Citations

SummaryBackground and AimsMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and vibration‐controlled transient elastography (VCTE) have the potential to assess disease progression; however, repeatability data in people with cirrhosis are lacking. We aimed to assess the effect of disease severity on measurement variability and contribute to the evidentiary basis for the qualification of repeating liver stiffness measurements (LSM) in practice and research.MethodsThis prospective study included 49 adult participants (58.3% female) with cirrhosis who underwent same‐day repeat LSM examinations. The primary outcome was the same‐day, same‐operator repeatability coefficient% (RC%) and the within‐case coefficient of variation (wCV) for each modality. Secondary outcomes include the intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC). The relationship between measurement variability (interquartile for VCTE, standard deviation for MRE) and disease severity (mean liver stiffness) was evaluated by linear regression with the coefficient of determination R2 reported.ResultsSame‐day repeat MRE and VCTE exams were prospectively conducted in 33 and 45 participants, respectively. The RC% appeared 82% higher for VCTE versus MRE (38% vs. 21%), with consistent findings in head‐to‐head analyses. The wCV for VCTE and MRE was 14% and 8% respectively, indicating VCTE has 75% higher within‐subject measurement variation than MRE. ICC was excellent for LSM by VCTE (0.92) and MRE (0.96). Measurement variability increased with mean liver stiffness for VCTE (R2 = 0.78) and MRE (R2 = 0.93).ConclusionBoth VCTE and MRE demonstrated increased measurement variability with disease severity. However, MRE outperformed VCTE in terms of technical repeatability in patients with cirrhosis. These repeatability estimates may improve the qualification of NITs in practice.

SummaryBackground & AimsThe natural progression of hepatic decompensation in metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is not well‐characterised. We aimed to describe it by conducting a retrospective analysis.MethodsThis longitudinal, retrospective analysis of well‐characterised MASLD cohorts followed for hepatic decompensation and death. The sequence of liver‐related events was evaluated, and the median time between hepatic decompensation episodes and death versus. transplantation was measured.ResultsOf the 2016 patients identified, 220 (11%) developed at least one episode of hepatic decompensation during a median follow‐up of 3.2 years. Ascites was the most common first liver‐related event [153 (69.5%)], followed by hepatic encephalopathy (HE) [55 (25%)] and variceal haemorrhage (VH) [30 (13.6%)]. Eighteen out of the 220 (8.1%) patients had more than one liver‐related event as their first hepatic decompensation. Among the patients who had the first episode, 87 (39.5%) had a second episode [44 (50.5%) HE, 31 (35.6%) ascites, and 12 (13.7%) VH]. Eighteen out of 220 (8.1%) had a third episode [10 (55.5%) HE, 6 (33.3%) VH, and 2 (11.1%) ascites]. Seventy‐three out of 220 (33.1%) died, and 31 (14%) received liver transplantation. The median time from the first episode to the second was 0.7 years and 1.3 years from the second episode to the third. The median survival time from the first episode to death or transplantation was 2.0 years.ConclusionThe most common first liver‐related event in MASLD patients is ascites. The median survival from the first hepatic decompensation to either death or transplantation is 2 years.

Background: Following the adoption of new nomenclature for steatotic liver disease, we aimed to build consensus on the use of International Classification of Diseases codes and recommendations for future research and advocacy. Methods: Through a two-stage Delphi process, a core group (n = 20) reviewed draft statements and recommendations (n = 6), indicating levels of agreement. Following revisions, this process was repeated with a large expert panel (n = 243) from 73 countries. Results: Consensus ranged from 88.8% to 96.9% (mean = 92.3%). Conclusions: This global consensus statement provides guidance on harmonizing the International Classification of Diseases coding for steatotic liver disease and future directions to advance the field.

SummaryBackgroundProgression to cirrhosis in non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is associated with a decrease in liver fat. However, the prognostic significance of liver fat content in NASH‐related significant fibrosis and cirrhosis is unclear.AimTo investigate the risk of decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and mortality stratified by liver fat content in NASH‐related significant fibrosis and cirrhosis.MethodsIn this meta‐analysis of individual participant data, 456 patients with both magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and MRI‐derived protein density fat fraction (MRI‐PDFF) were enrolled, and 296 patients with longitudinal follow‐up were analysed. MRE combined with fibrosis‐4 (MEFIB‐index), and MRI‐PDFF were used to measure liver fibrosis and fat, respectively. MEFIB‐negative, MEFIB‐positive+ MRI‐PDFF ≥5% and MEFIB‐positive+ MRI‐PDFF <5% were defined as no significant liver fibrosis, NASH with significant fibrosis and higher liver fat content, and NASH with significant fibrosis and low liver fat content groups, respectively. The primary outcome was hepatic decompensation, HCC and death.ResultsThe rates of decompensation, HCC and mortality were highest in the NASH with significant fibrosis and low liver fat group (33%, 17% and 17%, respectively), followed by the NASH with significant fibrosis and higher liver fat group (18%, 13% and 13% respectively), and lowest in the no significant fibrosis (MEFIB‐negative) group (0%, 1% and 2% respectively). In multivariable‐adjusted analysis, low liver fat content was strongly associated (HR = 42.2 [95% CI: 7.5–235.5, p < 0.0001]) with HCC, decompensation and death. Sensitivity analyses for patients with cirrhosis (MRE ≥5 kPa) determined consistent findings.ConclusionsLow liver fat content in patients with burnt‐out NASH‐related significant fibrosis and cirrhosis is associated with an increase in hepatic decompensation, HCC and mortality.

