O’Neill, Anne

Abstract BACKGROUND The phase III ECOG-ACRIN E3F05 trial tested whether combined therapy with radiation and concomitant followed by adjuvant temozolomide is more effective than radiation alone in patients with grade II gliomas. The study incorporated 1p/19q analysis but predated assessment of IDH mutational status. We previously reported that the addition of temozolomide to radiotherapy significantly improved overall survival in grade II gliomas, with similar hazard ratios in co-deleted (0.56) and non-codeleted (0.53) tumors. Herein we incorporate the results of DNA methylation profiling to examine outcomes in IDHmt, non-codeleted subjects as well as co-deleted ones. METHODS All 172 subjects underwent 1p/19q co-deletion analysis as a stratification factor, 1p and 19q deletion analysis was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) gliomas by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) following standard methods, 97/172 (56.3%) had tissue with 60% or more tumor content available for DNA methylation profiling using Heidelberg classifier v12 and Bethesda Classifier 2.0 to ascertain classification as IDH mutant glioma and alternative evaluation of 1p/19q co-deletion status. RESULTS Of the 172 subjects, 74 (43.0%) had 1p/19q codeletion by FISH, 38 (22.1%) were IDHmt without codeletion, 14 (8.1%) were IDHwt, and 46 (26.7%) were non-codeleted with unknown IDH status (these include n=4 pts originally classified as 1p/19q undetermined). With a median follow-up of 130 months, the addition of TMZ to RT improved OS in patients with IDHmt, non-codeleted tumors (HR 0.15 (0.03-0.74)) and 10-year OS from 39% to 80%. In codeleted tumors, the addition of TMZ improved OS (HR 0.51 (0.19-1.42)) and 10-year OS from 68% to 90%. CONCLUSION The addition of temozolomide to radiation improves overall survival in both co-deleted and IDHmt, non-co-deleted grade II gliomas.

Abstract BACKGROUND Both radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) have meaningful single-modality anti-tumor activity against low-grade gliomas. ECOG-ACRIN E3F05 tested whether combined therapy with radiation and temozolomide is more effective than radiation alone in patients with grade II gliomas. METHODS Patients with grade II gliomas (central pathology review performed post hoc), no prior radiation/chemotherapy, and either age > 40, uncontrolled symptoms/seizures, or progression after initial observation were randomized 1:1 to radiation 50.4 Gy alone in 28 fractions (Arm A) versus radiation 50.4 Gy with concomitant and 12 four-week cycles of post-radiation TMZ (Arm B). Randomization was stratified by 1p/19q codeletion status, age, KPS, pre-operative tumor diameter, and contrast enhancement. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS), quality of life, cognition, severe toxicities, and impact of codeletion status were secondary objectives. RESULTS The trial opened 1/09. Accrual was stopped in 1/14 after RTOG 9802 reported benefit from the addition of PCV chemotherapy to radiation in grade II gliomas. A total of 172 subjects were enrolled. Median age was 44 (range 19-78) and 54% male. 1p/19q codeletion was present in 44%. NCI CTCAE (version 4) grade 3+ toxicity was more common in participants treated with TMZ: thrombocytopenia (11%) and neutropenia (5%) versus none in the radiation alone arm. With a median follow-up of 117 months, OS was superior in Arm B (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.95, stratified log-rank p value 0.03). OS HRs were 0.56 and 0.53 for subjects with and without 1p/19q codeleted tumors, respectively. PFS did not differ between Arms A and B (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.44-1.28, p = 0.30). Five and ten-year OS were 78% and 70% in Arm B versus 70% and 47% in Arm A. CONCLUSION The addition of temozolomide to radiation improves overall survival in both co-deleted and non-co-deleted grade II gliomas.

