Citations

AbstractBackgroundRecent advances in automatic face recognition have increased the risk that de‐identified research imaging data could be re‐identified from face imagery in brain scans.MethodAn ADNI committee of independent imaging experts evaluated 11 published techniques for face‐deidentification (“de‐facing”) and selected four algorithms (FSL‐UK Biobank, HCP/XNAT, mri_reface, and BIC) for formal testing using 183 longitudinal scans of 61 racially and ethnically diverse ADNI participants, evaluated by their facial feature removal on 3D rendered surfaces (confirming sufficient privacy protection) and by comparing measurements from ADNI routine image analyses on unmodified vs. de‐faced images (confirming negligible side effects on analyses).ResultEffects of the de‐facing methods on FreeSurfer at UCSF (Figure 1‐top), ASHS at University of Pennsylvania (Figure 1 bottom‐left), and longitudinal atrophy at Mayo Clinic (Figure 1 bottom‐right) were comparable with each other and sufficiently small vs. unmodified scans to recommend de‐facing in ADNI‐4. The FSL and mri_reface methods were more thorough in removing facial features, partly because these also removed ears (Figure 2‐top). mri_reface was recommended for ADNI‐4 primarily because fewer (zero) images had modified brain (Figure 2‐bottom), and ADNI leadership approved de‐facing with mri_reface. ADNI performed a second validation of its latest version on another diverse sample of 100 ADNI‐3 participants. These analyses included: boundary shift interval at University College London, where average differences in measurements were all <0.05%; cortical white matter hyperintensities at UC Davis, where they found “minimum impact” (R>0.97); and others.ConclusionADNI‐4 de‐faces all indicated image types (Table 1) before subsequent pre‐processing, analyses, and public release. Sites upload images to the central repository (LONI), where they are queued to the MRI Core at Mayo Clinic for de‐facing. Image types requiring de‐facing are de‐faced using mri_reface. Trained analysts inspect de‐faced images to confirm complete removal of the face and complete non‐modification of the brain, and any flagged images are re‐processed manually until issues are resolved. De‐faced images are converted back to DICOM and re‐uploaded for further distribution. Image types not requiring de‐facing are indicated to proceed directly to subsequent steps. In summary, ADNI‐4 has adopted mri_reface because it successfully de‐faces without substantially affecting brain measurements.

AbstractBackgroundNeuritic plaques with fibrillar beta‐amyloid (Aβ) peptides and tau‐protein neurofibrillary tangles, hallmark features of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, have been concomitantly associated with white matter (WM) integrity loss, while a unique effect of each pathology on WM integrity in a more demographically diverse population remains unknown.MethodTo examine the degree to which each pathology affects WM integrity in a more diverse non‐demented cohort, Aβ and tau PET, diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and cognition (memory and executive function composites) were examined from the U.S. POINTER neuroimaging participants (N=608; age=68.34±5.2; 61.8% females; 29% Aβ+) and a subset of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants (N=291; age=72.85±7.3; 50% females; 39% Aβ+) (Table). Aβ‐positivity was determined using tracer‐specific standardized cut‐offs. Tau SUVR was estimated for each Braak stage. For WM integrity, voxel‐based GLMs were applied to FSL‐processed fractional anisotropy (FA) maps using Braak stage tau SUVR and Aβ‐positivity status, along with covariates of age, sex, and b‐value profiles.ResultIn U.S. POINTER, independent from Aβ‐positivity status, greater tau burden in Braak stages I and II was related to lower FA across the tracts including the superior longitudinal fasciculus, fornix (cres), corpus callosum, and anterior thalamic radiation (Figure). Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters for Braak I and II significantly predicted executive function but not episodic memory. No association between FA and tau burden in Braak stages III/IV or V/VI was found. In the ADNI sample, greater tau burden in Braak I was related to lower FA mostly in left inferior longitudinal fasciculus and left uncinate fasciculus, while negative associations with FA became more diffuse with tau load in Braak III/IV and V/VI. Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters significantly predicted both episodic memory and executive function scores. Across both samples, after accounting for tau burden in each Braak stage, there were no association between Aβ‐positivity status and WM integrity.ConclusionDistinct associations between tau burden, WM integrity, and cognition were found across the studies, indicating greater impact of early tau burden on WM integrity in U.S. POINTER, accounting for Aβ‐positivity status. Factors contributing to the distinct associations across studies need further investigation.

