Citations

Abstract Background A previous multicenter study of patients with TP53-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms showed a significantly shorter survival in chronic phase myelofibrosis (MF-CP) that included primary (PMF) and secondary MF and was mostly based on research-based mutation screening and was not systematically controlled for patients without TP53 mutations (AJH 2025;100:552). The objective of the current study was to examine the prognostic impact of TP53 mutations (VAF ≥2%) that were discovered during clinical NGS testing among consecutive patients with PMF-CP. Impact on overall (OS) and leukemia-free (LFS) survival was analyzed in the context of other genetic risk factors and calculated from the time of mutation detection. Methods The current retrospective study includes consecutive patients with PMF-CP who underwent clinical NGS testing at the Mayo Clinic between 2015 and 2025. Diagnoses of PMF-CP and leukemic transformation (LT) were retrospectively fitted to be in accordance with the International Consensus Classification criteria (Blood 2022;140:1200). Mutation and cytogenetic analyses were performed according to institutional protocols for clinical use and reported in conformity with international guidelines. OS and LFS analyses were censored for treatment with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and calculated from the date of NGS. Conventional statistical methods were utilized (JMP Pro 17.1.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Results A total of 633 patients with PMF-CP underwent clinical NGS testing prior to LT and prior to ASCT (median age 65 years; males 59%). Median interval from initial diagnosis/referral to NGS testing was 2 months; 357 (56%), 392 (62%), and 429 (68%) patients had NGS performed within 3, 6 and 12 months of diagnosis, respectively. Risk distribution according to the dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS; Blood 2010;115:1703) were low (19%), intermediate-1 (44%), intermediate-2 (31%), or high (6%). TP53 mutations (TP53MUT) with variant allele frequency (VAF) of ≥2% were detected in 28 (4.4%) patients with a median VAF of 25.3% (range 2.4-85; ICC-defined multihit 43%). Patients with TP53MUT were more likely to harbor IDH2MUT (14% vs. 3%; p<0.01), EZH2MUT (14% vs. 4%; p=0.03), and unfavorable karyotype (36% vs. 19%; p=0.047) and less likely to harbor CALR type 1/like (4% vs. 18%; p=0.02) and SF3B1MUT (0% vs. 6%; p=0.07). The association with unfavorable karyotype was mainly driven by multihit configuration. No significant associations with clinical features were apparent. At a median follow-up of 40 months for surviving patients, 157 (25%) deaths, 48 (8%) LTs and 135 (21%) ASCTs were documented. A near-two-fold lower, albeit not statistically significant OS was observed in the presence of TP53MUT (median 123 vs. 228 months; HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.94-3.7; p=0.074); the difference reached significance for multihit TP53MUT (median 81 months; HR 3.6, 1.7-7.7; p<0.01) but not for non-multihit TP53MUT (median not reached; HR 0.7, 0.2-2.8; p=0.6), both compared to TP53WT (median 228 months). The significant impact of multihit TP53MUT on OS was confirmed in multivariable analysis (MVA) that included other high molecular risk (HMR) mutations and unfavorable karyotype: multihit TP53MUT (HR 2.5, 1.1-5.5; p=0.02), SRSF2MUT (2.4, 1.5-3.8; p<0.01), ASXL1MUT (1.8, 1.2-2.6; p<0.01), U2AF1MUT-Q157 (4.8, 2.6-8.6; p<0.01), and absence of CALR type 1/like (4.0, 2.0-7.8; p<0.01); additional prognostic contribution was not evident for unfavorable karyotype (p=0.17), EZH2MUT (p=0.3), IDH1MUT (p=0.6), IDH2MUT (p=0.7), or any other HMR mutation. Multihit TP53MUT was also associated with inferior LFS (10-year risk 62% vs. 32% for non-multihit TP53MUT vs. 15% for TP53WT; p=0.03) but significance was lost during MVA that included SRSF2MUT, which was the only HMR mutation showing a significant effect on LFS (HR 5.0, 2.5-9.8; p<0.01). Post-ASCT survival among 135 transplanted patients was significantly shorter for patients with multihit TP53MUT (N=4; median 5 months) vs. those with non-multihit TP53MUT (N=7; median not reached) vs. patients with TP53WT (N=124; median not reached) [p=0.02]. Conclusion The current study implicates multihit TP53MUT as an HMR mutation-independent prognostic factor for OS in PMF-CP. By contrast, prognosis in PMF-CP patients with non-multihit TP53MUT was more likely to be influenced by other HMR mutations, as was the case for those with TP53WT.

