Citations

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain prevalent after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), despite it being known to alleviate reflux. The physiological changes behind long-term GERD and hiatal hernia (HH) prevalence post-RYGB are not commonly investigated. Methods: In this consecutive cohort study, we examined patients who underwent RYGB and subsequent upper endoscopy, conducted by an expert bariatric endoscopist. The primary focus was on pouch endoscopic retrosflexion to evaluate the antireflux barrier (ARB). We gathered data encompassing patient demographics, anthropometrics, comorbidities, and findings from esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at the time of surgery and during follow-up EGD. Results: Our study included a total of 42 patients, predominantly female (97.5%) and White (100%), with an average age of 53.6±10.6 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 32.9±9.4 kg/m 2 . In our findings, all EGDs revealed the presence of a HH of varying sizes. The average HH size was 2.07±0.87 cm. The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) flap was also effaced in all patients with the majority (90.4%, 38 patients) classified as Hill grade IV and a smaller proportion (9.6%, 4 patients) as Hill grade III. Notably, PPI usage increased from the time of surgery to the time of EGD (69.0% vs. 42.9%, P =0.06). Conclusion: This research highlights the high incidence of HH and EGJ flap effacement in patients after RYGB, potentially elucidating the persistence of reflux symptoms, including weakly acidic or alkaline reflux, post-RYGB.

Objective: To develop and validate 2 predictive models, the Diabetes Remission Index (DRI) and the Weight loss–adjusted DRI (W-DRI), for assessing type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). Background: MBS, including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, is highly effective in achieving T2D remission, but outcomes vary across populations. Predicting remission remains critical for individualized patient care and optimizing surgical outcomes. Existing tools focus on general outcomes, and a specific model incorporating weight loss data has been lacking. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients with T2D and overweight/obesity (body mass index: ≥27 kg/m 2 ) who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between 2008 and 2018. Institution 1 (I-1) data (n = 503) were used to develop and internally validate the models, whereas Institution 2 (I-2) data (n = 409) were used for external validation. The DRI model incorporated preoperative variables, and the W-DRI model, in addition, included postsurgical weight loss. Predictive accuracy was assessed using area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve [area under the curve (AUC)], calibration plots, and stratified analyses. Results: In I-1, 44.7% of patients achieved T2D remission, with a DRI model AUC of 0.80. In I-2, 52.6% achieved remission, with a model AUC of 0.78. Incorporating weight loss improved W-DRI predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.82 in I-1, 0.79 in I-2). Calibration plots demonstrated strong agreement between predicted and observed remission rates. An online DRI and W-DRI calculator is available through the Mayo Clinic webpage (https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/dri-calculator/). Conclusions: The DRI and W-DRI models accurately predict T2D remission post-MBS, enabling personalized patient care and informed decision-making. Further validation across diverse populations is warranted.

Summary Metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS), including Roux‐en‐Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), have proven effective in promoting long‐term diabetes remission among patients with type‐2 diabetes (T2D). In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we investigated the effectiveness of RYGB and SG in achieving diabetes remission, specifically among patients with T2D and vascular complications, while accounting for similar baseline diabetes severity. Although various scores predict diabetes remission after bariatric surgery, they do not consider diabetes‐related vascular complications, which can influence outcomes even in patients with similar baseline T2D severity. We collected preoperative data on microvascular (retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy) and macrovascular comorbidities (coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accidents, peripheral artery disease) to compare the efficacy of RYGB and SG. Among 961 patients analysed, those with vascular complications showed higher remission rates with RYGB (OR: 1.97) compared to SG, despite similar baseline diabetes severity. Notably, RYGB patients with microvascular complications had a significant advantage in achieving T2D remission (OR: 2.95). However, no significant differences in remission were observed in patients with macrovascular complications. These findings suggest that RYGB may be more effective than SG in specific patient populations, particularly those with microvascular complications, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies.