AbstractBackgroundThere is limited information on biomarker‐defined Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology in community‐recruited individuals of diverse racial and ethnic groups. Here, we assessed the association of race/ethnicity with baseline biomarkers and cognitive measures and hypothesized a lower impact of AD pathology in non‐Hispanic White (nHW) participants in the U.S. POINTER study clinical trial, which evaluates the benefits of a multidomain lifestyle intervention on cognition of community‐recruited at‐risk elderly individuals.MethodWe included 879 participants from the U.S. POINTER study enrolled in the imaging substudy (∼50% of participants) who self‐identified as nHW (n=644), African American/Black (AA/B, n=132), Asian (n=29), and Hispanic (n=74). Outcomes measures included global Aβ pathology (18F‐florbetaben), temporal meta‐ROI tau (18F‐MK‐6240), MRI‐measured white matter hyperintensity volume (WMH) volumes, global clinical dementia rating (gCDR), and global, executive, and memory standardized cognitive scores. The nHW participants were selected as reference. Power transformations normalized skewed distributions. Multivariable linear regressions include age, sex, education, Framingham risk score, and area deprivation index (ADI) as covariates.ResultAA/B harbored lower WMHs, and meta‐temporal tau ROI values. In the full model, 0.5 gCDR participants had higher centiloid values, were more likely to be AA/B and Hispanic, and had a greater burden of WMHs. In addition, higher centiloid values were associated with a 0.5 gCDR in all groups except for the AA/B participants. Hispanic, AA/B, and Asian participants had lower cognitive scores than the nHW group. A higher ADI score was associated with lower global and executive cognitive scores but not with WMH volume or Aβ centiloid score.ConclusionThe analyses of the community‐based U.S. POINTER indicate that AA/B individuals present differences in AD and related dementia biomarker values. nHW had higher fully adjusted cognitive scores. These results indicate a significant heterogeneity in the cognitive testing performance and biomarker values of individuals at risk for dementia in the community.

AbstractBackgroundNeuritic plaques with fibrillar beta‐amyloid (Aß) peptides and tau‐protein neurofibrillary tangles, hallmark features of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, have been concomitantly associated with white matter (WM) integrity loss, while a unique effect of each pathology on WM integrity in a more demographically diverse population remains unknown.MethodTo examine the degree to which each pathology affects WM integrity in a more diverse non‐demented cohort, Aß and tau PET, diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and cognition (memory and executive function composites) were examined from the U.S. POINTER neuroimaging participants (N = 608; age = 68.34±5.2; 61.8% females; 29% Aß+) and a subset of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants (N = 291; age = 72.85±7.3; 50% females; 39% Aß+) (Table). Aß‐positivity was determined using tracer‐specific standardized cut‐offs. Tau SUVR was estimated for each Braak stage. For WM integrity, voxel‐based GLMs were applied to FSL‐processed fractional anisotropy (FA) maps using Braak stage tau SUVR and Aß‐positivity status, along with covariates of age, sex, and b‐value profiles.ResultIn U.S. POINTER, independent from Aß‐positivity status, greater tau burden in Braak stages I and II was related to lower FA across the tracts including the superior longitudinal fasciculus, fornix (cres), corpus callosum, and anterior thalamic radiation (Figure). Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters for Braak I and II significantly predicted executive function but not episodic memory. No association between FA and tau burden in Braak stages III/IV or V/VI was found. In the ADNI sample, greater tau burden in Braak I was related to lower FA mostly in left inferior longitudinal fasciculus and left uncinate fasciculus, while negative associations with FA became more diffuse with tau load in Braak III/IV and V/VI. Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters significantly predicted both episodic memory and executive function scores. Across both samples, after accounting for tau burden in each Braak stage, there were no association between Aß‐positivity status and WM integrity.ConclusionDistinct associations between tau burden, WM integrity, and cognition were found across the studies, indicating greater impact of early tau burden on WM integrity in U.S. POINTER, accounting for Aß‐positivity status. Factors contributing to the distinct associations across studies need further investigation.

