Citations

Clear

63 citation(s) found for "Teo, B".

Testing Adaptive Therapy Protocols Using Gemcitabine and Capecitabine in a Preclinical Model of Endocrine-Resistant Breast Cancer
Seyedi, Sareh , Teo, Ruthanne, Foster, Luke , Saha, Daniel , Mina, Lida A. , Northfelt, Donald W. , Anderson, Karen S. , Gatenby, Robert A. , Cisneros, Luis , Troan, Brigid V. , Anderson, Alexander R.A. , Maley, Carlo C. , Mina, Lida, Gatenby, Robert , Cisneros, Luis H , Troan, Brigid , Anderson, Alexander R A , Maley, Carlo C. , Foster, Luke, Shibata, Darryl K.

Mayo Clinic

Cancers | January 8, 2024 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 257

10.3390/cancers16020257 | PMID 38254748 Get It

Adaptive therapy, an ecologically inspired approach to cancer treatment, aims to overcome resistance and reduce toxicity by leveraging competitive interactions between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant subclones, prioritizing patient survival and quality of life instead of killing the maximum number of cancer cells. In preparation for a clinical trial, we used endocrine-resistant MCF7 breast cancer to stimulate second-line therapy and tested adaptive therapy using capecitabine, gemcitabine, or their combination in a mouse xenograft model. Dose modulation adaptive therapy with capecitabine alone increased survival time relative to MTD but not statistically significantly (HR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.043–1.1, p = 0.065). However, when we alternated the drugs in both dose modulation (HR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.024–0.55, p = 0.007) and intermittent adaptive therapies, the survival time was significantly increased compared to high-dose combination therapy (HR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.013–0.42, p = 0.003). Overall, the survival time increased with reduced dose for both single drugs (p < 0.01) and combined drugs (p < 0.001), resulting in tumors with fewer proliferation cells (p = 0.0026) and more apoptotic cells (p = 0.045) compared to high-dose therapy. Adaptive therapy favors slower-growing tumors and shows promise in two-drug alternating regimens instead of being combined.
A Likelihood Ratio Approach for Utilizing Case-Control Data in the Clinical Classification of Rare Sequence Variants: Application to BRCA1 and BRCA2
Zanti, Maria , O'Mahony, Denise G , Li, Hongyan , Aittomäkkiki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L. , Aronson, Kristan J. , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Brenner, Hermann , Caputo, Sandrine M. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Collaborators, GC-HBOC study, Daly, Mary B., Nicolo, Arcangela De , Eccles, Diana M., Engel, Christoph , Evans, D. Gareth , Fasching, Peter A. , Giele, Willemina R. R. Geurts -, Glendon, Gord , Goldberg, Mark S. , Gómez, E. , Güendert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric , Haiman, Christopher A. , Hamann, Ute, Harkness, Elaine F. , Hogervorst, Frans B.L., Hoppe, Reiner , Houdayer, Claude , Houlston, Richard S. , Howell, Anthony , Investigators, ABCTB, Jakimovska, Milena , John, Esther M. , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Lambrechts, Diether , Léone, Mélanie, Lindblom, Annika , Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Manoukian, Siranoush , Menon, Usha , Offit, Kenneth, Park, Sue K. , Peto, Julian , Plaseska‐Karanfilska, Dijana , Romero, Atocha , Schmutzler, Rita K. , Stone, Jennifer , Tapper, William , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Thomassen, Mads , Vachon, Celine M. , Vega, Ana , Wang, Qin , Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Zheng, Wei , Easton, Douglas F. , Goldgar, David E., Eccles, Diana , Lambrechts, Diether , Houdayer, Claude , Lambrechts, Diether , Teo, Soo H , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Houlston, Richard S , Vega, Ana , Evans, D Gareth , John, Esther M , Lambrechts, Diether , Brenner, Hermann , Romero, Atocha , Engel, Christoph , Zheng, Wei , Stone, Jennifer , Gómez-García, Encarna B , De Nicolo, Arcangela , Manoukian, Siranoush , Lindblom, Annika , Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana , Parsons, Michael T. , Dennis, Joe , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Augustinsson, Annelie , Becher, Heiko , Bojesen, Stig E. , Brown, Melissa A. , Buys, Saundra S. , Canzian, Federico , Castelao, Jose E. , Czene, Kamila , Devilee, Peter , Dörk, Thilo , Dunning, Alison M. , Dwek, Miriam , Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , García‐Closas, Montserrat , García-Sáenz, José Á. , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Geurts-Giele, Willemina R.R. , Giles, Graham G. , Guénel, Pascal , Hall, Per N , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Hopper, John L. , Jakubowska, Anna , Jernström, Helena , Kaaks, Rudolf , Kitahara, Cari M. , Koutros, Stella , Kraft, Peter , Lacey, James V. , Léoné, Mélanie, Lubiński, Jan , Lush, Michael J. , Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara , Martı́nez, Marı́a Elena , Milne, Roger L. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Murphy, Rachel A. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Newman, William G. , James, Paul A. , Peterlongo, Paolo , Punie, Kevin , Radice, Paolo , Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Rennert, Gad , Rosenberg, Efraim H. , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Sandler, Dale P. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Simard, Jacques , Southey, Melissa C. , Stoppa‐Lyonnet, Dominique , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Taylor, Jack A. , Teras, Lauren R. , Terry, Mary Beth , Troester, Melissa A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Vreeswijk, Maaike P.G. , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Wolk, Alicja , Feng, Bing , Couch, Fergus J. , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Michailidou, Kyriaki