Abstract BACKGROUND: DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) are US FDA approved for the management of CMML. These agents are associated with an overall response rate (ORR) of 40-50%, with a true complete remission (CR) rate of <20%. TET2 mutations are seen in 60% of CMML, with TET2 being a ferrous and oxoglutarate dependent DNA-dioxygenase that oxidizes 5mC to generate 5hmC, 5fC and 5caC. Ascorbic acid (AA) is critical for TET activity and can enhance TET 1/2/3 dioxygenase function by binding to the catalytic domain and when given in high doses, can result in glutathione depletion and free radical induced cell death. In a pilot study (Xie et al. Blood 2024), we demonstrated that high dose IV AA can be clinically effective and induce changes in differentially methylated regions (DMR) involving hematopoietic enhancers and improve cytopenias in TET2-mutant (mt) patients [CCUS]. We expanded this study to combine high dose IV AA with DNMTi to enhance the demethylation effect and produce durable responses in new diagnosed, treatment requiring, TET2mt CMML patients. METHODS: At Mayo Clinic, the LS1781 (NCT03418038) clinical trial was amended to include Arm E, combing high dose IV AA with standard of care decitabine in newly diagnosed TET2mt CMML patients that needed therapy. IV AA was dosed at 1 g/kg on days 1, 3 and 5 (per 28-day cycle, max dose 100 gm) through a central line, based on demonstrated safety from phase 1 studies. Standard dosing was adopted for decitabine, and patients were then asked to take oral AA, 1 gm daily from days 6-28. Key inclusion criteria included a WHO-defined diagnosis of CMML with at least one detectable TET2 mutation requiring therapy with adequate performance status (ECOG PS <2) and organ function (creatinine clearance > 55 mL/min). Response was evaluated by the MDS/MPN International Working Group Criteria (Savona et al. Blood 2015). We measured pre- and post-therapy (4 cycles) bone marrow variant allele fractions (VAF) through next generation sequencing assays, transcriptomic changes through RNA seq, and DNA methylation changes using the Illumina Methylation EPIC array. RESULTS: Between February 2024 and July 2025, a total of six patients were enrolled. The median age at enrollment was 73 years (range: 65-80); all Caucasian with 3 (50%) males. All patients had a diagnosis of CMML-1 with a median bone marrow (BM) blast percentage of 3 (0-10), median hemoglobin 13 (9.5-14.5) g/dL, median WBC count of 5.7 (2.1-12.6) x 109/L, absolute monocyte count 1.4 (0.7-2.7) x 109/L, and platelet count of 92.5 (32-123) x 109/L. TET2 (100%, 4 patients > 1 TET2 mutation at mean VAF of 36%), SRSF2 (67%), and KRAS (33%) were the most frequent molecular abnormalities. Neutropenia (without infection/sepsis) was the only treatment-associated adverse effect seen in 3 (50%, all grade 3) patients. Response was assessed in patients who completed at least 4 cycles (n=5) of therapy, with all (100%) patients meeting criteria for either a complete response (n=2, 40%), optimal marrow response (n=1, 20%) or clinical benefit (platelet response, n=2, 40%). In five patients who had NGS assessment pre-and post-therapy, there was a >50% reduction in TET2mt VAF, with one patient loosing the KRAS G12D clone in its entirety. Furthermore, we identified significant changes in DNA methylation associated with treatment with >85% of the CpGs being hypomethylated post-treatment. RNA-sequencing on patients pre- and post-treatment, identified key transcriptomic changes, with a decrease in expression of leukemogenic genes. Integration of the differential methylation data with transcriptomic changes identified several genes in which changes in DNA methylation correlated with a change in gene expression. These genes include regulators of blood cell development and inflammatory response including GATA2, BCL2, and HLA-DPA. Several leukemia-associated genes were downregulated including MEIS1, TCL1A, and SETBP1. CONCLUSION: In TET2mt CMML, high dose IV AA acid enhances TET activity and synergizes with DNMTi with encouraging clinical responses in all patients and with no new safety signals. On completion of this study, we plan a randomized phase 2 trial comparing high dose IV AA with decitabine vs decitabine alone in newly diagnosed TET2/IDHmt CMML.

Abstract Background: TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasms (MNs) represent one of the most lethal subgroups of blood cancers. The World Health Organization (WHO-5) recognize TP53-mutated (TP53mut) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) recognize TP53mut MDS and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) as distinct disease entities, acknowledging their dismal prognosis and the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. However, key discrepancies exist between the classifications, creating uncertainty in diagnosis, influencing therapeutic decisions, and complicating clinical trial enrolment for patients with uniformly poor survival. Importantly, neither classifications included TP53-mutated myelofibrosis (MF), other myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), and MDS/MPN overlap syndromes, despite growing evidence that these cases carry similar adverse outcomes. To address these critical gaps, we conducted a comprehensive analysis across the full spectrum of TP53-mutated MN. Methods: We included TP53mut cases with variant allele frequency (VAF ≥2%) of AML, MDS, MDS/MPN overlap, myelofibrosis and other MPN managed at the Mayo clinic (Rochester, USA) and Local Health Network in South Australia (Australia). Cases were classified according to the revised 4th edition WHO classification (WHO-4R). Biallelic TP53 loss was defined as: (i) ≥2 mutations with VAF ≥2%; (ii) single TP53mut with VAF ≥2% plus 17p loss on karyotype, FISH, or SNP array; or (iii) single TP53mut with VAF ≥50% with or without 17p loss. Monoallelic loss was defined as a single TP53mut with VAF <50% without 17p loss or copy neutral loss of heterozygosity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from diagnosis, censored at allogeneic transplantation. Conditional inference tree analysis was performed to define the effect of individual predictors on OS. Results: We identified 853 TP53mutMN cases including WHO-4R-defined AML (BM/PB blasts ≥20%, n=314; 36.8%), MDS with excess blasts-2 (EB-2; BM 10–19% or PB 5–19%, n=129; 15.1%), MDS-EB-1 (BM 5–9% or PB 2–4%, n=100; 11.7%), and MDS with low blasts (LB; BM <5% and PB <1%, n=228; 26.7%). MF included chronic phase (MF-CP, n=48; 5.6%), accelerated phase (MF-AP, n=7; 0.8%), and blast phase (MF-BP, n=17; 2.0%). Additional cases comprised other MPN-chronic