Citations

Clear

86 citation(s) found for "Samadder, Jewel".

A Mutation-Specific Decision Model for Segmental Versus Total Abdominal Colectomy in Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer
Leung, Sabrina W., Rehman, Nabeela, Alatout, Mayar H., Etzioni, David A. , Samadder, Jewel, Mishra, Nitin , Young‐Fadok, Tonia M., Brady, Justin T, Rehman, Nisha S., Chang, Yu‐Hui H., Young-Fadok, Tonia M, Leung, Sabrina W., Chang, Yu‐Hui , Brady, Justin T.

Mayo Clinic

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | December 8, 2025 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 374-383

10.1097/dcr.0000000000004042 | PMID 41358683 Get It

BACKGROUND: Metachronous cancer risk varies by mismatch repair mutation in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Total colectomy offers decreased risk of metachronous colorectal cancers but decreased quality of life compared with segmental colectomy. OBJECTIVE: Compare segmental versus total colectomy for colon cancer via a mutation-specific Markov decision model. DESIGN: Simulated survival and colorectal metachronous occurrence among patients with MLH1, MSH2 , or MSH6 mutations undergoing either segmental or total colectomy. SETTINGS: National databases, literature review. PATIENTS: Simulated patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival, quality-adjusted life years based on procedure-specific utility states (segmental colectomy 0.99, total colectomy 0.95). RESULTS: Among patients aged 25 years, total colectomy offered less than 1 year of increased mean survival compared with segmental resection across all mutations ( MLH1: 0.8 years, MSH2: 0.9, MSH6: 0.3). This difference in survival decreased with increasing age. Segmental resection offered a small increase in quality-adjusted life years compared with total colectomy across all ages. This difference was highest for MSH6 (0.9 years vs MLH1 : 0.6 and MSH2 : 0.4 at age 25), particularly at younger ages of diagnosis. In a sensitivity analysis, lower total colectomy utility states resulted in greater increases in quality-adjusted life years with segmental colectomy across all mutations. LIMITATIONS: Metachronous cancer risk data do not distinguish between colon and rectal cancers and is extrapolated beyond age 70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Segmental and total colectomy offer similar survival and quality-adjusted life year outcomes. With decreased risk of metachronous cancers, patients with MSH6 mutations across all ages may prefer segmental resection owing to higher quality-adjusted life years and lower survival benefits from total colectomy compared with MLH1 and MSH2 patients. Operative strategy in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer should be individualized, and this study shows that mutation-specific differences in survival and quality-adjusted life years are small. See Video Abstract . MODELO DE DECISIÓN ESPECÍFICO PARA LA MUTACIÓN EN LA COLECTOMÍA ABDOMINAL SEGMENTARIA FRENTE A LA COLECTOMÍA ABDOMINAL TOTAL EN EL CÁNCER COLORRECTAL HEREDITARIO NO POLIPOSO ANTECEDENTES: El riesgo de cáncer metacrónico varía según la mutación de reparación de desajustes en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal hereditario no poliposo. La colectomía total ofrece un menor riesgo de cánceres colorrectales metacrónicos, pero una menor calidad de vida en comparación con la colectomía segmentaria. OBJETIVO: Comparar la colectomía segmentaria con la colectomía total para el cáncer de colon mediante un modelo de decisión de Markov específico para mutaciones. DISEÑO: Simulación de la supervivencia y la aparición metacrónica de cáncer colorrectal en pacientes con mutaciones MLH1, MSH2 o MSH6 sometidos a colectomía segmentaria o total. ENTORNO: Bases de datos nacionales, revisión de la literatura. PACIENTES: Pacientes simulados con cáncer colorrectal hereditario no poliposo. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Supervivencia global, años de vida ajustados por calidad basados en estados de utilidad específicos del procedimiento (colectomía segmentaria 0,99, colectomía total 0,95). RESULTADOS: Entre los pacientes de 25 años, la colectomía total ofreció menos de un año de aumento de la supervivencia media en comparación con la resección segmentaria en todas las mutaciones ( MLH1: 0,8 años, MSH2: 0,9, MSH6: 0,3). Esta diferencia en la supervivencia disminuyó con el aumento de la edad. La resección segmentaria ofreció un pequeño aumento en los años de vida ajustados por calidad en comparación con la colectomía total en todas las edades. Esta diferencia fue mayor para MSH6 (0,9 años frente a MLH1 : 0,6 y MSH2 : 0,4 a los 25 años), especialmente en las edades más jóvenes de diagnóstico. En un análisis de sensibilidad, los estados de utilidad más bajos de la colectomía total dieron lugar a mayores aumentos en los años de vida ajustados por calidad con la colectomía segmentaria en todas las mutaciones. LIMITACIONES: Los datos sobre el riesgo de cáncer metacrónico no distinguen entre cánceres de colon y recto y se extrapolan más allá de los 70 años. CONCLUSIONES: La colectomía segmentaria y la colectomía total ofrecen resultados similares en cuanto a la supervivencia y los años de vida ajustados por calidad. Con la disminución del riesgo de cánceres metacrónicos, los pacientes con mutaciones MSH6 de todas las edades pueden preferir la resección segmentaria debido a los mayores años de vida ajustados por calidad y los menores beneficios de supervivencia de la colectomía total en comparación con los pacientes MLH1 y MSH2 . La estrategia quirúrgica en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal hereditario no poliposo debe individualizarse, y este estudio muestra que las diferencias específicas de la mutación en la supervivencia y los años de vida ajustados por calidad son pequeñas. ( AI-generated translation )
Exome Sequencing Enhances Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia Within a Multi-Site Healthcare System
Samadder, N. Jewel , Schroeder, Mariah , Petersen, M. , Shamoun, Fadi , Kullo, Iftikhar J. , Curry, Timothy B. , Houwink, Elisa J. F. , Bublitz, Michelle L. , Bandel, Lorelei A. , Armasu, Sebastian M. , Ferber, Matthew J. , Olson, Rory J. , Tan-Arroyo, Jennifer , Morales‐Rosado, Joel A. , Klee, Eric W. , Kruisselbrink, Teresa , Egan, Jan B. , Kemppainen, Jennifer L., Bidwell, Jessa , Anderson, Jennifer L. , McAllister, Tammy M., Baudhuin, Linnea M. , Summer-Bolster, Jolene M., Voss, Molly M , Kullo, Iftikhar J , Vierkant, Robert A , Ferber, Matthew J , Olson, Rory , Arroyo, Jennifer , Morales-Rosado, Joel A , Klee, Eric W , Larson, Nicholas B , Kruisselbrink, Teresa M , Egan, Jan B , Bidwell, Jessa S , Baudhuin, Linnea M , Kunze, Katie L , Golafshar, Michael , Presutti, Richard J , Lazaridis, Konstantinos N , Houwink, Elisa J F , Schroeder, Mariah L , Vierkant, Robert A. , Larson, Nicholas B. , Kunze, Katie L. , Golafshar, Michael A. , Presutti, R. John , Lazaridis, Konstantinos N.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine | November 12, 2025 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circgen.125.005174 | PMID 41221644 Get It

