Citations

Abstract Background: Chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA) impacts quality of life and reproductive options, and may play a role in treatment decision-making for young breast cancer patients. Although age, increasing doses of alkylating agents, and tamoxifen are known to increase the risk of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA), it is difficult to predict which women will develop CRA in order to inform fertility preservation and treatment decisions. We sought to investigate whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that have been associated with a younger age at natural menopause and ovarian reserve in non-oncologic populations were predictive of CRA in two large German clinical trials that administered gonadotoxic chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 1322 premenopausal participants under age 50 who enrolled in SUCCESS B (a phase 3 trial of FEC-docetaxel-trastuzumab +/- gemcitabine for high risk early stage breast cancer) or SUCCESS C (a phase 3 trial of FEC-docetaxel-cyclophosphamide vs. docetaxel-cyclophosphamide that also tested the efficacy of a weight loss intervention in early stage breast cancer patients) were eligible for this study. We excluded patients who were receiving ovarian suppression. On these trials, menstrual status was self-reported as amenorrheic or not every three months after chemotherapy. Bloods were stored and patients provided consent for DNA analysis. We genotyped nine candidate SNPs in six genes (rs2002555 and rs11170547 in AMHR2, rs6166 in FSHR, rs10852344 <60kb from TNFRSF17/RUNDC2A/ GSPT1, rs12461110 in NLRP11, rs1801133 in MTHFR, rs2066470 in MTHRF, rs3810682 in BMP15, and rs615942 in COASY), and examined their association with CRA at 12-month and 24-month time points using logistic regression adjusted for age, BMI, and tamoxifen. Results: Of the 554 eligible women with SNP data and menstrual data at 12 months, 70% reported CRA; of the 458 eligible women with SNP data and menstrual data at 24 months, 69% reported CRA. The two SNPs in AMHR2 showed suggestive associations with CRA at 12 and 24 months. [Final results pending]. Conclusions: Genetic variation in AMHR2 may be associated with CRA. Additional research will be needed to validate these findings in other breast cancer survivors and to identify additional SNPs that may be associated with CRA. Together with other clinical factors, genetic variation may improve our ability to predict who will experience CRA, and may inform reproductive and treatment decision-making in cancer patients. Citation Format: Ruddy KJ, Rack B, Schwitulla J, Lambrechts D, Haeberle L, Schramm A, Trapp E, Scholz C, Beutler AS, Ginsburg E, Couch F, Partridge AH, Wang L, Weinshilboum RM, Janni W, Vachon C, Fasching P. Genetic predictors of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-07.

Abstract Background: Workplace concerns are particularly salient for young women with breast cancer (BC), and a cancer diagnosis (dx) and treatment may affect their careers. We sought to evaluate the perceived impact of dx on employment, describe job changes, and identify factors associated with transition out of the workforce after dx of BC at a young age. Methods: As part of an ongoing, multi-center cohort of young women diagnosed with BC at age ≤ 40, we surveyed women with early-stage BC about their pre- and post-dx employment status. Additional items assessed socio-demographic and treatment information; tumor characteristics were ascertained via pathology and medical record review. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of transitioning from pre-dx employment to unemployment at 1 year after dx. Among women employed 1 year after dx, we evaluated job satisfaction, perceived impact of dx on job performance, accommodations made by employers, and perceived likelihood of employment in the future. Results: 76% of women (555/730) were employed both before dx and at 1 year; 13% were not employed at either time point; 7% were employed pre-dx but unemployed at 1 year; 4% were not employed prior to dx but reported employment at 1 year. Among women employed 1 year after dx, 74% (427/581) were somewhat or completely satisfied with their job. Only 6% said cancer or treatment limited their ability to perform their job quite a bit or very much; 38% said their ability was affected a little bit. Most (63%) said their employers had made accommodations for them, and almost all women (93%) said it was very likely they would be working in 1 year. In multivariable analyses (Table 1), women with stage 3 disease (vs. stage 1), were more likely to transition out of the workforce following dx, while women with a college or graduate degree (vs. no college degree) were less likely to transition out. Conclusion: Most young women with early stage BC remain employed and report a willingness by their employer to make accommodations following a breast cancer dx. While few women reported that their dx or treatment limited their job performance, the finding that women with more advanced disease were more likely to transition out of the workforce suggests an impact of dx/treatment burden on employment. Women without a college degree were also at risk for unemployment post-dx, suggesting that job type, socioeconomic status, and environment affect employment outcomes. Attention to these subgroups of women is warranted to ensure that they are sufficiently supported given the potential adverse psychosocial and financial impacts of unemployment on patients, families, communities, and society. Table 1. Multivariable analysis of factors associated with transition out of workforce 1year post-dx (N=634) OR (95% CI)Stage (ref=1) 04.52 (0.60-33.85)21.11 (0.48-2.58)34.05 (1.53-10.72)*White non-Hispanic (ref=non-WNH)1.47 (0.56-3.81)College graduate (ref=no college degree)0.44 (0.22-0.90)*Married/Living as married (ref=unmarried)0.95 (0.43-2.08)Parous (ref=nulliparous)1.75 (0.83-3.69)Age at diagnosis (years)0.98 (0.90-1.06)Mastectomy (ref=lumpectomy)1.74 (0.75-4.05)Endocrine therapy (ref=none)0.75 (0.41-1.39)Chemotherapy (ref=none)5.20 (0.93-29.22)Radiation (ref=none)1.38 (0.64-2.96)*p<0.05 Citation Format: Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM, Rajagopal PS, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Come S, Borges V, Gelber S. Employment trends in young women following a breast cancer diagnosis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-04.

