Back to Authors

De Paulis, Ruggero

0000-0002-3603-2202

Mayo Clinic

Department of Cardiac Surgery, European Hospital, Unicamillus University, Rome, Italy.

Citations 4

Current status of aortic valve repair surgery

European Heart Journal | February 14, 2025 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 1394-1411

10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf038 | PMID 39950993

Abstract Severe aortic valve regurgitation, if not timely treated, can significantly impact patients’ survival both for tricuspid aortic valve and bicuspid aortic valve patients, with the latter being significantly younger. Increased understanding of the root anatomy and its physiology has opened the way to techniques of aortic valve repair surgery. The techniques mainly relate to re-establishing a correct root and annular geometry and eliminating leaflet prolapse. These techniques are applied both in the presence of a dilated and normal root and are equally valid for tricuspid or bicuspid valve. Techniques for repairing a bicuspid valve might vary depending on the different valve phenotypes. Medium and long-term results appear favourable and potentially superior to those of prosthetic replacement in terms of valve-related complications and quality of life. Optimal surgical treatment, especially in younger and selected patients, should aim to avoid aortic valve replacement and its related complications.
International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes

Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging | July 22, 2021 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e200496

10.1148/ryct.2021200496 | PMID 34505060

International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery | January 25, 2021 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 448-476

10.1093/ejcts/ezab038 | PMID 34293102

Abstract This International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes.
Summary: international consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery | January 23, 2021 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 481-496

10.1093/ejcts/ezab039 | PMID 34292332

Abstract This International evidence-based nomenclature and classification consensus on the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy recognizes 3 types of bicuspid aortic valve: 1. Fused type, with 3 phenotypes: right-left cusp fusion, right-non cusp fusion and left-non cusp fusion; 2. 2-sinus type with 2 phenotypes: Latero-lateral and antero-posterior; and 3. Partial-fusion or forme fruste. This consensus recognizes 3 bicuspid-aortopathy types: 1. Ascending phenotype; root phenotype; and 3. extended phenotypes.