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder that increases risk for premature coronary artery disease and has accessible and effective interventions. The Dutch lipid clinic network is currently the most used diagnostic criterion; however, genetic sequencing provides a definitive diagnosis of FH. The goals of this study were to determine whether germline genetic screening using exome sequencing could be used to efficiently identify individuals who were genotype positive for FH. METHODS: Participants were recruited from 3 geographically and racially diverse sites in the United States (Rochester, MN; Phoenix, AZ; and Jacksonville, FL). Participants underwent Exome+ sequencing (dba Helix, San Mateo, CA) and return of results for specific genetic findings in APOB , LDLR , or PCSK9 . A chart review was performed to collect demographics, personal, and family cardiovascular history. RESULTS: At the time of the study, 84 413 participants were enrolled in the Tapestry study. Annotation and interpretation of all variants in genes for FH resulted in the identification of 419 likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants (prevalence, 0.50%), which included 116 APOB , 298 LDLR , and 5 PCSK9 . Sixty-six percent were female, the mean body mass index was 27.3, with 12.3% reporting a history of diabetes. Hypertriglyceridemia (≥150 mg/dL) was present in 39.5% and reduced HDL (<50 mg/dL) was present in 56.7% of patients. 27.5% of patients were not on cholesterol-lowering medications, and only 10% of FH carriers were at goal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. A history of coronary artery disease was reported in 22.4% of the cohort. Nearly 90% of these participants were newly diagnosed carriers of FH. Only 30.8% of confirmed genetic diagnoses of FH satisfied clinical (Dutch lipid clinic network) criteria for a diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the need for wider utilization of germline genetic sequencing for enhanced screening and detection of individuals who have familial hypercholesterolemia. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05212428.
Primary Care Clinician Preferences and Perspectives on Multi-Cancer Detection Testing Across an Integrated Healthcare System
Austin, Jessica D. , Nelson, Ilyse A., Tilburt, Jon C. , Ellinghysen, Eric R., Yee, Claire , Quillen, Jaxon , Dougan, Brian M. , Presutti, John R., Samadder, N. Jewel , Ghosh, Karthik, Ressler, Steven W. , Hurt, Ryan T. , Samadder, Niloy Jewel, Ressler, Steven W , Ghosh, Karthik , Austin, Jessica D , Yee, Claire , Quillen, Jaxon K , Nelson, Ilyse A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Personalized Medicine | September 29, 2025 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 452