phase (n=3, 0.4%) and MDS/MPN overlap syndromes (n=7, 0.8%). Of 848 evaluable TP53mut MN, 616 (72.6%) harbored biallelic TP53 loss and 232 (27.4%) had monoallelic loss, with 42.4% (n=98) of monoallelic cases harboring a complex karyotype (CK). Biallelic loss was highly prevalent in AML (83.1%), MDS (70.4%), and MDS/MPN overlap (71.4%), but was less frequent in cases with MPN (33.3%) and MF-chronic phase (25.0%). Across the spectrum, the frequency of biallelic loss increased stepwise with disease progression, rising from MDS-LB (62.8%) to MDS-EB1 (76.0%), MDS-EB2 (79.5%), AML (83.1%), and MF-AP/BP (79.2%) (P<0.0001). In multivariable analysis, WHO-4R category, TP53mut VAF, biallelic loss and CK were independent predictors of poor survival in TP53mut MN. Conditional inference tree analysis stratified the cohort into seven prognostic groups with distinct median OS: (1) AML, MF-BP/AP, and MDS/MPN overlap regardless of mono/biallelic and CK status (n=335, 39.7%; median OS 4.0 months); (2) MDS-EB1/EB2 with biallelic loss or monoallelic plus CK (n=212, 25.1%; 7.2 months); (3) MDS-LB, MF-CP and MPN with CK (n=156, 18.5%, OS 10.2 months); (4) biallelic MDS-LB (n=28, 3.3%; OS 15.6 months), (5) monoallelic MDS-EB1/EB2 without CK (n=20, 2.4%; OS 26.2 months), (6) monoallelic MDS-LB without CK (n=57, 6.7%; OS 33.4 months), and (7) MF-CP and other MPN without CK (n=36, 4.3%; OS 37.0 months). This analysis defines a clear stepwise risk gradient, identifying subsets with extremely poor prognosis versus a relatively indolent disease. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the prognostic impact of TP53mut MN across the entire MN spectrum, providing a framework for future refinement of TP53-driven disease classification. Key findings include: (i) MF-AP/BP and MDS/MPN overlap exhibit survival outcomes as dismal as AML, irrespective of the TP53 allele status; and (ii) complex karyotype is a surrogate for “biallelic equivalent”, refining risk interpretation in monoallelic cases. Overall, our study defines seven prognostic subgroups spanning all TP53mut MN, offering a foundation for risk-adapted clinical trial design and future classification updates.

Abstract Background: VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) syndrome is a hemato-inflammatory syndrome due to somatic mutations in UBA1 gene. Recently, DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (specifically, 5-azacitidine) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) have shown success in eradication of UBA1 clones and clinical remission in some patients. This study aims to provide a comparative efficacy analysis between DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (hypomethylating agents/HMA) versus alloHSCT in VEXAS syndrome patients. Methods: This is a multi-center, retrospective cohort study. UBA1 mutations were detected either through next generation sequencing [NGS, limit of detection (LOD) 2% variant allele fraction (VAF)] or quantitative droplet digital polymerase chain reaction testing (ddPCR, LOD 0.5% VAF). Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), glucocorticoid (GC) discontinuation/reduction in dose (prednisone < 10 mg/day), and complete molecular remission (CMR, defined as an undetectable UBA1 mutation). OS was calculated from the time of diagnosis to death or last follow up. Cumulative incidence of reduction in GC dose was calculated using competing risk analysis after accounting for death. Results: Between years 2020-2024, a total of thirty-nine male patients (median age 67, range 45-82 years) with VEXAS syndrome, necessity for therapy (GC-refractory inflammation and/or progressive marrow failure/myeloid neoplasm) and confirmed UBA1 pathogenic mutation were included. Of these, 18 (46%) received HMA therapy (5-azacitidine 72% and Decitabine 28%) with a median of 4 (range 1-36) cycles. and 21 (54%) underwent alloHSCT (MSD=4, MUD=12, MMUD=2, and haploidentical=3), all received reduced intensity conditioning (Flu/Mel =11, Flu/Bu=5, Flu/Cy/TBI=2, and TBF=3) and 91% received post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (only 2 patients in alloHSCT group received prior HMA without benefit). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between HMA and alloHSCT groups; age at treatment (median 70 vs 65 years, p=0.2), and UBA1 M41V subtype (25% vs 40%, p=0.3), cytogenetic and non-UBA1 mutation abnormalities (p=0.4), prior lines of therapy (median 4 in both, p=0.5), time from diagnosis to therapy (median 7 vs 13 months, p=0.15), indication for therapy (p=0.12), Charlson CI scores (median 4 in both, p=0.4) and HCI-CI scores (median 4 in both, p=0.7). At a median follow-up of 45 (range 7-57) months, 11 (28%) deaths (alloHSCT=3 and HMA=8) were documented. Causes of death included infections (n=6), cardiac disease (n=2), poor graft function (n=2) and pulmonary GVHD (n=1). Compared to HMA therapy, alloHSCT group demonstrated higher rates of GC discontinuation (52% vs 6%, p<0.01) and CMR (evaluable= 22, 100% vs 50%, p<0.01). In the HMA group, 50% (n=9) discontinued therapy after a median of 4 months due to infectious complications or lack of benefit. In the alloHSCT group, 3 (14%) patients developed grade 2 acute GVHD (1-skin, 2-gut, no grade 3-4 acute GVHD) and 4 (19%) experienced moderate to severe chronic GvHD (2-lung, 2-mucocutaneous). In multivariable analysis (MVA) adjusted for age and HCT-CI, alloHSCT was identified as the strongest favorable predictor for OS (HR 0.18 95% CI 0.04-0.8) with similar results when analysis was restricted to transplant-eligible patients < 75 years of age (HR 0.1, 95% CI 0.03-0.6). In a 6-month post-treatment landmark analysis (n=31 evaluable), patients who underwent alloHSCT (n=17) exhibited numerically superior GC discontiuation rate (29% vs 14%, p=0.049) and subsequent OS compared to HMA (2-years OS: 84% vs. 61%, median not reached vs 25 months, 95% CI: 0.06–1.7). In a post-treatment competing risk [GC dose reduction (death)] analysis alloHSCT was associated with superior 2-, and 3-year rates of 57% (10%), and 76% (10%), compared to HMA 22% (24%), and 31% (42%) [p<0.01 (0.04)]. AlloHSCT was also associated with higher rate of CMR (evaluable= 21, alloHSCT N=16 and HMA N=5, 100% vs 60%, p=0.01). At the last follow up, none of the patients who achieved CMR had re-emergence of the UBA1 clone (despite early mixed chimerism). Conclusions: This study represents the largest comparative analysis of alloHSCT versus HMA therapy in VEXAS syndrome, and confirms superiority of alloHSCT in achieving molecular remission, GC discontinuation/dose reduction, and overall survival. Prospective clinical trial confirmation is warranted.