Abstract Background: Young women with breast cancer need highly effective contraception given the potential implications of unplanned pregnancy for optimal treatment, and the teratogenic risks. We sought to determine the contraceptive methods used by young women after diagnosis (dx) of breast cancer and factors associated with use of less effective methods or no contraceptive method, which confers a 6-90% annual risk of pregnancy in sexually active women in contrast to highly effective methods (risk <1%). Methods: As part of a randomized trial conducted in 54 sites to test an education and support intervention for young women with breast cancer and their oncologists, we surveyed women about their pre-dx, current, and planned contraceptive use, and about communication with their providers regarding contraception. Women enrolled within 3 months of dx; contraception items were included on 3- and 12-month post-enrollment surveys. Intrauterine device (IUD) use, tubal sterilization, hysterectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (hyst/BSO) after dx, or male partner vasectomy were classified as highly effective methods; all other methods and non-use were categorized as less effective. We excluded women not at risk of pregnancy: hyst/BSO prior to dx, or no indication for contraception. We used logistic regression to explore factors associated with use of less effective methods. Results: Of 424 women who completed the 3-month post-enrollment survey, median age at dx was 39 (range 22-45). 312 women at risk of pregnancy were included in this analysis, including 291 reporting sexual activity with a male partner within the last 6 months, and 21 reporting no recent sexual activity but reporting use of birth control. 123 women (39%) used highly effective contraceptive methods prior to dx; after dx, 161 (52%) reported current use of or a plan to use a highly effective method. 19 women (6%) reported use of a hormonal birth control method since dx; 7 (2%) reported withdrawal as their only contraceptive method; 25 (8%) reported no contraception. 30% of women did not recall a discussion of avoiding pregnancy or need for contraception during treatment with their providers. In multivariable analyses (N=310), desire for additional biologic children (OR 7.54, 95% CI 3.88-14.66) and provider discussion of contraception and pregnancy (OR 2.13 95% CI 1.20-3.78) were associated with use of less effective contraception. Age, race/ethnicity, disease stage, and partner status were not significantly associated with use of less effective methods. Conclusion: About half of women who are at risk of pregnancy reported use or planned use of less effective contraceptive methods or no method of contraception following dx of breast cancer. Women with breast cancer and their providers may benefit from targeted education on contraceptive options and method effectiveness. Citation Format: Rosenberg SM, Dutton CR, Ligibel J, Barry W, Ruddy KJ, Sprunck-Harrild K, Emmons KM, Partridge AH. Contraception use in young women with breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-18.

