Citations

NPM1 mutations (NPM1+) are found in about 30% of adult AML. While NPM1+ are generally associated with favorable risk, prior studies have shown that NPM1+ older patients, defined as ≥ 65 years, have significantly worse outcomes. The updated European Leukemia Net 2022 (ELN22) now classifies NPM1+ AML patients with FLT3-ITD (ITD+) and MDS-associated mutations (MDSm+) as adverse-risk, while NPM1+/ITD-/MDSm+ patients remain favorable-risk unless they have an adverse-risk karyotype. A recent report (Chan et al., Blood Adv 2024) found MDSm+ conferred worse OS only in patients ≥ 60 years; however another report (Othman et al., Blood 2024) did not find MDSm+ were significantly associated with adverse outcomes in a larger cohort of NPM1+ patients. To further assess this question, we examined the mutational landscape in a large cohort of pre-treatment, diagnostic specimens from 456 patients enrolled in SWOG clinical trials (SWOG-9031, SWOG-9333, S0106, and S0112) and 126 patients from the UW/FHCC Hematopoietic Repository (Total N=582). Patients were treated with curative intent as per standard practice or clinical trials. Out of the 582 patients, 191 were NPM1+ (33%), of which 148 patients had cytogenetic and long-term outcome data. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence estimates were estimated. C-statistics and AUC for Cox, cause-specific and logistic regression models for overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), time to relapse (TTR, calculated in n=106 who achieved complete remission [CR], death in remission analyzed as a competing risk) and CR were calculated for age, ELN17, and ELN22, as well as ELN17 and ELN22 adjusting for age. ELN17 favorable-risk patients reclassified as adverse-risk (N=5 of 108) demonstrated significantly shorter EFS (HR=2.50, p=0.05) and CR rate (OR=0.20, p=0.024), although with similar OS (HR 1.30, p=0.66) and TTR (HR=1.20, p=0.86). ELN17 favorable-risk patients reclassified as ELN22 intermediate-risk (N=23 of 108) did not show a significant difference in OS (HR 1.47, p=0.20), EFS (HR 1.35, p=0.12), CR rate (OR 0.75, p=0.46), or TTR (HR=1.64, p=0.11) compared to ELN22 favorable-risk. For ELN17 intermediate-risk (N=40), 5 patients were reclassified as ELN22 adverse-risk (12.5%) and had significantly shorter EFS (HR 2.89, p=0.037) compared to ELN22 intermediate risk, although there was not a significant difference in CR rate (OR 0.31, p=0.23) or OS (HR 0.81, p=0.67). We next compared the prognostic significance of age relative to ELN risk classification. Age was associated with higher C-statistics (OS=0.65, TTR=0.57 and EFS=0.60) and AUC (CR=0.64) compared to both ELN17 (OS=0.56, TTR=0.54, EFS=0.54, CR=0.54) or ELN22 (OS=0.57, TTR=0.57, EFS=0.57, CR=0.58). The combination of age and ELN22 resulted in the highest C-statistics for OS, TTR, and EFS (OS=0.68, TTR=0.60, EFS=0.64). To further assess the impact of MDSm on risk-stratification of NPM1+ AML, we performed multivariable analyses adjusting for FLT3-ITD, MDSm, and age in patients without adverse-risk disease. These analyses showed MDSm did not have a significant association with OS when controlling for age or FLT3-ITD. We also compared ELN22 favorable-risk patients with and without MDSm (MDSm+ N=18; MDSm- N=61). Compared with the MDSm-, there was a trend toward an inferior OS (HR 1.85, p=0.054) for MDSm+ patients but not EFS (HR 1.38, p=0.3) or TTR (HR 1.2, p=0.64). When stratified by age (<65, N=53 vs. ≥65, N=26), MDSm+ in younger patients did not show a difference for OS (HR 0.96, p=0.96), EFS (HR 0.63, p=0.53) or TTR (HR 0.4, p=0.37). Older ELN22 favorable-risk patients (≥65) had similarly poor OS (MDSm- HR 3.33 and MDSm+ 3.27, respectively, p=0.001 for both) and EFS (MDSm- HR 3.11 and MDSm+ 2.39, p=0.001 and 0.01) compared to younger MDSm- patients. In our study, the ELN22 guidelines incrementally improve risk stratification for EFS in NPM1+ patients. However, age remains the most prognostic factor, and patients ≥ 65 years have similar adverse clinical outcomes, whether classified as favorable risk by ELN17, ELN22, or incorporating MDSm. Moreover, MDSm do not confer a worse prognosis in NPM1+ patients when accounting for age or FLT3-ITD status. These findings differ from a recent report by Chan et al. and are in keeping with the report by Othman et al. Therefore, further understanding of the underlying biology of age and its effect on NPM1+ AML is needed to improve outcomes for older patients.

