.8%), and stem cell transplant (0%/17.5%). Conclusions: Over half of pts receiving leukapheresis did not receive CAR-T infusion, highlighting a persistent gap between eligibility and treatment delivery. These data emphasize an urgent need for broadly accessible BCMA-targeted therapies that provide deep and durable responses.

5054 Background: Rucaparib significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) versus physician’s choice of docetaxel or an androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) (abiraterone or enzalutamide) in men with BRCA mutations who were chemotherapy-naïve in the mCRPC setting and had received one prior ARPI in the phase 3 TRITON3 trial (NCT02975934). This post-hoc analysis evaluated whether the timing of prior ARPI therapy impacted the efficacy of rucaparib. Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to rucaparib (600 mg BID) or physician’s choice of docetaxel or ARPI, after progression on 1 prior second-generation ARPI in any setting. The primary endpoint was rPFS. Outcomes were analyzed according to whether patients received the prior ARPI in the metastatic castration sensitive (mCSPC) or castration resistant (mCRPC) setting. Data cutoff was August 25, 2022. Results: Of the 302 BRCA1/2 patients, 68 received prior ARPI in the mCSPC setting (42 rucaparib; 26 physician’s choice) and 234 in the mCRPC setting (159 rucaparib; 75 physician’s choice). Baseline characteristics were generally similar. Prior treatments in the mCSPC and mCRPC groups, respectively, included abiraterone (73.5% vs 53.0%), enzalutamide (29.4% vs 48.3%), and docetaxel (17.6% vs 24.8%). Median rPFS favored rucaparib over physician’s choice in both groups (mCSPC: 13.6 vs 8.2 months; HR 0.60 [95% CI, 0.32–1.15]; mCRPC: 11.2 vs 5.8 months; HR 0.43 [95% CI, 0.30–0.61]). Median OS was similar between treatments in both settings (mCSPC: 23.2 vs 21.7 months; HR 0.81 [95% CI, 0.47–1.41]; mCRPC: 23.2 vs 21.0 months; HR 0.91 [95% CI, 0.66–1.25]). Treatment-related adverse events occurred at comparable rates (89.6% vs 86.1%). Conclusions: Rucaparib demonstrated efficacy in patients with BRCA-mutated mCRPC, regardless of whether prior ARPI was administered in the mCSPC or mCRPC setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02975934 .

Background: Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) pose a significant treatment challenge due to biofilm-associated resistance, which limits antibiotic effectiveness. Bacteriophages, naturally occurring viruses that selectively infect and lyse bacteria, can disrupt biofilms, potentially enhancing antibiotic activity. We present the case of a male in his 70s with a history of total hip arthroplasty in 1973 who developed a chronic methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) PJI. Despite eight surgical interventions and multiple courses of suppressive antibiotics, the infection persisted, necessitating the use of bacteriophage therapy. Methods: The patient's MSSA isolate was sent to a bacteriophage laboratory in Quebec, which identified effective bacteriophages, and a two-bacteriophage cocktail was selected. Following approval by Health Canada and the University of Calgary (REB23-1733), bacteriophages were administered during a planned incision and drainage (I&D). Locally, bacteriophage was applied topically into the hip, followed by 2 weeks of twice-daily intravenous bacteriophage therapy with standard-of-care intravenous antibiotics. Results: Therapy was well tolerated except for initial mild rigors. Now, 24 weeks after bacteriophage administration, there is cessation of pain, normalization of inflammatory markers, and significant improvement in quality of life while continuing on suppressive antibiotics. Conclusions: Bacteriophage therapy was safe in our case, and emerging evidence is promising for its use in PJIs. However, regulatory hurdles, cost, and lack of standardized protocols currently limit its use. Classified as experimental therapy in Canada, bacteriophage use is restricted to clinical trials. This case underscores the potential for broader adoption of bacteriophage therapy in managing PJIs across Canada.

Abstract INTRODUCTION We describe the reliability of remote self‐administered digital cognitive measures completed via the Mayo Test Drive (MTD) web‐based platform. METHODS A total of 1846 participants (mean age = 70, SD = 12, range 31–101; 48% male; 96% White; 99% non‐Hispanic; 97% cognitively unimpaired) with two to four complete MTD sessions at ∼7.5‐month intervals were included. Test‐retest reliability was assessed using single‐rating, absolute‐agreement, and two‐way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals. ICCs for in‐person‐administered traditional neuropsychological measures were compared to MTD for a subset of 244 participants. Analyses also compared reliability across demographic, residential, and session context subgroups. RESULTS Reliability was good for the MTD Composite (total ICC = 0.79 [0.77, 0.80]), and moderate‐to‐good for the primary outcome variables for each MTD subtest (total ICCs 0.70–0.83 for Stricker Learning Span and Symbols). The reliability of the remote self‐administered MTD was similar to in‐person‐administered cognitive measures. DISCUSSION MTD showed moderate‐to‐good reliability, supporting its use in longitudinal monitoring.