Mayo Clinic

Human Mutation | September 15, 2023 | Volume: 2023 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-17

10.1155/2023/9961341 | PMID 38725546 Get It

A large number of variants identified through clinical genetic testing in disease susceptibility genes are of uncertain significance (VUS). Following the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), the frequency in case-control datasets (PS4 criterion) can inform their interpretation. We present a novel case-control likelihood ratio-based method that incorporates gene-specific age-related penetrance. We demonstrate the utility of this method in the analysis of simulated and real datasets. In the analysis of simulated data, the likelihood ratio method was more powerful compared to other methods. Likelihood ratios were calculated for a case-control dataset of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) and compared with logistic regression results. A larger number of variants reached evidence in favor of pathogenicity, and a substantial number of variants had evidence against pathogenicity—findings that would not have been reached using other case-control analysis methods. Our novel method provides greater power to classify rare variants compared with classical case-control methods. As an initiative from the ENIGMA Analytical Working Group, we provide user-friendly scripts and preformatted Excel calculators for implementation of the method for rare variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other high-risk genes with known penetrance.
Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With High-Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Coleman, Jonathan , Yip, Wesley , Wong, Nathan C. , Sjoberg, Daniel D. , Bochner, Bernard H. , Dalbagni, Guido , Herr, Harry W., Eugene, K. , Donahue, Timothy F. , Kim, Kwanghee , Vargas, H. Alberto, Alvim, Ricardo , Ghafoor, Soleen , Benfante, Nicole , Meraney, Anoop, Shichman, Steven J., Kamradt, Jeffrey M., Nair, Suresh , Baccala, Angelo A., Palyca, Paul, Lash, Bradley W. , Rizvi, Muhammad A. , Swanson, Scott K., Muina, Antonio F, Teo, Min Yuen , Bajorin, Dean F. , Coleman, Jonathan A , Cha, Eugene K , Donahue, Timothy F , Pietzak, Eugene J , Hakimi, A Ari , Al-Ahmadie, Hikmat A , Alvim, Ricardo G , Nair, Suresh , Apolo, Andrea B , Iyer, Gopa , Rosenberg, Jonathan E , Teo, Min Y , Bajorin, Dean , Donat, S. Machele

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 5, 2023 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1618-1625