Abstract Background In 2008, bevacizumab received accelerated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for use in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Based on the preclinical and preliminary clinical activity of the trastuzumab and bevacizumab combination, ECOG-ACRIN E1105 trial was developed to determine if the addition of bevacizumab to a chemotherapy and trastuzumab combination for first-line therapy would improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2-positive MBC. Findings: 96 patients were randomized to receive standard first-line chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab between November 2007 and October 2009, and 93 began protocol therapy. Induction therapy was given for 24 weeks, followed by maintenance trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab. 60% (56/93) began carboplatin and 74% (69/93) completed 6 cycles of induction therapy. Primary endpoint was PFS. Median PFS was 11.1 and 13.8 months for placebo and bevacizumab arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 95%, Confidence Interval [Cl] for bevacizumab vs. placebo: 0.73 [0.43–1.23], p = 0.24), and at a median follow-up of 70.7 months, median survival was 49.1 and 63 months (HR [95% Cl] for OS: 1.09 [0.61–1.97], p = 0.75). The most common toxicities across both arms were neutropenia and hypertension, with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, fatigue, and sensory neuropathy reported more frequently with bevacizumab. Conclusions In this trial, the addition of bevacizumab did not improve outcomes in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Although the trial was underpowered due to smaller than anticipated sample size, these findings corroborated other clinical trials during this time.

520 Background: Systemic inflammation may contribute to cancer progression (PMC2803035), including recurrence of early breast cancer (PMC4828958). We hypothesized that inflammatory cytokines and/or chemokines may be associated with distant recurrence (DR). Methods: We performed a case:control study in women with stage II-III Her2-negative breast cancer, all of whom had surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, then weekly paclitaxel) with/without bevacizumab, plus endocrine therapy if ER-positive (PMC6118403). Propensity score matching was used to identify approximately 250 case:control pairs (with/without DR). Serum samples obtained before adjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed using the MSD V-Plex Human Cytokine 36-Plex Kit for detection of human cytokines and chemokines involved in the Th1/Th2 pathway, chemotaxis, the Th17 pathway, angiogenesis, and immune system regulation. Conditional logistic regression analysis, with models fit via maximum likelihood, were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and test for associations. Due to skewed nature of cytokines, HRs are reported on log base 2 scale. If adjusted for multiple testing including 36 markers, a p value of < 0.0014 would be required for statistical significance. Results: A total 249 matched pairs (498 patients) were identified. Covariates used for propensity score matching included age, menopausal status (post 54% vs. pre/peri 46%), ER/PR status (one/both pos 64% vs. both neg 36%) tumor size ( < = 2cm 17%, > 2-5cm 67%, > 5cm 16%) nodal status (neg 15%,1-3+ 32%, 4+ 53%), and grade (low 3%, int. 31%, high 66%). The only biomarker associated with a significantly increased DR risk when adjusted for multiple testing was the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 (HR 1.37, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.15, 1.65, p = 0.0006). Others associated with a 2-sided p value < 0.05 included the chemokine MDC(macrophage-derived chemokine/CCL22) (1.90, 95% CI 1.17, 3.1, p = 0.0098), the T helper cell inflammatory cytokine IL-17A (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.10, 1.67, p = 0.0052), and the cytokine VEGF-A (HR 1.13 for, 95% CI 1.01, 1.27, p = 0.037). There was no statistical interaction between VEGF-A and bevacizumab benefit. The median and mean value for IL-6 was 0.95 and 7.5 pg/ml (range 0.04-2761.24 pg/ml). Conclusions: This analysis provides level 1B evidence indicating that higher levels of the cytokine IL-6 at diagnosis are associated with a significantly higher DR risk in high-risk stage II-III breast cancer despite optimal adjuvant systemic therapy. This provides a foundation for confirmatory validation of IL-6 as a prognostic biomarker, and potentially as a predictive biomarker for testing therapeutic interventions targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway. Supported by NCI U10CA180820,180794,180821; UG1CA189859,232760,233290, 233196; Komen Foundation; Breast Cancer Research Foundation. Clinical trial information: NCT00433511.