Abstract Background. The increase in breast cancer risk during pregnancy and postpartum is well known; however, the molecular phenotype of breast cancers occurring shortly after pregnancy has not been well studied. Given this, we investigated whether nulliparity and the time interval since pregnancy among parous women affects the breast cancer phenotype in young women. Materials and Methods. We examined molecular phenotype in relation to time since pregnancy in a prospective cohort of 707 young women (aged ≤40 years) with breast cancer. Parity was ascertained from study questionnaires. Using tumor histologic grade on central review and biomarker expression, cancers were categorized as luminal A- or B-like, HER2 enriched, and triple negative. Results. Overall, 32% were luminal A-like, 41% were luminal B-like, 9% were HER2 enriched, and 18% were triple negative. Although, numerically, patients diagnosed >5 years after pregnancy had more luminal A-like subtypes than women with shorter intervals since pregnancy, there was no evidence of a relationship between these intervals and molecular subtypes once family history of breast cancer and age at diagnosis were considered. Conclusion. Distribution of breast cancer molecular phenotype did not differ significantly among young women by parity or time interval since parturition when important predictors of tumor phenotype such as age and family history were considered. Implications for Practice: Distribution of breast cancer molecular phenotype did not differ among parous young women by time interval since pregnancy. The implication of these findings for clinical practice suggests that pregnancy-associated breast cancers may be seen up to 5 years beyond parturition.

Abstract Background: In CALGB-49907 (NEJM 2009;360:2055), older patients (pts) with ESBC were randomized to standard adjuvant chemo (AC or CMF versus capecitabine). The objective of this secondary QoL analysis is to assess if pts’ BL chemo preference (CP, defined as high or low), is associated with the following during and after completion of chemo: self and professional-reported toxicity, changes in mental health, function, QoL, recurrence-free (RFS) and overall (OS) survival. Patients and Methods: Of 633 trial pts 350 participated in the QoL substudy; 145/350 pts completed the BL assessment regarding CP. CP was measured by asking the amount of benefit women would require to choose adjuvant chemo in a hypothetical situation, irrespective of chemo agents. Women who chose chemo for an increase in OS of ≤12 months (mo) were designated as high chemo preference (HCP) and those who chose >12 mo were designated low chemo preference (LCP). CP associations were evaluated with: BL perception of self-health and perceived QoL on chemo; patient reported outcomes (PROs), changes in function and QoL (based on EORTC-QLQ-C30); anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale); observed grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) by NCI common toxicity criteria (CTC v2.0). Pts were assessed at midtreatment and at 1, 12, 18 and 24 mo post-treatment. Chi-square tests, t-tests, and Cox models were used for categorical, continuous, and time-to-event variables, respectively. Results: The demographic and tumor characteristics of women (median age 71) who provided CP at BL were not different from women in the QoL subset or from non-QoL pts. 68/145 (47%) women had a HCP. CP groups did not differ based on age, surgery type, tumor and nodal stage, hormone receptor status, performance status, chemo assignment, education, marital or employment status except the LCP group had a higher proportion of white women (95% vs. 78%, p=0.004). At BL, there were no differences in perception of self-health based on CP but women with LCP predicted QoL on chemo to be worse than women with HCP (p=0.006) and reported greater nausea/vomiting. Mid-treatment, LCP pts reported worse nausea/vomiting, financial worries, and cancer symptoms. Post-treatment, LCP pts had worse constipation (at 1 mo) and financial worries (at 24 mo). There were no differences based on CP for dyspnea, pain, fatigue, insomnia, anxiety or depression at any timepoint. Mid-treatment, LCP women reported lower QoL and worse social, emotional and physical function compared to HCP women. These scores were not significantly different after treatment completion. LCP women had significantly higher rates of grade 3-5 AEs (53 vs. 34%, p=0.02) during treatment but these did not persist post-therapy. CP was not significantly associated with OS (HR =0.75, p=0.36) or RFS (HR=0.94, p=0.84). Conclusions: LCP at BL was associated with lower QoL, worse physical symptoms, AEs and function mid-therapy, but not mental health. Mid-therapy declines in women with LCP largely reversed post-therapy. This information may be useful for oncology professionals to counsel older ESBC pts with LCP receiving adjuvant chemo. Citation Format: Ajeet Gajra, Linda McCall, Hyman B Muss, Harvey J Cohen, Aminah Jatoi, Karla V Ballman, Ann H Partridge, Linda Sutton, Barbara A Parker, Gustav Magrinat, Jaqueline M Lafky, Arti Hurria. Association of patient preference for adjuvant chemotherapy (chemo) at baseline (BL) with toxicity, mental health, function, quality of life (QoL) and survival in older women with early stage breast cancer (ESBC) [CALGB 49907 Alliance] [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-07.