Summary Background There are limited data regarding the longitudinal association between MEFIB‐Index (MRE combined with FIB‐4) versus MAST‐Score (MRI‐aspartate aminotransferase) and hepatic decompensation. Aim To examine the longitudinal association between MEFIB‐Index versus MAST‐Score in predicting hepatic decompensation in patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Methods This was a longitudinal, retrospective analysis of subjects from United States, Japan, and Turkey who underwent a baseline MRE and MRI‐PDFF and were followed for hepatic decompensation. Cox‐proportional hazard analyses were used to assess the association between MEFIB‐Index versus MAST‐Score with a composite primary outcome (hepatic decompensation) defined as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and varices needing treatment. Results This meta‐analysis of individual participants (IPDMA) included 454 patients (58% women) with a mean (±SD) age of 56.0 (±13.5) years. The MEFIB‐Index (MRE ≥3.3 kPa + FIB 4 ≥1.6) and MAST‐Score (>0.242) were positive for 34% and 9% of the sample, respectively. At baseline, 23 patients met criteria for hepatic decompensation. Among 297 patients with available longitudinal data with a median (IQR) of 4.2 (5.0) years of follow‐up, 25 incident cases met criteria for hepatic decompensation. A positive MEFIB‐Index [HR = 49.22 (95% CI: 6.23–388.64, p < 0.001)] and a positive MAST‐Score [HR = 3.86 (95% CI: 1.46–10.17, p < 0.001)] were statistically significant predictors of the incident hepatic decompensation. MEFIB‐Index ( c ‐statistic: 0.89, standard error (SE) = 0.02) was statistically superior to the MAST‐Score ( c ‐statistic: 0.81, SE = 0.03) ( p < 0.0001) in predicting hepatic decompensation. Conclusion A combination of MRI‐based biomarker and blood tests, MEFIB‐Index and MAST‐Score can predict the risk of hepatic decompensation in patients with MASLD.

Importance Given the burden of chronic liver disease on the health care system, more information on the hepatoprotective association of statins in the general population is needed. Objective To examine whether regular statin use is associated with a reduction in liver disease, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related deaths, in the general population. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used data from the UK Biobank (UKB) (individuals aged 37-73 years) collected from baseline (2006-2010) to the end of follow-up in May 2021, from the TriNetX cohort (individuals aged 18-90 years) enrolled from baseline (2011-2020) until end of follow-up in September 2022, and from the Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB) (individuals aged 18-102 years) with ongoing enrollment starting in 2013 to the end of follow-up in December 2020. Individuals were matched using propensity score matching according to the following criteria: age, sex, body mass index, ethnicity, diabetes with or without insulin or biguanide use, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, dyslipidemia, aspirin use, and number of medications taken (UKB only). Data analysis was performed from April 2021 to April 2023. Exposure Regular statin use. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were liver disease and HCC development as well as liver-associated death. Results A total of 1 785 491 individuals were evaluated after matching (aged 55 to 61 years on average, up to 56% men, and up to 49% women). A total of 581 cases of liver-associated death, 472 cases of incident HCC, and 98 497 new liver diseases were registered during the follow-up period. Individuals were aged 55-61 years on average, with a slightly higher proportion of men (up to 56%). In UKB individuals (n = 205 057) without previously diagnosed liver disease, statin users (n = 56 109) had a 15% lower hazard ratio (HR) for the association of developing a new liver disease (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92; P &amp;lt; .001). In addition, statin users demonstrated a 28% lower HR for the association with liver-related death (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = .001) and a 42% lower HR for the development of HCC (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.96; P = .04). In TriNetX individuals (n = 1 568 794), the HR for the association of HCC was reduced even further for statin users (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.22-0.31; P = .003). The hepatoprotective association of statins was time and dose dependent, with a significant association in PMBB individuals (n = 11 640) for incident liver diseases after 1 year of statin use (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P = .03). Taking statins was particularly beneficial in men, individuals with diabetes, and individuals with a high Fibrosis-4 index at baseline. Carriers of the heterozygous minor allele of PNPLA3 rs738409 benefited from statin use and had a 69% lower HR for the association with HCC (UKB HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11-0.85; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study indicates substantial preventive associations of statins against liver disease, with an association with duration and dose of intake.

The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms “nonalcoholic” and “fatty” were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140–350 g/wk and 210–420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification.

Background and Aims: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an accurate, continuous biomarker of liver fibrosis; however, the optimal combination with clinical factors to predict the risk of incident hepatic decompensation is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate an MRE-based prediction model for hepatic decompensation for patients with NAFLD. Approach and Results: This international multicenter cohort study included participants with NAFLD undergoing MRE from 6 hospitals. A total of 1254 participants were randomly assigned as training (n = 627) and validation (n = 627) cohorts. The primary end point was hepatic decompensation, defined as the first occurrence of variceal hemorrhage, ascites, or HE. Covariates associated with hepatic decompensation on Cox-regression were combined with MRE to construct a risk prediction model in the training cohort and then tested in the validation cohort. The median (IQR) age and MRE values were 61 (18) years and 3.5 (2.5) kPa in the training cohort and 60 (20) years and 3.4 (2.5) kPa in the validation cohort, respectively. The MRE-based multivariable model that included age, MRE, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, and platelets had excellent discrimination for the 3- and 5-year risk of hepatic decompensation (c-statistic 0.912 and 0.891, respectively) in the training cohort. The diagnostic accuracy remained consistent in the validation cohort with a c-statistic of 0.871 and 0.876 for hepatic decompensation at 3 and 5 years, respectively, and was superior to Fibrosis-4 in both cohorts (p < 0.05). Conclusions: An MRE-based prediction model allows for accurate prediction of hepatic decompensation and assists in the risk stratification of patients with NAFLD.