Citations

Importance There is a lack of long-term efficacy and safety data on hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (hATTR-PN) and on RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutics in general. This study presents the longest-term data to date on patisiran for hATTR-PN. Objective To present the long-term efficacy and safety of patisiran in adults with hATTR-PN. Design, Setting, and Participants This global open-label extension (OLE) of the APOLLO randomized clinical trial and phase 2 OLE study enrolled patients from 43 hospitals or clinical centers across 19 countries between July 2015 and August 2017, with follow-up until November 2022. Of 212 eligible patients with hATTR who completed the phase 3 APOLLO or phase 2 OLE parent studies, 211 enrolled in and 138 completed the global OLE. Intervention Patisiran, 0.3 mg/kg, intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 5 years. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes evaluated at year 5 of the global OLE included disability (polyneuropathy disability [PND] score); polyneuropathy severity (Neuropathy Impairment Score [NIS]), nutritional status (modified body mass index [mBMI]), quality of life (Norfolk Quality of Life–Diabetic Neuropathy [Norfolk QOL-DN]), and Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS), with no statistical hierarchy. Safety, survival probability, and mortality were also assessed. Results At the global OLE baseline, the mean (SD) age was 61.3 (12.3) years, and 156 patients (73.9%) were male. In 138 patients completing the study, PND scores remained stable or improved in 89 patients (65.0%), NISs showed a mean (SD) change of 10.9 (14.7), and mean (SD) mBMI (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared times serum albumin in grams per liter) increased by 46.4 (120.7) over 5 years from baseline. Norfolk QOL-DN and R-ODS scores showed mean (SD) changes of 4.1 (16.7) and –3.7 (6.2), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) leading to study withdrawal occurred in 47 patients (22.3%). Infusion-related reactions were the most common treatment-related AE (n = 34 [16.1%]). Overall, 41 patients (19.4%) died during the study. Patisiran treatment in the parent study and low familial amyloid polyneuropathy score at parent study baseline were associated with significantly improved survival. Conclusions and Relevance In the longest study of an RNAi therapeutic for any disease, patisiran treatment resulted in modest changes for patients with hATTR-PN with an acceptable safety profile. These results highlight the importance of initiating early treatment for hATTR and the potential of RNAi therapeutics in medicine. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02510261

Background A multidisciplinary approach improves guideline‐directed medical therapy in systolic heart failure (HF), but its efficacy in patients with HF due to cardiac sarcoidosis is unreported. Methods and Results In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 848 patients from our institutional cardiac sarcoidosis clinics, identifying those with a cardiac sarcoidosis diagnosis, HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) at index evaluation, and echocardiograms within 90 days and 11 to 36 months. Patients were stratified by participation in a pharmacist‐led medication therapy management (MTM) program for guideline‐directed medical therapy optimization (MTM versus non‐MTM [NMTM]) without randomization. Demographics, left ventricular ejection fraction, guideline‐directed medical therapy (quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization score), and immunosuppressive therapy were assessed. Primary outcomes included changes in Kansas City Medical Optimization score, left ventricular ejection fraction, and cardiovascular event–free survival (unplanned HF hospitalization, left ventricular assist device /heart transplant, or death). The final cohort included 111 patients (median age, 57 years; 34% women; 64% New York Heart Association class I–II); 43 (39%) were MTM and 68 (61%) were NMTM. Mean Kansas City Medical Optimization score was similar at index evaluation (MTM, 23.2; NMTM, 29.6; P =0.83). At follow‐up (median, 16 months), the Kansas City Medical Optimization score increased significantly in both groups (MTM, 23.2 to 74.8; P <0.001; NMTM, 29.6 to 58.7; P <0.001) but was higher in MTM ( P =0.001). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction trended toward higher values in MTM (44.4% versus 40.0%, P =0.05). The primary clinical outcome occurred in 1 MTM (2.3%) and 16 NMTM (23.5%) patients, with higher risk in NMTM (hazard ratio, 11.97 [95% CI, 1.58–90.54]; P =0.002). Conclusions In this retrospective cohort study, a pharmacist‐led MTM program was associated with favorable guideline‐directed medical therapy optimization and lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis with HF.