10.1200/jco.22.00763 | PMID 36603175 Get It

PURPOSE Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has proven survival benefits for patients with invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, yet its role for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains undefined. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial of NAC with gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin (GC) for patients with high-risk UTUC before extirpative surgery to evaluate response, survival, and tolerability. METHODS Eligible patients with defined criteria for high-risk localized UTUC received four cycles of split-dose GC before surgical resection and lymph node dissection. The primary study end point was rate of pathologic response (defined as < ypT2N0). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability. RESULTS Among 57 patients evaluated, 36 (63%) demonstrated pathologic response (95% CI, 49 to 76). A complete pathologic response (ypT0N0) was noted in 11 patients (19%). Fifty-one patients (89%) tolerated at least three complete cycles of split-dose GC, 27 patients (47%) tolerated four complete cycles, and all patients proceeded to surgery. With a median follow up of 3.1 years, 2- and 5-year PFS rates were 89% (95% CI, 81 to 98) and 72% (95% CI, 59 to 87), while 2- and 5-year OS rates were 93% (95% CI, 86 to 100) and 79% (95% CI, 67 to 94), respectively. Pathologic complete and partial responses were associated with improved PFS and OS compared with nonresponders (≥ ypT2N any; 2-year PFS 100% and 95% v 76%, P < .001; 2-year OS 100% and 100% v 80%, P < .001). CONCLUSION NAC with split-dose GC for high-risk UTUC is a well-tolerated, effective therapy demonstrating evidence of pathologic response that is associated with favorable survival outcomes. Given that these survival outcomes are superior to historical series, these data support the use of NAC as a standard of care for high-risk UTUC, and split-dose GC is a viable option for NAC.
The “Michelangelo Code”: The Quest for Universal Truth
Savastano, Luis , Morreale, Robert F., Eliasoph, Philip, Dagi, Teo Forcht-, Nijensohn, Daniel E., Savastano, Luis E , Forcht-Dagi, Teo

Mayo Clinic

The Neuroscientist | July 22, 2022 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 157-172

10.1177/10738584221096642 | PMID 35866556 Get It

Michelangelo’s unparalleled frescoes in the Sistine Chapel have been traditionally construed to represent the traditional, Roman Catholic interpretation of the Seven Days of Creation in the Book of Genesis and the Last Judgement. Indeed, in September 2018, Pope Francis I offered a benediction for the Vatican’s art treasures and for “those who contributed to the Church’s history through art.” A number of studies have suggested that Michelangelo concealed anatomic information about the human brain in his renderings of God and biblical prophets and saints. Was the anatomic content of these images purposeful or coincidental? Was the anatomy intentionally concealed? Is there a common pattern with symbolic connotations in the anatomic representations? Was Michelangelo sending an encoded message? In this study, we analyze the imagery in the Sistine frescoes in light of the literature surrounding Michelangelo’s artistry with a particular interest in the relationship between the certain purported anatomic depictions and details demonstrable using scientific and anatomic techniques available during the High Renaissance.
Eosinophilic Disorders of the Gastrointestinal Tract and Associated Abdominal Viscera: Imaging Findings and Diagnosis
Yalon, Mariana , Amawi, Ali Dean Tahboub , Kelm, Zachary S. , Wells, Michael , Teo, Lynette , Heiken, Jay P. , Sheedy, Shannon P. , Torbenson, Michael , Fidler, Jeff L. , Venkatesh, Sudhakar K. , Tahboub Amawi, Ali D , Wells, Michael L , Teo, Lynette L S , Torbenson, Michael S , Venkatesh, Sudhakar K , Yalon, Mariana , Fidler, Jeff L.

Mayo Clinic

RadioGraphics | June 24, 2022 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1081-1102

10.1148/rg.220004 | PMID 35749291 Get It

CD274 ( PD-L1 ) Copy Number Changes (Gain) & Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy in Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract
Gupta, Sounak , Zhang, Yanming , Tickoo, Satish K. , Fine, Samson W. , Gopalan, Anuradha , Chen, Ying‐Bei , Teo, Min Yuen , Funt, Samuel A. , Bajorin, Dean F. , Ross, Dara S. , Ladanyi, Marc , Cheville, John C. , Solit, David B. , Reuter, Victor E. , Teo, Min Y , Vanderbilt, Chad , Sirintrapun, Sahussapont Joseph , Iyer, Gopa , Rosenberg, Jonathan E , Bochner, Bernard H. , Pietzak, Eugene J , Al-Ahmadie, Hikmat A

Mayo Clinic

Bladder Cancer | August 13, 2021 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 395-400