9508 Background: Chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA) is associated with infertility and may impact treatment decision-making. We investigated whether anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels before chemotherapy predict likelihood of CRA. Methods: 591 patients enrolled on the quality of life substudy of ECOG5103, which randomized breast cancer patients to doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel: 1) alone; 2) with concurrent bevacizumab; or 3) with prolonged bevacizumab. 144 of the 195 women who reported a period <12 months before enrollment consented to serum collection prior to chemotherapy. AMH was measured in 143 with available serum. Participants self-reported menstrual frequency at 12 and 18 months after enrollment. 12-month CRA was defined as no menses for 6 months before the 12-month survey, and 18-month CRA as no menses for 6 months before the 18-month survey. Fisher’s exact test was used to identify associations with CRA. Results: Of the 143, 16 were excluded due to bilateral oophorectomy or initiation of ovarian function suppression within 12 months, and 2 due to missing data at 12 months. In the remaining 125, median age at enrollment was 45 (range 25-55). 103 (82%) had CRA at 12 months, including 68% of patients </= 45 (43/63) and 97% of patients >45 (60/62). Median pre-chemotherapy AMH was 0.11 (range 0.01-8.63). 12-month CRA was more likely in women who received bevacizumab (p<0.01), were >45 (p<0.01), and had AMH </=0.11 (p<0.01) pre-treatment. Hormonal tx was not associated with 12-month CRA (p=0.63). 100 patients were eligible for 18-month CRA analysis: 81 (81%) had CRA, including 63% of patients </= 45 (33/52) and 100% (48/48) of patients >45. 18-month CRA was more likely in women >45 (p<0.01) and with AMH </=0.11 (p<0.01) pre-treatment. Bevacizumab (p=0.15) and hormonal tx (p=0.07) were not statistically significant predictors of 18-month CRA. Conclusions: Pre-chemotherapy AMH predicts risk of CRA at 12 and 18 months, and is a promising biomarker of ovarian reserve in young breast cancer survivors. Longer studies will be needed to ascertain whether lower pre-treatment AMH is associated with increased risk of later infertility. Clinical trial information: NCT00433511.

6025 Background: Blinding patients to treatment regimen is an important component of high quality randomized clinical trials although concern exists about how receipt of a placebo will impact participants’ views. In ECOG5103, patients were randomized to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer with either placebo (arm A) or bevacizumab (arms B and C) and treatment assignment was unblinded by 24 weeks. We sought to determine if unblinding was associated with differential changes in participants’ views. Methods: The Decision-Making/Quality of Life component (DM-QOL) included all patients enrolling on E5103 between 1/5- 6/8/10. Women were surveyed pretreatment and after unblinding. Wilcoxon rank sum testing was used to examine differences. Results: 572 patients on DM-QOL started protocol therapy; 118 on arm A, 454 on arm B/C; the two groups (arm A vs. B/C) were well balanced. 516 patients participated in pretreatment, 514 in unblinding survey. Pretreatment, 32% reported >moderate chance of recurrence in 5 years, 27% >moderate chance of serious problem from treatment, 99% feeling at least somewhat informed, 98% at least somewhat confident in study participation, most “extremely” confident. Overall, median response scores did not change over time, with no statistically significant differences between the groups in changes in perceptions of: recurrence risk (p=0.45); chances of a serious problem (p=0.12), feeling informed (p=0.99). However, they differed in confidence about study participation (p=0.04): after unblinding, a higher % of placebo-treated patients had increased confidence (38% vs. 25%), and a higher % of bevacizumab-treated patients had decreased confidence (29% vs. 22%), although 44% across all arms had no change. Conclusions: In a placebo-controlled, double-blinded RCT, unblinding did not significantly affect most participants’ views, regardless of receipt of placebo or experimental drug. However, confidence in study participation may have been affected by knowledge of receipt of bevacizumab; publicity surrounding this experimental therapy may have affected results.

