Citations

Abstract Aim A previous study showed significantly greater reductions in number of cigarettes smoked and biomarkers of toxicant and carcinogen exposure in smokers assigned to immediate reduction of nicotine in cigarettes to very low levels versus gradually over time or continued smoking of normal nicotine content cigarettes. This study examines the effects of these approaches on selected biomarkers associated with harmful biological effects. Design Three‐arm, randomized controlled trial. Setting Ten United States academic institutional sites. Participants Daily smokers uninterested in quitting smoking with a mean age of 45.1 [standard deviation (SD) = 13.4)] years and smoking 17.1 (SD = 8.5) cigarettes/day; 43.9% (549 of 1250) female; 60.6% (758 of 1250) white ethnicity. Interventions (1) Smoking cigarettes where nicotine content was immediately reduced to very low levels ( n = 503); (2) smoking cigarettes where nicotine content was gradually reduced, with dose changes occurring monthly ( n = 498); and (3) continued smoking with normal nicotine content cigarettes ( n = 249). Measurements Smokers were assessed at baseline while smoking their usual brand cigarettes, and again at 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 weeks. Outcomes were areas under the concentration time curve (AUC) for the period of study of biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress and hematological parameters. Findings No consistent significant differences were observed across groups (Bayes factors showing data to be insensitive), with the only exception being red blood cell size variability, which was observed to be lower in the immediate versus gradual nicotine reduction [mean difference = −0.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) = –0.18, −0.04, P = 0.004] and normal nicotine control groups (mean difference = − 0.15, 95% CI = –0.23, −0.06, P = 0.001). Conclusion It remains unclear whether switching to very low nicotine cigarettes leads to a short‐term reduction in biomarkers of tobacco‐related harm.

9506 Background: Survival is poor in mUM and treatment options are limited. MET kinase is over-expressed on UM and the MET inhibitor cabo showed activity in an early trial. Methods: A091201 was a 2:1 randomized phase II study testing progression-free survival (PFS) of cabo (60 mg daily) vs chemo (DTIC/TMZ). We studied baseline metastatic tumor samples (n = 19; 1 lung, 18 liver) by whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNAseq. We correlated data with OS and made comparisons for mUM vs. primary tumors from TCGA (n = 80). Results: 46 patients were accrued with 96% and 63% with liver metastases and elevated LDH, respectively. Toxicities were similar to prior reports of cabo and chemo. The trial stopped at interim analysis due to no difference in PFS (p = 0.964; HR = 0.99) or OS (p = 0.580; HR = 1.21). WES showed tumor mutational burden of 46±4 (mean±SEM) and did not separate OS at 1 year (p = 0.14, two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test) in A091201. Recurrent known mutations included GNAQ/11, SF3B1, BAP1; novel mutations included GOLGA6L10, PKD1L3, and FAM228B. Gene expression signatures differed significantly between A091201 and TCGA cohorts including MET signaling (p = 7.87e-22), T cell-inflamed (p = 0.004), homologous recombination deficiency (p = 0.004), proliferation (p = 0.009) and hypoxia (p = 5.2e-10) (two-sided Student’s t-test). Tumor immune cell enrichment analysis revealed significant differences with lower M1:M2 macrophage (p = 1.2e-10) and higher Tregs (p = 6.0E-21) in mUM relative to TCGA (two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition gene expression signature was significantly associated with worse OS in A091201 (p = 0.02) with angiogenesis signature trending toward significance (p = 0.21) (log-rank test). OS separated by differentially expressed genes with OS ≤ 1 year associating with increased expression of the angiogenesis/immune-associated molecule neuropilin 1. Conclusions: These results provide insights between primary and mUM indicating potential novel therapeutic approaches. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, T32GM007019, Exelixis. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; Clinical trial information: NCT01835145.

e16559 Background: ARVs that develop early during treatment with abiraterone acetate/ prednisone (AA/P) may play a role in treatment resistance. We evaluated metastatic site and whole blood mRNA expression of full-length AR (AR-FL) and ARVs to characterize treatment-emergent ARVs (TE-ARVs) from men with mCRPC pre- and post- 12 weeks of AA/P collected in a prospective clinical trial (NCT#01953640). Methods: RNAseq performed on paired metastatic site biopsy (n = 40) and whole blood (n = 25) passed quality control. Reads were aligned to the GRCh38 reference genome with the spliced-alignment TopHat2 package. AR-FL or ARVs were detected if ≥ 2 splice reads aligned to unique splice junctions for AR-FL, AR-8, AR-45, AR-23, AR-V3, AR-V5V6, AR-V7, AR-V8, AR-V9, AR-V10, AR-V12, AR-V13, and AR-V14, and normalized to splice reads per million (SRPM). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed on AR-FL and AR-Vs with ≥1 SRPM for association with time to treatment change (TTTC). Results: In metastatic site biopsies post-AA/P, the average number of splice reads was 27,376,541 (range 7,753,998 to 62,456,773). The median number of ARVs detected was 2 (range 0-8), with a total of total of 110 ARVs identified (Table). Dynamic shifts in ARV profiles were observed post-AAP, with 41 TE-ARVs identified in 17 unique patients. The most common TE-ARV was AR-8 (n = 8), followed by AR-45 (n = 5), AR-23 (n = 5), and AR-V7 (n = 4). The presence of AR-V7 post-AAP was adversely associated with TTTC (hazard ratio 2.46, p = 0.013). The identification of early TE- ARV was not associated with TTTC. In whole blood samples, post-AA/P detection of AR-FL was low (n = 3) and no ARVs were detected. Conclusions: No specific patterns were observed in ARV profiles obtained in the metastatic biopsies after 12 weeks of treatment with AA/P. Clinical trial information: 01953640. [Table: see text]