10.3233/blc-201532 | PMID 35071713 Get It

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are an important therapeutic option for urothelial carcinoma, but durable responses are achieved in a minority of patients. Identifying pre-treatment biomarkers that may predict response to these therapies or who exhibit intrinsic resistance, is of paramount importance. OBJECTIVE: To explore the prevalence of PD-L1 copy number alteration in urothelial carcinoma and correlate with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 1050 carcinomas of the bladder and upper urinary tract that underwent targeted next generation sequencing, prospectively. We assessed PD-L1 protein expression, copy number status (next generation sequencing/FISH), and detailed treatment response. RESULTS: We identified 9 tumors with PD-L1 amplification and 9 tumors with PD-L1 deletion. PD-L1 protein expression was the highest in PD-L1 amplified tumors. Of the 9 patients whose tumors harbored PD-L1 amplification, 6 received immunotherapy with 4 deriving clinical benefit, and 2 achieving durable response. Of the 9 patients whose tumors had PD-L1 copy number losses, 4 received immunotherapy with 3 experiencing disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 copy number alterations may serve as potential biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in urothelial carcinoma patients, if validated in larger cohorts.
Gene-Environment Interactions Relevant to Estrogen and Risk of Breast Cancer: Can Gene-Environment Interactions Be Detected Only among Candidate SNPs from Genome-Wide Association Studies?
Park, JooYong , Choi, Ji‐Yeob , Chung, Seokang , Song, Nan , Park, Sue K. , Han, Wonshik , Noh, Dong‐Young , Ahn, Sei-Hyun, Lee, Jong Won, Kim, Mi Kyung , Jee, Sun Ha , Wen, Wanqing , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Wang, Qin , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Shah, Mitul , Conroy, Don, Harrington, Patricia, Mayes, Rebecca , Hall, Per , Patel, Alpa V. , Couch, Fergus J. , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Roylance, Rebecca , Bojesen, Stig E. , Flyger, Henrik, Lambrechts, Diether , Baten, Adinda , Matsuo, Keitaro , Ito, Hidemi , Guénel, Pascal , Keeman, Renske , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Wu, Anna H. , Tseng, Chiu-Chen, Cox, Angela , Investigators, kConFab, Andrulis, Irene L. , Hopper, John L., Wu, Pei‐Ei , Shen, Chen‐Yang , Fasching, Peter A. , Ekici, Arif B. , Muir, Kenneth, Brenner, Hermann , Arndt, Volker , Jones, Michael E. , Swerdlow, Anthony J, Hoppe, Reiner , Ko, Yon-Dschun, Hartman, Mikael , Li, Jingmei , Mannermaa, Arto, Hartikainen, Jaana M. , Benítez, Javier, Haiman, Christopher A. , Dörk, Thilo , Bogdanova, Natalia , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Taib, Nur Aishah Mohd , Fletcher, Olivia, Johnson, Nichola , Grip, Mervi, Winqvist, Robert , Nevanlinna, Heli , Lindblom, Annika , Wendt, Camilla, Kristensen, Vessela N. , Collaborators, NBCS, Tollenaar, Rob A.�E.�M. , Heemskerk‐Gerritsen, Bernadette A. M. , Bonanni, Bernardo , Hamann, Ute, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Martinez, Maria Elena, Easton, Douglas F., Yoo, Keun-Young, Lambrechts, Diether , Song, Nan , Park, Sue K , Kim, Mi Kyung , Dennis, Joe , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Hall, Per N , Matsuo, Keitaro , Ito, Hidemi , Keeman, Renske , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Fasching, Peter A , Brenner, Hermann , Arndt, Volker , Hartikainen, Jaana M , Dörk, Thilo , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Johnson, Nichola , Nevanlinna, H , Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette A M , Bonanni, Bernardo , Lambrechts, Diether , Teo, Soo H , Jones, Michael E , Lambrechts, Diether , Cox, Angela , Guénel, Pascal , Hartman, Mikael , Li, Jingmei , Ekici, Arif B , Bojesen, Stig E , Lindblom, Annika , Mohd Taib, Nur Aishah , Sawyer, Elinor J , Choi, Jaesung , Czene, Kamila , Teras, Lauren R. , Couch, Fergus J. , Olson, Janet E. , Truong, Thérèse , Cross, Simon S. , Investigators, kConFab, Southey, Melissa C. , Lophatananon, Artitaya , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Mannermaa, Arto , González‐Neira, Anna , Fletcher, Olivia , Blomqvist, Carl , Wendt, Camilla, Collaborators, NBCS, Radice, Paolo , Manoochehri, Mehdi, Lacey, James V. , Dunning, Alison M. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Kang, Daehee