Abstract Introduction The European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 stratified acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (pts) treated with intensive chemotherapy (IC) into three groups based on genetic features. ELN 2024 (Döhner et al, Blood) and Beat AML 2024 (Hoff et al, Blood Advances) proposed revised systems to better capture the impact of genetic features in pts receiving less-intensive therapy (LIT). Real-world validation across treatment settings, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), is warranted. Methods We evaluated the performance of ELN 2022, ELN 2024, and Beat AML 2024 among AML pts treated at Mayo Clinic from 2016 to 2025. Only treated pts with available molecular data included. Response was assessed according to the ELN 2022 criteria. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from diagnosis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard (CPH) models were used to adjust for covariates. Model performances were assessed using Harrell's c-index. Results 426 AML pts (median age 68 years; 60% male) were included; 195 (46%) received IC and 231 (54%) received LIT, while Allo-HCT was performed in 133 (31%) pts. Complex karyotype was present in 126 (30%) and normal cytogenetics in 143 (34%) pts. Molecular mutations included TP53 (20%), TET2 (18%), DNMT3A (16%), SRSF2 (16%), RUNX1 (16%), ASXL1 (16%), and NPM1 (15%). Among evaluable pts (83%), complete remission (CR) after first-line therapy was achieved in 47%. Risk group assignments varied: ELN 2022 vs. ELN 2024 classified pts as favorable (20% vs. 55%), intermediate (20% vs. 24%), and adverse (60% vs. 20%); Beat AML 2024 categorized pts as favorable (41%), intermediate (21%), and adverse (38%). ELN 2024 reclassified 229 (54%) pts of whom 5% upstaged and 49% downstaged, primarily affecting ELN 2022 adverse (67%) and intermediate (46%) groups. Among LIT-treated, CR rates did not differ across groups in any classification. Per ELN 2024, CR was achieved in 43% (favorable), 67% (intermediate), and 29% (adverse) of the LIT-treated pts. However, among IC-treated pts, CR was higher in favorable/intermediate vs. adverse groups across all models (p<0.0001). Allo-HCT was most common in ELN 2024 intermediate (41%) and favorable (32%) vs. adverse (16%) groups. Median OS (months; 95% CI) for the entire cohort was 15.7 (12.5–20.9) with median follow-up time of 49.8 (40.9-55). By ELN 2022, OS of the entire cohort was 49.4 (30.7–NA) for favorable, 50.0 (29.2–NA) for intermediate, and 8.8 (7.7–11.2) for adverse (p<0.0001). Per ELN 2024, OS of the entire cohort was 25.4 (18.5–37.3), 20.3 (13.4–39.8), and 5.7 (3.4–8.2), respectively (p<0.0001). Beat AML 2024 stratified OS of the entire cohort as 42.5 (30.7–NA), 11.4 (9.3–16.7), and 5.6 (3.5–8.0) for favorable, intermediate, and adverse groups (p<0.0001). ELN 2024 stratified the OS of the pts treated with LIT as 15.7 (10.1-24.9), 8.0 (4.9-13.9), and 6.8 (3.4-10.2) for favorable, intermediate and adverse risk groups, (p <0.0001). Among ELN 2022 adverse-risk pts, those reclassified as favorable per ELN 2024 had superior OS (15.0, 9.8–22.7) compared to intermediate (7.8, 5.0–9.3) or adverse (5.4, 3.3–8.0) risk groups, p<0.0001. C-index (95% CI) for OS in the entire cohort was highest for Beat AML 2024 (0.658, 0.629–0.688), followed by ELN 2022 (0.627, 0.599–0.655), and ELN 2024 (0.600, 0.568–0.631). In LIT-treated pts, ELN 2024 (0.597, 0.558–0.637) and Beat AML 2024 (0.586, 0.545–0.627) outperformed ELN 2022 (0.559, 0.521–0.596). Among allo-HCT pts, regardless of treatment type, ELN 2022 (0.610, 0.539–0.681) performed better than ELN 2024 (0.568, 0.487–0.648). In multivariable CPH models adjusted for age, bone marrow blasts, treatment intensity, and complex karyotype, ELN 2022 and ELN 2024 adverse-risk groups had higher hazard of death (HR 2.4, 1.6–3.5 and HR 1.7, 1.1–2.5, respectively, vs. favorable). No significant difference was observed between intermediate and favorable risk for ELN 2022 (HR 1.4, 0.9–2.2) or ELN 2024 (HR 1.4, 0.9–1.9). Allo-HCT was associated with a lower hazard of death (HR 0.4, 0.3–0.5). Conclusions In this real-world AML cohort, ELN 2024 and Beat AML 2024 improved OS prediction in LIT-treated pts compared to ELN 2022. This advantage was not observed in allo-HCT pts. Multivariable analysis confirmed the adverse-risk group as having the worst prognosis across all models. These findings highlight the importance of aligning molecular risk stratification with treatment modalities to enhance prognostication in AML.