AbstractBackgroundRecent advances in automatic face recognition have increased the risk that de‐identified research imaging data could be re‐identified from face imagery in brain scans.MethodAn ADNI committee of independent imaging experts evaluated 11 published techniques for face‐deidentification (“de‐facing”) and selected four algorithms (FSL‐UK Biobank, HCP/XNAT, mri_reface, and BIC) for formal testing using 183 longitudinal scans of 61 racially and ethnically diverse ADNI participants, evaluated by their facial feature removal on 3D rendered surfaces (confirming sufficient privacy protection) and by comparing measurements from ADNI routine image analyses on unmodified vs. de‐faced images (confirming negligible side effects on analyses).ResultEffects of the de‐facing methods on FreeSurfer at UCSF (Figure 1‐top), ASHS at University of Pennsylvania (Figure 1 bottom‐left), and longitudinal atrophy at Mayo Clinic (Figure 1 bottom‐right) were comparable with each other and sufficiently small vs. unmodified scans to recommend de‐facing in ADNI‐4. The FSL and mri_reface methods were more thorough in removing facial features, partly because these also removed ears (Figure 2‐top). mri_reface was recommended for ADNI‐4 primarily because fewer (zero) images had modified brain (Figure 2‐bottom), and ADNI leadership approved de‐facing with mri_reface. ADNI performed a second validation of its latest version on another diverse sample of 100 ADNI‐3 participants. These analyses included: boundary shift interval at University College London, where average differences in measurements were all <0.05%; cortical white matter hyperintensities at UC Davis, where they found “minimum impact” (R>0.97); and others.ConclusionADNI‐4 de‐faces all indicated image types (Table 1) before subsequent pre‐processing, analyses, and public release. Sites upload images to the central repository (LONI), where they are queued to the MRI Core at Mayo Clinic for de‐facing. Image types requiring de‐facing are de‐faced using mri_reface. Trained analysts inspect de‐faced images to confirm complete removal of the face and complete non‐modification of the brain, and any flagged images are re‐processed manually until issues are resolved. De‐faced images are converted back to DICOM and re‐uploaded for further distribution. Image types not requiring de‐facing are indicated to proceed directly to subsequent steps. In summary, ADNI‐4 has adopted mri_reface because it successfully de‐faces without substantially affecting brain measurements.

AbstractBackgroundThe Uniform Data Set (UDS) neuropsychological battery, administered across Alzheimer’s Disease Centers (ADC), includes memory tests but lacks a list‐learning paradigm. ADCs often supplement the UDS with their own preferred list‐learning task. Given the importance of list‐learning for characterizing memory, we aimed to develop a harmonized memory score that incorporates UDS memory tests while allowing centers to contribute differing list‐learning tasks.MethodWe applied item‐banking confirmatory factor analysis to develop a composite memory score in 5,287 participants (mean age 67.1; SD = 12.2) recruited through 18 ADCs and four consortia (DiverseVCID, MarkVCID, ALLFTD, LEADS) who completed UDS memory tasks (used as linking‐items) and one of five list‐learning tasks. All analyses used linear regression. We tested whether memory scores were affected by which list‐learning task was administered. To assess construct validity, we tested associations of memory scores with demographics, disease severity (CDR Box Score), an independent memory task (TabCAT Favorites, n = 675), and hippocampal volume (n = 811). We compared performances between cognitively unimpaired (n = 279), AD‐biomarker+ MCI (n = 26), and AD‐biomarker+ dementia (n = 98). In a subsample with amyloid‐ and tau‐PET (n = 49), we compared memory scores from participants with positive vs negative scans determined using established quantitative cutoffs.ResultModel fit indices were excellent (e.g., CFI = 0.998) and factor loadings were strong (0.43‐0.93). Differences in list‐learning task had a negligible effect on scores (average Cohen’s d = 0.11). Higher memory scores were significantly (p’s<.001) correlated with younger age (β = ‐0.18), lower CDR Box Scores (β = ‐0.63), female sex (β = 0.12), higher education (β = 0.19), larger hippocampal volume (β = 0.42), and an independent memory task (β = 0.71, p<0.001). The memory composite declined in a stepwise fashion by diagnosis (cognitively unimpaired>MCI>AD dementia, p<0.001). On average, amyloid‐PET positivity was associated with lower composite scores, but was not statistically significant (β = ‐0.34; p = 0.25; d = 0.40). Tau‐PET positivity was associated with worse performance, demonstrating a large effect size (β = ‐0.75; p<0.002; d = 0.91).ConclusionThe harmonized memory score developed in a large national sample was stable regardless of contributing list‐learning task and its validity for cross‐cohort ADRD research is supported by expected associations with demographics, clinical measures, and Alzheimer’s biomarkers. A processing script will be made available to enhance cross‐cohort ADRD research.