10.3390/jpm15100452 | PMID 41149814 Get It

Background/Objectives: Multi-cancer detection (MCD) tests have emerged as a promising tool to redefine the landscape of early cancer detection. Implementation of this novel technology will likely fall to primary care clinicians (PCC). The purpose of this study is to characterize and explore differences in PCCs perceptions and preferences towards MCD testing. Methods: Between March and May of 2023, this cross-sectional survey was administered to 281 PCCs, including physicians and advanced care providers practicing within an integrated healthcare system spanning five states. The survey collected data on self-reported characteristics, perceptions of MCD testing, and preferences for learning about MCD testing. Analysis was limited to those with no prior experience with MCD testing (N = 181, response rate 22.8%). Descriptive statistics summarized key variables and chi-square tests assessed differences in perceptions and preferences by key characteristics. Results: Most PCCs were interested in MCD testing (66.3%), but limited knowledge/awareness of MCD testing and confidence to manage patients with a positive test were observed, along with concerns around cost (76.7%) and misuse/poor implementation. The primary preferences for learning about MCD testing were online courses or classroom instruction (64.5%). Significant differences in perceptions and preferences for learning were observed by location, degree, and years in practice. Conclusions: PCCs in our study held positive views towards MCD testing, but gaps and variation in knowledge and confidence towards MCD testing and concerns around the cost and misuse/poor implementation were observed. While efforts to train and educate all PCCs on MCD testing is a critical first step, more research is needed to understand how best to support implementation tailored to individual and system-level needs and characteristics.
Adiposity distribution and risks of 12 obesity-related cancers: a Mendelian randomization analysis
Hazelwood, Emma , Goudswaard, Lucy J. , Lee, Matthew A. , Vabistsevits, Marina , Pournaras, Dimitri J. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Gruber, Stephen B. , Gsur, Andrea , Li, Li , Vodičková, Ľudmila , Grant, Robert C. , Samadder, N. Jewel , Timpson, Nicholas J. , Vincent, Emma E. , Brenner, Hermann , Buchanan, Daniel D , Gruber, Stephen B , Gsur, Andrea , Li, Li , Vodickova, Ludmila , Samadder, N Jewel , Gunter, Marc J , Yarmolinsky, James , Richardson, Tom G , Freisling, Heinz , Vincent, Emma E , Hazelwood, Emma , Brenner, Hermann , Gunter, Marc J. , Schuster‐Böckler, Benjamin , Murphy, Neil

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | September 12, 2025 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2621-2642

