Citations

Background: Two National Cancer Institute-funded pharmacovigilance programs have identified 49 serious hematology-related ADRs since 1998. The programs, called RADAR (Research on Adverse Drug events and Reports) and then SONAR (Southern Network on Adverse Reactions) involve > 50 institutions and > 75 co-investigators worldwide. The work builds on three prior studies evaluating “Davids and Goliaths” in medical oncology and in cardiology (PLOS One, eClinicalMedicine, and Journal of Scientific and Professional Integrity). Here we review the hematology focused safety investigations of RADAR/SONAR. Methods: Data were based on initial safety signals being identified by a RADAR/SONAR co-investigator. Then, case-series were derived. Collaborations with basic scientists allowed for basic science correlative studies. Results were disseminated primarily as Brief Report in the literature and Black Box warnings on the related drug. In some instances, studies identified hematologic toxicities that prevent FDA from approving a submitted drug application. Results: sADRs were frequently identified based on very small case series, including ticlopidine-and clopidogrel associated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (22 and 10 patients, respectively), thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated venous thromboembolism (9 and 5 patients, respectively), rituximab-associated progressive multi-focal leukoencephalopathy (22 patients), peginesatide-associated fatal anaphylaxis (5 patients), and COVID-19 vaccine associated immune thrombocytopenia (1 patient). Meta-analyses provided data for epoetin- and darbepoetin-associated mortality among cancer patients and lenalidomide- and thalidomide-associated venous thromboembolism. Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, RADAR/SONAR investigated social media and pre-prints (COVID-19 vaccine associated cerebral vein thrombosis and immune thrombocytopenia). Time from FDA approval to sADR discovery was a median of 5 years (range, 0 months (thalidomide-associated venous thromboembolism) to 34 years (ciprofloxacin-associated neuropsychiatric toxicity). Basic science correlative studies identified ADAMTS13 autoantibodies (ticlopidine), leachates that developed in a multi-dose vial (peginesatide), anti-red blood cell antibodies (epoetin-associated pure red cell aplasia), and high-risk genes (fluoroquinolones and rituximab). Overall, RADAR/SONAR studies are estimated to have saved over 1 million lives and also resulted in overall payments to the Department of Justice of $1.5 billion (related to marketing of unsafe drugs). Discussion: RADAR/SONAR has proven to be a very important adjunct to FDA and pharmaceutical manufacturer-led safety investigations for hematology, paralleling the success in medical oncology and in cardiology. Going forward, independent centers of excellence for safety-focused investigations such as the CERSI network and the SENTINEL network (both are NIH funded) should be broadened to include a hematology-focused safety center.

Background and significance: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by the production of amyloidgenic clonal light chains that deposit in various tissues. The addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Dara-VCD) has improved the depth of hematologic and organ responses and is an approved induction therapy in newly diagnosed AL amyloid patients (DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028631). However, this approach has not yet demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit and follow up remains short. With strict adherence to eligibility criteria, in particular severity of cardiac involvement, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as consolidative therapy is safe with transplant related mortality on par with multiple myeloma. This approach generates deep and sustained responses, but it is unclear if it offers an additional survival benefit following Dara-VCD induction. The only randomized trial evaluating the role of ASCT in AL amyloid is outdated (DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa070484) and no randomized data exist to inform the optimal use of ASCT in the era of Dara-VCD induction. Furthermore, multi-organ involvement in AL amyloid drives morbidity and mortality thus the impact of any consolidative therapy on cardiac and renal involvement in addition to overall survival but must be defined. Finally, the approval of Dara-VCD therapy was based on complete hematologic response rates but there is increasing data demonstrating that achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity by either bone marrow next generation flow cytometry (DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26562) or peripheral blood mass spectrometry (DOI: 10.1038/s41408-020-0291-8) generates improved organ response, hematologic progression free survival, and possibly OS. Methods: This randomized phase 3 SWOG led intergroup trial (S2213; NCT06022939) is being conducted within the United States and will accrue a total of 143 participants per arm. The primary endpoint will compare MOD-PFS (major organ deterioration progression free survival: defined as time from randomization to death, cardiac/renal progression, or hematologic progression) between participants receiving an ASCT with those receiving 3 cycles of Dara-VCD consolidation following 3 cycles of uniform Dara-VCD induction. Following the assigned consolidation, all patients will receive 18 months of daratumumab maintenance therapy. A median MOD-PFS of 31 months is anticipated in the non-ASCT arm. This study has 90% power and a two-sided significance level of 0.05 to detect a hazard ratio of 0.62 corresponding to a MOD-PFS of 50 months in the ASCT arm. Important additional endpoints include OS, hematologic PFS, cardiac and renal responses, MRD negativity both by peripheral blood mass spectrometry and bone marrow next generation flow cytometry, delayed utilization of ASCT, and quality of life. Key inclusion criteria include non-severe cardiac AL amyloid (NT-proBNP <5000; TnT < 0.06; NYHA I or II, EF ≥ 40%), CrCl ≥30 mL/min, serum dFLC > 2 mg/dL, and supine systolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg. Importantly, patients are permitted to have up to one full cycle or 28 days of any plasma cell directed therapy prior to enrollment. This trial was activated on 12/1/2023 with the first patient enrolled 07/01/2024. Funding: NIH/NCI/NCTN grants U10CA180888, U10CA180819; and in part by Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Johnson & Johnson (now J&J Innovative Medicine).