Mayo Clinic

Cancers | May 14, 2021 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2370

10.3390/cancers13102370 | PMID 34069208 Get It

In this study we aim to examine gene–environment interactions (GxEs) between genes involved with estrogen metabolism and environmental factors related to estrogen exposure. GxE analyses were conducted with 1970 Korean breast cancer cases and 2052 controls in the case-control study, the Seoul Breast Cancer Study (SEBCS). A total of 11,555 SNPs from the 137 candidate genes were included in the GxE analyses with eight established environmental factors. A replication test was conducted by using an independent population from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), with 62,485 Europeans and 9047 Asians. The GxE tests were performed by using two-step methods in GxEScan software. Two interactions were found in the SEBCS. The first interaction was shown between rs13035764 of NCOA1 and age at menarche in the GE|2df model (p-2df = 1.2 × 10−3). The age at menarche before 14 years old was associated with the high risk of breast cancer, and the risk was higher when subjects had homozygous minor allele G. The second GxE was shown between rs851998 near ESR1 and height in the GE|2df model (p-2df = 1.1 × 10−4). Height taller than 160 cm was associated with a high risk of breast cancer, and the risk increased when the minor allele was added. The findings were not replicated in the BCAC. These results would suggest specificity in Koreans for breast cancer risk.
Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Survival by Tumor Subtype: Pooled Analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Morra, Anna , Jung, Audrey , Behrens, Sabine , Keeman, Renske , Ahearn, Thomas U. , Arndt, Volker , Augustinsson, Annelie , Auvinen, Päivi , Becher, Heiko , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bojesen, Stig E. , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Brenner, Hermann , Camp, Nicola J. , Campa, Daniele , Castelao, Jose E. , Choi, Ji‐Yeob , Cox, Angela , Easton, Douglas F. , Eccles, Diana M., Egan, Kathleen M. , Evans, D. Gareth , Fasching, Peter A. , Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , Gapstur, Susan M. , Gaudet, Mia M. , Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal , Haiman, Christopher A. , Håkansson, Niclas , Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael , Heyworth, Jane , Hoppe, Reiner , Hopper, John L. , Hunter, David J. , Jager, Agnes , Jakimovska, Milena , Janni, Wolfgang , Koutros, Stella , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Lambrechts, Diether , Li, Jingmei , Lindblom, Annika , Mannermaa, Arto , Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara , Mariapun, Shivaani, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Muranen, Taru , Newman, William G. , Noh, Dong‐Young , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Obi, Nadia , Olsson, Håkan , Park‐Simon, Tjoung‐Won , Petridis, Christos , Plaseska‐Karanfilska, Dijana , Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Rennert, Gad , Rennert, Gad , Rhenius, Valerie , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Schneeweiß, Andreas , Schwentner, Lukas , Shah, Mitul , Shen, Chen‐Yang , Tollenaar, Rob A.�E.�M. , Tomlinson, Ian , Torres, Diana , Vachon, Celine M. , Wang, Qin , Wang, Sophia , Williams, Justin A. , Winqvist, Robert , Wu, Anna H. , Yoo, Keun-Young, Yu, Jyh‐Cherng , Zheng, Wei , Yang, Xiaohong R. , Eliassen, A. Heather , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Eccles, Diana , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Lambrechts, Diether , Arndt, Volker , Augustinsson, Annelie , Brenner, Hermann , Camp, Nicola J , Canzian, Federico , Cox, Angela , Dunning, Alison M , Evans, D Gareth , Fasching, Peter A , Gago-Dominguez, Manuela , García-Sáenz, José A , Gaudet, Mia M , Giles, Graham G , Guénel, Pascal , Hall, Per N , Hart, Steven N , Hartman, Mikael , Ito, Hidemi , Jager, Agnes , Jakubowska, Anna , Janni, Wolfgang , Kaaks, Rudolf , Kapoor, Pooja Middha , Koutros, Stella , Lambrechts, Diether , Li, Jingmei , Matsuo, Keitaro , Milne, Roger L , Muranen, Taru A , Newman, William G , Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won , Pharoah, Paul D P , Rennert, Gad , Rennert, Gad , Rhenius, Valerie , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Schneeweiss, Andreas , Scott, Christopher , Southey, Melissa C , Stram, Daniel O. , Tamimi, Rulla M , Tomlinson, Ian , Torres, Diana , Vachon, Celine M. , Wolk, Alicja , Ziogas, Argyrios , Holmes, Michelle D , García-Closas, Montserrat , Teo, Soo H , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Chang-Claude, Jenny , Lambrechts, Diether , Behrens, Sabine , Eccles, Diana , Keeman, Renske , Zheng, Wei , Wang, Sophia S , Jung, Audrey Y , Becher, Heiko , Eliassen, A Heather , Håkansson, Niclas , Rashid, Muhammad U , Bojesen, Stig E , Lindblom, Annika , Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana , Sawyer, Elinor J , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Freeman, Laura E. Beane , Blomqvist, Carl , Briceño, Ignacio , Brucker, Sara Yvonne , Canzian, Federico , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Clarke, Christine L. , Couch, Fergus J. , Cross, Simon S. , Czene, Kamila , Dörk, Thilo , Dunning, Alison M. , Dwek, Miriam , García-Sáenz, José Á. , Giles, Graham G. , Han, Sileny , Hart, Steven N. , Ito, Hidemi , Jakubowska, Anna , Kaaks, Rudolf , Kang, Daehee , Middha, Pooja , Kitahara, Cari M. , Kraft, Peter , Lacey, James V. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Lubiński, Jan , Lush, Michael J. , Manoochehri, Mehdi, Matsuo, Keitaro , Milne, Roger L. , Olshan, Andrew F. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Presneau, Nadège , Scott, Christopher G. , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Southey, Melissa C. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Tapper, William , Troester, Melissa A. , Truong, Thérèse , Wolk, Alicja , Ziogas, Argyrios , Schmidt, Marjanka K.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | January 26, 2021 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 623-642

