Citations

AbstractTransthyretin‐mediated amyloidosis (ATTR) is a rare, under‐recognized, progressively debilitating, fatal disease caused by the aggregation and extracellular deposition of amyloid transthyretin (TTR) fibrils in multiple organs and tissues throughout the body. TTR is predominantly synthesized by the liver and normally circulates as a homotetramer, while misfolded monomers aggregate to form amyloid fibrils. One strategy to treat ATTR amyloidosis is to reduce the amount of TTR produced by the liver using drugs that directly target the TTR mRNA or gene. This narrative review focuses on how TTR gene silencing tools act to reduce TTR production, describing strategies for improved targeted delivery of these agents to hepatocytes where TTR is preferentially expressed. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), termed RNA silencers, cause selective degradation of TTR mRNA, while a TTR gene editing tool reduces TTR expression by introducing nonsense mutations into the TTR gene. Two strategies to facilitate tissue‐specific delivery of these nucleic acid‐based drugs employ endogenous receptors expressed by hepatocytes. Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that recruit apolipoprotein E support low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐mediated uptake of unconjugated siRNA and are now used for CRISPR gene editing tools. Additionally, conjugating N‐acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) moieties to ASOs or siRNAs facilitates receptor‐mediated uptake by the asialoglycoprotein receptor. In summary, ATTR is a progressive disease with various clinical manifestations due to TTR aggregation, deposition, and amyloid formation. Receptor‐targeted ligands (eg, GalNAc) and nanoparticle encapsulation (eg, LNPs) are technologies to deliver ASOs, siRNAs, and gene editing tools to hepatocytes, the primary location of TTR synthesis.

Abstract Activated B cell (ABC) type diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), double hit lymphoma (DHL) and double expressor lymphoma (DEL) have poor outcomes to frontline R‐CHOP but impact of these molecular features on outcomes of relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease is not well‐characterized. We evaluated the association of diagnostic cell of origin (COO), double hit and double expressor status with overall survival after first relapse in DLBCL patients who were enrolled into the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) cohort. COO was available from immunohistochemistry (IHC) using Hans criteria or gene expression profiling (GEP) (Nanostring) on the diagnostic FFPE biopsy. Of 373 pts with R/R DLBCL, 278 had COO by IHC: 152 were GCB, 107 were non‐GCB. One hundred and fourty had COO by GEP: 44 were ABC, 65 were GCB and 13 were unclassifiable. Nineteen out of 163 (12%) were DHL; 30 out of 135 (22%) had DEL. COO, either by IHC (2 years OS GCB: 45% [CI 95 : 38–54] vs. non‐GCB: 44% [CI 95 :36–55], p > 0.05) or GEP (2 years OS ABC: 42% [CI 95 : 29–59] vs. GCB: 40% [CI 95 : 30–54], p > 0.05), was not associated with difference in OS. DHL (2 years OS 16 [CI 95 :6–45] vs. 45% [CI 95 : 34–59], p < 0.01) and DEL (2 years OS 33% [CI 95 : 20–56], vs. 50% [CI 95 : 41–60], p < 0.05) had lower OS than non‐DHL and non‐DEL/non‐DHL counterparts, respectively. COO by IHC or GEP was not associated with OS in R/R DLBCL while DHL and DEL were adverse prognostic markers in DLBCL at first relapse.

AbstractDirect comparisons of the effectiveness of the numerous novel therapies in the diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treatment landscape in a range of head‐to‐head randomized phase 3 trials would be time‐consuming and costly. Comparative effectiveness studies using real‐world data (RWD) represent a complementary approach. Recently, several studies of relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL have used RWD to create observational cohorts to compare patient outcomes with cohorts derived from single‐arm phase 2 trials. Using propensity score methods to balance clinically and prognostically relevant baseline covariates, closely matched patient‐level cohorts can be generated. By incorporating appropriate measures to assess covariate balance and address potential bias in comparative effectiveness study designs, robust comparative analyses can be performed. Results from such studies have been used to supplement regulatory approval of therapies assessed in single‐arm trials. While RWD studies have a greater susceptibility to bias compared to randomized controlled trials, well‐designed and appropriately analyzed studies can provide complementary real‐world evidence on treatment effectiveness.