Abstract Background Missense mutations in IDH1 are well-established therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In contrast, the synonymous IDH1 variant p.Gly105Gly (rs11554137), present in 5–10% of AML cases, has been considered a benign polymorphism due to its high population frequency (5.7% overall, 0.7–10.5%) and lack of protein-altering effect. However, prior studies have associated this variant with inferior outcomes (Wagner, J Clin Oncol, 2010), though findings have been inconsistent. Few studies have examined its prognostic significance in the context of treatment intensity or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Methods With IRB approval, clinical and genomic data were extracted from the Mayo Clinic AML database for patients diagnosed between Jan 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2025. Patients were stratified by IDH1 Gly105Gly (rs11554137) status via NGS on bone marrow. Outcomes included co-mutation profiles, treatment response, measurable residual disease (MRD) by multiparametric flow cytometry, and survival. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression models for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were adjusted for age at diagnosis, ELN 2022 risk category, and SCT conditioning regimen. Results Among 379 AML patients, 36 (9.5%) harbored the IDH1 Gly105Gly (rs11554137) variant (cases) (median VAF 49%, IQR 48–49.2). In the full cohort, median age was 68 years (IQR 59–74), M:F ratio was 1.5; 75% had de novo AML, and median follow-up was 52 months. Among cases, common cytogenetic abnormalities included complex karyotype (28%), del(7q) (14%), and trisomy 8 (6%), while frequently mutated genes included DNMT3A (19%), IDH2 (17%), and BCOR (14%). Of 345 treated patients, 43% received intensive, and 56% received low-intensity regimens, including hypomethylating agent (HMA) alone (n=13), HMA+venetoclax (n=159), and targeted therapy (n=7). Among cases, complete remission (CR) rates were higher with intensive vs. low-intensity therapy (70% vs. 17%, p=0.03). MRD positivity post induction was more common in cases (66% vs. 26%, p=0.01), suggesting suboptimal leukemic clearance. Among 103 patients who underwent allogeneic SCT in CR1 (47% received myeloablative conditioning), morphologic relapse occurred in 64.3% of cases compared to 23.6% of controls (p = 0.004). Cases experienced significantly inferior median RFS (8 months [95% CI 5–NA] vs. not reached for controls, p <0.001), indicating more durable post-SCT remission in the control group. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, ELN risk, conditioning intensity, MRD status, and complex karyotype, the IDH1 Gly105Gly variant remained independently associated with shorter RFS (HR 3.97, 95% CI: 1.74–9.05, p = 0.001). Complex karyotype was also an independent predictor of relapse (HR 3.35, 95% CI: 1.28–8.73, p = 0.014). Consistent with this, logistic regression revealed a significantly increased odds of post-SCT relapse among cases (OR 7.95, 95% CI: 2.19–35.27, p=0.001), independent of clinical covariates. Relapsed cases were significantly more likely to harbor FLT3-ITD mutations than relapsed controls (p=0.041). Pathway-level analysis revealed increased frequency of mutations in signal transduction genes (FLT3-ITD, CSF3R, NF1) (p=0.002). All CNS relapses among cases occurred in patients harboring at least one of these mutations. Despite the higher relapse rate, there were no significant differences in OS (14.4 vs. 11.3 months, p=0.36) between cases and controls. The IDH1 Gly105Gly variant was not independently associated with OS (HR 1.26, p=0.30). In contrast, age (p<0.0001) and adverse ELN risk (p<0.0001) were significant predictors of inferior OS. These findings suggest that the prognostic impact of IDH1 Gly105Gly is most pronounced in the post-SCT setting. Conclusion The synonymous IDH1 Gly105Gly variant (rs11554137) is an independent predictor of post-SCT relapse in AML, potentially mediated by co-occurring mutations in signal transduction pathways. Despite no observed impact on OS, likely due to effective salvage therapies, the variant's link to lower CR rates with low-intensity therapy and higher MRD burden suggests treatment intensity influences its clinical relevance. These findings support reevaluating the prognostic role of synonymous variants in AML and call for larger studies and mechanistic investigations into splicing, transcript stability, and translation.