Abstract INTRODUCTION The U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER) is evaluating lifestyle interventions in older adults at risk for cognitive decline and dementia. Here we characterize the baseline data set of the POINTER Imaging ancillary study. METHODS Participants underwent health and cognitive assessments and neuroimaging with multimodal positron emission tomography (PET) (beta‐amyloid [Aβ] and tau) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Framingham risk score (FRS) was used to quantify cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. RESULTS A total of 1052 participants (31% from underrepresented ethnoracial groups) were enrolled. Compared to Aβ−, Aβ+ (29%) participants were older, had higher apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) ε4 carriage rate and white matter hyperintensity volume, and greater temporal tau. FRS was related to MRI measures, but not AD biomarkers. FRS and tau had independent effects on cognition. DISCUSSION In this heterogenous, at‐risk cohort, CVD risk was related to more abnormal brain structure and poorer cognition, representing a putative non‐AD (Alzheimer's disease) pathway to brain injury and cognitive decline. Highlights The U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER) cohort is enriched for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and poor lifestyle POINTER Imaging collected multimodal neuroimaging data in this unique, at‐risk cohort Amyloid burden was related to age, apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) ε4 carriage, and measures of disease progression Associations between amyloid and tau, and tau and cognition, were relatively weak CVD risk and tau pathology were independently related to memory

Abstract INTRODUCTION A key goal of the Alzheimer's Disease NeuroImaging Initiative (ADNI) positron emission tomography (PET) Core is to harmonize quantification of β‐amyloid (Aβ) and tau PET image data across multiple scanners and tracers. METHODS We developed an analysis pipeline (Berkeley PET Imaging Pipeline, B‐PIP) for ADNI Aβ and tau PET images and applied it to PET data from other multisite studies. Steps include image pre‐processing, refacing, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/PET co‐registration, visual quality control (QC), quantification of tracer uptake, and standardization of Aβ and tau standardized uptake value ratios (SUVrs) across tracers. RESULTS Measurements from 10,105 cross‐sectional and longitudinal Aβ and tau PET scans acquired in several studies between 2010 and 2024 can be processed, harmonized, and directly merged across tracers and cohorts. DISCUSSION The B‐PIP developed in ADNI is a scalable image harmonization approach used in several observational studies and clinical trials that facilitates rigorous Aβ and tau PET quantification and data sharing. Highlights Quantitative results from ADNI Aβ and tau PET data are generated using a rigorous, scalable image processing pipeline This pipeline has been applied to PET data from several other large, multisite studies and trials Quantitative outcomes are harmonizable across studies and are shared with the scientific community

Abstract White matter hyperintensities (WMH) and infarcts found on magnetic resonance imaging (MR infarcts) are common biomarkers of cerebrovascular disease. In this review, we summarize the methods, publications, and conclusions stemming from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) related to these measures. We combine analysis of WMH and MR infarct data from across the three main ADNI cohorts with a review of existing literature discussing new methodologies and scientific findings derived from these data. Although ADNI inclusion criteria were designed to minimize vascular risk factors and disease, data across all the ADNI cohorts found consistent trends of increasing WMH volumes associated with advancing age, female sex, and cognitive impairment. ADNI, initially proposed as a study to investigate biomarkers of AD pathology, has also helped elucidate the impact of asymptomatic cerebrovascular brain injury on cognition within a cohort relatively free of vascular disease. Future ADNI work will emphasize additional vascular biomarkers. Highlights White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are common to advancing age and likely reflect brain vascular injury among older individuals. WMH and to a lesser extent, magnetic resonance (MR) infarcts, affect risk for transition to cognitive impairment. WMHs and MR infarcts are present, even among Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants highly selected to have Alzheimer's disease (AD) as the primary pathology. WMH burden in ADNI is greater among individuals with cognitive impairment and has been associated with AD neurodegenerative markers and cerebral amyloidosis. The negative additive effects of cerebrovascular disease appear present, even in select populations, and future biomarker work needs to further explore this relationship.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONRecent technological advances have increased the risk that de‐identified brain images could be re‐identified from face imagery. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a leading source of publicly available de‐identified brain imaging, who quickly acted to protect participants’ privacy.METHODSAn independent expert committee evaluated 11 face‐deidentification (“de‐facing”) methods and selected four for formal testing.RESULTSEffects of de‐facing on brain measurements were comparable across methods and sufficiently small to recommend de‐facing in ADNI. The committee ultimately recommended mri_reface for advantages in reliability, and for some practical considerations. ADNI leadership approved the committee's recommendation, beginning in ADNI4.DISCUSSIONADNI4 de‐faces all applicable brain images before subsequent pre‐processing, analyses, and public release. Trained analysts inspect de‐faced images to confirm complete face removal and complete non‐modification of brain. This paper details the history of the algorithm selection process and extensive validation, then describes the production workflows for de‐facing in ADNI.Highlights ADNI is implementing “de‐facing” of MRI and PET beginning in ADNI4. “De‐facing” alters face imagery in brain images to help protect privacy. Four algorithms were extensively compared for ADNI and mri_reface was chosen. Validation confirms mri_reface is robust and effective for ADNI sequences. Validation confirms mri_reface negligibly affects ADNI brain measurements.