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0924 | PMID 33500318 Get It

Abstract Background: It is not known whether modifiable lifestyle factors that predict survival after invasive breast cancer differ by subtype. Methods: We analyzed data for 121,435 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 67 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium with 16,890 deaths (8,554 breast cancer specific) over 10 years. Cox regression was used to estimate associations between risk factors and 10-year all-cause mortality and breast cancer–specific mortality overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) status, and by intrinsic-like subtype. Results: There was no evidence of heterogeneous associations between risk factors and mortality by subtype (Padj &gt; 0.30). The strongest associations were between all-cause mortality and BMI ≥30 versus 18.5–25 kg/m2 [HR (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19 (1.06–1.34)]; current versus never smoking [1.37 (1.27–1.47)], high versus low physical activity [0.43 (0.21–0.86)], age ≥30 years versus &lt;20 years at first pregnancy [0.79 (0.72–0.86)]; &gt;0–&lt;5 years versus ≥10 years since last full-term birth [1.31 (1.11–1.55)]; ever versus never use of oral contraceptives [0.91 (0.87–0.96)]; ever versus never use of menopausal hormone therapy, including current estrogen–progestin therapy [0.61 (0.54–0.69)]. Similar associations with breast cancer mortality were weaker; for example, 1.11 (1.02–1.21) for current versus never smoking. Conclusions: We confirm associations between modifiable lifestyle factors and 10-year all-cause mortality. There was no strong evidence that associations differed by ER status or intrinsic-like subtype. Impact: Given the large dataset and lack of evidence that associations between modifiable risk factors and 10-year mortality differed by subtype, these associations could be cautiously used in prognostication models to inform patient-centered care.
Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology
Paganetti, Harald , Beltran, Chris , Both, Stefan , Flanz, J., Grosshans, David R. , Knopf, Antje , Langendijk, Johannes A. , Nyström, Håkan, Raaymakers, Bas W. , Richter, Christian , Sawakuchi, Gabriel O. , Schippers, Marco, Teo, B, Unkelbach, Jan , Wohlfahrt, Patrick , Furutani, Keith, Sawakuchi, Gabriel O , Beltran, Chris J , Dong, Lei , Furutani, Keith M. , Grassberger, Clemens , Parodi, Katia , Shaitelman, Simona Flora , Lomax, Antony