1021 Background: At 5 years, AT did not improve disease free survival or overall survival and RS was a more accurate predictor of relapse than standard clinicopathologic characteristics for patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive tumors. Methods: A Phase III Intergroup trial tested adjuvant AT vs. AC. Women with 1-3 N + or N - and T-size > 1cm were randomized to 4 cycles of AT (60 mg/m2/60 mg/ m2) or AC (60 mg/m2/600 mg/m2) q 3 wk x 4. Patients(pts) with ER + and/ or PR + tumors received tam for 5 yrs. Pts were stratified by nodal, HR (ER+ PR+, ER+PR-, ER-PR+, ER-PR-, ER/PR unk) and menopausal status. The primary endpoint was DFS. A sample of 465 pts with HR + breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive axillary nodes who did (N =116) or did not have a recurrence had tumor tissue evaluated using the 21- gene assay. Grade and HR expression were evaluated locally and centrally. Results: 2952 pts were randomized between 7/30/98 and 1/21/00. 2883 were eligible and analyzable. Arms were balanced for age, HR, menopause, nodes, surgery, grade and T-size: median age 51; 64% ER +; 65% LN-; grade: 10% low, 38% int., 46% high; and median T-size - 2.0 cm. At a median follow-up of 11.5 years the DFS/OS results are shown in the table below. RS was a highly significant predictor of recurrence including node negative and node positive disease (P < .0001) and predicted recurrence more accurately than clinical variables. Conclusions: At 11.5 yrs. median follow-up, there remains no difference in DFS or OS, although there continue to be fewer events in the AT arm in the prespecified ER/PR negative subgroup. At 10 years, the RS continues to be a more accurate predictor of relapse than standard clinical features. [Table: see text]

605 Background: Pre-clinical and nonrandomized clinical data support synergy of the combination of bevacizumab and trastuzumab. We conducted a randomized double-blinded phase III trial of chemotherapy/trastuzumab ± bevacizumab to evaluate efficacy (PFS after treatment initiation) of the addition of bevacizumab in first-line treatment of HER2+ MBC. Methods: Days 1, 8 and 15 paclitaxel ± carboplatin were administered with trastuzumab and either placebo or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for a total of 6 months. Antibody therapy was then continued without chemo every 3 weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Disease assessments were performed every 3 months. Results: Ninety-six of the planned 489 analyzable patients (pts) were accrued between 2007 and 2009, at which time the study terminated due to poor accrual. Seventy % of pts were post-menopausal, 60% had ER+/HER2+ BC. Median age was 55 years (28-80). Outcomes and toxicities are summarized on the tables below. Median follow-up was 30 months. Conclusions: The combination of chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and bevacizumab did not significantly increased toxicity, and was overall safe and well tolerated. No significant differences in clinical benefit were observed between both treatment arms. Data on CTCs and Quality of Life will be presented at the meeting. This study was conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (Robert L. Comis, MD, Chair) and supported in part by Public Health Service Grants CA23318, CA66636, CA21115, CA32291, CA31946, CA49957, CA27525, CA14548, CA17145, CA32102, CA25224, CA49. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

6527 Background: Biomarker information can risk stratify patients based on potential for benefits/toxicity from therapy. Ideally, a biomarker will identify those who benefit with limited toxicity. However, the impact of biomarkers is unclear when indicting individuals with greatest benefit are also at increased risk for toxicity. Methods: We surveyed participants at 18 month follow-up in the Decision-Making/Quality of Life (DM-QOL) component of ECOG5103, a RCT where patients were randomized to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer with either placebo or bevacizumab (in 2 schedules). We asked patients for the preferred treatment in two hypothetical scenarios: 1) preference for chemo A or chemo A + B without biomarker information; 2) preference for chemo A or chemo A+B when participants tested positive for a “B-receptor” which increased both the benefit and toxicity of chemo A+B. McNemar’s test was used to examine changes in preferences. Results: 439 patients completed both scenarios on 18-month survey. The Table shows the treatment preferences in each scenario. The positive biomarker information in scenario 2 led 60/439 (14%) participants to switch their preference. The main reason for treatment preference in scenario 2 was greater benefits of chemo A+B (64%), the lower risks with chemo A (20%) and positive biomarker (10%). Among participants who changed preference, those randomized to receive bevacizumab were more likely to switch to chemo A in scenario 2. Conclusions: Information about a positive biomarker, indicating increased benefit and increased risk from additional chemo, did not significantly change participants’ preferred treatment. All participants were involved in a large placebo controlled double blind trial and the majority (70%) preferred the most aggressive course of treatment in both scenarios. Whether patients not enrolled in the trial would be more sensitive to the increased risk information is unclear. [Table: see text]