Introduction: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) often results in systolic heart failure (HF) and responds favorably to guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT). A multidisciplinary team approach to HF care is recommended but few published examples exist in CS patients. Methods: We queried an institutional registry of 599 CS patients (2000-2023) for patients with index LVEF < 50% (within 90 d of index CS evaluation) and follow-up TTE within 11-36 months. In our CS medication therapy management (MTM) program (started 1/8/2019), pharmacists conduct independent visits with CS patients (in person or remote), discuss GDMT tolerance and symptoms, review monitoring laboratory studies, and adjust GDMT (ACEi/ARB/ARNi, beta-blocker, MRA, and/or SGLT2i) via collaborative practice agreement with the CS cardiologists. Patients were classified as MTM (≥1 MTM encounter) or NMTM patients (0 encounters). We compared (1) GDMT, (2) cardiac remodeling, and (3) clinical outcomes (event free survival to first heart failure hospitalization, LVAD, heart transplant, or death). Results: Nineteen percent (113/599) CS patients met inclusion criteria (34% female, 92% white, median age 57 y, 19% definite CS, 58% probable CS, 31% presumed CS), with 44 MTM (median 11.5 encounters, IQR 11) and 69 NMTM patients. Both MTM and NMTM patients were on a median 2 GDMT agents at index evaluation (p=0.21). At follow-up (median 19 mo MTM, 15 mo NMTM, p=0.05), MTM patients were on more GDMT agents than NMTM (median 3.0 vs 2.0, p<0.001), with higher % target dose of ACEi/ARB/ARNi (98% vs 71%, p=0.009), beta-blocker (87% vs 57%, p=0.004), and SGLT2i use (30% vs 9%, p=0.004), but similar MRA use (48% vs 32%, p=0.09). Immunosuppressive therapy was used in 88% patients (89% MTM vs 87% NMTM, p=0.79). Index LVEF was similar (MTM 36%, NMTM 32%, p=0.07). Mean change in LVEF (excluding LVAD/transplant patients) demonstrated a non-significant trend towards improved remodeling in MTM (+8.6%) vs NMTM patients (+5.5%; p=0.39). MTM patients exhibited lower risk of the clinical outcome (1/44 MTM vs 16/69 MTM patients; univariable HR 0.08 [95%CI 0.01 - 0.63], log-rank p=0.016). Conclusions: A pharmacist MTM program for CS patients with HF is associated with improved GDMT uptitration and clinical outcomes, emphasizing the value of collaborative multidisciplinary CS care.

Myocarditis is defined by an immune response to infection or injury, most commonly identified after a viral infection or recent exposure to cardiotoxins or drugs. Classic myocarditis may also result from the activation of the immune system by self-antigens without an exogenous trigger. Pathogenic variants of genes encoding sarcolemmal and desmosomal proteins are present in 4% to 44% of myocarditis patients and may relate to persistent cardiac dysfunction and arrhythmias. The most common clinical presentation is acute chest pain resembling an ischemic infarction or pericarditis. Heart failure and syncope from tachy- or brady-arrhythmias are features of a complicated clinical course with substantial risk of future cardiovascular events and death. High-sensitivity troponin, ECG, and echocardiograms are useful but lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity to confirm the diagnosis. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance is indicated to confirm myocarditis in low-risk, uncomplicated cases. Endomyocardial biopsy is indicated to guide therapy in high-risk scenarios. In this review, we discuss the clinical aspects, pathogenesis, genetic susceptibility, and management of uncomplicated, complicated, and fulminant myocarditis related to viral injury. We identify gaps in understanding and suggest prime research questions in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of acute myocarditis. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05335928.

Abstract Aims Acute myocarditis, although a rare disease, can be associated with sudden cardiac death or the need for transplantation in both children and young adults. To date, there is no definitive evidence to support the routine use of immunosuppressive therapy or treatment targeting inflammation in patients with myocarditis. Animal models of cardiovascular (CV), as well as neurological diseases, have demonstrated that cannabidiol has significant anti-inflammatory properties and may represent a promising therapy in acute myocarditis. This efficacy has been shown in a murine model of autoimmune myocarditis as well as in in vitro and in vivo models of heart failure (HF). Methods and results We present the rationale and design of the ARCHER Trial, an international multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study examining the safety and efficacy of a pharmaceutically produced cannabidiol formulation, in patients with mild to moderate acute myocarditis. Eligible patients are those with acute myocarditis, randomized within 10 days of the diagnostic cardiac MRI (CMR), which has met defined diagnostic criteria for myocarditis. Oral treatment (cannabidiol or placebo) is titrated from 2.5 mg/kg of body weight up to 10 mg/kg of body weight b.i.d. (or highest tolerated dose) and taken for 12 weeks in addition to standard of care therapy for HF. The primary endpoints are defined as changes in global longitudinal strain (GLS) and extra cellular volume (ECV), measured by CMR at 12 weeks. Assuming 80% power, a 5% alpha risk and 25% missing CMR follow-up data at Week 12, 100 patients are required to demonstrate the desired treatment effect of 18%. The change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline to Week 12 was selected as the secondary endpoint. Additional exploratory endpoints include changes in hs-troponin, NT-proBNP, markers of inflammation and endothelial function during the 12-week treatment period. The trial is ongoing but is now more than 50% recruited. As enrolment in the trial continues, no interim data are available for inclusion in this Design paper. Conclusions The ongoing ARCHER Trial is an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study, designed to determine the effect of a pharmaceutically produced cannabidiol formulation on CMR parameters in patients presenting with acute myocarditis. Enrolment of 100 patients is expected to conclude in Q3 2024. Study results will be available in early 2025.

Abstract Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a form of inflammatory cardiomyopathy associated with significant clinical complications such as high-degree atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, and heart failure as well as sudden cardiac death. It is therefore important to provide an expert consensus statement summarizing the role of different available diagnostic tools and emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. By integrating clinical information and the results of diagnostic tests, an accurate, validated, and timely diagnosis can be made, while alternative diagnoses can be reasonably excluded. This clinical expert consensus statement reviews the evidence on the management of different CS manifestations and provides advice to practicing clinicians in the field on the role of immunosuppression and the treatment of cardiac complications based on limited published data and the experience of international CS experts. The monitoring and risk stratification of patients with CS is also covered, while controversies and future research needs are explored.