Objective To define the natural history, patterns of recurrence and treatment modalities for local prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence following radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT), and to investigate factors that could predict metastasis‐free survival (MFS) in this unique patient population. Methods We queried a prospectively maintained PCa registry to identify men developing in‐field recurrence (IFR) following RP and RT from 2008 to 2021 at a single institution. IFR was defined as biopsy‐proven recurrent PCa or the presence of persistent positron emission tomography‐avid lesions in the prior radiation field without evidence of metastasis. Cox regression was conducted to determine predictors of MFS. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to calculate MFS, cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) for patients in three primary therapy categories: cryoablation, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, and surveillance. Results Of 4575 patients from our registry, 108 (2.3%) with IFR were identified. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to IFR from salvage treatment was 78 (50–126) months. A total of 29 patients (26%) were managed with cryoablation, 23 (21%) with ADT, and 28 (25%) with surveillance. The median (IQR) follow‐up was 76 (48–100) months. There were no statistically significant differences in MFS ( P = 0.67) or OS ( P = 0.07) among the three primary treatment cohorts. Patients treated with ADT or cryoablation had longer CSS compared to patients managed with surveillance ( P = 0.047). Conclusions We found that IFR may present years after completion of primary treatment for PCa. While curative management strategies may be attempted, local and distant metastatic recurrence is common and often requires systemic therapy.

ABSTRACT Ureaplasma species can cause systemic infections in immunocompromised hosts, including lung transplant recipients. Here, we investigated the impact of prior exposure to Ureaplasma urealyticum on the risk of U. urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum infection in mice subjected to an immunosuppression regimen similar to that administered to solid organ transplant recipients. Mice were immunized with three intramuscular injections of U. urealyticum , with control mice injected with adjuvant only. Following immunization, mice received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone, and then were challenged with U. urealyticum or U. parvum intraperitoneally and intratracheally over 6 days. Relative U. urealyticum antibody levels in plasma were assessed over time, and lungs were harvested at sacrifice for bacterial load quantification, assessed using a color-changing unit assay. U. urealyticum antibody levels were higher in immunized compared with control animals ( P < 0.0001), even when animals were immunosuppressed. U. urealyticum and U. parvum lung burden was reduced in immunized compared with control mice (~6 log 10 reduction for U. urealyticum and <1 log 10 reduction for U. parvum ; P = 0.008 and 0.046, respectively). In summary, this study shows that prior exposure to live U. urealyticum provides some protection against infection with U. urealyticum . IMPORTANCE Ureaplasma -induced hyperammonemia syndrome is a rare but potentially deadly complication of solid organ transplantation, especially lung transplantation. The pathophysiology of this relatively recently recognized condition is poorly understood, and it is unclear what factors may influence patient susceptibility. This study investigates the possible protective effects of prior exposure to Ureaplasma urealyticum in a mouse model subjected to an immunosuppression regimen similar to that given to lung transplant recipients. The findings show that prior exposure could provide protection against Ureaplasma lung infection.