Abstract Introduction Low-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav®), the only FDA-approved treatment for idiopathic hypersomnia in adults, was evaluated in the phase 4, open-label DUET study (NCT05875974). This post-hoc analysis evaluated subgroups of participants with idiopathic hypersomnia stratified by patient-reported ideal nighttime sleep duration (with [>9 hours] and without [≤9 hours] long sleep need [LSN]), based on Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale (IHSS) Item 1. Methods DUET included screening, 8-day baseline (BL), 2−8-week LXB dose titration/optimization, 2-week stable-dose, 8-day end-of-treatment (EOT), and 2-week safety follow-up periods. Outcomes were Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), IHSS, polysomnographic total sleep time (TST), and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) and Change (PGI-C). Least squares mean (LSM) changes (BL-to-EOT) were BL-adjusted; P values are nominal. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed by subgroup. Results Of 46 enrolled participants with idiopathic hypersomnia, 45 had BL IHSS data; 24 reported LSN (>9 hours) and 21 reported no LSN (≤9 hours). Most (LSN/without LSN) were female (100%/61.9%) and White (91.7%/76.2%), with mean±SD age 36.8±11.1/38.6±12.1 years; 20/24 and 19/21 completed the study. BL mean±SE (LSN/without LSN) ESS scores were 16.8±0.5/16.1±0.7; LSM changes (95% CI): LSN −9.5 (−11.5, −7.6; P< 0.0001; n=20), without LSN −7.4 (−9.4, −5.4; P< 0.0001; n=19). BL mean±SE (LSN/without LSN) IHSS total scores were 35.7±1.3/30.5±1.8; LSM changes (95% CI): LSN −18.3 (−22.4, −14.1; P< 0.0001; n=19), without LSN −12.5 (−16.9, −8.0; P< 0.0001; n=17). BL mean±SE (LSN/without LSN) IHSS long sleep/sleep inertia component scores were 12.5±0.6/9.2±0.6; LSM changes (95% CI): LSN −5.5 (−6.8, −4.1; P< 0.0001; n=19), without LSN −4.0 (−5.4, −2.5; P< 0.0001; n=17). BL mean±SE (LSN/without LSN) polysomnographic TSTs were 490.0±26.0/442.7± 24.7 minutes; LSM changes (95% CI): LSN −53.1 (−92.5, −13.7; P=0.0097; n=20), without LSN −59.4 (−99.8, −18.9; P=0.0052; n=19). On the PGI-C, most participants (LSN/without LSN) endorsed improved overall disease (100%/88.2%; n=19/n=17) at EOT. TEAEs were reported in 79.2% (LSN) and 66.7% (without LSN); most (LSN/without LSN) were mild (45.8%/42.9%) or moderate (33.3%/23.8%) in severity; 1 (without LSN) was serious (unrelated to study drug). Conclusion Participants with or without LSN (>9 hours or ≤9 hours, respectively) taking LXB showed improvements in multiple idiopathic hypersomnia symptoms and reduced TST. Support (if any) Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Abstract Introduction Jazz DUET (Develop hypersomnia Understanding by Evaluating low-sodium oxybate Treatment; NCT05875974) was the first study to evaluate effectiveness/safety of low-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav®) >9 g/night (outside the recommended range: 6–9 g/night). This analysis evaluated changes in patient-reported hypersomnolence measures in participants with narcolepsy taking LXB >9 g/night compared with LXB 9 g/night. Methods DUET was a phase 4, prospective, open-label study with screening, 8-day LXB 9 g/night (9g-baseline), titration/optimization, stable-dose, and 8-day end-of-treatment (EOT) optimized LXB >9 g/night (up to 12g; >9g-EOT) periods. Patient-reported measures included Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), electronic sleep diaries (completed daily during 9g-baseline and >9g-EOT; subjective total sleep time [TST], number of awakenings, sleep efficiency [TST divided by time in bed], sleep quality [5-point scale; “very good” to “very poor”], and how rested/refreshed the participant felt upon awakening [5-point scale; “very well” to “not at all”]), Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS; administered 90 minutes post-polysomnography awakening at 9g-baseline and >9g-EOT), and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10 (FOSQ-10). LSM differences (95% CI) from 9g-baseline to >9g-EOT (nominal P-values) were 