Abstract Introduction Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a chronic condition associated with progressive heart failure, resulting from extracellular deposition of misfolded transthyretin (TTR) protein as amyloid fibrils in the myocardium. Currently, there are few disease-modifying treatments. NNC6019–0001 is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to deplete amyloid via antibody-mediated phagocytosis by targeting a unique epitope that is exposed only on misfolded monomeric and aggregated forms of TTR. In a phase 1, open-label, 3-month dose escalation trial, NNC6019–0001 was well tolerated at all doses tested (up to and including 30 mg/kg).1 The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Exploratory cardiac endpoints were stable or indicated a possible benefit. Purpose To evaluate the effect of NNC6019–0001 30 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg on cardiac functional endpoints and predictive biomarkers in patients with ATTR-CM, and to assess pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, to establish the optimal dose for a phase 3 trial. Methods This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial recruiting 99 patients with hereditary or wild-type ATTR-CM (Figure). Inclusion criteria are New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III heart failure, left ventricle wall thickening (LVWT) ≥12 mm, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels ≥650 pg/mL in sinus rhythm and &gt;1000 pg/mL in atrial fibrillation, and a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance of 150–450 m. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive intravenous NNC6019–0001 30 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg or placebo, each in addition to standard of care, every 4 weeks for 52 weeks, followed by a 12-week follow-up. In a sentinel dosing phase, three patients per arm will receive the study drug or placebo, in combination with 24-hour inpatient cardiac monitoring and 7 days of continuous cardiac (tele-) monitoring. The primary endpoints are change from baseline to week 52 in 6MWT and in NT-proBNP levels. Secondary endpoints include cardiac measures: extracellular volume on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, global longitudinal strain, troponin T levels, hospitalization due to cardiovascular events, and urgent visits due to heart failure. Quality of life will be assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). All-cause mortality, pharmacokinetics and treatment-emergent adverse events will also be assessed. Results The trial will start mid-2022 with global recruitment. Conclusion Disease-modifying treatments are needed for patients with ATTR-CM, where treatment is often limited to managing symptoms and best supportive care; the first disease-modifying therapies recently became available. This phase 2 trial will be used to determine the appropriate dose for the phase 3 trial of NNC6019–0001, a novel antibody therapy designed to deplete amyloid in patients with ATTR-CM. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This trial was funded by Novo Nordisk A/S. Medical writing support was provided by Johanna Scheinost PhD, PharmaGenesis Oxford Central, Oxford, UK, with funding from Novo Nordisk A/S.

Abstract An enhanced understanding of the molecular heterogeneity of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has opened the door to clinical trials evaluating novel agents with subtype-specific activity. It is an emerging question whether core needle biopsies (CNB) can adequately meet the increasing tissue requirements of these clinical trials. This can potentially lead to selective enrollment of patients who can undergo excisional biopsy (EB). It is also important to know whether patients who can undergo extensive diagnostic work up differ in their disease characteristics and outcomes from those who cannot. In this observational study, we describe the characteristics, outcomes, and adequacy of diagnostic tissue in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma who underwent EB vs CNB. Of the 1061 patients, 532 (49.8%) underwent EB and 529 (50.1%) underwent CNB. A significantly higher proportion of patients with CNB had advanced stage disease, an international prognostic index of ≥3, and inadequate tissue for molecular analyses. Patients with CNB had significantly worse 5-year event-free survival (67.6% vs 56.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; confidence interval [CI]95, 0.6-0.9, P &lt; .001) and 5-year overall survival (76.4% vs 69.2%; HR, 0.8; CI95, 0.6-0.9, P &lt; .001). Thus, patients who underwent CNB have poor-risk features and inferior outcomes on frontline chemoimmunotherapy, are more likely to have inadequate tissue for molecular analyses, and might not meet the tissue requirements of biomarker-driven clinical trials. Thus, the increasing tissue requirements of biomarker-driven clinical trials may result in the exclusion of patients with high-risk DLBCL who need novel agents.