10.1093/jnci/djaf201 | PMID 40987470 Get It

Abstract Introduction There is convincing evidence that overall adiposity increases the risks of several cancers. Whether the distribution of adiposity plays a similar role is unclear. Methods We used 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to examine causal relationships of 5 adiposity distribution traits (abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT); visceral adipose tissue (VAT); gluteofemoral adipose tissue (GFAT); liver fat; and pancreas fat) with the risks of 12 obesity-related cancers (endometrial, ovarian, breast, colorectal, pancreas, multiple myeloma, liver, kidney (renal cell), thyroid, gallbladder, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and meningioma). Results Sample size across all genome-wide association studies (GWAS) ranged from 8407 to 728 896 (median: 57 249). We found evidence that higher genetically predicted ASAT increased the risks of endometrial cancer, liver cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) per standard deviation (SD) higher ASAT = 1.79 (1.18 to 2.71), 3.83 (1.39 to 10.53), and 2.34 (1.15 to 4.78), respectively). Conversely, we found evidence that higher genetically predicted GFAT decreased the risks of breast cancer and meningioma (ORs and 95% CIs per SD higher genetically predicted GFAT = 0.77 (0.62 to 0.97) and 0.53 (0.32 to 0.90), respectively). We also found evidence for an effect of higher genetically predicted VAT and liver fat on increased liver cancer risk (ORs and 95% CIs per SD higher genetically predicted adiposity trait = 4.29 (1.41 to 13.07) and 4.09 (2.29 to 7.28), respectively). Discussion Our analyses provide novel insights into the relationship between adiposity distribution and cancer risk. These insights highlight the potential importance of adipose tissue distribution alongside maintaining a healthy weight for cancer prevention.
Myelodysplastic Syndrome in a Patient With Cronkhite‐Canada Syndrome
Shim, Kevin G. , Khadarian, Kevork, Samadder, Jewel, Zhou, Jiehao , Shim, Kevin G , Zhou, Jiehao , Yi, Cecilia Arana

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Case Reports | July 31, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ccr3.70602 | PMID 40746769 Get It

ABSTRACTCronkhite‐Canada Syndrome (CCS) is a rare non‐hereditary gastroenterological polyposis syndrome without a clear etiology. Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematological disorders. Immune dysregulation has been posited as a contributor to the development of both. A 70‐year‐old man developed chronic diarrhea, dysgeusia, and onycholysis. Endoscopic evaluation and testing to exclude hereditary polyposis syndromes resulted in a diagnosis of CCS. Approximately 1 year later, he was noted to have persistent anemia, which was ultimately diagnosed as MDS. He was evaluated with a myeloid disorder next‐generation sequencing panel and found to have mutations in IDH2, SRSF2, and JAK2. This is the second reported case characterizing concomitant MDS and CCS. This is the first case to report the development of MDS after the diagnosis and treatment of CCS. A successful management strategy for both disorders is outlined within this case report.
A prediction model for metachronous colorectal cancer: development and validation
Zhang, Y. , Karahalios, Amalia , Win, Aung Ko , Makalic, Enes , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Schmit, Stephanie L. , Samadder, N. Jewel , Macrae, Finlay , Zhang, Ye , Buchanan, Daniel D , Schmit, Stephanie L , Samadder, N Jewel , Macrae, Finlay A , Jenkins, Mark A , Win, Aung K , Makalic, Enes , Boussioutas, Alex , Jenkins, Mark A.

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | July 14, 2025 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2082-2088

10.1093/jnci/djaf191 | PMID 40668756 Get It

Abstract Background Being able to estimate the risk of metachronous disease in a patient with colorectal cancer (CRC) could enable risk-appropriate surveillance. The aim of this study was to develop a risk-prediction model to estimate individual 10-year risk of metachronous disease following a CRC diagnosis. Methods A population-based cohort of patients with CRC was recruited soon after diagnosis between 1997 and 2012 from the United States, Canada, and Australia. Cox regression with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalization was used to identify factors that predicted the risk of a new primary CRC diagnosed at least 1 year after the initial CRC diagnosis. Potential predictors included demography, anthropometry, lifestyle factors, comorbidities, personal and family cancer history, medication use, age at diagnosis, and pathological features of the first CRC. Internal validation through bootstrapping was used to evaluate the discrimination and calibration. Results We included 6085 CRC cases; 138 (2.3%) of these cases were diagnosed with metachronous disease over a median of 12 years (IQR = 5-17 years). Metachronous CRC risk was predicted by body mass index; smoking status; level of physical activity; family history of cancer and synchronous CRC; stage, grade, histological type, and DNA mismatch repair status; and age at diagnosis of the first CRC. The model was valid with a C statistic of 0.65 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.68) and a calibration slope of 0.873 (SD = 0.087). Conclusions Metachronous CRC can be predicted with reasonable accuracy using a prediction model that consists of clinical variables collected as part of routine practice.
Gastric Polyposis and Cancer in Western Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Epidemiology, Detection, and Management
Aelvoet, Arthur S., Idos, Gregory , Kelly, Kaitlyn J. , Kieber‐Emmons, AnnMarie, Markowitz, Arnold J. , Samadder, N. Jewel , Yurgelun, Matthew B. , Burke, Carol A. , Aelvoet, Arthur S. , Burke, Carol A , Dekker, Evelien , Cruise, Michael W. , Grady, William M. , Kupfer, Sonia S. , Weiss, Jennifer M.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | June 11, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2025.7027 | PMID 40499589 Get It