e16067 Background: Metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is largely incurable, and its treatment remains challenging. Sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is one of the current standard-of-care options for treatment-naïve patients with metastatic RCC. Despite the proven efficacy of Sunitinib, prolonged treatment with some tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been associated with significant adverse events (AEs). Therefore, we aimed to calculate the exact efficacy in addition to the prevalence of all AEs of Sunitinib in a pooled analysis from all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A comprehensive electronic database search was conducted for all RCTs comparing the clinical outcomes and adverse events of Sunitinib versus all other available treatments for treatment-naïve advanced/metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. We then calculated the pooled outcomes and prevalence of the most common reported side effects of Sunitinib. All statistical analyses were performed using R Statistical Software v3.4.0 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). Results: We included 8 RCTs, with a total of 4106 patients. The mean age was62, with 66.44% males.The efficacy of Sunitinib was reported as 3 main outcomes: Median progression free survival at 10.73 [7.76, 13.7] months, median overall survival at 23.28 [16.74, 29.81] months and the estimated objective response rate at 25[13, 37] %. Any grade AEs were reported in 72% of patients with the following frequencies: fatigue 44%, diarrhea 38%, nausea 31%, hand-foot syndrome 30%, hypertension 27%, dysgeusia 25%, hypothyroidism25%, constipation 20%, stomatitis 20%, inflammation of the mucosa 18%, dyspepsia 16%, vomiting 14%, rash 12%, asthenia 11%, and epistaxis10%.Grade 3&4 (severe) AEs were reported in 52% of patients with the following frequencies: hypertension 9%, fatigue 8%, hand-foot syndrome 5%, asthenia 5%, diarrhea 4%, and inflammation of the mucosa 2%. Conclusions: Despite Sunitinib being one of the current standard treatments for patients with metastatic/advanced clear-cell RCC, with well-described efficacy, its safety profile is still concerning with a significant prevalence of reported grade 3-4 AEs of 52% of the treated patients in the included RCTs. These findings underscore the importance of the emergence of newer drugs and treatment plans for patients with metastatic RCC, not only to achieve similar or better clinical outcomes but also to decrease the percentage of grade 3-4 AEs.

e15698 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and carcinomas (NECs) are a diverse group of tumors with an equally diverse biology and clinical behavior. Data on tissue-based genomic profiling of NETs exists, however, there is limited data using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) technology. We sought out to characterize NETs via ctDNA to identify genomic alterations. Methods: 27 patients with metastatic NET/NEC with 32 total plasma samples were analyzed using Guardant360 ctDNA assay. Breakdown of NET/NEC by location: 14 pancreatic NET (pNET), 11 NEC, 1 small bowel NET, 1 lung NET. The ctDNA test detects single nucleotide variants in 54-73 genes, copy number amplifications, fusions, and indels in selected genes. Results: Of the 27 patients, 19 (70%) had a detectable genomic alteration. The detectable (non-synonymous) alterations are as follows: TP53 (n = 14, 70%), NF1 (n = 8, 40%), EGFR (n = 5, 25%), BRCA2 (n = 4, 20%), KRAS (n = 4, 20%), ARID1A (n = 3, 15%), CDK6 (n = 3, 15%), ALK (n = 3, 15%), MET (n = 2, 10%), PTEN (n = 2, 10%), BRAF (n = 2, 10%), MTOR (n = 2, 10%) AKT1 (n = 1), BRCA1 (n = 1), CCND2 (n = 1), CCNE1 (n = 1), CTNNB1 (n = 1), ESR1 (n = 1), FGFR2 (n = 1), HRAS (n = 1), IDH1 (n = 1), KIT (n = 1), MYC (n = 1), NOTCH1 (n = 1), NRAS (n = 1), PDGFRA (n = 1), RAF1 (n = 1), RB1 (n = 1), SMAD4 (n = 1), STK11 (n = 1), TSC1 (n = 1), ERBB2 (n = 1), PIK3CA (n = 1). Conclusions: This experience highlights the feasibility of ctDNA to help identify genomic alterations in this patient population. Further studies incorporating ctDNA testing in this patient population are warranted.