Abstract Lessons learned Intravenous paricalcitol did not improve the efficacy of pembrolizumab, likely related to the short half-life. Background Immunotherapy has limited benefit in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with the tumor microenvironment playing a key role in immune resistance. In preclinical studies, vitamin D receptor (VDR) agonists have been shown to sensitize pancreatic tumors to PD-1 blockade. Methods This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase II trial to evaluate pembrolizumab with or without paricalcitol as maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Participants were ≥18 years; histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic PDAC showing no disease progression after frontline systemic therapy, and achieving maximal cytoreduction (eg, with no further antitumor effect), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status of 0 or 1; adequate organ function. Study treatment included: pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks and either paricalcitol 25 mcg IV 3 times per week or placebo. The primary objective was to evaluate 6-month progression free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include evaluating the toxicity of the combination and overall survival (OS). Results There was no significant difference in 6-month PFS, median PFS, median OS, nor treatment-related AEs between the 2 arms. Conclusions and relevance Paricalcitol did not improve the efficacy of pembrolizumab likely related to its short half-life of only 5-7 hours. Microbiome analysis revealed significant difference between long-term (&gt;12 weeks) and short-term (&lt;12 weeks) survival groups across treatment arms. Modulation of the tumor microenvironment will likely require more sustained VDR activity. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT03331562.

Background: Many children born with single ventricle physiology are palliated with Fontan operation, which may include a fenestration creation. This has been demonstrated to improve short-term outcomes after surgery. Reduced exercise capacity has been shown to be a predictor of prognosis in Fontan patients. Aim: We sought to compare cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) data between fenestrated and non-fenestrated Fontan patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 185 patients referred for CPET from 2011 to 2024. Patients with complete CPET data were included. Type of Fontan, comorbidities, and echocardiogram data were ascertained electronically. Patients were divided into 2 different groups according to the fenestration patency. Fisher’s exact test or chi-square was used to compare categorical variables. T-test and Turkey-Kramer were used to compare continuous variables. Adjustment using General Lineal Models procedure were used to identify any confounder that could affect the results. P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: 142 patients were classified in the non-fenestrated (NF) group, and 43 in the fenestrated group (FF). Baseline characteristics of both groups are shown in Table 1. From the evaluated CPET variables, the minute ventilation-carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2) was higher in the FF (p=<0.001), and oxygen saturation at peak exercise (SatO2) was lower in this group (p= <0.001) (Figure 1). There was no significant difference between peak oxygen consumption (VO2) between groups. When adjusted by comorbidities only VE/VCO2 nadir, slope and peak SatO2 were statistically significant different between groups (Table 2). Conclusion: Ventilatory variables showed significant differences when fenestration was presented, secondary to V-Q mismatch from increased right to left shunt. Despite the theoretical advantage of increased cardiac output from Fontan fenestration, exercise performance was similar between both groups.

Objectives: The aims of the study are to develop a prostate cancer risk prediction model that combines clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–related findings and to assess the impact of adding Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesions-level findings on its diagnostic performance. Methods: This 3-center retrospective study included prostate MRI examinations performed with clinical suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) between 2018 and 2022. Pathological diagnosis within 1 year after the MRI was used to diagnose csPCa. Seven clinical, 3 patient-level MRI-related, and 4 lesion-level MRI-related findings were extracted. After feature selection, 2 logistic regression models with and without lesions-level findings were created using data from facility I and II (development cohort). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) between the 2 models was compared in the PI-RADS ≥3 population in the development cohort and Facility III (validation cohort) using the Delong test. Interfacility differences of the selected predictive variables were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test or chi-squared test. Results: Selected lesion-level features included the peripheral zone involvement and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. The model with lesions-level findings had significantly higher AUC than the model without in 655 examinations in the development cohort (0.81 vs 0.79, respectively, P = 0.005), but not in 553 examinations in the validation cohort (0.77 vs 0.76, respectively). Large interfacility differences were seen in the ADC distribution (P < 0.001) and csPCa proportion in PI-RADS 3–5 (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Adding lesions-level findings improved the csPCa discrimination in the development but not the validation cohort. Interfacility differences impeded model generalization, including the distribution of reported ADC values and PI-RADS score-level csPCa proportion.