Background: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare and understudied plasma cell disorder. It is caused by abnormal misfolding of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains, leading to extracellular deposition of amyloid, ultimately resulting in organ dysfunction and death. Since AL amyloidosis is uncommon, therapies are adapted from the more common plasma cell disorders like multiple myeloma. Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, was first tested in several prospective and retrospective studies in AL patients with relapsed refractory disease. The ANDROMEDA study (Kastritis E et al, NEJM 2021) established daratumumab in combination with CyBorD (Cyclophosphamide-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone) followed by daratumumab maintenance as the new standard of care compared to CyBorD alone for newly diagnosed patients. Consequently, daratumumab maintenance has become universally offered to all newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients. Notably, there was no second randomization before the initiation of maintenance therapy in ANDROMEDA. Hence, a critical question that remains is whether the superior efficacy observed in the investigational arm of the ANDROMEDA trial is solely a result of the addition of daratumumab during the induction phase or if the maintenance phase contributed to the favorable outcomes in the investigational arm. We hypothesize that a shorter duration of maintenance would prove non-inferior to the standard duration of daratumumab maintenance in patients with AL amyloidosis that have responded to Daratumumab-CyBorD induction. To answer this question we are conducting a pragmatic phase 2 randomized trial assessing the optimal duration of daratumumab maintenance in patients with AL amyloidosis who have responded to Daratumumab-CyBorD induction. Study Design, Patients and Methods: We use broadened eligibility criteria consistent with pragmatic trial design. The estimated total enrollment is up to 96 patients. The main eligibility criteria are patients with biopsy-proven AL Amyloidosis who have completed 6 cycles of Dara-CyBorD-based induction treatment and achieved an adequate response to induction (defined as hematological complete response (CR), hematological very good partial response (VGPR), or hematological partial response (PR) with at least one organ response). Patients in whom bortezomib and/or cyclophosphamide were omitted from induction due to toxicity concerns or adverse effects are allowed. The major exclusion criteria are patients who were concomitantly diagnosed with multiple myeloma based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. This phase II, open-label, multicenter trial (NCT05898646) randomizes patients who have attained an adequate response to 6 cycles of Dara-CyBorD-based induction in a 1:1 ratio, using a dynamic allocation procedure that balances the marginal distributions of the stratification factors (age, cardiac stage, and t(11;14) status). Randomization is to either single-agent daratumumab maintenance of 6 cycles duration (experimental arm) or 18 cycles of daratumumab maintenance (control arm) (cycle = 28 days). Treatment is allowed to be given at a local facility After completing maintenance treatment, patients will follow up every 3 months for up to 36 months from registration. The primary endpoint of the trial is to evaluate the non-inferiority of a shorter (6 cycles) daratumumab maintenance measured by event-free survival (EFS) compared to the standard maintenance of 18 cycles in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis who receive 6 cycles of daratumumab-CyBorD based induction. EFS in this study is defined as time from registration to any of the following events: hematological progression, organ progression, subsequent anti-plasma cell therapy in the absence of hematological progression but with persistent organ dysfunction or death, whichever occurs first. Secondary endpoints are depth of hematological and organ response, bone marrow measurable residual disease negativity rate, duration of response, quality of life, and survival. By investigating whether a shorter duration of maintenance is non-inferior to the standard duration, we aim to inform clinical practice and potentially reduce the toxicities associated with prolonged maintenance therapy, including hypogammaglobulinemia, recurrent infections, the need for intravenous gammaglobulin replacement, and financial toxicity.

