Citations

Background: Left ventricular (LV) mass regression after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) is a favorable effect of LV unloading, but its relationship to improved clinical outcomes is unclear. We examined the effect on clinical outcomes after transcatheter AVR (TAVR) of: 1) amount of LV mass index (LVMi) regression; and 2) persistent severe LV hypertrophy (LVH). Methods: Of 2115 patients with symptomatic AS at high surgical risk receiving TAVR in the PARTNER randomized trial or continued access registry, 462 (55% women) who had severe LVH (LVMi ≥149 g/m 2 men, ≥122 g/m 2 women, by ASE criteria) at baseline (BL) and LVMi measured 6 mo post-TAVR were included in our analysis. The effect of LVMi regression was evaluated by comparing outcomes in patients with greater vs. lesser decrease (dichotomized by median % change) in LVMi between BL and 6 mo, and in those without vs. with persistent severe LVH 6 mo post-TAVR. Cox PH models evaluated rates of all-cause mortality (6-12 mo), rehospitalizations (through 1 yr), and the composite of these two outcomes. Results: LVMi decreased from 173±32 (BL) to 121±25 g/m 2 (6 mo) (p<0.001) in those with greater LVMi regression, and from 164±30 (BL) to 158±34 g/m 2 (6 mo) (p<0.001) in those with lesser LVMi regression. Patients with greater vs. lesser LVMi regression had similar baseline clinical characteristics, a lower rate of rehospitalization (10.5% vs. 19.9%, p=0.006) and lower rate of the composite endpoint of death or rehospitalization (13.2% vs. 21.4%, p=0.02), but a similar rate of death (4.9% vs. 4.8%, p=0.86). Persistent severe LVH at 6 mo post-TAVR was present in 54% (58% of whom were women). Patients without vs. with persistent severe LVH had similar baseline clinical characteristics, a lower rate of rehospitalization (11.9% vs. 18.1%, p=0.053) and lower rate of the composite endpoint of death or rehospitalization (13.3% vs. 20.7%, p=0.03), but a similar rate of death (3.9% vs. 5.7%, p=0.42). Similar results were obtained when including patients with moderate or severe LVH. Conclusions: In high-risk patients with severe AS and severe LVH undergoing TAVR, greater LV mass regression and resolution of initially severe LVH at 6 months are associated with a lower rate of death or repeat hospitalization.

Abstract Background Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is recommended to distinguish between true-severe and pseudo-severe aortic stenosis (AS) in patients with low flow low-gradients and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &lt;50%. However, DSE has mostly been tested in the setting of LVEF&lt;35%. Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of DSE according to aortic valve calcification (AVC) score, in patents with low-flow, low-gradient AS across a wide range of LVEF. Methods Patients with aortic mean gradient &lt;40 mmHg, aortic valve area (AVA) &lt;1.0 cm2, and stroke volume index (SVi) ≤35 mL/m2 undergoing DSE were identified from three prospectively collected patient cohorts, and stratified according to LVEF; &lt;35%, 35-50% and &gt;50%. Severe AS was defined as AVC score ≥2000 AU among men, and ≥1200 AU for women. Recommendation for severe AS according to DSE, are an AVA &lt;1.0 cm2 combined with an aortic mean gradient ≥40 mmHg or peak velocity ≥4 m/s. Receiver operating characteristic curves for DSE-derived AVA, mean gradient and Vmax were used to identify optimal cut-off points for each LVEF subgroup. Results Of the 221 patients included in the study, 78 (35%) presented with LVEF &lt;35%, 67 (30%) with LVEF 35-50%, and 76 (34%) with LVEF &gt;50%. Baseline characteristics are presented in the table. Based on AVC, severe AS was present in 102 (46%) of patients. Using recommended thresholds for severe AS for AVC and DSE, led to a sensitivity of 49%, a specificity of 84% and an accuracy of 67% for DSE for all patients with LVEF &lt;50%, but with significant heterogeneity between groups figure. AVA performed rather uniformly across LVEF subgroups; (AUC =0.68 vs 0.62 vs 0.54, p=0.36) LVEF&lt;35%, LVEF 35-50%, LVEF&gt;50% respectively and displayed a rather uniform optimal cut-off (1.0 cm2 vs 0.9 cm2 vs 0.8 cm2). However, mean gradient and Vmax during DSE, both showed significantly diagnostic heterogeneity across LVEF groups (AUC= 0.90 vs 0.67 vs 0.65, p=&lt;0.001 and AUC= 0.90 vs 0.66 vs 0.60, p=&lt;0.001) with different optimal thresholds (30 mmHg & 3.8 m/s, 45 mmHg & 4.3 m/s and 37mmHg & 4 m/s, LVEF&lt;35%, LVEF 35-50%, LVEF&gt;50%, respectively). Conclusion Our study shows, that the association between DSE gradients and AS severity assessed by AVC demonstrates important heterogeneity depending on LVEF. While DSE had the highest accuracy in patients with LVEF&lt;35% both patients with LVEF 35-50%, and patients with LVEF&gt;50% showed significantly less concordance between DSE and AVC.