Background: Pathologic reflux is a common debilitating digestive condition and anti-reflux surgery is an effective treatment option. Depending on the specifics of the procedure, anti-reflux surgery leads to distinct changes in the endoscopic appearance of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). This American Foregut Society (AFS) white paper develops nomenclature for describing the endoscopic characteristics of the EGJ after commonly performed laparoscopic antireflux operations. Methods: The AFS Anti-Reflux Barrier Collaborative analyzed the anatomic manipulation and corresponding endoscopic appearance of the EGJ after commonly performed anti-reflux surgery including: (1) 360° anterior/posterior (AP) fundoplication (Nissen); (2) posterior partial fundoplication (Toupet); (3) anterior partial fundoplication (Watson, Dor); (4) magnetic sphincter augmentation; and (5) concomitant hiatal hernia repair with transoral fundoplication (cTIF). Results: Characteristics common to the anti-reflux surgery procedures include restoration of intra-abdominal esophageal length and crural diaphragm repair such that the hiatal aperture is no longer visible in the retroflexed endoscopic view. With regard to the geometry of anti-reflux procedures, the Collaborative established that when evaluated endoscopically in retroflection, the surgically constructed valve should be described in reference to the angle of His and the extent of anatomic change described in terms of (1) the depth of the anterior and posterior grooves, (2) the apposition of the valve collar to the endoscope, (3) the length of the valve, and (4) the position of the squamocolumnar junction relative to the lip of the valve. Conclusions: Current anti-reflux operations share much in common but employ varying degrees of valvular reconstruction leading to distinct endoscopic characteristics. Developing a consistent nomenclature for describing the appearance of the post-surgical valve is essential to develop a better understanding of how variables such as the tightness of the hiatal repair, tightness of the valve collar, and length of the valve can impact the outcome of anti-reflux surgery and predict reflux recurrence.

Background: Within the spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), pathologic reflux applies to the subset of patients with either erosive esophagitis or abnormal esophageal acid exposure on pH-metry, consequences of a dysfunctional antireflux barrier (ARB). Methods: The American Foregut Society (AFS) tasked a 13-member working group of expert foregut surgeons and esophagologists (The ARB Cooperative) to develop a white paper on ARB function, dysfunction, and mechanisms of action of antireflux surgery through discussion of relevant literature summarized herein. Results: The ARB Cooperative concluded that pathologic reflux is a consequence of the interplay between progressive anatomical distortion of the ARB and physiology. Factors contributing to ARB dysfunction include (1) separation of crural diaphragm from the lower esophageal sphincter with widening of the hiatus and diminished crural diaphragm sphincteric function; (2) loss of the intra-abdominal lower esophageal sphincter segment with complete disabling of the flap valve component of the ARB; (3) axial hiatal hernia leading to reflux during swallow-induced lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, LES hypotension, inspiration related reflux, a lowered threshold for eliciting transient LES relaxations, and increased compliance of the gastroesophageal junction leading to greater diameter of sphincter opening during transient LES relaxations. With regard to antireflux surgery, the objectives include: (1) reduction of hiatal hernia and restoration of the intra-abdominal esophageal segment; (2) repair of the dilated hiatus; (3) restoring flap valve function by modifying gastroesophageal anatomy; and (4) restricting gastroesophageal junction opening during periods of relaxation. Conclusions: This ARB Cooperative white paper supports the concept of there being 3 major inter-related mechanisms promoting ARB competence: the LES as an intrinsic sphincter, the crural diaphragm as an extrinsic sphincter, and the gastroesophageal valve, a mechanical 1-way valve. Pathological reflux occurs with progressive anatomical disruption of the ARB which in turn leads to physiological dysfunction, the severity of which parallels the extent of anatomical disruption. The corollary of this is that the primary mechanism of antireflux surgery is to restore the ARB by eliminating or compensating for its anatomical disruption. It is the hope of the cooperative that understanding the proposed framework will help clinicians and researchers in improving antireflux procedures.