Background:Patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) often receive immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs; eg, lenalidomide), proteasome inhibitors (eg, bortezomib), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as part of their initial treatment. However, most pts relapse following initial treatment, with increasing attrition rates observed at each subsequent line of therapy (LOT), creating an unmet need for treatment options for pts with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) who have prior exposure to these agents. Current regimens for pts who have prior exposure to lenalidomide and anti-CD38 mAbs include elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (EPd; approved in Europe and the US) and pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd; approved in Europe and Australia), but disease control, as well as depth and durability of response, could be improved. Talquetamab (tal) and teclistamab (tec), targeting CD3 and either G protein-coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5D, tal) or B-cell maturation antigen (tec), are the first T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) approved as monotherapies in Europe and the US for the treatment of pts with triple-class exposed (TCE) RRMM. Use of these novel immunotherapies in earlier LOTs, either with a dual-antigen targeting approach or by enhancing the activity of the BsAb with an IMiD (pomalidomide), may provide deeper, more durable responses and improve pt quality of life. Preliminary data using these combination treatments have shown promising results: in the phase 1b MonumenTAL-2 study (NCT05050097), tal+pomalidomide (tal-P) demonstrated overall response rates (ORRs) of >84% in pts with RRMM with ≥2 prior LOTs and in the phase 1b/2 RedirecTT-1 study (NCT04586426), tal+tec (tal-tec) showed ORRs of >77% in pts with TCE RRMM. MonumenTAL-6 (NCT06208150) is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy of tal-P vs investigator's choice of EPd or PVd and tal-tec vs investigator's choice of EPd or PVd in pts with RRMM with 1-4 prior LOTs, including lenalidomide and an anti-CD38 mAb. Study Design and Methods: Eligibility includes pts aged ≥18 years with documented MM per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, with measurable disease at screening, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, who have received 1-4 prior LOTs (including lenalidomide and an anti-CD38 mAb in any prior LOT), and have progressive disease on or after their last therapy. Pts with prior exposure to pomalidomide, tec, or GPRC5D-directed therapies are excluded. Approximately 795 pts are randomized 1:1:1 to receive tal-P, tal-tec, or investigator's choice of EPd or PVd. Tal is administered subcutaneously at 0.8 mg/kg every other week (Q2W), and tec is administered subcutaneously at 3.0 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W) following step-up doses of each. Pts are permitted to switch from Q2W to Q4W tal dosing following a confirmed very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) at cycle 5. Pomalidomide, EPd, and PVd are administered per approved dosing schedules. Randomization is stratified by number of prior LOTs (1 vs ≥2), International Staging System stage at screening (I vs II/III), and investigator's choice of treatment (EPd vs PVd). Pts receive study treatment until disease progression, start of subsequent anti-MM treatment, death, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or end of study, whichever occurs first. A finite dosing approach is employed for tal and tec. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include ORR assessed per IMWG 2016 criteria, ≥VGPR rate, complete response (CR) or better rate, rate of minimal residual disease-negative CR, overall survival, PFS on next LOT, time-to-next treatment, and pt-reported outcomes. This study is actively recruiting, with more than 160 locations in 26 countries. Results will provide insights into the efficacy of the combination of BsAbs in therapeutic strategies that exploit their different mechanisms of action to overcome treatment resistance and improve outcomes of pts with TCE RRMM in earlier LOTs.