Abstract Background: Disease relapse is a major cause of mortality post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantion (alloHCT) in patients with myeloid neoplasms (MN). Cytogenetic risk classification is a key prognostic factor in predicting relapse post-transplant. Next generation sequencing (NGS) offers added prognostic insight by identifying relapse-associated mutations. We assessed the impact of mutation type and burden on post-alloHCT relapse risk and relapse-free survival (RFS) in MN patients with non-adverse-risk cytogenetics. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent alloHCT at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 01/01/2018 - 10/01/2023. Eligible patients had MN with non-adverse-risk cytogenetics [Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with non-adverse-risk cytogenetics per ELN 2022, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with non-high/very high-risk cytogenetics per IPSS-R criteria, and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) (excluding myelofibrosis), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or MDS/MPN overlap with non-complex and non-monosomal karyotypes]. The primary endpoint was 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) post-alloHCT, analyzed via competing risk models. RFS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic mutations were identified using univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) Cox models. A decision tree was used to define mutation-based relapse risk groups. Results: Of 585 patients, 215 (37%) met inclusion criteria; 133 (62%) were male. Median age at diagnosis was 61 years (IQR 53-65.5). Diagnoses included AML (125, 58.1%), MDS (55, 25.6%), CMML (17, 7.9%), MDS/MPN (11, 5.1%), and MPN (7, 3.3%). Median follow-up post-alloHCT was 3.2 years (IQR 1.9-5.2). Donor sources were mostly matched unrelated donors (120; 55.8%), followed by matched related donors (72; 33.5%), haploidentical donors (15; 7%), mismatched unrelated donors (6; 2.8%), and cord blood transplants (2; 0.9%). Most patients reduced intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning (144, 67%), while others received myeloablative (71, 33%). Mutation frequencies were as follows: ASXL1 58 (27.0%), RUNX1 45 (20.9%), FLT3 41 (19.1%), SRSF2 41 (19.1%), DNMT3A 39 (18.1%), STAG2 22 (10.2%), SF3B1 18 (8.4%),BCOR 18 (8.4%), WT1 16 (7.4%), U2AF1 13 (6.0%), ZRSR2 10 (4.7%), TP53 6 (2.8%), EZH2 3 (1.4%). In UVA, mutations in FLT3 (HR 2.15, p=0.018), SF3B1 (SF3B1 HR 3.08, p=0.002), PTPN11(HR 2.93, p=0.032), and WT1 (HR 2.29, p=0.069) were associated with increased risk of 3-year CIR. However, only FLT3 (HR 1.98, p=0.042) and SF3B1 (HR 4.0, p<0.001) retained significance in MVA. SF3B1 correlated with inferior 3-year RFS in UVA (HR 1.99, p=0.034) but not in MVA. Mutations in ASXL1, BCOR, EZH2, RUNX1, SRSF2, STAG2, ZRSR2, U2AF1, and TP53 had no significant impact on CIR or RFS. Harboring ≥2 or ≥3 mutations did not impact CIR or RFS. A decision tree model based on SF3B1, FLT3, DNMT3A, and WT1 mutations stratified patients into 3 risk groups. The high-risk group (n=32; 15%) had 50% 3-year relapse incidence (RI) and included patients with SF3B1 mutations or SF3B1-wildtype (WT) with concurrent FLT3 and DNMT3A mutations. The intermediate-risk group (n=36; 17%) included SF3B1-WT patients with either FLT3 mutations and DNMT3A WT (21% RI), or SF3B-1-WT and FLT3-WT patients with WT1 mutations (33% RI). The low-risk group (n=147; 67%) lacked all 4 mutations and had the lowest 3-year RI of 14%. The 3-year CIR significantly differed across these 3 risk groups (51.9%, 27.3%, and 15.8% in high, intermediate, and low-risk groups respectively; p<0.001). The 3-year RFS was significantly inferior in the high-risk group (35.55%, p=0.001), but similar among intermediate and low-risk groups (67.11% and 63.4%, respectively). Conclusion: In non-adverse risk cytogenetic MN, SF3B1 and FLT3 mutations predicted relapse post-alloHCT. Notably, mutations that were traditionally associated with adverse-risk AML per ELN 2022 (e.g, ASXL1, TP53) were not associated with relapse in this cohort. The discrepancy may reflect exclusion of patients with high-risk cytogenetics, as the prognostic impact of these mutations may depend on co-cytogenetic anomalies. In non-adverse-risk cytogenetics MN, we identified 3 groups of patients based on the presence or absence of SF3B1, FLT3, DNMT3A, and WT1 mutations. Those with mutated SF3B1 or concurrent FLT3/DNMT3A mutations experienced the highest risk of relapse post-alloHCT, translating into inferior RFS. Our findings need to be verified in a larger data registry.

