Citations

Epidural and dorsal root stimulation have emerged as promising therapies to restore function after spinal cord injury. However, how each modality uniquely or jointly engages spinal circuits remains unclear. To address this, we analyzed leg electromyography (EMG) responses to epidural stimulation (ES) and dorsal root ganglia stimulation (DRGS) delivered to the lumbosacral cord in the same individuals.

Abstract Objectives The study aimed to compare long-term outcomes of the David and Yacoub valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) procedures in a nationwide, low-volume setting. Methods All patients undergoing elective VSARR in Denmark between January 2010 and April 2022 were identified using the Danish registries. The primary end-point was all-cause death. Secondary end-points included stroke, reoperation, a composite of death or reoperation, and long-term echocardiographic outcomes. Analyses were performed in both crude and propensity score-matched (PSM) populations and compared with outcomes from a control group comprised of all elective composite root replacement procedures performed at the contributing centres in the study period. Results A total of 160 patients underwent VSARR (median age; David vs Yacoub; 49.7 [SD 14.1] years vs 51.5 [SD 14.3] years; P = .42) with the David (n = 92, 57.5%; median follow-up 8.2 [SD 3.6] years) or Yacoub (n = 68, 42.5%; median follow-up 7.1 [SD 2.4] years) procedure. Ten-year all-cause death was similar (David 9.3% [95% CI: 2.3-15.2] vs Yacoub 8.8% [95% CI: 3.6-20.6]; log-rank P = .54). Reoperation rates (log-rank P = .12), stroke incidence (P = .41), and the composite end-point of death or reoperation (log-rank P = .63) were comparable, with consistent findings in the PSM cohort. Long-term echocardiographic follow-up demonstrated no difference in recurrent regurgitation, stenosis, or valve-related complications. Compared to elective composite root replacement (CRR) (n = 486), VSARR demonstrated lower rate of all-cause death (P = .027) and stroke (P = .026), while reoperation rate was higher (13.8% vs 4.3%; P < .001). However, the risk of reoperation was comparable between procedures when accounting for competing risk of death (log-rank P = .17). Conclusions Long-term outcomes following elective VSARR using the David and Yacoub procedure were comparable. VSARR was associated with lower risk of all-cause death and stroke compared to elective CRR, supporting the two VSARR procedures as durable options when performed in experienced centres with careful patient selection, even in low-volume settings.

Abstract Background Recently, a posterior pathway for fluid drainage from the retina to the meningeal lymphatics in the optic nerve (ON) sheath was identified in rodents using intravitreal imaging tracers directly injected into the ocular-globe. Fluid and solute clearance along this pathway may be associated with many diseases. However, intravitreal tracers are rarely used in clinical imaging. As intravenous Gadolinium-based-contrast-agent (GBCA) can enter the globe via the blood-ocular-barriers, it may provide an alternative approach to image this pathway. Purpose To establish a clinically feasible intravenous GBCA-based MRI approach for tracking fluid and solute transport along the posterior lymphatic pathway in the ocular glymphatic system. Materials&Methods This prospective study was conducted from March 2021 to September 2022 in healthy participants. Dynamic-susceptibility-contrast-in-the-CSF (cDSC) MRI was performed before, immediately and 4 hours after intravenous-GBCA administration to track GBCA distribution in aqueous humor (AH) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in regions-of-interest (ROIs) in the globe (anterior-cavity, vitreous-body), in the intraorbital and extraorbital ON, and in the intracranial CSF space proximal to the ON (chiasmatic-cistern, interpeduncular-cistern). Kruskal–Wallis tests with post-hoc Dunn’s tests were used for group comparisons. Results Sixteen healthy participants (mean age±SD: 51±21 years, 5 men) were recruited. Intravenous-GBCA enhancement was observed in all ROIs immediately after injection. At 4-hour-post-GBCA, the vitreous body showed a trend of smaller enhancement area (55±11% versus 49±11%, P =.14) and lower GBCA-concentration (0.044±0.014 versus 0.028±0.010 mmol/L, P =.07) compared to immediate-post-GBCA. The intraorbital ON showed more widespread enhancement (39±5% versus 59±6%, P =.01) and significantly higher GBCA-concentration (0.023±0.009 versus 0.059±0.015 mmol/L, P <.001) at 4-hour-post-GBCA. Conclusion Dynamic fluid and solute transportation along the posterior lymphatic pathway in the ocular glymphatic system in healthy participants was measured by tracking intravenous-GBCAs entering the globe via the blood-ocular-barriers using cDSC-MRI. Summary Statement Dynamic fluid and solute transportation along the posterior lymphatic pathway in the ocular glymphatic system in healthy participants was measured by tracking intravenous-Gadolinium-based-contrast-agents entering ocular-globe via blood-ocular-barriers using dynamic-susceptibility-contrast-in-the-CSF (cDSC)-MRI. Key Results In this prospective study of sixteen participants, Gadolinium-based-contrast-agent (GBCA)-induced signal changes were detected in the aqueous-humor and cerebrospinal fluid immediately following intravenous administration using dynamic-susceptibility-contrast-in-the-CSF (cDSC)-MRI. At 4-hour-post-GBCA, the vitreous-body showed a trend of smaller enhancement area (55±11% versus 49±11%, P =.14) and lower GBCA-concentration (0.044±0.014 versus 0.028±0.010 mmol/L, P =.07) compared to immediate-post-GBCA. The intraorbital-optic-nerve showed more widespread enhancement (39±5% versus 59±6%, P =.01) and higher GBCA-concentration (0.023±0.009 versus 0.059±0.015 mmol/L, P <.001) at 4-hour-post-GBCA.