Abstract Introduction: Blood-based tests represent a compelling option for early detection and management of cancers and other chronic diseases. While blood-based tests may offer potential to increase patient engagement, the assumption of greater adherence in clinical practice requires further evaluation. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the real-world adherence to established blood-based tests for commonly recommended screening indications, to better inform expectations for proposed application to average-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and citations was performed to identify literature published from 2010 to 2023. Studies examined adherence to routine blood-based laboratory tests with a Grade A or B recommendation per the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) for diabetes, dyslipidemia, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in an average-risk patient population were included. In addition, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing adherence for prostate cancer screening (Grade-C USPSTF recommendation), the only commonly accessible blood-based single-cancer screening test for average-risk adults, was also included. Studies without venipuncture-derived blood were excluded. Results: Of 53,067 articles screened, 69 were included in the analysis. Overall, adherence rates of blood-based tests were highly variable, with median values (interquartile range, IQR) of 66.3% (11.8%), 67.8% (18.0%), 34% (28.7%), and 36.8% (30%) for diabetes, dyslipidemia, HCV, and HIV, respectively. PSA testing adherence was 37.2% (18.4%). Beyond disease type, adherence varied by study design, data source, patient characteristics, clinical setting, and study country. Information and selection bias were the most common risks of bias. Conclusions: Based on data from this comprehensive systematic review, real-world adherence to currently recommended, blood-based screening strategies is suboptimal. Future research is needed to identify the extent to which these data are generalizable to blood-based CRC screening, and to determine if/how this candidate strategy would impact clinical, economic, and health equity outcomes. Citation Format: Quang A. Le, Takako Kiener, Heather A. Johnson, Rukaiyya S. Khan, Joyce Kong, Kevin H. Li, Gina Thompson, A. Burak Ozbay, Mallik Greene, Paul J. Limburg, A. Mark Fendrick, John B. Kisiel, Derek W. Ebner. Systematic review of real-world adherence to blood-based laboratory tests for average-risk disease screening: potential implications for emerging colorectal cancer screening modalities [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Liquid Biopsy: From Discovery to Clinical Implementation; 2024 Nov 13-16; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2024;30(21_Suppl):Abstract nr A027.