Introduction: Electro-anatomic mapping (EAM) has been studied as a modality to improve the sensitivity and reduce false negative rates with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). We systematically reviewed the literature describing EAM guided EMB. Methods: An experienced librarian developed search strategies for Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid CDR, Cochrane Central, Scopus and Web of Science. There were no restrictions on language or publication date. Animal studies were excluded. Search strategy included MESH headings and keywords including endomyocardial biopsy and electroanatomic mapping. Results: Out of 139 studies initially identified, 16 (9 case series, 7 case reports) were included in this systematic review. EAM guided EMB was performed in 152 patients and results of 241 biopsies were available for analysis. The most common indications for EAM guided EMB were suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). While fluoroscopic visualization of the bioptome close to mapping catheter was the most commonly utilized biopsy technique (n=7 studies), direct visualization of bioptome on CARTO (n=4) and on NavX (n=2) were used as well. Low voltage areas had abnormal myocardial histology more commonly (range 60-100%) than normal voltage areas (range 11-52%). Sensitivity of low voltage areas for abnormal myocardium ranged from 60% to 82%. EAM guided EMB appears safe and adverse events were noted in only one study (remote hemopericardium). Conclusions: EAM guided EMB is a safe and efficacious method to improve the sensitivity and reduce the false negative rate of conventional fluoroscopy guided biopsy.

Introduction Current evidence suggests that abnormal ventriculo-vascular coupling may contribute to the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) by increasing ventricular filling pressures and consequently, left atrial pressure. Recent investigations have also suggested that inflammation might have a role in the pathophysiology of AF. We hypothesize that autoimmune vasculitis plays a significant role in the pathogenetic mechanism of AF. Methods In this longitudinal cohort study, residents of Olmsted County, MN with first- time diagnosed AF during 1980-2000 and a reference age- and sex-matched control group from the same underlying population and time period were identified and followed until death, or 2000. The relationship between autoimmune vasculitis and first documented AF was analyzed. Results Of a total of 8766 patients (mean age 61.1+14.9 years; 56% women), 691 (7.9%) were diagnosed with autoimmune vasculitis during the 20 year period. The prevalence of autoimmune vasculitis in the AF group was 9.9% and 5.9% in the control group; p <0.001, respectively. After adjusting for CAD and LV dysfunction, the odds of autoimmune vasculitis in AF was 1.7 times higher than in controls (OR 1.69, 95%; CI 1.42 - 2.01, p < 0.0001). AF patients with autoimmune vasculitis had a worse survival compared to controls; p=.0114 (log-rank test). Conclusion Autoimmune vasculitis strongly increases the risk of atrial fibrillation and portends shorter survival in the AF population. These observations may represent one mechanism linking increased arterial stiffness and inflammation in the pathogenesis and prognosis of AF as an age-related disorder.

Background: In peripheral artery disease (PAD), claudication limits exercise performance, functional status and quality of life. Phosphodiesterase III inhibitors improve claudication-limited exercise performance in patients with PAD. K-134, a novel phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, was evaluated in a phase II trial incorporating an adaptive design to assess safety, quality of life and peak walking time (PWT) on a graded treadmill with cilostazol as an active comparator. Design: Patients with PAD were randomized to receive placebo (N = 87), K-134 at a dose of 25 mg (N = 42), 50 mg (N = 85) or 100 mg (N = 84), or cilostazol at a dose of 100 mg (N = 89), each given twice daily for 26 weeks. A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) implemented adaptive design was used to allow early discontinuation of unsafe or minimally informative K-134 arms. Interim safety assessments at 2 weeks included dosing of study medication at the study site followed by measurements of postural vital signs and symptoms, and at 4 weeks with a treadmill test at peak drug concentration to evaluate for ischemia or arrhythmias. Results: Based on prospectively defined adaptive criteria, the 25 mg K-134 arm was discontinued as the 50 mg and 100 mg doses were adequately tolerated, had no unanticipated safety signals, and were thus most likely to be informative concerning K-134 in the target population. In the intention-to-treat cohorts at 26 weeks PWT increased by 37% in the 100 mg K-134 arm and 23% on placebo (primary analysis p = 0.089). Using a mixed effects analysis in the entire population, 100 mg K-134 and cilostazol were each superior to placebo in improving PWT. In the per protocol population both K-134 100 mg and cilostazol 100 mg increased PWT as compared with placebo at 14 and 26 weeks. K-134 had tolerability and adverse effect profiles similar to that of cilostazol, with gastrointestinal adverse events, headache and dizziness the most common. Both drugs were associated with an increase in withdrawals prior to study completion due to adverse events as compared with placebo. Conclusions: K-134 was generally well tolerated, and at a dose of 100 mg twice daily had a safety profile and effect on treadmill walking performance that was similar to that of cilostazol.