Abstract The B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–targeting bispecific T-cell engager pavurutamab (AMG 701) directs the cytotoxic T-cell response toward multiple myeloma (MM) cells. This phase 1/1b, open-label, dose-exploration and dose-expansion study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pavurutamab monotherapy in patients with triple-class relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Pavurutamab (5-18 000 μg) was administered IV weekly with step-up dosing in week 1. Overall, 172 patients received at least 1 dose of pavurutamab; 73 received the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; 18 000 μg), with 2 different step-up dosing regimens in phase 1b. Twelve patients had dose-limiting toxicities, which included cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and increased transaminases; none of which occurred at the RP2D. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events included CRS (74.4%), anemia (61.0%), neutropenia (47.1%), and hypophosphatemia (45.3%). Grade ≥3 infections were noted in 60 patients (34.9%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 46.5% among all patients and 65.8% (very good partial response [VGPR] or better, 60.3%) among 73 patients treated at the RP2D. At median follow-up of 17.2 months, median duration of response (DOR) was 36.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.3 to not estimable). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 5.5 months (95% CI, 2.8-10.1) and 16.8 months (95% CI, 5.0 to not estimable) with the RP2D. Pavurutamab exposure generally increased in a dose-proportional manner, with high soluble BCMA levels correlating with lower exposure level. The acceptable safety profile, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of pavurutamab supports anti-BCMA T-cell engager therapy in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03287908.

Background Psychiatric disorders are increasingly contributing to global disability. Despite advances in conservative management, the prevalence of treatment-resistant cases remains high. Meanwhile, neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders (NPD) remains underused, largely due to strict regulations and historical concerns, particularly those related to neuropsychological side effects (NPSE). Objective To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare NPSE associated with radiofrequency ablative NPD to those observed in neuro-oncological, neurovascular and epilepsy surgeries. Methods PubMed, Embase and LILACS databases were searched in April 2024 for articles published in English/Spanish from 1990 to 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Results A total of 48 articles with 2678 participants were included. The frequency of transient and permanent NPSE in the NPD group ranged from 0.94% to 11.50% and 0.94% to 2.03%, respectively, comparable to the other surgical groups (epilepsy: 0.31–11.70%; vascular: 0.52–22.90%; oncology: 0.94–17.60% for transient NPSE; epilepsy: 0.31–12%; vascular: 0.40–1.96% and oncology: 0.84–1.48% for permanent NPSE). Regarding permanent NPSE, arguably the most critical consideration, the NPD group showed better outcomes in memory, language and social cognition than the epilepsy group, but worse outcomes in executive and perceptual-motor functions. Compared with the vascular group, the NPD group had better executive function but worse complex attention. Finally, the NPD group had fewer permanent deficits than the oncology group in executive function, complex attention and perceptual-motor domains, although language performance was lower. Conclusions Contemporary NPD apparently carries a similar risk of NPSE as other conventional neurosurgical procedures, challenging misconceptions and this unjustified barrier to its broader use.

Abstract Modern radiation therapy (RT) technologies allow for improved sparing of normal tissues, decreasing the risk of both acute and long-term toxicities. Existing RT dose constraints for prospective trials within the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) were formulated in the context of solid malignancies. As patients with hematologic malignancies are often treated with lower RT doses and are usually younger with more favorable prognoses, customized dose constraints are needed. The NRG Oncology Hematologic Malignancies Working Group (NRG HEME) commissioned a review of existing organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints from published primary literature, the NRG Center for Innovation in Radiation Oncology (CIRO), and national guidelines. Customized constraints were developed by iterative review by NRG HEME. Final recommendations were approved by radiation oncology representatives from all the lymphoma NCTN groups (NRG Oncology, Children’s Oncology Group, Alliance, ECOG-ACRIN, SWOG, Canadian Cancer Trials Group). For 49 OARs, a strict recommended constraint was determined, of which 20 were not present in CIRO. Of the remaining 29 constraints, 20 were lower, 2 were the same, and 5 used different metrics; 2 were higher than at least 1 CIRO trial constraint. Acceptable variations were determined and unacceptable variations were added for select critical OARs for plan scoring. While doses to OARs without explicit unacceptable variations should not exceed acceptable variations, violations should not be considered for plan quality assessment on trials. This consensus list of standard OAR constraints should be incorporated for all future NCTN trials in hematologic malignancies. Strict dose constraints will minimize long-term toxicities in this patient population.