9g-baseline-adjusted. Results Forty-eight participants took LXB >9g (mean±SD age: 39.2±10.9 years; 62.5% female). Total stable-dose LXB (mean±SD) was 11.1±1.0 g/night (n=45). From 9g-baseline to >9g-EOT, ESS scores improved (LSM [95% CI]: –3.1 [–4.2, –1.9]; P< 0.0001; n=44), nocturnal TST increased (0.3h [0.1, 0.4]; P=0.0163; n=26), sleep efficiency increased (3.8% [1.7, 5.9]; P=0.0011; n=26), and number of awakenings remained stable (–0.2 [–0.7, 0.3]; P=0.3959; n=26). Percentage of participants rating sleep quality as “very good”/”good” increased from 26.9% (9g-baseline) to 61.5% (>9g-EOT), as did rested sleep (“very well”/”well”/”somewhat” rested) from 57.7% to 69.2%, respectively. From 9g-baseline to >9g-EOT, KSS scores decreased (–0.9 [–1.4, –0.4]; P=0.0004; n=39); FOSQ-10 scores also increased (1.3 [0.5, 2.0]; P=0.0014; n=40). Of 48 participants, 36 (75.0%) experienced ≥1 TEAE (mostly mild/moderate and 1 serious [syncope, unrelated to treatment]). No changes in respiratory polysomnography measures were observed. Conclusion Participants with narcolepsy who optimized to LXB >9 g/night, relative to 9 g/night, reported increased sleep quality and restfulness that paralleled improvements in daytime sleepiness and daytime functioning. TEAEs were consistent with those at lower dosages. Support (if any) Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Abstract Introduction People with idiopathic hypersomnia often experience sleep inertia, characterized by profound difficulty waking up with grogginess, disorientation, and cognitive impairment immediately after awakening. This post-hoc analysis of the DUET study (NCT05875974) evaluated objective and subjective sleep inertia in participants with idiopathic hypersomnia taking low-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav®) stratified by patient-reported ideal nighttime sleep duration (with [>9h] and without [≤9h] long sleep need [LSN]), based on Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale (IHSS) item 1. Methods DUET was a phase 4, prospective, open-label study of LXB with baseline (BL), titration/optimization, stable-dose, and end-of-treatment (EOT) periods. Exploratory outcomes included Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT; objective performance impairment) and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS; subjective sleepiness), administered BL and EOT, in the morning after overnight polysomnogram. The 10-minute PVT was completed at 10, 40, and 90 minutes after awakening. The KSS, a single-item, 9-point scale, was completed upon awakening and immediately before/after PVT assessments. Separate nonlinear, mixed-effects regression models were applied to PVT lapses and KSS ratings to estimate objective and subjective sleep inertia magnitudes, respectively, in LSN subgroups, along with sleep inertia dissipation time constants for the overall cohort. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. Results Of 46 enrolled participants with idiopathic hypersomnia, 45 had BL IHSS data; 24 reported LSN and 21 reported no LSN. Most (with/without LSN) were female (100.0%/61.9%) and White (91.7%/76.2%); 20/24 and 19/21 completed the study. Based on PVT lapses, objective sleep inertia ±SE (with/without LSN) at BL was 17.0±4.2/4.2±2.8, and at EOT was 0.0±na/2.0±0.9 (BL-to-EOT changes [95% CI]: −17.0 [−25.5, −8.5] and −2.2 [−6.9, 2.5]). Based on KSS, subjective sleep inertia ±SE (with/without LSN) at BL was 6.5±0.3/5.1±0.5, and at EOT was 0.81±0.5/1.5±0.6 (BL-to-EOT changes [95% CI]: −5.7 [−6.7, −4.7] and −3.5 [−4.5, −2.6]). Sleep inertia dissipation time constants ±SE were 2.7±1.1h (PVT) and 13.9±3.8h (KSS). TEAEs were consistent with the known LXB safety profile. Conclusion Participants with idiopathic hypersomnia experienced subjective and objective sleep inertia at BL, with prolonged dissipation after awakening. Objective BL sleep inertia was particularly severe in participants with LSN (>9h). After LXB treatment, notable improvements in objective and subjective sleep inertia were observed for both subgroups. Support (if any) Jazz Pharmaceuticals