Mayo Clinic

Physics in Medicine & Biology | November 23, 2020 | Volume: 66 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 05RM01

10.1088/1361-6560/abcd16 | PMID 33227715 Get It

Abstract The treatment of cancer with proton radiation therapy was first suggested in 1946 followed by the first treatments in the 1950s. As of 2020, almost 200 000 patients have been treated with proton beams worldwide and the number of operating proton therapy (PT) facilities will soon reach one hundred. PT has long moved from research institutions into hospital-based facilities that are increasingly being utilized with workflows similar to conventional radiation therapy. While PT has become mainstream and has established itself as a treatment option for many cancers, it is still an area of active research for various reasons: the advanced dose shaping capabilities of PT cause susceptibility to uncertainties, the high degrees of freedom in dose delivery offer room for further improvements, the limited experience and understanding of optimizing pencil beam scanning, and the biological effect difference compared to photon radiation. In addition to these challenges and opportunities currently being investigated, there is an economic aspect because PT treatments are, on average, still more expensive compared to conventional photon based treatment options. This roadmap highlights the current state and future direction in PT categorized into four different themes, ‘improving efficiency’, ‘improving planning and delivery’, ‘improving imaging’, and ‘improving patient selection’.
Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Association Study of Endometrial Cancer and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Identifies Genetic Risk Regions Associated with Risk of Both Cancers
Glubb, Dylan M. , Thompson, Deborah J. , Aben, Katja K.H. , Alsulimani, Ahmad , Amant, Frédéric , Annibali, Daniela , Barricarte, Aurelio , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bermisheva, Marina , Bernardini, Marcus Q. , Bischof, Katharina , Bodelón, Clara , Brand, Alison H. , Brinton, Louise A. , Bruinsma, Fiona , Burghaus, Stefanie , Cai, Hui , Carney, Michael E. , Chen, Chu , Chen, Xiao Qing, Chen, Zhihua , Cunningham, Julie M. , Vivo, Immaculata De , Dörk, Thilo , Edwards, Todd, Ekici, Arif B. , Ewing, Ailith , Fasching, Peter A. , Ferguson, Sarah, Flanagan, James M. , Fostira, Florentia, Gao, Bo , Gaudet, Mia M. , Gawełko, Jan , Goodman, Marc T. , Harter, Philipp , Hein, Alexander , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Hillemanns, Peter , Høgdall, Claus , Holliday, Elizabeth , Huntsman, David G. , Huzarski, Tomasz , Jones, Michael E. , Kelley, Joseph L., Killeen, Jeffrey , Klapdor, Rüdiger , Köbel, Martin , Konopka, Bożena , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Kopperud, Reidun Kristin, Koti, Madhuri , Lambrechts, Diether , Lele, Shashikant , Lester, Jenny, Li, Andrew J., Liang, Dong , Liebrich, Clemens, Lipworth, Loren , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lu, Karen H., May, Taymaa, McGuire, Valerie , McNeish, Iain A. , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Odunsi, Kunle , Olsson, Håkan , Oršulić, Sandra , Osório, Ana , Park‐Simon, Tjoung‐Won , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Podgórska, Agnieszka , Ramus, Susan J. , Riggan, Marjorie J. , Rothstein, Joseph H. , Runnebaum, Ingo B. , Scott, Rodney J. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Sieh, Weiva , Śpiewankiewicz, Beata, Sutphen, Rebecca , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Thompson, Pamela J., Titus, Linda , Tone, Alicia , Edwards, Digna Velez, Vergote, Ignace , Wang, Zhaoming , Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Group, for the OPAL Study, Group, for the AOCS, Whittemore, Alice S. , Wu, Xifeng , Wu, Anna H. , O’Mara, Tracy A. , Lu, Karen H. , Lambrechts, Diether , Barricarte, Aurelio , Bischof, Katharina , Bodelon, Clara , Brenton, James D , Brinton, Louise A , Buchanan, Daniel D , Cunningham, Julie M , De Vivo, Immaculata , Fazio, Anna de , Doherty, Jennifer A , Dörk, Thilo , Dunning, Alison M , Edwards, Todd , Ewing, Ailith , Fasching, Peter A , Flanagan, James M , Friedenreich, Christine M , Gaudet, Mia M , Gawełko, Jan , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Giles, Graham G , Glasspool, Rosalind , Harris, Holly R , Hein, Alexander , Heitz, Florian , Hillemanns, Peter , Jakubowska, Anna , Jones, Michael E , Karlan, Beth Y , Karnezis, Anthony , Kjaer, Susanne K , Klapdor, Rüdiger , Köbel, Martin , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lu, Lingeng , McAlpine, Jessica N , McNeish, Iain A , Menon, Usha , Nevanlinna, H , Orsulic, Sandra , Palli, Domenico , Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won , Permuth, Jennifer B , Ramus, Susan J , Runnebaum, Ingo B , Sieh, Weiva , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Szafron, Lukasz M , Teo, Soo H , Thompson, Pamela J , Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim , Titus, Linda , Tumino, Rosario , Vanderstichele, Adriaan , Vergote, Ignace , Vierkant, Robert A , Webb, Penelope M , Winham, Stacey J , Spurdle, Amanda B , Lambrechts, Diether , Moysich, Kirsten , Wang, Zhaoming , O'Mara, Tracy A , Ekici, Arif B , Amant, Frederic , Høgdall, Claus K , Huzarski, Tomasz , Brand, Alison H , Goodman, Marc T , Attia, John , Berchuck, Andrew , Bjørge, Line , Brenton, James D. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Bützow, Ralf C. , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Chen, Xiao Qing, Cook, Linda S. , DeFazio, Anna , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Bois, Andreas du , Dunning, Alison M. , Dürst, Matthias , Fountzilas, George , Giles, Graham G. , Glasspool, Rosalind , Gronwald, Jacek , Harris, Holly R. , Heitz, Florian , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Høgdall, Estrid , Jakubowska, Anna , Jensen, Allan , Karlan, Beth Y. , Karnezis, Anthony N. , Хуснутдинова, Э. К. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Kraft, Peter , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Larson, Melissa C. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Macciotta, Alessandra , Mattiello, Amalia , McAlpine, Jessica N. , Modugno, Francesmary , Nevanlinna, Heli , Palli, Domenico , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Permuth, Jennifer B. , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Risch, Harvey A. , Senz, Janine , Setiawan, Veronica Wendy , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Szafron, Lukasz M. , Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim , ­Tumino, ­Rosario , Turman, Constance , Vanderstichele, Adriaan , Edwards, Digna R. Velez , Vierkant, Robert A. , Webb, Penelope M. , Group, for the OPAL Study, Group, for the AOCS, White, Emily , Winham, Stacey J. , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Spurdle, Amanda B.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | November 3, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 217-228

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0739 | PMID 33144283 Get It

Abstract Background: Accumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. We aimed to identify joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci by performing a meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from these two cancers. Methods: Using LDScore regression, we explored the genetic correlation between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e., inverse-variance meta-analysis, colocalization, and M-values) and performed analyses stratified by subtype. Candidate target genes were then prioritized using functional genomic data. Results: Genetic correlation analysis revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10−5). We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (PBonferroni &lt; 2.4 × 10−9). In addition, four novel subgenome-wide regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12, and 11q13.3 were identified (P &lt; 5 × 10−7). Promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and ovarian cell lines and expression quantitative trait loci data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation. Conclusions: Using cross-cancer GWAS meta-analysis, we have identified several joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci and candidate target genes for future functional analysis. Impact: Our research highlights the shared genetic relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Further studies in larger sample sets are required to confirm our findings.