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are at increased risk of developing cancer, with the most common sites being colorectal, duodenal/ampullary and thyroid. In the last decade, an alarming increase in gastric cancer has been reported in the Western FAP population. These cancers are often diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor prognosis, even in patients undergoing regular upper endoscopic surveillance. Most gastric cancers in Western patients with FAP occur in the proximal stomach, where a carpeting of fundic gland polyposis hampers visualization of gastric cancer and its precursor lesions during endoscopic surveillance. Although fundic gland polyps are the most prevalent proximal polyp, several different dysplastic lesions can be found in the stomachs of patients with FAP. including fundic gland polyps with dysplasia, foveolar-type adenomas, pyloric gland adenomas, and intestinal-type adenomas. Although adenomas are the most likely precursors to gastric cancer, the exact lesions responsible for gastric cancer in FAP are not yet fully understood. This review focuses on gastric polyposis and the characteristics of gastric cancer in Western patients with FAP, including risk factors, lesion detection, surveillance and management of gastric polyposis, and areas for future research.
Advancing the Evaluation and Management of CDH1-Associated Gastric Cancer
Lerner, Benjamin A. , Gupta, Samir , Burke, Carol A. , Samadder, Jewel, Yurgelun, Matthew B. , Kelly, Kaitlyn J. , Prats, Mariana Moreno, Joseph, Nora, Idos, Gregory , Swanson, Benjamin , Kieber‐Emmons, AnnMarie, Llor, Xavier , Gupta, Samir , Samadder, Jewel J., Gupta, Samir , Burke, Carol A , Kupfer, Sonia S. , Katona, Bryson W , Grady, William M. , Weiss, Jennifer M.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 9, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2025.7006 | PMID 40203872 Get It

Gastric cancer is a significant global health concern, with CDH1-associated gastric cancer representing a small but important subset of cases. Historically, individuals with CDH1 pathogenic germline variants were advised to undergo prophylactic total gastrectomy due to the high reported risk of gastric cancer and the limited sensitivity of upper endoscopy in detecting signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). However, emerging data suggest that the cumulative lifetime risk of advanced gastric cancer among CDH1 germline pathogenic variant carriers is lower than previously thought, and early-stage SRCC detected on endoscopy does not necessarily indicate imminent—or even eventual—progression to advanced cancer. The near-universal presence of T1a SRCC in gastrectomy specimens from asymptomatic CDH1 pathogenic variant carriers calls into question the reflexive recommendation for gastrectomy, including upon detection of SRCC during surveillance. Furthermore, the morbidity and quality-of-life impact associated with total gastrectomy require careful consideration. Active endoscopic surveillance has shown promise as an alternative management strategy for gastrectomy in patients lacking indicators of >T1a SRCC, though current data are limited by short follow-up periods and selection bias. This review synthesizes recent findings on the natural history of CDH1-associated gastric cancer and evaluates the risks and benefits of gastrectomy versus active endoscopic surveillance, with the goal of helping clinicians provide personalized and evidence-based recommendations for patients with CDH1 pathogenic variants.
Implementation of a Multicancer Detection (MCD) Test in a Tertiary Referral Center in Asymptomatic Patients: An 18-Month Prospective Cohort Study
Ghosh, Aditya , Dougan, Brian M. , Gilman, Elizabeth A. , Salonen, Bradley R. , Bonnes, Sara L. , Andersen, Carl , Pasha, Amirala S. , Nanda, S. , Pagel, Erin M., Verness, Christina D., Crowley, Steven D. , Ressler, Steven W. , Samadder, Jewel, Chaudhuri, Aadel A. , Sánchez, William , Croghan, Ivana T. , Stephenson, Christopher R. , Ghosh, Karthik, Hurt, Ryan T. , Gilman, Elizabeth A , Adusumalli, Jay, Andersen, Carl A, Pasha, Amirala S , Pagel, Erin M , Samadder, Jewel J., Presutti, Richard J , Sanchez, William , Croghan, Ivana T , Ghosh, Aditya K , Ressler, Steven W , Adusumalli, Jayanth , Presutti, R. John