Measuring intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) has been proposed as a means to help maintain optimal ultrafiltration and prevent complications such as hernias, peritoneal leaks, and gastroesophageal reflux, which are linked with high IPP levels. The Durand method is a commonly accepted method for measuring IPP; however, it is cumbersome and not routinely used in clinics due to its complexity. Here we report the outcome of a pilot study that evaluated the agreement between IPP measured using an in-line pressure transducer and IPP measured using the Durand method during in-clinic automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) therapy. This was an exploratory, descriptive, early feasibility study conducted among patients with a diagnosis of kidney failure who were on APD therapy. IPP was continuously measured using an investigational device (x-MIP transducer) and at fixed timepoints using the Durand method. The study included 10 patients with a median age of 47.0 years and a median body mass index of 28.1 kg/m 2 . The study population was predominantly female, comprising 70% of the participants. The transducer IPP showed a moderate agreement with manual IPP, as most differences in measurements were within ±3 cmH 2 O. Overall, IPP did not correlate with fill-volume. However, when examined on a per-patient level, six patients showed stronger correlations ( ρ > 0.7) between IPP and fill-volume, while the remaining four patients had weaker correlations ( ρ < 0.5). No safety concerns were identified in the study. In summary, this study indicates that a transducer-based IPP measurement device could serve as an alternative to the Durand method.

Abstract Specialized immune niches located in the stroma-tumor junction promote interactions between tumor-resident antigen-presenting cells and effector lymphocytes that are required for immunotherapy efficacy. We have hypothesized that this stromal-based immune crosstalk may be regulated by provisional extracellular matrix signals, analogous to the early-stages of wound healing where provisional matrix hosts robust immune activity. A cardinal provisional matrix remodeling event, the regulated proteolysis of the large proteoglycan versican (VCAN) generates an immunomodulatory fragment (matrikine), versikine, that engages adaptive immunity. We have previously shown that VCAN proteolysis correlates with T-cell infiltration across multiple solid and liquid cancers with the most immune-evasive cancers showing low to negligible rates of VCAN proteolysis (e.g., 0% in pancreatic adenocarcinoma). A recent clinical trial generated informative prospective data linking VCAN proteolysis with immunotherapy outcomes: patients whose metastatic colorectal tumors categorized as VCAN proteolysis-weak (VPW, 60% of cases) demonstrated inferior responses to checkpoint inhibition (CPI, pembrolizumab) and worse outcomes compared to VCAN proteolysis-predominant (VPP, 40%) cases. Leveraging these prospective trial data, we hypothesized that versikine therapy may rationally reverse the immunosuppression associated with the prevalent VPW phenotype. To tailor versikine therapy to specific human biomarker-stratified tumor phenotypes, we studied experimental models replicating partially T-permissive VPW-VCANlo human cancers and poor-prognosis, immune-exclusionary VPW-VCANhi cancers. Across VPW-like tumors, versikine promoted the stromal accumulation of CD40lghiIcoshiFoxp3neg Tfh-like CD4+ T cells that engaged dendritic cells (DC) and CD8+ T cells in “immune triads” even at baseline (prior to CPI), concurrently with the intratumoral expansion of activated CD8+ T cells expressing cytolytic molecules (granzymes, perforin). In VPW-VCANlo tumors, versikine delivered as LNP-mRNA or recombinant protein demonstrated monotherapy activity, dependent on Batf3-lineage DC and CD8+ T cells. When combined with single-agent CPI, versikine cured most VPW-VCANlo tumors with memory to tumor re-challenge. In VPW-VCANhi tumors, versikine synergized with combination immunotherapy modulating “mature DCs enriched in immunoregulatory molecules” (mregDC). Our data provide mechanistic rationale for the biomarker-stratified, therapeutic restoration of a provisional matrix-regulated immune signaling network to reverse resistance to CPI. Moreover, the data highlight the need to reevaluate prior approaches to globally disrupt tumor stroma in favor of biomarker-driven, pathway-focused harnessing of stromal signals that modulate anti-tumor immunity. Citation Format: Daniel J. Lagal, Duncan Hong, Athanasios Papadas, Emma Geatches, George Yacu, Surabhi Naik, Alicia Gibbons, Alexander Cicala, Kersi Pestonjamasp, Peter Toth, Kristina Matkowskyj, Dustin A. Deming, Fotis Asimakopoulos. Biomarker-driven restoration of tumor provisional matrix signaling network reverses resistance to checkpoint inhibition immunotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6746.