Abstract Introduction Histiocytic neoplasms (HN) are a rare, heterogeneous group of hematologic disorders derived from myeloid-dendritic cell lineages. The most common forms include Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), and Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD). These disorders are driven by recurrent activating mutations in the MAPK pathway, most frequently involving BRAF, MAP2K1, PIK3CA, KRAS, and NRAS. This discovery enabled a major therapeutic advance with the use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, resulting in durable responses. For patients harboring KRAS mutations, MEK inhibitors (MEKi) remain the primary therapeutic approach. However, the impact of KRAS mutation subtypes on treatment response remains poorly understood. Our study aimed to characterize the spectrum of KRAS mutations in LCH, ECD, and RDD and evaluate the responses to MEKi, providing insights to guide future treatment strategies. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients with LCH, ECD, and RDD who were evaluated at Mayo Clinic or University of Alabama at Birmingham. Patients were included if next-generation sequencing identified a KRAS mutation. The response assessment was based on radiographic evaluation under the most recent Histiocyte Society consensus guideline. Results We identified 23 patients with a KRAS mutation: 17 females (73.9%) and 6 males (26.1%), with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years (range, 20–78). RDD accounted for 73.9% (17/23) and ECD for 26.1% (6/23); no KRAS mutations were detected in LCH patients. The most frequent KRAS variants were p.K117N (34.8%), p.G12D (17.4%), p.A146T (13.0%), p.G13C (8.7%), and p.G13D (8.7%), with additional variants including p.T58I, p.A59G, p.A146P, and p.A146V. Mutation distribution differed by disease group: p.G12D was more common in ECD (50%) than RDD (5.9%) (p=0.01), whereas p.K117N occurred in 47.1% of RDD and was absent in ECD. Regarding treatment, 57% (13/23) received MEKi, all initially cobimetinib, with 1 patient switched to trametinib due to progression. Of the 10 patients who did not receive MEKi, 1 was treated with vemurafenib for a concurrent BRAF p.V600E mutation; 3 remained on observation; 2 underwent surgery without recurrence; 3 received other systemic therapies including corticosteroid, methotrexate, rituximab, lenalidomide, or sirolimus; and 1 developed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, treated with R-CHOP. The overall response rate in the 12 patients on MEKi (excluding 1 patient too early for assessment) was 75%—3 (25%) CR and 6 (50%) PR (including 1 who initially progressed on cobimetinib but responded to trametinib). All 3 non-responders had RDD. Among the 5 patients with p.K117N, 3 had no response to cobimetinib, 1 achieved PR, and 1 achieved CR; notably, 1 non-responder switched to trametinib and achieved PR in 2 months. All 3 patients with codon 146 mutations achieved PR. Of the 2 patients with p.G12D, 1 achieved CR with a co-occurring MAP2K1 mutation, and 1 had no response. No additional genotype–response patterns were observed. Similar heterogeneity has been reported in prior studies. In a phase II cobimetinib trial, an ECD patient with p.R149G achieved PR, whereas another ECD patient with p.G12R and an LCH patient with p.G13C achieved CR in the presence of co-occurring ARAF and NRAS mutations, respectively. A retrospective cohort described an ECD patient with p.K117N achieving PR on dabrafenib and trametinib with a concurrent BRAF mutation and another with p.G12A achieving PR on trametinib. In a multicenter analysis of trametinib, a patient with p.A59T (co-occurring BRAF and NRAS mutations) had no response, whereas another with p.A146P achieved PR. Collectively, these findings, together with our data, underscore that KRAS-mutated histiocytoses exhibit heterogeneous responses to MEKi, likely influenced by variant type and co-mutations. Discussion KRAS mutations represent an important subset of MAPK pathway alterations in HN, although their prevalence varies by disease type and appears extremely rare in LCH, with no cases identified in our cohort. The most common variants include p.K117N and p.G12D, which may be linked to suboptimal response to MEKi in the absence of concurrent MAPK pathway alterations. As MEKi acts downstream, efficacy likely depends on the level of pathway activation conferred by specific KRAS variants. Larger studies are needed to confirm these observations and identify mutation-specific predictors to guide personalized treatment.

Abstract Introduction: Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare histiocytic neoplasm, with approximately 90% of patients exhibiting alterations in the MAPK pathway. BRAF and MEK inhibitors have shown promising results in treating MAPK pathway-altered LCH. However, treatment interruptions due to adverse effects are common, and limited access to targeted therapies complicates care globally. While chemotherapy remains a common treatment for LCH, the outcomes for patients with MAPK pathway-altered LCH specifically receiving chemotherapy are still unclear. Methods: This multi-institutional international retrospective cohort study analyzed adult patients with BRAF or MAP2K (gain-of-function, GOF) altered LCH that were consecutively seen at Mayo Clinic, MN, AZ, and FL, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Peking Union Medical College Hospital in China between 2007 and 2024. All patients who were included in this study were treated with chemotherapy, and those who have received targeted therapies or other modalities of frontline treatment were excluded. All time-to-event analyses were performed from the frontline therapy initiation, using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression-free survival (PFS) included death and progression as events and was measured from the time of treatment initiation. The response assessment was based on radiographic evaluation in accordance with the most recent Histiocyte Society consensus guideline. Risk organ involvement was defined as disease involving the liver, spleen, bone marrow or central nervous system. Results: A total of 63 patients with LCH were included. The median age of the population was 34 years (range: 27-43), and males were 59%. Risk organ involvement was seen in 44 (70%) of patients and multisystemic LCH was observed in 48 (76%) patients. Among the 63 patients, BRAF gain-of-function alterations were observed in 79%, MAP2K mutations in 19%, and BRAF fusions in 2%. Of the BRAF gain-of-function alterations, BRAFV600E mutation was seen in 64% patients and [p.N486_P490del] deletion in 36%. There was no significant difference in organ involvement (single-system versus multisystem) or risk organ involvement between patients with BRAF and MAP2K alterations. All 63 patients received systemic therapy with chemotherapy and the regimens included Cytarabine (n=43), Cladribine (n=5), Etoposide (n=1), Methotrexate (n=1), and combined Methotrexate and Cytarabine (n=13). The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 3.8 years (range 3.2–5.0 years), with similar durations observed in patients with single-system vs. multisystem involvement and those with risk-organ involvement vs. no risk-organ involvement. The overall response rate among patients who received chemotherapy was 89%, with complete responses in 15 patients (26%) and partial responses in 40 patients (64.5%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 2.61 years (95% CI: 2.06–NA). The 3-year PFS did not significantly differ based on risk organ involvement: 50.6% (95% CI: 36–71) for patients with risk organ involvement versus 47.4% (95% CI: 28–81) for those without, p=0.52. Patients with single-system disease experienced longer PFS compared to those with multisystem disease; the 3-year PFS was 80.2% (95% CI: 58.7–100) versus 42.2% (95% CI: 29–61.5), respectively, p=0.04. Conclusions: Our results indicate that LCH patients with a GOF alteration in the MAPK pathway derive significant clinical benefit from chemotherapy, achieving deep and durable responses. Therefore, patients should not be excluded from treatment due to the absence of targeted therapies, as they can still attain substantial responses and clinical improvement with chemotherapy, even in the context of MAPK pathway-driven disease.