Background: Etripamil nasal spray (NS) is a fast acting, self-administered calcium channel blocker in development for the termination of AV-nodal-dependent supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Prior randomized, placebo-controlled and open-label studies have demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy of etripamil in converting paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) to sinus rhythm (SR) self-administered without direct medical supervision. Research Question/Hypothesis: To assess patterns and annualized PSVT episode frequency among patients opting to self-administer acute treatment with etripamil. Methods: NODE-303 was an event-driven, multi-center, open-label Phase 3 study, conducted in North and South America to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etripamil in patients with documented PSVT over multiple episodes. Test dosing was not performed prior to at-home use. Enrolled patients, upon perceiving symptoms of PSVT: applied an ambulatory ECG monitor, performed a previously trained vagal maneuver and, if symptoms persisted, self-administered etripamil NS 70 mg. During the study, the protocol was amended to allow a repeat dose (70 mg) if symptoms persisted 10 min after the first dose. Each patient could self-treat up to 4 episodes. Results: Of 1,116 enrolled patients, 503 (45.1%) treated ≥1 perceived PSVT episode (safety population). Etripamil achieved conversion to SR in 60% of patients by 30 minutes and 70% by 60 minutes. A total of 220, 118, 62, and 103 patients completed the study with 1, 2, 3, and 4 etripamil-treated perceived episodes of PSVT, respectively, with an average time on study of 440 days. Among these patients, the average number of annualized etripamil-treated PSVT episodes was 3.2 (standard deviation 3.8). Annualized use: etripamil was self-administered for 0-2 PSVT episodes per year, 2-6 episodes, 6-12 episodes, and >12 episodes, in 54%, 32%, 10%, and 4% of patients, respectively (Figure). Conclusions: This analysis aimed to assess the annualized use of etripamil NS in a real-world setting, by analyzing how often patients would self-administer the drug for PSVT episodes. Of patients that self-administered etripamil (n=503), the majority treated >1 episode and the annualized frequency of episodes treated with etripamil was 3.2 episodes/yr.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Lymphopenia attributed to postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can accelerate tumor recurrence and contribute to poor prognosis in GBM. We hypothesize that short course (1-2 weeks) CRT can mitigate lymphopenia compared to standard course and may provide immune benefits for future combination therapy. METHODS GBM patients were randomized on a multi-site phase II study comparing short course (35Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/10Fx depending on target volume) (Arm A) versus standard dose fractionation (60Gy/30Fx or 40Gy/15Fx, Arm B). All patients received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). This unplanned interim analysis evaluates changes of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), CD4 and CD8 prospectively at 3-timepoints: baseline (prior to CRT), end of CRT, and 1-month post-CRT. RESULTS To date, 72 patients enrolled (34 Arm A, 38 Arm B). Median age 66 (35-86), ECOG 0-2. Patients characteristics as followed in Arm A vs. Arm B, respectively: female 47% vs. 42%, MGMT promotor methylated 31% vs. 34%, steroid use 46% vs. 45%, ALC 1310 cells/mm3 (330 –9730) vs. 1480 (750 –7750), CD4 531 cells/mm3 (86 –1368) vs. 662 (318 –1671), and CD8 151 cells/mm3 (56 –940) vs. 272 (68 –875). Lymphocytes data were collected in 49 patients (21 Arm A, 28 Arm B). There were signficantly fewer reductions of ALC, CD4 and CD8 in Arm A. Median ALC changes were 95% and 99% of baseline (Arm A) vs 52% and 61% of baseline (Arm B) at the end of CRT and 1-month post-CRT, respectively (p&lt;0.01). Median CD4 changes 93% and 96% of baseline (Arm A) vs 51% and 49% (Arm B), and median CD8 changes 97% and 98% of baseline (Arm A) vs 57% and 71% (Arm B) at the end of CRT and 1-month post-CRT, respectively (p&lt;0.05). CONCLUSIONS This interim analysis suggests that short course RT could reduce treatment-related lymphopenia and immune suppression compared to standard RT, thus could be potentially beneficial to combine with immunotherapy.

Abstract BACKGROUND Lymphopenia, a common finding in patients with high-grade gliomas (HGGs), is associated with poor outcomes including worse survival, fatigue, and in some cases, increased opportunistic infections. Interleukin-7 (IL-7) is a cytokine crucial for lymphocyte survival and proliferation. We previously demonstrated long-acting IL-7 (rhIL-7-hyFc, efineptakin alfa, NT-I7) increases absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) and extends survival in preclinical murine models of HGG. Here, we report results using rhIL-7-hyFc to effectively reduce lymphopenia in patients with HGG. METHODS We performed a phase II randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of rhIL-7-hyFc in patients with newly diagnosed HGGs (82% IDH-wildtype glioblastoma in both groups). Patients received rhIL-7-hyFc (720mcg/kg) or placebo one-week post-radiation and temozolomide, with subsequent doses at weeks 13, 25, and 37. The primary endpoint was ALC four weeks post-initial administration; exploratory endpoints included CD4 count, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We enrolled 22 patients (median age 59.5 years, range 33-74; 40.9% female) with HGG. Both groups exhibited comparable demographics, including MGMT methylation status, and received a median of 2 doses of rhIL-7-hyFc or placebo. At 4 weeks, the pre-specified primary endpoint, ALC significantly increased relative to baseline in the treatment group, compared to placebo (median percent change=148% vs. 16.7%, p=0.007), as did CD4 count (121% vs. 10.5%, p=0.011). There were no treatment-related grade 4/5 adverse events. Exploratory endpoints of PFS and OS will be reported at time of conference. CONCLUSIONS rhIL-7-hyFc is safe and effective in improving ALC and CD4 count in patients with newly diagnosed HGG undergoing temozolomide and concurrent radiation therapy. This study was powered to meet the primary endpoint; larger trials will likely be required to demonstrate clinical efficacy. Nevertheless, these data support the continued exploration of rhIL-7-hyFc as an adjunct to standard therapy to mitigate lymphopenia and potentially extend survival for patients with HGG.