Objective CT aortic valve calcium score (AVCscore) and density (AVCdensity) thresholds have been recommended for aortic stenosis (AS) severity assessment in tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). We aimed to compare AVCscore and AVCdensity in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) versus TAV. Methods Retrospective single-centre study of patients with echocardiographic AS-severity and CT-AVC assessments within 6 months, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, all referred for clinical AS evaluation. Severe AS was defined as aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm2 or indexed AVA ≤0.6cm2/m2 plus mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg or peak velocity ≥4 m/s. AVC was assessed by Agatston method. Results Of the 1957 patients, 328 had BAV and 1629 had TAV, age 65±11 vs 80±9 years (p<0.001), men 65% vs 56% (p=0.006), respectively. BAV morphology was associated with higher AVCscore and AVCdensity independent of age, comorbidities and AS severity (p<0.001) in men only (sex and BAV interaction p<0.001). In patients with severe AS, mean AVCscore and AVCdensity were higher in BAV-men than that in TAV-men (both p<0.001), but similar in BAV-women and TAV-women (both p≥0.4). Such patterns remained the same after adjustment for clinical covariates and AS severity. Best thresholds for severe AS diagnosis in BAV-men were 2916 AU by AVCscore and 600 AU/cm2 by AVCdensity which were higher than the guideline-recommended thresholds, while thresholds in BAV-women (1036 AU and 282 AU/cm2) were similar to guideline-recommended ones. Conclusion Valve calcification in AS differs according to valve morphology and sex. BAV-men with severe AS exhibit greater AVCscore and AVCdensity than TAV-men. This presents a diagnostic challenge to the current guidelines, which needs confirmation in larger studies.

Introduction: Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is the key pathophysiology underlying aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to assess computed tomography AVC in AS by valve morphology (bicuspid [BAV] vs. tricuspid aortic valve[TAV]) and sex. Methods: Retrospective study of patients with echocardiographic AS severity and AVC assessments within six months. Patients with > moderate aortic regurgitation, prosthetic aortic valve, or indeterminate aortic valve morphology were excluded. Severe AS with high mean gradient (MG) was defined as aortic valve area (AVA)≤1cm2 or indexed AVA≤0.6 cm2/m2 + MG≥40 mmHg. Results: Of 2647 patients, 361(65% men) had BAV and 2286(59% men) had TAV, age 65±11 vs. 80±9 years(p<0.001), AVA 1.07±0.42 vs. 0.90±0.25 cm2(p<0.001), MG 41±16 vs.42±14 mmHg(p=0.4) for BAV and TAV, respectively. For both BAV and TAV groups, age, MG, and severe AS frequency were similar between women and men(all p≥0.06). BAV morphology affected AVC-AS severity and AVC-sex associations (p for interactions <0.001): as AS severity increased, mean AVC difference became larger between BAV-men and TAV-men, but smaller between BAV-women and TAV-women. Similar patterns were observed in AVC density (AVCd, AVC divided by left ventricular outflow tract diameter)-AS severity and AVCd-sex associations (p for interactions < 0.001). In patients with concordant AS severity and MG levels, the best BAV AVC-cutoff for detecting severe AS + high MG by area-under-the-curve analysis was 924 AU for BAV-women and 2851 AU for BAV-men, different from guideline-recommended AVC-thresholds (1200 for women and 2000 for men). The best BAV AVCd cutoff was 289 for BAV-women and 476 for BAV-men, similar to the cutoffs for patients predominantly with TAV (292 for women and 476 for men from Clavel MA JACC 2013). The BAV-AVC threshold identified more patients with severe AS than guideline-recommended threshold in BAV-women (84% vs 74%, p<0.001), but not in BAV-men. Conclusions: Valvular calcium accretion in AS was different by valve morphology and sex. As compared to TAV, BAV-women exhibited the least calcification while BAV-men exhibited the highest. Such patterns may impact the sensitivity of guideline-recommended AVC thresholds for detecting severe AS in BAV patients.

Abstract This International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes.

Abstract This International evidence-based nomenclature and classification consensus on the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy recognizes 3 types of bicuspid aortic valve: 1. Fused type, with 3 phenotypes: right-left cusp fusion, right-non cusp fusion and left-non cusp fusion; 2. 2-sinus type with 2 phenotypes: Latero-lateral and antero-posterior; and 3. Partial-fusion or forme fruste. This consensus recognizes 3 bicuspid-aortopathy types: 1. Ascending phenotype; root phenotype; and 3. extended phenotypes.

Bioprostheses are prone to structural valve degeneration, resulting in limited long-term durability. A significant challenge when comparing the durability of different types of bioprostheses is the lack of a standardized terminology for the definition of a degenerated valve. This issue becomes especially important when we try to compare the degeneration rate of surgically inserted and transcatheter bioprosthetic valves. This document, by the VIVID (Valve-in-Valve International Data), proposes practical and standardized definitions of valve degeneration and provides recommendations for the timing of clinical and imaging follow-up assessments accordingly. Its goal is to improve the quality of research and clinical care for patients with deteriorated bioprostheses by providing objective and strict criteria that can be utilized in future clinical trials. We hope that the adoption of these criteria by both the cardiological and surgical communities will lead to improved comparability and interpretation of durability analyses.