4110 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) comprise around 2% of all malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal system. The genomic landscape of NET has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to confirm the feasibility of next generation sequencing (NGS) using ctDNA in NET and characterize common alterations in the genomic profile. Methods: Molecular alterations in 114 plasma samples from 114 patients with NET using clinical-grade NGS of ctDNA (Guardant360Ò) across multiple institutions were evaluated. The test detects single nucleotide variants in 54-73 genes, copy number amplifications, fusions, and indels in selected genes. Results: A total of 114 NET patients were evaluated, of which 64 (56.1%) were female. Mean age was 59.7 years with a range between 23-89 years. ctDNA NGS testing was performed on 114 plasma samples; 1 patient had testing performed twice. Genomic alterations were defined in 94 (n = 94/114, 82.5%) samples with a total of 289 alterations identified after excluding variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) and synonymous mutations. Alterations were identified in at least one sample from 83 patients; TP53 associated genes were most commonly altered (n = 83/289, 28.7%), followed by KRAS (n = 22, 7.6%), PI3CA (n = 15, 5.2%), CCNE1 (n = 15, 5.2%), BRAF (n = 13, 4.5%), MYC (n = 12, 4.1%), ERBB2 (n = 11, 3.8%), APC (n = 10, 3.5%), EGFR (n = 10, 3.5%), MET (n = 10, 3.5%), PTEN (n = 9, 3.1%), RB1 (n = 9, 3.1%), CDK6 (n = 7, 2.4%), AR (n = 5, 1.7%), ARID1A (n = 5, 1.7%), FGFR1 (n = 5, 1.7%), and PDGFRA (n = 5, 1.7%). Other genomic alterations of low frequency, but clinical relevance included: CDK4 (n = 4, 1.3%), NF1 (n = 4, 1.3%), RAF1 (n = 4, 1.3%), GNAS (n = 3, 1.0%), KIT (n = 3, 1.3%), BRCA2 (n = 2, 0.7%), CCND2 (n = 2, 0.7%), CTNNB1 (n = 2, 0.7%), JAK2 (n = 2, 0.7%), NRAS (n = 2, 0.7%), SMAD4 (n = 2, 0.7%), and TERT (n = 2, 0.7%). Alterations in AKT1, ALK, ATM, BRCA1, CCND1, CDKN2A, FGFR2, MTOR, RHOA, SMO and STK11 were all reported once (n = 1, 0.3%). Conclusions: Evaluation of ctDNA is feasible among individuals with NET. Liquid biopsies are not invasive and can provide personalized options for targeted therapies in NET patients.

e15066 Background: Circulating cell-free tumor-DNA (ctDNA) testing (‘liquid biopsy’) is increasingly being employed both in clinical trials as well as clinical practice. We aimed to contrast and compare the differences in the number of somatic mutations observed on ctDNA testing between mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-High) versus mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) colorectal cancers (CRC). Methods: We had 20 patients at Mayo Clinic Florida that were dMMR/MSI-High with testing through the commercially available platform (Guardant360) that uses a 73-gene panel. Median numbers of somatic mutations were compared between the 2 subset of CRC. Results: Patients with dMMR/MSI-High CRC had a median of 8 mutations (range: 2-15) versus a median of 4 mutations (range: 1-22) in pMMR/MSS patients, p-value of 0.001. Similarly, the mean number of somatic mutations were 7.47 (S.D. ± 4.15) versus 5.02 mutations (S.D. ± 3.83) in patients with dMMR/MSI-H and pMMR/MSS, tumors respectively. Though it is simplistic, we could still potentially identify patients who may be candidates for immunotherapy by gauging the mutational burden reported (Table). Furthermore, on serial testing, decline in mutational burden as early as few weeks into therapy was predictive of response later on imaging. Conclusions: Analysis of number of somatic mutations on ctDNA testing can be complementary to MMR/MSI-testing, especially in situations when tissue is not available or safe to obtain. This can also be of value in predicting and/or following response to immunotherapy. The utility of this may go beyond CRC in identifying patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. [Table: see text]

3566 Background: According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) joint review on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) issued in March 2018, widespread use of ctDNA assays in most patients with advanced cancer is still an area of ongoing research. However, multiple studies thereafter published and/or presented support its use in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This has led to several institutions adopting it as ‘clinical practice’. The aim of this study is to report on our institution’s adoption of ctDNA testing for every patient at the time of diagnosis and/or time of progression. Methods: We report on results of 322 CRC patients with 607 ctDNA tests at our center from January 2017 to February 2019 using a commercially available platform (Guardant360). Results: Among 322 patients of our cohort, a total of 607 ctDNA tests were done (Table). 127 (39.4%) of these tests were serial analyses. In the CRC patients who had serial testing, at progression, mechanisms of resistance included acquisition of KRAS, NRAS, EGFR mutations; and HER2- and MET-amplifications. The subclonal mutations were noted to disappear when the selective inhibition was stopped. This was seen in patients on targeted therapies/biologics rather than chemotherapy. This was of value in treatment modification, clinical trial selection and/or monitoring of disease progression in these patients. Conclusions: While ctDNA testing may not be ready for primetime in all advanced cancers, it is increasingly being adopted in practice for especially metastatic CRC. Of particular value is the serial ctDNA testing in the RAS/RAF wildtype subset and now BRAF V600E mutant CRC on anti-EGFR based therapies. [Table: see text]