Citations

Abstract Objectives IBM is characterized by slowly progressive muscle weakness making it challenging to detect significant changes in weakness during a clinical trial. Trial participants receiving placebo may behave differently from in natural history studies. We aimed to quantify the change in muscle strength and IBM Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS) of IBM patients receiving placebo during clinical trials. Methods Several databases were searched. Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials without treatment intervention on the placebo group were included. Standardized mean differences (SMD) for change in muscle strength and mean differences for IBMFRS were used to calculate pooled effects, using DerSimonian-Laird continuous random effect models. Meta-regression determined change in muscle strength. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 indicator. Results Eleven eligible trials were identified with 257 participants receiving placebo and a low risk of bias per the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool. Participants receiving placebo on average had a measurable decline in muscle strength with a mean effect size of –0.398 (95% CI –0.652, –0.144) (P = 0.002). SMD changed by –0.009 (–0.016, –0.002) points per week (P = 0.015). Manual muscle testing was associated with higher heterogeneity (I2 = 67.68%) compared with quantitative muscle testing (I2 = 0%). Only three studies reported IBMFRS results. The pooled change in IBMFRS at 12 months was –2.189 points (–3.893, –0.485) on this 0 to 40-point scale (P = 0.012), with relatively high heterogeneity. Conclusion Participants with IBM displayed a measurable decline in their muscle strength and IBMFRS during clinical trials, in keeping with the disease’s slowly progressive nature. These estimates can inform sample size calculations in future studies.

ABSTRACTBackground and AimsChronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is difficult to distinguish from mimicking disorders, with misdiagnosis resulting in IVIG overutilization. We evaluate a clinical‐electrophysiological model to facilitate CIDP versus mimic neuropathy prediction.MethodsUsing the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) 2021 CIDP guidelines we derived 26 clinical and 144 nerve conduction variables. The model was generated and validated utilizing total CIDP (n = 129) and mimics (n = 309); including (1) IgG4‐nodopathies; (2) POEMS (polyneuropathy–organomegaly–endocrinopathy–monoclonal protein‐skin changes); (3) anti‐myelin‐associated‐glycoprotein; (4) paraneoplastic; (5) Waldenström B‐cell lymphoma; (6) diabetic neuropathies; (7) amyloidosis; (8) Charcot–Marie–Tooth; (9) motor neuropathies/neuronopathies; and (10) idiopathic‐inflammatory‐myopathies.ResultsWe analyzed 9282 clinical and 51 408 electrophysiological data points. Univariate analysis identified 11 of 26 clinical variables with significant odds ratios. A multivariate regression model using four clinical and two electrophysiologic variables achieved 93% area‐under‐curve (95% CI 91–95): progression over 8 weeks (OR 40.66, 95% CI 5.31–311.36), absent autonomic involvement (OR 17.82, 95% CI 2.93–108.24), absent muscle atrophy (OR 16.65, 95% CI 3.27–84.73), proximal weakness (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.58–8.33), ulnar motor conduction velocity slowing < 35.7 m/s (OR 5.21, 95% CI 2.13–12.76), and ulnar motor conduction block (OR 13.37, 95% CI 2.47–72.40). A web‐based probability calculator (https://news.mayocliniclabs.com/cidp‐calculator/) was developed, with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity at a 92% probability threshold. Specificity improved to 93% when considering “red flags,” electrophysiologic criteria, and laboratory testing.InterpretationA probability calculator using clinical electrophysiological variables assists CIDP differentiation from mimics, with scores below 92% unlikely to have CIDP. The highest specificity is achieved by considering clinical “red flags,” electrophysiologic demyelination, and laboratory testing.

Subacute, painful weakness is a common problem encountered by neurologists and can be associated with systemic symptoms. The patient presented with 6 weeks of progressive neuropathic pain followed by sensory changes and distal-predominant weakness. This case reviews the broad differential for such a presentation and a comprehensive, stepwise approach to diagnosis. Particular attention is paid to the potentially treatable polyradiculoneuropathies, including more recently recognized immune-mediated etiologies. Through this stepwise approach, we review how a definitive diagnosis was made.

AbstractIntroduction/AimsRhabdomyolysis is an etiologically heterogeneous, acute necrosis of myofibers characterized by transient marked creatine kinase (CK) elevation associated with myalgia, muscle edema, and/or weakness. The study aimed to determine the role of electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing relative to genetic testing and muscle biopsy in patients with unprovoked rhabdomyolysis in identifying an underlying myopathy.MethodsEDX database was reviewed to identify unprovoked rhabdomyolysis patients who underwent EDX testing between January 2012 and January 2022. Each patient's clinical profile, EDX findings, muscle pathology, laboratory, and genetic testing results were analyzed.ResultsOf 66 patients identified, 32 had myopathic electromyography (EMG). Muscle biopsy and genetic testing were performed in 41 and 37 patients, respectively. A definitive diagnosis was achieved in 15 patients (11 myopathic EMG and 4 nonmyopathic EMG; p = .04) based on abnormal muscle biopsy (4/11 patients) or genetic testing (12/12 patients, encompassing 5 patients with normal muscle biopsy and 3 patients with nonmyopathic EMG). These included seven metabolic and eight nonmetabolic myopathies (five muscular dystrophies and three ryanodine receptor 1 [RYR1]‐myopathies). Patients were more likely to have baseline weakness (p < .01), elevated baseline CK (p < .01), and nonmetabolic myopathies (p = .03) when myopathic EMG was identified.DiscussionMyopathic EMG occurred in approximately half of patients with unprovoked rhabdomyolysis, more likely in patients with weakness and elevated CK at baseline. Although patients with myopathic EMG were more likely to have nonmetabolic myopathies, nonmyopathic EMG did not exclude myopathy, and genetic testing was primarily helpful to identify an underlying myopathy. Genetic testing should likely be first‐tier diagnostic testing following unprovoked rhabdomyolysis.

Purpose: Complex repetitive discharges (CRDs) are incompletely understood needle electromyography (EMG) waveforms seen in both myopathic and neurogenic disorders including radiculopathies. This study aimed to clarify the significance of CRDs in patients with radiculopathies. Methods: This case–control study randomly identified 100 patients with needle EMG evidence of radiculopathy demonstrating at least one CRD in the electrodiagnostically involved myotome between January 2017 and January 2022. These patients were compared with 100 randomly selected patients with EMG evidence of radiculopathy without CRDs controlled for sex, age at EMG testing, and affected nerve root segment. Patient clinical symptoms, neurologic examination, EMG features, and imaging were analyzed. A paired sample t-test for categorial data and χ2 test for nonparametric data were used for statistical analysis with significance defined as P < 0.05. Results: Patients with radiculopathies with CRDs had longer disease duration averaging 59 months (range 1–480) compared with patients with radiculopathies without CRDs averaging 26 months (range 1–192, P < 0.01). Clinical symptoms of paresthesias and weakness were both significantly more common in patients with radiculopathies with CRDs than those without CRDs (P < 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). Needle EMG demonstrated a greater average number of muscles with neurogenic motor unit potentials per radiculopathy in patients with radiculopathies with CRDs compared with those without CRDs. Imaging studies of patients with radiculopathies with CRDs were more likely to reveal evidence of nerve root compression (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The presence of CRDs in patients with radiculopathies is consistent with clinically more symptomatic radiculopathies and a longer duration of nerve root compromise.