Abstract Background: There is an increasing recognition that many young women with breast cancer will have favorable outcomes without chemotherapy. We sought to characterize decision-making surrounding adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (CT) in this population for whom chemotherapy has historically been a standard of care. Methods: As part of an ongoing, multi-center, prospective cohort of young women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 and younger, we identified 657 women with Stage I-III breast cancer. Participants were asked to complete surveys by mail that included questions about socio-demographics, decision-making, and treatment history within the first year following diagnosis. Tumor characteristics were ascertained via pathology and medical record review. We used Chi-square tests to compare: decisional involvement (patient-driven vs. shared vs. physician-driven), degree of confidence, and feeling informed about the CT decision (the latter two measured on a 0-10 scale, categorized as follows: 0-5=low; moderate=6-8; 9-10=high) between women who did and did not receive CT. To explore clinical appropriateness of the CT decision, we used logistic regression to assess the relationship between tumor characteristics and non-receipt of CT among women with Stage I/II disease. Results: Among women with Stage I (n=250), II (n=312), and III (n=95), disease, 66%, 95%, and 100%, received CT, respectively. A greater proportion of women who had CT were highly confident with their decision compared with women who did not have CT (80% vs. 60%, p<0.0001); women who did not have CT were more likely to report a low level of feeling informed about the CT decision compared to women who received CT (20% vs. 5%, p<0.0001). Women who did not have CT were also more likely to report the final CT decision as made by their doctor (49% vs. 28%) and less likely to report a shared decision (33% vs. 59%, p<0.0001). Non-receipt of CT in women with Stage I/II disease (n=546) was associated within having node negative disease, T1 (vs. T2 or larger), Her2- negative, and hormone receptor positive tumors. Conclusion: Although non-receipt of CT would be expected to be viewed favorably by patients and doctors, we found that women who received CT felt more confident and better informed than those who received no CT. Given that women who did not have CT were also less likely to perceive the CT decision as shared, improved communication together with better decisional support may be beneficial, especially for women who do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Citation Format: Shoshana M Rosenberg, Karen Sepucha, Kathryn J Ruddy, Lidia Schapira, Steven Come, Virginia Borges, Evan Morgan, Nancy U Lin, Shari Gelber, Rulla M Tamimi, Ann H Partridge. Decision-making surrounding adjuvant chemotherapy in young women with early stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-03.

AbstractObjectiveUsing a large prospective cohort of women age 40 or younger diagnosed with breast cancer, we examined the relationship between perceived partner support and anxiety.MethodsSix hundred seventy‐five young women with breast cancer Stages I–III, median age 36, completed a self‐report baseline questionnaire. Perceived partner support was assessed using items extracted from the marital subscale of the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System; generalized social support was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study–Social Support Survey. Anxiety was measured using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluated the association between partner support, other sociodemographic factors, and anxiety.ResultsMean age at diagnosis was 35.4 years. Fourteen percent of the women were not partnered, and among those who were partnered or in a significant relationship, 20% were categorized as unsupported. In univariate and multivariable analysis adjusting for sociodemographic factors, women in an unsupported‐partnered relationship had higher odds of anxiety symptoms compared with women in a supported‐partnered relationship. Young age and being financially insecure were also both independently associated with anxiety.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that partner support may play a key role in a young woman's adjustment to a serious stressor such as breast cancer. In addition, younger age increases vulnerability to anxiety as does struggling with finances. Because supportive efforts of a partner have potential to protect against the impact of stress, interventions to enhance partner support and reduce anxiety might be beneficial to address challenges experienced as a couple in this setting. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.