Introduction Intravenous Immunoglobulin G (IVIg) is a pooled antibody Immunoglobulin G product that is used for a large and ever-growing number of medical indications. It is also known to be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications such that the Food and drug administration (FDA) has mandated a “black box” warning alerting physicians to this risk. Particular lots of IVIg preparations have been recalled due to a higher-than-expected rate of thromboembolic adverse events (“Evaluation of the Risk of Thromboembolic Events After Immunoglobulin Administration, 2006-2012”. Sentinel Product Assessment, US FDA, 7/13/2017). While a number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain the thromboembolic risk, platelet activation induced by small amounts of aggregated IgGs in IVIg preparations remains the leading hypothesis. Currently, testing of IVIg lots specifically looking at their ability to induce platelet activation is not routinely performed due to challenges with acquisition of fresh platelets for testing, and lack of availability of technically simple platelet activation endpoints. Recent breakthroughs in platelet storage technology have demonstrated that platelet viability can be preserved for long periods (months-years) by controlled-rate cryopreservation which also allows platelets to retain FcγRIIa-mediated signaling (FcγRIIa is the IgG receptor on platelets). This technology has been successfully leveraged for the detection of platelet-activating heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) antibodies (Blood, 140 (25) 2722-2729, 2022). Goals of the study We hypothesized that long-term stored cryopreserved platelets could be used to detect platelet-activating IVIg preparations using a technically simple ELISA endpoint that measures levels of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), a platelet granule protein, released upon platelet activation. If successful, this tool could help de-risk IVIg from the standpoint of thrombotic adverse reactions. Methods Aggregated IgG was prepared by heat treatment of IVIg (Pel-Freez- Rogers, AR) as previously described (Immunol. Lett. (15) 311-316, 1987). Platelets were cryopreserved as previously described (Blood, 140 (25) 2722-2729, 2022) with minor modifications. Cryopreserved platelets were thawed and treated with heat-aggregated or untreated IVIg at concentrations ranging from 19 to 75mcg/mL. After incubation, supernatants were collected by centrifugation and were assayed for TSP-1 by an antigen capture ELISA which has been shown previously to correlate with platelet activation. Results 10-month-old “off-the-shelf” cryopreserved platelets treated with buffer control displayed minimal platelet activation as measured by the TSP1 ELISA (Optical density, OD: 0.21). Similarly, platelets treated with IVIg (non-aggregated IgG) at concentrations ranging from 19 to 75mcg/mL displayed little-to-no platelet activation in the TSP1 ELISA (OD: 0.22-0.29). In contrast, cryopreserved platelets treated with heat aggregated IVIg demonstrated marked platelet activation in the TSP1 ELISA with ODs in the 0.60-0.82 range, correlating with increasing concentrations of heat-aggregated IVIg in the reaction. Conclusions De-risking IVIg from a prothrombotic standpoint has been challenging due to the need for fresh platelets for testing and the lack of technically simple means to assess platelet activation. Here, we leveraged breakthrough platelet storage technology coupled to a technically simple ELISA endpoint that allowed for rapid and easy identification of platelet activating forms of IVIg. This easy-to-use self-contained test kit could be implemented as a quality control/patient safety tool to de-risk IVIg preparations from the standpoint of platelet activation-mediated thrombosis. Future studies aim to test a large number of IVIg lots, including “problem” lots associated with thromboembolic events to assess the incidence of platelet activating IgG molecules in IVIg preparations. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (C.G.J.: HL147734).

Introduction. Platelet-activating anti-Platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies mediate a number of thrombotic thrombocytopenic syndromes, including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and more recently recognized conditions, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), adenovirus-associated thrombotic thrombocytopenia, and monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS). In MGTS (Blood. 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1772-1776), a monoclonal IgG antibody to PF4 mediates a chronic prothrombotic state characterized by recurrent thrombosis. More recent evidence suggests that MGTS may present with negative results in HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serotonin release assay (SRA), and positivity only in PF4-dependent functional assays such as the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA; submitted). The presence of MGUS in patients has long been associated with high risks of thrombotic disease (Blood. 