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health | March 26, 2025 | Volume: 16 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/21501319251329290 | PMID 40132152 Get It

Objective: Multicancer Detection (MCD) tests, such as the GRAIL Galleri, offer a novel approach to cancer screening by detecting cancer-specific methylation patterns in cell-free DNA through a single blood sample. This study evaluated an 18-month implementation of MCD testing in a tertiary ambulatory internal medicine clinic. Patients and Methods: Between June 2022 and November 2023, 2244 asymptomatic (without symptoms attributed to cancer) patients underwent MCD testing. The study focused on operational workflows, patient and physician education, and diagnostic follow-up of positive results. Standardized materials, including electronic health record (EHR) workflows, FAQs, and diagnostic pathways, were developed to facilitate implementation. Challenges included managing false positives, patient anxiety, costs, and ethical considerations. Results: Of the 2244 patients tested, 17 (0.76%) had positive results, and 15 underwent further diagnostic evaluation. Cancer was confirmed in 11 (73.3%) patients, including cases of breast, colon, esophageal, lymphoma, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers. Four patients had no identifiable malignancy despite comprehensive work-up. Conclusions: MCD testing is feasible in routine clinical workflows, with 73% of positive cases yielding cancer diagnoses. While promising, further research is required to assess long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and optimal implementation strategies of cancer interception in broader healthcare settings.
Germline Genetic Testing in Patients with Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Prospective Multicenter Study to Evaluate Cancer Susceptibility
Ailts, Isaak , Golafshar, Michael A. , Kunze, Katie L. , Klint, Margaret, Barrus, Kathleen , Nussbaum, Robert L., Esplin, Edward D. , Leach, Brandie, Nielsen, Sarah M. , Samadder, N. Jewel , Seetharam, ­Mahesh , Young, Sarah , Golafshar, Michael , Esplin, Edward D , Kunze, Katie L , Leach, Brandie

Mayo Clinic

International Journal of Molecular Sciences | March 21, 2025 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 2839

10.3390/ijms26072839 | PMID 40243416 Get It

Sarcomas are rare heterogenous mesenchymal tumors with over seventy-five different subtypes, with varying biology and outcomes, with no clear inciting factor in the vast majority. To determine the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in patients with sarcomas, we undertook a prospective multi-site study of germline sequencing using an 84-gene next-generation sequencing panel among patients receiving care at the four Mayo Clinic Cancer Centers. Of 115 patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma, the median age was 60 years, 49.6% were female, 82.6% were White. The anatomical location of the primary tumor included extremities (34.8%), retroperitoneum (19.1%), trunk (13.0%), and head and neck (7.8%). Family history of cancer was present in 62.6% of the study population. Ten patients (8.7%) had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (PGV). Of these, three had stage IV sarcoma, and seven had earlier-stage sarcoma (stages I–III). Among the 55 (48.7%) patients who had variant of uncertain significance (VUS), 41.1% (22/55) had stage IV sarcoma and 58.9% (33/55) had earlier-stage disease. Of the ten patients with PGV, high-to-moderate penetrance gene abnormalities were identified in eight patients (80%) involving TP53 (3), BRCA1 (1), SDHA (1), ATM (2), and NBN (1) genes. The vast majority of the PGVs (70%) would not have been detected using the current guidelines. Because of the paucity of sarcomas and lack of effective treatment options for advanced disease, germline testing in sarcomas represents a potentially impactful strategy to assess therapeutic options and for assessment of familial risk.