Abstract Purpose. Malignant histiocytoses (MHs) including Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS), interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma (IDCS), and histiocytic sarcoma (HS) are rare, aggressive neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineage. Prognosis is generally poor, particularly in disseminated disease. While mutation-specific therapies are increasingly used in indolent histiocytic neoplasms, their role in MH remains unclear due to the frequent presence of complex mutational profiles. Our understanding of the genomic landscape of MH is limited. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize the molecular alterations in MH.Methods. We conducted a retrospective chart review of MH patients seen at Mayo Clinic and the University of Alabama at Birmingham who underwent comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS), including DNA ± RNA analysis. A systematic literature review using PubMed identified additional MH cases with available molecular data.Results. We identified 17 institutional MH cases (3 IDCS, 3 LCS, 11 HS) and 72 cases from the literature (6 IDCS, 11 LCS, 55 HS) with NGS data. Among the 89 total patients, 26 (29%) had DNA-only sequencing and 63 (71%) had combined DNA/RNA sequencing. Twelve patients (n=12; 13%) had a single mutation; the majority had multiple alterations. The most frequently mutated genes were: RAS (n=26; 29%), CDKN1/2 (n=26; 29%), MAP2K1 (n=15; 17%), PTEN (n=11; 12%), BRAF non-V600E (n=8; 9%), PTPN11 (n=8; 9%), CREBBP (n=8; 9%), TET2 (n=8; 9%), DNMT3A (n=7; 8%), fusions (n=7; 8%), BRAFV600E (n=6; 7%), and NF1 (n=4; 4%). Fusions included BRAF::NRF11, BRAF::CLIP2, BRAF::MBP, EGFR::CYTOR, CDKN2A::ADGRG6, IGH::BCL6, and CLIP2-BRAF. Two patients had no alteration detected. Non-V600E BRAF mutations included D594G (n=3), G596R (n=1), G466A (n=1), N581T (n=1), N581I (n=1), and N581S (n=1). Common co-mutations with BRAF included CDKN2A/B (n=9), TP53 (n=6), KRAS/NRAS (n=5), and PDGFR (n=1). Only 2 of 15 MAP2K1-mutated patients (13%) had isolated mutations; the rest had co-mutations, most frequently TP53 (n=3) and BCL2 (n=3). MAP2K1 mutations included F53I (n=2), C121S (n=2), I103N (n=1), Q56P(n=3), E203K (n=1), F53-K57del (n=1), and F53-Q58del (n=1).NRAS mutations (n=6) included Q16K (n=2), G12C (n=1), Q61R (n=1), and 2 unspecified. KRAS mutations (n=20) included G13D (n=3), Q61H (n=3), G12V (n=2), K117N (n=1), V14I (n=1), and 10 unspecified. The most frequent co-mutational pattern (24%) was RAS plus another gene: BRAF (n=3), TP53 (n=6), MAP2K1 (n=2), PTEN (n=4), and CDKN2A/B (n=6).Twelve patients (12/26; 46%) were treated with targeted therapies. Responses included 6 partial and 5 complete responses. Median duration of response was 27.5 months (range 7–54). The sole non-responder had co-occurring NRASand TP53 mutations and received trametinib. Responders received a range of agents matched to their mutations: trametinib (BRAFV600E, MAP2K1F53I, KRASQ16H/PTEND24G/EPHB1R327C, MAP2K1F53I/BCL2/CDKN1B/KIT, and CALR), dabrafenib + trametinib(BRAFG596R/KRASQ61H), imatinib (MAP2K1C121S/METG28881T/DUSP2G137D/HIST1H3BC97Y/GRIN2AS1216C and PTPN11/STK11/GNA11/JAK2), chidamide + sintilimab(IDH2G515A/RHOAG50T/TET23344delC), sirolimus(PTEN/FGFR3/SETD2) and sorafenib (BRAFD594G/KRASK117N/TP53). Most responders (8/11) had multiple mutations; only 3 had single alterations, suggesting multi-mutant MH may still be targetable. Common complex patterns included BRAF+CDKN2A + CDKN2B (n=4), BRAF + CDKN2A + TP53 (n=2), and BRAF + CDKN2A + KRAS (n=2).Conclusion. The MAPK pathway (BRAF, MAP2K1, RAS) is the most altered signaling axis in MH, often accompanied by mutations in tumor suppressors and cell cycle regulators such as TP53, CDKN2A/B, and PTEN. Most MH patients exhibit multiple genomic alterations. Despite this complexity, durable clinical responses to targeted agents are achievable, even in heavily mutated cases. These findings support the use of comprehensive genomic profiling in MH to identify therapeutic targets and guide precision treatment strategies.