2010 Jun 17;115(24):4991-8), but the mechanism by which they predispose to thrombosis has been relatively unexplored. In this study, we evaluated a cohort of MGUS patients who experience thrombosis for the presence of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies. M ethods. An administrative database search was performed of Mayo Clinic records to identify patients who had a diagnosis of MGUS, and thrombosis. Research samples from 134 MGUS patients with IgG monoclonal protein and thrombosis were obtained from Mayo Clinic's dysproteinemia biobank and subjected to PF4 antigen-based and functional screening. Research studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mayo Clinic. Results. Of the 134 patients, 17 (12.7%) activated platelets in the PEA (≥19%). To exclude non-specific activation (e.g. due to HLA antibodies), secondary PEA testing was performed to assess whether platelet activation was mediated by a HIT-like antibody (i.e., PF4- and IgG-dependent, and inhibitable with high concentrations of heparin). Four patients, hereafter referred to as patients 1-4, were identified as having a HIT-like antibody, as demonstrated by PF4-dependent platelet activation that could be inhibited with high concentrations of heparin (100 U/mL), and blockade of the platelet IgG receptor, FcγRIIa. Patients 1 and 2 had persistent, platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies based on PEA testing of multiple samples obtained several years apart. Patient 1 had a recurrent, multi-year history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), while patient 2 had one DVT episode. Patient 3 demonstrated a HIT antibody-like profile in the PEA in two of three samples available for testing and had a history of thrombotic cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Patient 4 demonstrated a HIT-like platelet-activating antibody in only one of four samples tested, and consistent with this finding, had an MGUS identified on clinical testing at only one time point (“small” IgG lambda, not quantified), 3 months prior to the platelet-activating sample. This patient experienced multiple thrombotic events including DVTs, left atrial thrombus and embolic CVA, pulmonary embolism and acute limb ischemia. All patients tested negative in two FDA-approved antigen-based HIT assays tested (Immucor PF4 IgG and Zymutest HIA IgG), similar to a recent MGTS case (submitted). SRA was negative in both Patients 1 & 2, weakly positive in Patient 3 (33%, with high CV), and positive (72%) in Patient 4. Conclusions. Definitive diagnosis of patients with MGTS provides insight into a mechanism of “unexplained” thrombosis and may offer additional treatment pathways for these patients with recurrent thrombosis (New Eng J of Med, 2024 Aug 8). Serologic testing in two patients correlated strongly with observations of thrombosis, and the study confirmed recent findings that anti-PF4 antibodies may present with unusual serology that is neither HIT- nor VITT-like (with negative results in both ELISA and SRA). The incidence of confirmed/suspected MGTS was 3% (4/134) in this population of MGUS patients with thrombosis. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Introduction Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have a poor prognosis and, until recently, lacked therapeutic options. Ivosidenib (IVO) is an oral, targeted, small-molecule inhibitor of mIDH1. In October 2023, IVO was granted FDA approval for the treatment of adult pts with mIDH1 R/R MDS on the basis of results from the pivotal AG120-C-001 MDS substudy (NCT02074839); IVO showed an acceptable safety profile and induced durable remissions, with a high rate (38.9%) of complete remissions (CR) per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria (DiNardo et al. Blood Adv 2024; bloodadvances.2023012302.). Response criteria evolve to better reflect clinical benefit in specific pt populations and reduce interobserver variability. The updated IWG 2023 criteria for higher-risk MDS lowered the hemoglobin threshold for CR, added response categories for pts with <5% blasts or limited count recovery, and eliminated the marrow CR (mCR) category. Herein we analyze responses, transfusion independence (TI), and survival outcomes of pts treated with IVO according to IWG 2023 criteria. In addition, responses assessed per IWG 2023 and IWG 2006 criteria are compared. Methods Pts with mIDH1 R/R MDS who had received prior SOC therapy were eligible. Oral IVO 500 mg was administered daily on days 1-28 of 28-day cycles. Responses were assessed per IWG 2023 criteria, and a composite CR (CRc) category was included in the analysis, which comprises all CR categories: CR + CR equivalent (CRe) + CR with limited count recovery (CRL) + CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh). Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as CR + mCR + partial remission (PR) per IWG 2006 criteria, and as CRc + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) per IWG 2023 criteria. For TI analysis, non-CRc was defined as HI + PR + no response (NR)/not evaluable + progressive disease. TI was defined as requiring no transfusion for ≥56 days. Results In total, 19 pts were enrolled (median age: 73 yr; prior hypomethylating therapy: 78.9%) and data from 18 efficacy-evaluable pts were analyzed. CR + PR rate (primary endpoint) per IWG 2006 was 38.9%, with all 7 (38.9%) responders having CR. CRc + PR rate per IWG 2023 was 66.7% (n=12), with all responders having CRc, including 5 (27.8%) pts with CR, 3 (16.7%) with CRe, and 4 (22.2%) with CRL (CR unilineage [CRLuni], n=2 [11.1%]; CR bilineage [CRLbi], n=2 [11.1%]); no pt had CRh or PR. ORR was 83.3% per IWG 2006, with 7 (38.9%) pts having CR and 8 (44.4%) mCR; 4 (22.2%) pts with mCR had HI. Per IWG 2023 criteria, the ORR was 72.2%, with 12 (66.7%) pts having CRc and 1 (5.6%) HI with neutrophil response. The 8 mCR per IWG 2006 criteria were reclassified as 1 CR, 4 CRL (2 CRLuni and 2 CRLbi), 1 HI, and 2 NR per IWG 2023. Median time to CRc was 1.58 mo. Median duration of CRc was not reached and Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates at 3, 6, and 12 mo were 90.9%, 81.8%, and 68.2%, respectively. Five (CRc group n=4; non-CRc group n=1) of 7 (71.4%) and 3 (CRc, n=1; non-CRc, n=2) of 4 pts requiring red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion at baseline, respectively, had TI. Median time to any (RBC/platelet) TI was 2.64 and 2.43 mo for pts with CRc and non-CRc, respectively. Moreover, 10 of 12 (83.3%) pts with CRc and 3 of 6 (50%) with non-CRc had or maintained TI during the study. Median duration of TI was not reached and KM estimates at 3 and 6 mo were 90.0% and 65.6%, respectively, for pts with CRc and 100% and 66.7% for non-CRc. Median event-free survival (EFS) was not reached for pts with CRc (n=12) or NR (n=5), and KM estimates at 1 yr were 68.2% and 53.3%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for pts with CRc and was 16.5 mo for pts with NR. For pts with CRc, OS KM estimates at 1, 3, and 5 yr were 90.9%, 51.1%, and 51.1%, respectively. For pts with NR, OS KM estimates were 75% at 1 yr and not estimable at 3 and 5 yr. For the pt with HI, the EFS estimate at 1 yr was 100% and OS estimates were 100% at 1, 3, and 5 yr. Conclusions IVO resulted in a high ORR (72.2%) according to IWG 2023 criteria, including a 66.7% CRc rate, despite the removal of the mCR category. Of 8 mCR per IWG 2006 criteria, 5 (62.5%) were reclassified as CRc per IWG 2023 criteria. By eliminating mCR and assessing response in a high-risk population with <5% blasts, IWG 2023 criteria accurately capture the clinical benefit of IVO in R/R MDS. While comparison of survival outcomes between IWG 2006 and IWG 2023 is limited by the small sample size, a similar trend with response-dependent EFS and OS outcomes was observed.

Background: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is one of the most treatable leukemias in the current era, with cure rates upwards of 90%. Early mortality due to coagulopathies often seen at diagnosis is a major driver of adverse outcomes. Prompt initiation of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is crucial for suspected APL, as it is known to reverse these coagulopathies. Chemotherapy-free protocols consisting of arsenic trioxide (ATO) and ATRA have become the standard of care for low-risk APL with high cure rates and reduced hematologic toxicities. For high-risk disease, there are multiple treatment options that have not been compared. Since APL is rare, there is a lack of real-world data for this disease. This retrospective review aimed to assess the outcomes of APL patients (pts) across multiple institutions and to examine the most common induction regimens, characteristics linked to early (30-day) mortality, and supportive care strategies. Methods: This retrospective study involved 9 institutions in the US and was conducted through the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases (COMMAND). Data included pts admitted from 8/5/2006 through 2/3/2024 with a confirmed diagnosis of APL. Each institution received a data-collection form and contributed data on APL pts from presentation to last follow-up. Key data categories included patient demographics, presenting laboratory and molecular data, treatment regimen, supportive care, and patient outcomes. Results: Data for 412 pts were identified with a median age of 51 (range 17-90) and 49% were female. Cardiovascular comorbidities were present in 44% of pts and 16% had a known pulmonary comorbidity. At presentation 109 (27%) had high risk-disease, defined as a white blood cell count (WBC) greater than 10 x 109/L. A FLT3 mutation was seen in 50% of tested pts, WT1 (22%), KRAS (3.6%), and NRAS (6.5%). The median WBC at presentation was 2 x 109/L (range: 0-166 x 109/L) and the median platelet count was 27 x 109/L (range: 2.0-315 109/L). Twenty-six percent presented with grade 2+ thrombosis, bleeding, or both. A higher percentage of pts with high-risk vs. low-risk disease presented with grade 2+ thrombosis, bleeding, or both (43% vs. 20%), DIC (60% vs. 36%), and mutated FLT3 (81% vs. 37%). The majority of pts received a chemotherapy-free induction regimen consisting of ATRA plus ATO. It was determined that 36 (8.7%) pts received induction with intermittent ATO plus ATRA (Burnett AK, Lancet Oncol 2015), 276 (67%) received daily ATO plus ATRA (Ravandi F, J Clin Oncol 2009 and Lo Coco, NEJM 2013), and 70 (17%) received a regimen inclusive of an anthracycline plus ATRA. Eleven pts did not start an induction regimen other than single-agent ATRA due to early death, while 19 had their regimen classified as “other” because they did not follow a conventional induction path. In total, 295/358 (82%) received ATRA within 24 hours of admission. At least 1 dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin was given to 58 (14%) pts, of which 35 (60%) were considered high risk. The incidence of differentiation syndrome (DS) was 37% (n=154). Among the 243 pts who received steroid prophylaxis, 30% developed DS, compared to 52% of those who did not receive prophylaxis. Among the 360 pts with at least 1 available PCR result after starting induction, 94% achieved PCR-negativity. The 30-day mortality rate was 6.6%. On univariate analysis, presenting variables associated with a higher 30-day mortality include older age, diabetes, cardiovascular comorbidities, thrombosis or bleeding, DIC, eGFR < 60, elevated total bilirubin and D-dimer levels, and high-risk disease. The median overall survival (OS) of the cohort was not reached, and the 5- and 10-year OS was 88% (95% CI: 84-91%) and 79% (95% CI: 72-87%) respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 2.7% (95% CI: 1.4 - 5.1%), with no additional relapses observed. The incidence of CNS relapse at 3 years was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.3% - 2.8%), with 2 of the 4 pts classified as high-risk. Conclusion: This is the largest real-world evidence data collection in the US evaluating the outcome of pts with APL in the current era, inclusive of ATO as front-line induction. Outcomes for this disease remain extremely positive, with low 30-day mortality rates noted in this study along with durable OS rates and low incidence of relapse. Additional information on outcomes, safety, and supportive care will be presented at the meeting.

Introduction: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) has been previously described in pregnancy, however there is limited data available on the impact of TTP in this subset of patients. In this analysis, we evaluate the maternal and fetal morbidity outcomes of TTP in hospitalized pregnant patients. Methods: We used retrospective data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify all hospital admissions of pregnant patients with and without TTP from 2012 to 2021 using ICD-9/10 codes. To describe the impact of TTP on maternal and fetal morbidity, we identified different morbidity indicators using standard Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions with a particular focus on preeclampsia/eclampsia, thromboembolic events (venous and arterial), other organ failure, maternal morbidity and fetal outcomes including intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and fetal loss. To account for the effects of acute TTP during pregnancy versus a history of TTP, we separately analyzed hospitalizations that included plasma therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Predictors of maternal/fetal morbidities in pregnant TTP patients were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: We identified 7,514,304 pregnancy hospitalizations with a mean age of 29 years. Of these, 234 women had a diagnosis of TTP, with 74 receiving TPE during admission (acute TTP during pregnancy). Compared to pregnancy-related hospitalizations in women without TTP, those with TTP were more likely to be African American, admitted to urban teaching hospitals, have lower income, and have a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Most maternal morbidity outcomes were significantly higher in hospitalizations with TTP as compared to those without TTP including increased eclampsia (2.1% vs 0.08%), acute myocardial infarction (1.7% vs 0.01%, p<0.001), puerperal cerebrovascular disorders (8.1% vs 0.7%, p<0.001), cardiac arrest (0.9% vs 0.01%), acute renal failure (35% vs 0.2%, p<0.001), adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (6.4% vs 0.06%, p<0.001), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (18% vs 0.2%, p<0.001), pulmonary edema/acute heart failure (5.1% vs 0.1%, p<0.001), sepsis (9% vs 0.22%, p<0.001), shock (6.4% vs 0.1%, p<0.001), air/thrombotic embolism (3.0% vs 0.05%, p<0.001), blood transfusion requirement (25.6 vs 1.28%, p<0.001), and ventilation requirement (6.4% vs 0.06%, p<0.001). There was also a higher need for cesarean sections in TTP hospitalizations compared to non-TTP (57.1% vs 36.9%). For fetal morbidity outcomes, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) was more common in TTP hospitalizations (6.8% vs 2.4%, p<0.001), while there was no statistical difference between the two groups in the rates of preterm delivery (3.9% vs 3.3%, p=0.651). In-hospital mortality (1.7% vs 0.02%, p<0.001), and length of stay (11 vs 3 days, p<0.001) were also significantly higher in hospitalizations with TTP. Patients with TTP who received TPE during the hospital stay had worse maternal morbidity outcomes than those who did not, likely reflecting the active nature of the disease in this cohort. In the multivariate analysis, CCI ≥ 1 (OR 3.52, 95% CI, 1.64-7.54) and receipt of TPE (OR 2.99, 95% CI, 1.52-5.86) were associated with higher likelihood of maternal/fetal morbidity in TTP hospitalizations. Conclusion: In conclusion, TTP has a significant impact on hospitalized pregnant patients, both on maternal and fetal outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess risk factors associated with TTP in pregnancy and ideal treatment regimens for these patients.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare lymphoma with a median age at diagnosis of 60-70 years. Front line therapy has traditionally been bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in older patients and then Bruton Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) for relapsed disease. Due to their efficacy, BTKi are now being combined with chemotherapy as induction treatment. The TRIANGLE trial of R-CHOP/R-DHAP +/- ibrutinib +/- transplant showed the benefit of adding a BTKi in young patients (Dreyling M, 2022). The SHINE trial, a phase III trial of BR +/- ibrutinib in patients >65 years, showed a significant improvement in median PFS (81 months vs. 53 months) (Wang M, 2022). However, this came with an increase in toxicity with more treatment related deaths in the ibrutinib arm (11% vs. 6%) and no difference in overall survival. Therefore, a better tolerated approach is still needed in older patients. A phase II study of rituximab + indefinite ibrutinib in 50 patients >65 years demonstrated efficacy of frontline BTKi with a 96% ORR and 71% CR (Jain P, 2021). However, a disadvantage of BTKi therapy is continuous treatment until disease progression or intolerance. In this study half of patients required dose reductions and almost a third of patients stopped treatment due to drug toxicity, most frequently atrial fibrillation or bleeding. If front line intermittent BTKi therapy is as effective as continuous therapy, it could minimize cumulative toxicity. A052101 (NCT05976763), an Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trial, is a randomized phase 3 multicenter trial of upfront zanubrutinib that asks the question “in older patients with previously untreated MCL who obtain a CR with zanubrutinib-rituximab, is it safe and equally effective to stop treatment and restart it upon disease progression rather than continuing indefinitely?” The A052101 trial is enrolling pts with previously untreated MCL who are either >70 years old or 60-69 years old but are not transplant candidates due to cardiac ejection fraction <45%, DLCO <60% of predicted, creatinine clearance <70, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of >2, or a Cumulative Illness Rating Scales score of >6. Key exclusion criteria include: history of a severe bleeding disorder or clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias. Patients will take zanubrutinib 320 mg daily and rituximab/rituximab biosimilar once monthly for 6 cycles. Patients with less than partial response after 6 cycles will go off study treatment. Patients with a complete remission will be randomized in a 1:1 manner to intermittent treatment versus continuous treatment. Randomization will be stratified by age (60-69 years vs ≥70 years) and MIPI score. Those randomized to the continuous arm will receive zanubrutinib until intolerance or disease progression. Those randomized to the intermittent arm will stop all study drugs after those initial 6 cycles and will restart zanubrutinib at first disease progression and continue it until intolerance or second disease progression. In order to make the study results generalizable to clinical practice, disease progression will be defined by clinical parameters rather than minimal residual disease testing. The primary objective of this study is to compare time from randomization to first progression or death (PFS1) in the continuous treatment arm to the time to second progression or death (PFS2) in the intermittent treatment arm. The primary evaluation will be to determine whether, for patients in a CR, active monitoring followed by retreatment with zanubrutinib therapy upon disease progression will result in non-inferior clinical outcomes compared to indefinite zanubrutinib. Serial quality of life testing and adverse event monitoring will be performed throughout the study to gain a full understanding of the impact of continuous vs intermittent zanubrutinib on patients' lives. A052101 has the potential to change management of older patients with previously untreated MCL. If our study demonstrates that the time to second progression/death when using the stop and retreat strategy is non-inferior to time to first progression/death when using continuous BTK therapy, then it might lead to a new standard of care in this patient population. This could result in decreased health care costs, decreased toxicity and improved quality of life for older patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org